Rhetoric and reflexivity in cognitive theories of language

Linguistic theories rarely examine linguistic discourse as an object of self-reflexive scrutiny. This paper examines how the issue of reflexivity is dealt with in two cognitive theories of language, Chomskyan linguistics and cognitive linguistics. It is argued that Chomskyan linguistics systematical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Language & communication 2005-10, Vol.25 (4), p.377-397
Main Author: Werry, Chris
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Chomsky
Chomsky, Noam
Cognitive linguistics
Cognitive models
Linguistics
Reflexivity
Rhetoric
Theory
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Linguistic theories rarely examine linguistic discourse as an object of self-reflexive scrutiny. This paper examines how the issue of reflexivity is dealt with in two cognitive theories of language, Chomskyan linguistics and cognitive linguistics. It is argued that Chomskyan linguistics systematically excludes consideration of the language of linguistic inquiry. I suggest that this systematic exclusion is achieved through a set of rhetorical moves that construct linguistic discourse as a ‘transparent window.’ The paper contrasts the suppression of reflexivity in Chomskyan linguistics with its treatment in cognitive linguistics. It is argued that despite statements suggesting a reflexive stance and an interest in looking ‘at’ as well as ‘through’ linguistic discourse, cognitive linguistics continues for the most part to treat linguistic discourse as a transparent window or neutral metalanguage.
ISSN:0271-5309
1873-3395
DOI:10.1016/j.langcom.2005.07.002