Loading…
Linguistic Attention Control: Attention Shifting Governed by Grammaticized Elements of Language
In 2 experiments, the authors investigated attention control for tasks involving the processing of grammaticized linguistic stimuli (function words) contextualized in sentence fragments. Attention control was operationalized as shift costs obtained with adult speakers of English in an alternating-ru...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2005-05, Vol.31 (3), p.508-519 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a497t-405abd2c3541de4d90e5de2013c350904cafbe794bc06b86cdd0b99fdcadb6873 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a497t-405abd2c3541de4d90e5de2013c350904cafbe794bc06b86cdd0b99fdcadb6873 |
container_end_page | 519 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 508 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Taube-Schiff, Marlene Segalowitz, Norman |
description | In 2 experiments, the authors investigated attention control for tasks involving the processing of grammaticized linguistic stimuli (function words) contextualized in sentence fragments. Attention control was operationalized as shift costs obtained with adult speakers of English in an alternating-runs experimental design (
R. D. Rogers & S. Monsell, 1995
). Experiment 1 yielded significant attention shift costs between tasks involving judgments about the meanings of grammatical function words. The authors used a 3-stage experimental design (
G. Wylie & A. Allport, 2000
), and the emerging pattern of results implicated task set reconfiguration and not task set inertia in these shift costs. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that shift costs were lower when the tasks involved shared attentional resources (processing the same grammatical dimension) versus unshared resources (different grammatical dimensions). The authors discuss the results from a cognitive linguistic perspective and for their implications for the view that language itself can serve a special attention-directing function. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.508 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85625526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ689497</ericid><sourcerecordid>614469222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a497t-405abd2c3541de4d90e5de2013c350904cafbe794bc06b86cdd0b99fdcadb6873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LwzAUhoMobk7_gAwZot515rvJ5Rjzi4E3eh3SJJWOrp1JC-7fm7KygRcuN4Gc57wnhweAawSnCJL0EeJUJCmRZErQlEwZFCdgiCSRCcKCnYLhHhiAixBWsDtEnIMBYhJBROgQjJdF9dUWoSnMZNY0rmqKuprM66rxdXkJznJdBnfV3yPw-bT4mL8ky_fn1_lsmWgq0yahkOnMYkMYRdZRK6Fj1uE4ID5BCanReeZSSTMDeSa4sRZmUubWaJtxkZIReNjlbnz93brQqHURjCtLXbm6DUowjhnD_CjIU8Eh4ug4iBFNmRARvP0DrurWV3FbxRGlXGKM_4NiDuFcwG4JvIOMr0PwLlcbX6y13yoEVedLdTpUp0MRpIiKvmLTTZ_cZmtnDy29oAjc94AORpe515UpwoHjAjFGuqDxjnO-MPvy4o0LGR3F8t2urDdabcLWaB-Nly6on3J9-M4voHCvxQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614469222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Linguistic Attention Control: Attention Shifting Governed by Grammaticized Elements of Language</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Taube-Schiff, Marlene ; Segalowitz, Norman</creator><creatorcontrib>Taube-Schiff, Marlene ; Segalowitz, Norman</creatorcontrib><description>In 2 experiments, the authors investigated attention control for tasks involving the processing of grammaticized linguistic stimuli (function words) contextualized in sentence fragments. Attention control was operationalized as shift costs obtained with adult speakers of English in an alternating-runs experimental design (
R. D. Rogers & S. Monsell, 1995
). Experiment 1 yielded significant attention shift costs between tasks involving judgments about the meanings of grammatical function words. The authors used a 3-stage experimental design (
G. Wylie & A. Allport, 2000
), and the emerging pattern of results implicated task set reconfiguration and not task set inertia in these shift costs. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that shift costs were lower when the tasks involved shared attentional resources (processing the same grammatical dimension) versus unshared resources (different grammatical dimensions). The authors discuss the results from a cognitive linguistic perspective and for their implications for the view that language itself can serve a special attention-directing function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.508</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15910134</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEPCEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Attention ; Attention Control ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition & reasoning ; Costs ; Cues ; Experiments ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grammar ; Human ; Humans ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Language ; Linguistics ; Male ; Memory, Short-Term ; Miscellaneous ; Oral Language ; Paired-Associate Learning ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Research Design ; Semantics ; Sentences ; Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2005-05, Vol.31 (3), p.508-519</ispartof><rights>2005 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association May 2005</rights><rights>2005, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a497t-405abd2c3541de4d90e5de2013c350904cafbe794bc06b86cdd0b99fdcadb6873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a497t-405abd2c3541de4d90e5de2013c350904cafbe794bc06b86cdd0b99fdcadb6873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31220,31270</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ689497$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16815538$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15910134$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taube-Schiff, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segalowitz, Norman</creatorcontrib><title>Linguistic Attention Control: Attention Shifting Governed by Grammaticized Elements of Language</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>In 2 experiments, the authors investigated attention control for tasks involving the processing of grammaticized linguistic stimuli (function words) contextualized in sentence fragments. Attention control was operationalized as shift costs obtained with adult speakers of English in an alternating-runs experimental design (
