Loading…

Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories

Nearly all theories of language development emphasize the importance of distributional cues for segregating words and phrases into syntactic categories like noun, feminine or verb phrase. However, questions concerning whether such cues can be used to the exclusion of referential cues have been debat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of child language 2005-05, Vol.32 (2), p.249-268
Main Authors: GERKEN, LOUANN, WILSON, RACHEL, LEWIS, WILLIAM
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-dcfa7e6a47bd8dd56a9ca25ca520dd24e039138ed03d70217cdd88705ddcc7e13
cites
container_end_page 268
container_issue 2
container_start_page 249
container_title Journal of child language
container_volume 32
creator GERKEN, LOUANN
WILSON, RACHEL
LEWIS, WILLIAM
description Nearly all theories of language development emphasize the importance of distributional cues for segregating words and phrases into syntactic categories like noun, feminine or verb phrase. However, questions concerning whether such cues can be used to the exclusion of referential cues have been debated. Using the headturn preference procedure, American children aged 1;5 were briefly familiarized with a partial Russian gender paradigm, with a subset of the paradigm members withheld. During test, infants listened on alternate trials to previously withheld grammatical items and ungrammatical items with incorrect gender markings on previously heard stems. Across three experiments, infants discriminated new grammatical from ungrammatical items, but like adults in previous studies, were only able to do so when a subset of familiarization items was double marked for gender category. The results suggest that learners can use distributional cues to category structure, to the exclusion of referential cues, from relatively early in the language learning process.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0305000904006786
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85630394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0305000904006786</cupid><ericid>EJ777498</ericid><sourcerecordid>1495621751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-dcfa7e6a47bd8dd56a9ca25ca520dd24e039138ed03d70217cdd88705ddcc7e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtrFTEUhYMo9rT1Bwgig9C-jd25Z96UQ-2FgorV15CTZErqXNokA_bfm-kZWlGkT_thfXux114IvcbwHgOWR9-AAgeABhiAkEo8QyvMRFNLAeQ5Ws1yPes7aDel63uyUS_RDhbAOOGwQh_OhtYMOVXWDNWUfOVCyjFsphzGwXSVnXyq8li1Y-yrdDdkY3Owhc7-aozBp330ojVd8q-WuYe-fzq-XJ_WF59PztYfL2rLRZNrZ1sjvTBMbpxyjgvTWEO4NZyAc4R5oA2myjugTgLB0jqnlATunLXSY7qHDre-N3G8LUdl3YdkfdeZwY9T0ooLWjzYk6BQoDCW9EmQS1CKwOz47i_wepxi-U7ShGAGWEheILyFbBxTir7VNzH0Jt5pDHpuS__TVtl5uxhPm967x42lngIcLIBJ1nRtNIMN6Q-u5G2YLNybLedjsA_y8bmUkjWqyPVWLt36Xw-6iT-1kFRyLU6-6h_nGK8vT7_o-TN0yWL6TQzuyj8m_n-a34vqwoY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221401675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>GERKEN, LOUANN ; WILSON, RACHEL ; LEWIS, WILLIAM</creator><creatorcontrib>GERKEN, LOUANN ; WILSON, RACHEL ; LEWIS, WILLIAM</creatorcontrib><description>Nearly all theories of language development emphasize the importance of distributional cues for segregating words and phrases into syntactic categories like noun, feminine or verb phrase. However, questions concerning whether such cues can be used to the exclusion of referential cues have been debated. Using the headturn preference procedure, American children aged 1;5 were briefly familiarized with a partial Russian gender paradigm, with a subset of the paradigm members withheld. During test, infants listened on alternate trials to previously withheld grammatical items and ungrammatical items with incorrect gender markings on previously heard stems. Across three experiments, infants discriminated new grammatical from ungrammatical items, but like adults in previous studies, were only able to do so when a subset of familiarization items was double marked for gender category. The results suggest that learners can use distributional cues to category structure, to the exclusion of referential cues, from relatively early in the language learning process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7602</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0305000904006786</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16045250</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCLGBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Child development ; Child Language ; Children &amp; youth ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive categorization ; Cues ; Debates ; Developmental psychology ; Experiments ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gender ; Grammar ; Grammatical gender ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Infant ; Infants ; Language ; Language Acquisition ; Learning Processes ; Linguistics ; Male ; Native language acquisition ; Newborn. Infant ; Phonology ; Predicate ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Russian language ; Semantics ; Studies ; Syntax ; Verbal Behavior ; Verbal cues ; Verbal Learning ; Verbs ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Journal of child language, 2005-05, Vol.32 (2), p.249-268</ispartof><rights>2005 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press May 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-dcfa7e6a47bd8dd56a9ca25ca520dd24e039138ed03d70217cdd88705ddcc7e13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/221401675/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/221401675?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12851,12861,21378,21382,21394,27924,27925,31000,31269,31270,33611,33612,33877,33878,33911,33912,34775,34776,43733,43880,43896,44200,62661,62662,62664,62677,72960,74196,74221,74397,74413,74728</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ777498$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16943947$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16045250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GERKEN, LOUANN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILSON, RACHEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEWIS, WILLIAM</creatorcontrib><title>Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories</title><title>Journal of child language</title><addtitle>J. Child Lang</addtitle><description>Nearly all theories of language development emphasize the importance of distributional cues for segregating words and phrases into syntactic categories like noun, feminine or verb phrase. However, questions concerning whether such cues can be used to the exclusion of referential cues have been debated. Using the headturn preference procedure, American children aged 1;5 were briefly familiarized with a partial Russian gender paradigm, with a subset of the paradigm members withheld. During test, infants listened on alternate trials to previously withheld grammatical items and ungrammatical items with incorrect gender markings on previously heard stems. Across three experiments, infants discriminated new grammatical from ungrammatical items, but like adults in previous studies, were only able to do so when a subset of familiarization items was double marked for gender category. The results suggest that learners can use distributional cues to category structure, to the exclusion of referential cues, from relatively early in the language learning process.