Loading…

Linguistic Attention Control: Attention Shifting Governed by Grammaticized Elements of Language

In 2 experiments, the authors investigated attention control for tasks involving the processing of grammaticized linguistic stimuli (function words) contextualized in sentence fragments. Attention control was operationalized as shift costs obtained with adult speakers of English in an alternating-ru...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2005-05, Vol.31 (3), p.508-519
Main Authors: Taube-Schiff, Marlene, Segalowitz, Norman
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a497t-405abd2c3541de4d90e5de2013c350904cafbe794bc06b86cdd0b99fdcadb6873
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a497t-405abd2c3541de4d90e5de2013c350904cafbe794bc06b86cdd0b99fdcadb6873
container_end_page 519
container_issue 3
container_start_page 508
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
container_volume 31
creator Taube-Schiff, Marlene
Segalowitz, Norman
description In 2 experiments, the authors investigated attention control for tasks involving the processing of grammaticized linguistic stimuli (function words) contextualized in sentence fragments. Attention control was operationalized as shift costs obtained with adult speakers of English in an alternating-runs experimental design ( R. D. Rogers & S. Monsell, 1995 ). Experiment 1 yielded significant attention shift costs between tasks involving judgments about the meanings of grammatical function words. The authors used a 3-stage experimental design ( G. Wylie & A. Allport, 2000 ), and the emerging pattern of results implicated task set reconfiguration and not task set inertia in these shift costs. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that shift costs were lower when the tasks involved shared attentional resources (processing the same grammatical dimension) versus unshared resources (different grammatical dimensions). The authors discuss the results from a cognitive linguistic perspective and for their implications for the view that language itself can serve a special attention-directing function.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.508
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85625526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ689497</ericid><sourcerecordid>614469222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a497t-405abd2c3541de4d90e5de2013c350904cafbe794bc06b86cdd0b99fdcadb6873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LwzAUhoMobk7_gAwZot515rvJ5Rjzi4E3eh3SJJWOrp1JC-7fm7KygRcuN4Gc57wnhweAawSnCJL0EeJUJCmRZErQlEwZFCdgiCSRCcKCnYLhHhiAixBWsDtEnIMBYhJBROgQjJdF9dUWoSnMZNY0rmqKuprM66rxdXkJznJdBnfV3yPw-bT4mL8ky_fn1_lsmWgq0yahkOnMYkMYRdZRK6Fj1uE4ID5BCanReeZSSTMDeSa4sRZmUubWaJtxkZIReNjlbnz93brQqHURjCtLXbm6DUowjhnD_CjIU8Eh4ug4iBFNmRARvP0DrurWV3FbxRGlXGKM_4NiDuFcwG4JvIOMr0PwLlcbX6y13yoEVedLdTpUp0MRpIiKvmLTTZ_cZmtnDy29oAjc94AORpe515UpwoHjAjFGuqDxjnO-MPvy4o0LGR3F8t2urDdabcLWaB-Nly6on3J9-M4voHCvxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614469222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linguistic Attention Control: Attention Shifting Governed by Grammaticized Elements of Language</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Taube-Schiff, Marlene ; Segalowitz, Norman</creator><creatorcontrib>Taube-Schiff, Marlene ; Segalowitz, Norman</creatorcontrib><description>In 2 experiments, the authors investigated attention control for tasks involving the processing of grammaticized linguistic stimuli (function words) contextualized in sentence fragments. Attention control was operationalized as shift costs obtained with adult speakers of English in an alternating-runs experimental design ( R. D. Rogers &amp; S. Monsell, 1995 ). Experiment 1 yielded significant attention shift costs between tasks involving judgments about the meanings of grammatical function words. The authors used a 3-stage experimental design ( G. Wylie &amp; A. Allport, 2000 ), and the emerging pattern of results implicated task set reconfiguration and not task set inertia in these shift costs. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that shift costs were lower when the tasks involved shared attentional resources (processing the same grammatical dimension) versus unshared resources (different grammatical dimensions). The authors discuss the results from a cognitive linguistic perspective and for their implications for the view that language itself can serve a special attention-directing function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.508</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15910134</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEPCEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Attention ; Attention Control ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Costs ; Cues ; Experiments ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grammar ; Human ; Humans ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Language ; Linguistics ; Male ; Memory, Short-Term ; Miscellaneous ; Oral Language ; Paired-Associate Learning ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Research Design ; Semantics ; Sentences ; Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2005-05, Vol.31 (3), p.508-519</ispartof><rights>2005 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association May 2005</rights><rights>2005, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a497t-405abd2c3541de4d90e5de2013c350904cafbe794bc06b86cdd0b99fdcadb6873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a497t-405abd2c3541de4d90e5de2013c350904cafbe794bc06b86cdd0b99fdcadb6873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31220,31270</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ689497$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16815538$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15910134$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taube-Schiff, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segalowitz, Norman</creatorcontrib><title>Linguistic Attention Control: Attention Shifting Governed by Grammaticized Elements of Language</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>In 2 experiments, the authors investigated attention control for tasks involving the processing of grammaticized linguistic stimuli (function words) contextualized in sentence fragments. Attention control was operationalized as shift costs obtained with adult speakers of English in an alternating-runs experimental design ( R. D. Rogers &amp; S. Monsell, 1995 ). Experiment 1 yielded significant attention shift costs between tasks involving judgments about the meanings of grammatical function words. The authors used a 3-stage experimental design ( G. Wylie &amp; A. Allport, 2000 ), and the emerging pattern of results implicated task set reconfiguration and not task set inertia in these shift costs. