Loading…
Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories
Nearly all theories of language development emphasize the importance of distributional cues for segregating words and phrases into syntactic categories like noun, feminine or verb phrase. However, questions concerning whether such cues can be used to the exclusion of referential cues have been debat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of child language 2005-05, Vol.32 (2), p.249-268 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-dcfa7e6a47bd8dd56a9ca25ca520dd24e039138ed03d70217cdd88705ddcc7e13 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 268 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 249 |
container_title | Journal of child language |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | GERKEN, LOUANN WILSON, RACHEL LEWIS, WILLIAM |
description | Nearly all theories of language development emphasize the importance of distributional cues for segregating words and phrases into syntactic categories like noun, feminine or verb phrase. However, questions concerning whether such cues can be used to the exclusion of referential cues have been debated. Using the headturn preference procedure, American children aged 1;5 were briefly familiarized with a partial Russian gender paradigm, with a subset of the paradigm members withheld. During test, infants listened on alternate trials to previously withheld grammatical items and ungrammatical items with incorrect gender markings on previously heard stems. Across three experiments, infants discriminated new grammatical from ungrammatical items, but like adults in previous studies, were only able to do so when a subset of familiarization items was double marked for gender category. The results suggest that learners can use distributional cues to category structure, to the exclusion of referential cues, from relatively early in the language learning process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0305000904006786 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85630394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0305000904006786</cupid><ericid>EJ777498</ericid><sourcerecordid>1495621751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-dcfa7e6a47bd8dd56a9ca25ca520dd24e039138ed03d70217cdd88705ddcc7e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVtrFTEUhYMo9rT1Bwgig9C-jd25Z96UQ-2FgorV15CTZErqXNokA_bfm-kZWlGkT_thfXux114IvcbwHgOWR9-AAgeABhiAkEo8QyvMRFNLAeQ5Ws1yPes7aDel63uyUS_RDhbAOOGwQh_OhtYMOVXWDNWUfOVCyjFsphzGwXSVnXyq8li1Y-yrdDdkY3Owhc7-aozBp330ojVd8q-WuYe-fzq-XJ_WF59PztYfL2rLRZNrZ1sjvTBMbpxyjgvTWEO4NZyAc4R5oA2myjugTgLB0jqnlATunLXSY7qHDre-N3G8LUdl3YdkfdeZwY9T0ooLWjzYk6BQoDCW9EmQS1CKwOz47i_wepxi-U7ShGAGWEheILyFbBxTir7VNzH0Jt5pDHpuS__TVtl5uxhPm967x42lngIcLIBJ1nRtNIMN6Q-u5G2YLNybLedjsA_y8bmUkjWqyPVWLt36Xw-6iT-1kFRyLU6-6h_nGK8vT7_o-TN0yWL6TQzuyj8m_n-a34vqwoY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>221401675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>GERKEN, LOUANN ; WILSON, RACHEL ; LEWIS, WILLIAM</creator><creatorcontrib>GERKEN, LOUANN ; WILSON, RACHEL ; LEWIS, WILLIAM</creatorcontrib><description>Nearly all theories of language development emphasize the importance of distributional cues for segregating words and phrases into syntactic categories like noun, feminine or verb phrase. However, questions concerning whether such cues can be used to the exclusion of referential cues have been debated. Using the headturn preference procedure, American children aged 1;5 were briefly familiarized with a partial Russian gender paradigm, with a subset of the paradigm members withheld. During test, infants listened on alternate trials to previously withheld grammatical items and ungrammatical items with incorrect gender markings on previously heard stems. Across three experiments, infants discriminated new grammatical from ungrammatical items, but like adults in previous studies, were only able to do so when a subset of familiarization items was double marked for gender category. The results suggest that learners can use distributional cues to category structure, to the exclusion of referential cues, from relatively early in the language learning process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7602</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0305000904006786</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16045250</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCLGBJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Child development ; Child Language ; Children & youth ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive categorization ; Cues ; Debates ; Developmental psychology ; Experiments ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gender ; Grammar ; Grammatical gender ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Infant ; Infants ; Language ; Language Acquisition ; Learning Processes ; Linguistics ; Male ; Native language acquisition ; Newborn. Infant ; Phonology ; Predicate ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Russian language ; Semantics ; Studies ; Syntax ; Verbal Behavior ; Verbal cues ; Verbal Learning ; Verbs ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Journal of child language, 2005-05, Vol.32 (2), p.249-268</ispartof><rights>2005 Cambridge University Press</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge University Press May 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-dcfa7e6a47bd8dd56a9ca25ca520dd24e039138ed03d70217cdd88705ddcc7e13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/221401675/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/221401675?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12851,12861,21378,21382,21394,27924,27925,31000,31269,31270,33611,33612,33877,33878,33911,33912,34775,34776,43733,43880,43896,44200,62661,62662,62664,62677,72960,74196,74221,74397,74413,74728</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ777498$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16943947$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16045250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GERKEN, LOUANN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILSON, RACHEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEWIS, WILLIAM</creatorcontrib><title>Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories</title><title>Journal of child language</title><addtitle>J. Child Lang</addtitle><description>Nearly all theories of language development emphasize the importance of distributional cues for segregating words and phrases into syntactic categories like noun, feminine or verb phrase. However, questions concerning whether such cues can be used to the exclusion of referential cues have been debated. Using the headturn preference procedure, American children aged 1;5 were briefly familiarized with a partial Russian gender paradigm, with a subset of the paradigm members withheld. During test, infants listened on alternate trials to previously withheld grammatical items and ungrammatical items with incorrect gender markings on previously heard stems. Across three experiments, infants discriminated new grammatical from ungrammatical items, but like adults in previous studies, were only able to do so when a subset of familiarization items was double marked for gender category. The results suggest that learners can use distributional cues to category structure, to the exclusion of referential cues, from relatively early in the language learning process.