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive categorization</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Grammatical gender</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Native language acquisition</subject><subject>Newborn. Infant</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Predicate</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Russian language</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><subject>Verbal cues</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0305-0009</issn><issn>1469-7602</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtrFTEUhYMo9rT1Bwgig9C-jd25Z96UQ-2FgorV15CTZErqXNokA_bfm-kZWlGkT_thfXux114IvcbwHgOWR9-AAgeABhiAkEo8QyvMRFNLAeQ5Ws1yPes7aDel63uyUS_RDhbAOOGwQh_OhtYMOVXWDNWUfOVCyjFsphzGwXSVnXyq8li1Y-yrdDdkY3Owhc7-aozBp330ojVd8q-WuYe-fzq-XJ_WF59PztYfL2rLRZNrZ1sjvTBMbpxyjgvTWEO4NZyAc4R5oA2myjugTgLB0jqnlATunLXSY7qHDre-N3G8LUdl3YdkfdeZwY9T0ooLWjzYk6BQoDCW9EmQS1CKwOz47i_wepxi-U7ShGAGWEheILyFbBxTir7VNzH0Jt5pDHpuS__TVtl5uxhPm967x42lngIcLIBJ1nRtNIMN6Q-u5G2YLNybLedjsA_y8bmUkjWqyPVWLt36Xw-6iT-1kFRyLU6-6h_nGK8vT7_o-TN0yWL6TQzuyj8m_n-a34vqwoY</recordid><startdate>20050501</startdate><enddate>20050501</enddate><creator>GERKEN, LOUANN</creator><creator>WILSON, RACHEL</creator><creator>LEWIS, WILLIAM</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050501</creationdate><title>Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories</title><author>GERKEN, LOUANN ; WILSON, RACHEL ; LEWIS, WILLIAM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-dcfa7e6a47bd8dd56a9ca25ca520dd24e039138ed03d70217cdd88705ddcc7e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive categorization</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Grammatical gender</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Native language acquisition</topic><topic>Newborn. Infant</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Predicate</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Russian language</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><topic>Verbal cues</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GERKEN, LOUANN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILSON, RACHEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEWIS, WILLIAM</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of child language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GERKEN, LOUANN</au><au>WILSON, RACHEL</au><au>LEWIS, WILLIAM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ777498</ericid><atitle>Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories</atitle><jtitle>Journal of child language</jtitle><addtitle>J. Child Lang</addtitle><date>2005-05-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>249-268</pages><issn>0305-0009</issn><eissn>1469-7602</eissn><coden>JCLGBJ</coden><abstract>Nearly all theories of language development emphasize the importance of distributional cues for segregating words and phrases into syntactic categories like noun, feminine or verb phrase. However, questions concerning whether such cues can be used to the exclusion of referential cues have been debated. Using the headturn preference procedure, American children aged 1;5 were briefly familiarized with a partial Russian gender paradigm, with a subset of the paradigm members withheld. During test, infants listened on alternate trials to previously withheld grammatical items and ungrammatical items with incorrect gender markings on previously heard stems. Across three experiments, infants discriminated new grammatical from ungrammatical items, but like adults in previous studies, were only able to do so when a subset of familiarization items was double marked for gender category. The results suggest that learners can use distributional cues to category structure, to the exclusion of referential cues, from relatively early in the language learning process.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>16045250</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0305000904006786</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-0009
ispartof Journal of child language, 2005-05, Vol.32 (2), p.249-268
issn 0305-0009
1469-7602
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85630394
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Cambridge Journals Online; Art, Design and Architecture Collection; Linguistics Collection; ProQuest One Literature; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Child development
Child Language
Children & youth
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive categorization
Cues
Debates
Developmental psychology
Experiments
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gender
Grammar
Grammatical gender
Humans
Hypotheses
Infant
Infants
Language
Language Acquisition
Learning Processes
Linguistics
Male
Native language acquisition
Newborn. Infant
Phonology
Predicate
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Russian language
Semantics
Studies
Syntax
Verbal Behavior
Verbal cues
Verbal Learning
Verbs
Young Children
title Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A52%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Infants%20can%20use%20distributional%20cues%20to%20form%20syntactic%20categories&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20child%20language&rft.au=GERKEN,%20LOUANN&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=249-268&rft.issn=0305-0009&rft.eissn=1469-7602&rft.coden=JCLGBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0305000904006786&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1495621751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-dcfa7e6a47bd8dd56a9ca25ca520dd24e039138ed03d70217cdd88705ddcc7e13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221401675&rft_id=info:pmid/16045250&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0305000904006786&rft_ericid=EJ777498&rfr_iscdi=true