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that shift costs were lower when the tasks involved shared attentional resources (processing the same grammatical dimension) versus unshared resources (different grammatical dimensions). The authors discuss the results from a cognitive linguistic perspective and for their implications for the view that language itself can serve a special attention-directing function.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention Control</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Paired-Associate Learning</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1LwzAUhoMobk7_gAwZot515rvJ5Rjzi4E3eh3SJJWOrp1JC-7fm7KygRcuN4Gc57wnhweAawSnCJL0EeJUJCmRZErQlEwZFCdgiCSRCcKCnYLhHhiAixBWsDtEnIMBYhJBROgQjJdF9dUWoSnMZNY0rmqKuprM66rxdXkJznJdBnfV3yPw-bT4mL8ky_fn1_lsmWgq0yahkOnMYkMYRdZRK6Fj1uE4ID5BCanReeZSSTMDeSa4sRZmUubWaJtxkZIReNjlbnz93brQqHURjCtLXbm6DUowjhnD_CjIU8Eh4ug4iBFNmRARvP0DrurWV3FbxRGlXGKM_4NiDuFcwG4JvIOMr0PwLlcbX6y13yoEVedLdTpUp0MRpIiKvmLTTZ_cZmtnDy29oAjc94AORpe515UpwoHjAjFGuqDxjnO-MPvy4o0LGR3F8t2urDdabcLWaB-Nly6on3J9-M4voHCvxQ</recordid><startdate>20050501</startdate><enddate>20050501</enddate><creator>Taube-Schiff, Marlene</creator><creator>Segalowitz, Norman</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050501</creationdate><title>Linguistic Attention Control</title><author>Taube-Schiff, Marlene ; Segalowitz, Norman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a497t-405abd2c3541de4d90e5de2013c350904cafbe794bc06b86cdd0b99fdcadb6873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention Control</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Paired-Associate Learning</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Words (Phonetic Units)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taube-Schiff, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segalowitz, Norman</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taube-Schiff, Marlene</au><au>Segalowitz, Norman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ689497</ericid><atitle>Linguistic Attention Control: Attention Shifting Governed by Grammaticized Elements of Language</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2005-05-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>508</spage><epage>519</epage><pages>508-519</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><coden>JEPCEA</coden><abstract>In 2 experiments, the authors investigated attention control for tasks involving the processing of grammaticized linguistic stimuli (function words) contextualized in sentence fragments. Attention control was operationalized as shift costs obtained with adult speakers of English in an alternating-runs experimental design ( R. D. Rogers &amp; S. Monsell, 1995 ). Experiment 1 yielded significant attention shift costs between tasks involving judgments about the meanings of grammatical function words. The authors used a 3-stage experimental design ( G. Wylie &amp; A. Allport, 2000 ), and the emerging pattern of results implicated task set reconfiguration and not task set inertia in these shift costs. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that shift costs were lower when the tasks involved shared attentional resources (processing the same grammatical dimension) versus unshared resources (different grammatical dimensions). The authors discuss the results from a cognitive linguistic perspective and for their implications for the view that language itself can serve a special attention-directing function.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>15910134</pmid><doi>10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.508</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7393
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2005-05, Vol.31 (3), p.508-519
issn 0278-7393
1939-1285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85625526
source APA PsycARTICLES; Business Source Ultimate; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Attention
Attention Control
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition & reasoning
Costs
Cues
Experiments
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Grammar
Human
Humans
Inhibition (Psychology)
Language
Linguistics
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Miscellaneous
Oral Language
Paired-Associate Learning
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Research Design
Semantics
Sentences
Words (Phonetic Units)
title Linguistic Attention Control: Attention Shifting Governed by Grammaticized Elements of Language
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T23%3A08%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linguistic%20Attention%20Control:%20Attention%20Shifting%20Governed%20by%20Grammaticized%20Elements%20of%20Language&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Taube-Schiff,%20Marlene&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=508&rft.epage=519&rft.pages=508-519&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft.coden=JEPCEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.508&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614469222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a497t-405abd2c3541de4d90e5de2013c350904cafbe794bc06b86cdd0b99fdcadb6873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614469222&rft_id=info:pmid/15910134&rft_ericid=EJ689497&rfr_iscdi=true