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child development</subject><subject>Child Language</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive categorization</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Grammatical gender</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Native language acquisition</subject><subject>Newborn. Infant</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Predicate</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Russian language</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Syntax</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><subject>Verbal cues</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>0305-0009</issn><issn>1469-7602</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVtrFTEUhYMo9rT1Bwgig9C-jd25Z96UQ-2FgorV15CTZErqXNokA_bfm-kZWlGkT_thfXux114IvcbwHgOWR9-AAgeABhiAkEo8QyvMRFNLAeQ5Ws1yPes7aDel63uyUS_RDhbAOOGwQh_OhtYMOVXWDNWUfOVCyjFsphzGwXSVnXyq8li1Y-yrdDdkY3Owhc7-aozBp330ojVd8q-WuYe-fzq-XJ_WF59PztYfL2rLRZNrZ1sjvTBMbpxyjgvTWEO4NZyAc4R5oA2myjugTgLB0jqnlATunLXSY7qHDre-N3G8LUdl3YdkfdeZwY9T0ooLWjzYk6BQoDCW9EmQS1CKwOz47i_wepxi-U7ShGAGWEheILyFbBxTir7VNzH0Jt5pDHpuS__TVtl5uxhPm967x42lngIcLIBJ1nRtNIMN6Q-u5G2YLNybLedjsA_y8bmUkjWqyPVWLt36Xw-6iT-1kFRyLU6-6h_nGK8vT7_o-TN0yWL6TQzuyj8m_n-a34vqwoY</recordid><startdate>20050501</startdate><enddate>20050501</enddate><creator>GERKEN, LOUANN</creator><creator>WILSON, RACHEL</creator><creator>LEWIS, WILLIAM</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050501</creationdate><title>Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories</title><author>GERKEN, LOUANN ; WILSON, RACHEL ; LEWIS, WILLIAM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-dcfa7e6a47bd8dd56a9ca25ca520dd24e039138ed03d70217cdd88705ddcc7e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child development</topic><topic>Child Language</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive categorization</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Grammatical gender</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Native language acquisition</topic><topic>Newborn. Infant</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Predicate</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Russian language</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Syntax</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><topic>Verbal cues</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GERKEN, LOUANN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WILSON, RACHEL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LEWIS, WILLIAM</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Journal of child language</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GERKEN, LOUANN</au><au>WILSON, RACHEL</au><au>LEWIS, WILLIAM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ777498</ericid><atitle>Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories</atitle><jtitle>Journal of child language</jtitle><addtitle>J. Child Lang</addtitle><date>2005-05-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>249-268</pages><issn>0305-0009</issn><eissn>1469-7602</eissn><coden>JCLGBJ</coden><abstract>Nearly all theories of language development emphasize the importance of distributional cues for segregating words and phrases into syntactic categories like noun, feminine or verb phrase. However, questions concerning whether such cues can be used to the exclusion of referential cues have been debated. Using the headturn preference procedure, American children aged 1;5 were briefly familiarized with a partial Russian gender paradigm, with a subset of the paradigm members withheld. During test, infants listened on alternate trials to previously withheld grammatical items and ungrammatical items with incorrect gender markings on previously heard stems. Across three experiments, infants discriminated new grammatical from ungrammatical items, but like adults in previous studies, were only able to do so when a subset of familiarization items was double marked for gender category. The results suggest that learners can use distributional cues to category structure, to the exclusion of referential cues, from relatively early in the language learning process.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>16045250</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0305000904006786</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-0009 |
ispartof | Journal of child language, 2005-05, Vol.32 (2), p.249-268 |
issn | 0305-0009 1469-7602 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85630394 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Cambridge Journals Online; Art, Design and Architecture Collection; Linguistics Collection; ProQuest One Literature; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Child development Child Language Children & youth Cognition & reasoning Cognitive categorization Cues Debates Developmental psychology Experiments Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gender Grammar Grammatical gender Humans Hypotheses Infant Infants Language Language Acquisition Learning Processes Linguistics Male Native language acquisition Newborn. Infant Phonology Predicate Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Russian language Semantics Studies Syntax Verbal Behavior Verbal cues Verbal Learning Verbs Young Children |
title | Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A52%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Infants%20can%20use%20distributional%20cues%20to%20form%20syntactic%20categories&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20child%20language&rft.au=GERKEN,%20LOUANN&rft.date=2005-05-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=249-268&rft.issn=0305-0009&rft.eissn=1469-7602&rft.coden=JCLGBJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0305000904006786&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1495621751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-dcfa7e6a47bd8dd56a9ca25ca520dd24e039138ed03d70217cdd88705ddcc7e13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=221401675&rft_id=info:pmid/16045250&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0305000904006786&rft_ericid=EJ777498&rfr_iscdi=true |