R. D. Rogers & S. Monsell, 1995
). Experiment 1 yielded significant attention shift costs between tasks involving judgments about the meanings of grammatical function words. The authors used a 3-stage experimental design (
G. Wylie & A. Allport, 2000
), and the emerging pattern of results implicated task set reconfiguration and not task set inertia in these shift costs. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that shift costs were lower when the tasks involved shared attentional resources (processing the same grammatical dimension) versus unshared resources (different grammatical dimensions). The authors discuss the results from a cognitive linguistic perspective and for their implications for the view that language itself can serve a special attention-directing function.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention Control</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Paired-Associate Learning</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1LwzAUhoMobk7_gAwZot515rvJ5Rjzi4E3eh3SJJWOrp1JC-7fm7KygRcuN4Gc57wnhweAawSnCJL0EeJUJCmRZErQlEwZFCdgiCSRCcKCnYLhHhiAixBWsDtEnIMBYhJBROgQjJdF9dUWoSnMZNY0rmqKuprM66rxdXkJznJdBnfV3yPw-bT4mL8ky_fn1_lsmWgq0yahkOnMYkMYRdZRK6Fj1uE4ID5BCanReeZSSTMDeSa4sRZmUubWaJtxkZIReNjlbnz93brQqHURjCtLXbm6DUowjhnD_CjIU8Eh4ug4iBFNmRARvP0DrurWV3FbxRGlXGKM_4NiDuFcwG4JvIOMr0PwLlcbX6y13yoEVedLdTpUp0MRpIiKvmLTTZ_cZmtnDy29oAjc94AORpe515UpwoHjAjFGuqDxjnO-MPvy4o0LGR3F8t2urDdabcLWaB-Nly6on3J9-M4voHCvxQ</recordid><startdate>20050501</startdate><enddate>20050501</enddate><creator>Taube-Schiff, Marlene</creator><creator>Segalowitz, Norman</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050501</creationdate><title>Linguistic Attention Control</title><author>Taube-Schiff, Marlene ; Segalowitz, Norman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a497t-405abd2c3541de4d90e5de2013c350904cafbe794bc06b86cdd0b99fdcadb6873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention Control</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Paired-Associate Learning</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Words (Phonetic Units)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taube-Schiff, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Segalowitz, Norman</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taube-Schiff, Marlene</au><au>Segalowitz, Norman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ689497</ericid><atitle>Linguistic Attention Control: Attention Shifting Governed by Grammaticized Elements of Language</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2005-05-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>508</spage><epage>519</epage><pages>508-519</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><coden>JEPCEA</coden><abstract>In 2 experiments, the authors investigated attention control for tasks involving the processing of grammaticized linguistic stimuli (function words) contextualized in sentence fragments. Attention control was operationalized as shift costs obtained with adult speakers of English in an alternating-runs experimental design (
R. D. Rogers & S. Monsell, 1995
). Experiment 1 yielded significant attention shift costs between tasks involving judgments about the meanings of grammatical function words. The authors used a 3-stage experimental design (
G. Wylie & A. Allport, 2000
), and the emerging pattern of results implicated task set reconfiguration and not task set inertia in these shift costs. Experiment 2 further demonstrated that shift costs were lower when the tasks involved shared attentional resources (processing the same grammatical dimension) versus unshared resources (different grammatical dimensions). The authors discuss the results from a cognitive linguistic perspective and for their implications for the view that language itself can serve a special attention-directing function.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>15910134</pmid><doi>10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.508</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2005-05, Vol.31 (3), p.508-519 |
issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85625526 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; Business Source Ultimate; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Attention Attention Control Biological and medical sciences Cognition & reasoning Costs Cues Experiments Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Grammar Human Humans Inhibition (Psychology) Language Linguistics Male Memory, Short-Term Miscellaneous Oral Language Paired-Associate Learning Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Research Design Semantics Sentences Words (Phonetic Units) |
title | Linguistic Attention Control: Attention Shifting Governed by Grammaticized Elements of Language |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T23%3A08%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Linguistic%20Attention%20Control:%20Attention%20Shifting%20Governed%20by%20Grammaticized%20Elements%20of%20Language&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Taube-Schiff,%20Marlene&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=508&rft.epage=519&rft.pages=508-519&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft.coden=JEPCEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.508&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E614469222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a497t-405abd2c3541de4d90e5de2013c350904cafbe794bc06b86cdd0b99fdcadb6873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614469222&rft_id=info:pmid/15910134&rft_ericid=EJ689497&rfr_iscdi=true |