Loading…
Language Learning Strategies and English Proficiency of Chinese University Students
: This study investigated the relationship between language learning strategy (LLS) preferences and English proficiency among Chinese university students. Oxford's (1990) Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) and an institutional version (ITP) of the Test of English as a Foreign Langu...
Saved in:
Published in: | Foreign language annals 2005-03, Vol.38 (1), p.100-107 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4360-395334f84a4a2bf10326122a7e2af2c90de311c3c687b47b7d24562cb3836d9a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4360-395334f84a4a2bf10326122a7e2af2c90de311c3c687b47b7d24562cb3836d9a3 |
container_end_page | 107 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 100 |
container_title | Foreign language annals |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Nisbet, Deanna L. Tindall, Evie R. Arroyo, Alan A. |
description | : This study investigated the relationship between language learning strategy (LLS) preferences and English proficiency among Chinese university students. Oxford's (1990) Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) and an institutional version (ITP) of the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) were administered to 168 third‐year English majors. Multiple regression analysis revealed that SILL strategies accounted for only 4% of the variation in ITP‐TOEFL score. Results of a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated no significant differences between males and females on eight measures of learning strategy preferences and proficiency. Findings suggest a need for further research examining other factors that may account for variation in proficiency among Chinese learners. The authors recommend a closer examination of the relationship between learning strategies and proficiency, and the possible interplay of learner autonomy, across diverse cultural settings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02457.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85631532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ741801</ericid><sourcerecordid>85631532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4360-395334f84a4a2bf10326122a7e2af2c90de311c3c687b47b7d24562cb3836d9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1v1DAURSNEJYaWf8Ai6oJd0ueP2AkbVI2m06KoVEwr2FmO85J6SJ1iJ3Tm35NRqlmwwxsv7r1H9omicwIpmc7FNiUF50khKaQUIEuHCijPZLp7Ey2O0dtoAUCyRJL857vofQhbACioJItoU2rXjrrFuETtnXVtvBm8HrC1GGLt6njl2s6Gx_jO9401Fp3Zx30TLx-tw4Dxg7N_0Ac77KfhWKMbwll00ugu4IfX-zR6uFrdL6-T8tv6ZnlZJoYzAQkrMsZ4k3PNNa0aAowKQqmWSHVDTQE1MkIMMyKXFZeVrKefCWoqljNRF5qdRp9m7rPvf48YBvVkg8Gu0w77Mag8E4xkjE7F83-K2370bnqbokQAJTnnU-nzXDK-D8Fjo569fdJ-rwiog2y1VQej6mBUHWSrV9lqN40_zmP01hyHq6-SkxzIFH-Z4xfb4f4_wOqqvLwlABMhmQk2DLg7ErT_pYRkMlM_btfqDtbfYSPvlWB_ASJTnpE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216021844</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Language Learning Strategies and English Proficiency of Chinese University Students</title><source>Wiley</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Nisbet, Deanna L. ; Tindall, Evie R. ; Arroyo, Alan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nisbet, Deanna L. ; Tindall, Evie R. ; Arroyo, Alan A.</creatorcontrib><description>: This study investigated the relationship between language learning strategy (LLS) preferences and English proficiency among Chinese university students. Oxford's (1990) Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) and an institutional version (ITP) of the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) were administered to 168 third‐year English majors. Multiple regression analysis revealed that SILL strategies accounted for only 4% of the variation in ITP‐TOEFL score. Results of a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated no significant differences between males and females on eight measures of learning strategy preferences and proficiency. Findings suggest a need for further research examining other factors that may account for variation in proficiency among Chinese learners. The authors recommend a closer examination of the relationship between learning strategies and proficiency, and the possible interplay of learner autonomy, across diverse cultural settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-718X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9720</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02457.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FLGAAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>China ; Chinese languages ; College Students ; Cultural differences ; English (Second Language) ; English as a second language ; English as a second language learning ; English as a second language tests ; English proficiency ; Foreign Countries ; Foreign language learning ; Foreign students ; Gender Differences ; Language Acquisition ; Language Proficiency ; Language Tests ; Learning Strategies ; Majors (Students) ; Measures (Individuals) ; Multiple Regression Analysis ; Second Language Learning ; Second Languages ; Statistical Analysis ; Strategy Inventory for Language Learning ; Test of English as a Foreign Language</subject><ispartof>Foreign language annals, 2005-03, Vol.38 (1), p.100-107</ispartof><rights>2005 American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages</rights><rights>Copyright American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages Spring 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4360-395334f84a4a2bf10326122a7e2af2c90de311c3c687b47b7d24562cb3836d9a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4360-395334f84a4a2bf10326122a7e2af2c90de311c3c687b47b7d24562cb3836d9a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/216021844/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/216021844?