Comparison of statistical methods, type of articles and study design used in selected Pakistani medical journals in 1998 and 2007

• Published in: Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association 2010-09, Vol.60 (9), p.745-750
• Main Authors: MASOOD HUSSAIN RAO, KHAN, Nazeer
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abstracting and Indexing as Topic - statistics & numerical data; Asian Continental Ancestry Group; Bibliometrics; Biological and medical sciences; General aspects; Humans; Medical sciences; Pakistan; Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data; Publishing; Research Design; Statistics as Topic
• ISSN: 0030-9982

To compare the statistical methods, types of article and design of studies used in 1998 and 2007 articles of leading indexed and non-indexed medical journals of Pakistan. Six leading medical journals of Pakistan: (1) JCPSP, (2) JPMA, (3) JAMC, (4) PJMS, (5) PJMR and (6) PAFMJ, were selected for this study. Articles reviewed were 1057 to achieve the above mentioned objective. The articles reviewed for 1998 and 2007 were 366 and 691, respectively. Original articles contributed the maximum percentage of 65.6%, followed by case reports with 24.8%. The contribution of case reports in 1998 was 20.5% which increased to 27.1% in 2007. There was no statistically significant difference between 'indexed' and 'non-indexed' journals for different type of statistical methods in 1998 or 2007. In total, 749 articles were categorized as 'original articles' or 'short communication'. Among them, 51% articles mentioned study design and 67.3% of them were correct for the respective methodology. In 1998, 202 (74%) articles did not use any statistics or indicated only descriptive statistics, while in 2007, 239 (50.2%) articles did the same. The reader who was familiar with t-test and contingency tables in 1998 could have understood 97.4% of the scientific articles. However, this percentage dropped to 83.0% in 2007. Quality of elaborating methods and usage of biostatistics in 6 leading Pakistani medical journals improved from 1998 to 2007, but has still to come up as compared to other western medical journals.