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,12832,21359,21363,21375,27905,27906,31250,31251,33592,33593,33858,33859,33892,33893,43714,43861,43877,62640,62641,62643,62656,73945,73970,74146,74162</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ741801$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nisbet, Deanna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tindall, Evie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arroyo, Alan A.</creatorcontrib><title>Language Learning Strategies and English Proficiency of Chinese University Students</title><title>Foreign language annals</title><description>: This study investigated the relationship between language learning strategy (LLS) preferences and English proficiency among Chinese university students. Oxford's (1990) Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) and an institutional version (ITP) of the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) were administered to 168 third‐year English majors. Multiple regression analysis revealed that SILL strategies accounted for only 4% of the variation in ITP‐TOEFL score. Results of a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated no significant differences between males and females on eight measures of learning strategy preferences and proficiency. Findings suggest a need for further research examining other factors that may account for variation in proficiency among Chinese learners. The authors recommend a closer examination of the relationship between learning strategies and proficiency, and the possible interplay of learner autonomy, across diverse cultural settings.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Chinese languages</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English as a second language</subject><subject>English as a second language learning</subject><subject>English as a second language tests</subject><subject>English proficiency</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Foreign language learning</subject><subject>Foreign students</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Language Acquisition</subject><subject>Language Proficiency</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Majors (Students)</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Second Languages</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Strategy Inventory for Language Learning</subject><subject>Test of English as a Foreign Language</subject><issn>0015-718X</issn><issn>1944-9720</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1v1DAURSNEJYaWf8Ai6oJd0ueP2AkbVI2m06KoVEwr2FmO85J6SJ1iJ3Tm35NRqlmwwxsv7r1H9omicwIpmc7FNiUF50khKaQUIEuHCijPZLp7Ey2O0dtoAUCyRJL857vofQhbACioJItoU2rXjrrFuETtnXVtvBm8HrC1GGLt6njl2s6Gx_jO9401Fp3Zx30TLx-tw4Dxg7N_0Ac77KfhWKMbwll00ugu4IfX-zR6uFrdL6-T8tv6ZnlZJoYzAQkrMsZ4k3PNNa0aAowKQqmWSHVDTQE1MkIMMyKXFZeVrKefCWoqljNRF5qdRp9m7rPvf48YBvVkg8Gu0w77Mag8E4xkjE7F83-K2370bnqbokQAJTnnU-nzXDK-D8Fjo569fdJ-rwiog2y1VQej6mBUHWSrV9lqN40_zmP01hyHq6-SkxzIFH-Z4xfb4f4_wOqqvLwlABMhmQk2DLg7ErT_pYRkMlM_btfqDtbfYSPvlWB_ASJTnpE</recordid><startdate>200503</startdate><enddate>200503</enddate><creator>Nisbet, Deanna L.</creator><creator>Tindall, Evie R.</creator><creator>Arroyo, Alan A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200503</creationdate><title>Language Learning Strategies and English Proficiency of Chinese University Students</title><author>Nisbet, Deanna L. ; Tindall, Evie R. ; Arroyo, Alan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4360-395334f84a4a2bf10326122a7e2af2c90de311c3c687b47b7d24562cb3836d9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Chinese languages</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English as a second language</topic><topic>English as a second language learning</topic><topic>English as a second language tests</topic><topic>English proficiency</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Foreign language learning</topic><topic>Foreign students</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Language Acquisition</topic><topic>Language Proficiency</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Majors (Students)</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Multiple Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Second Languages</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Strategy Inventory for Language Learning</topic><topic>Test of English as a Foreign Language</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nisbet, Deanna L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tindall, Evie R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arroyo, Alan A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Foreign language annals</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nisbet, Deanna L.</au><au>Tindall, Evie R.</au><au>Arroyo, Alan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ741801</ericid><atitle>Language Learning Strategies and English Proficiency of Chinese University Students</atitle><jtitle>Foreign language annals</jtitle><date>2005-03</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>100</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>100-107</pages><issn>0015-718X</issn><eissn>1944-9720</eissn><coden>FLGAAS</coden><abstract>: This study investigated the relationship between language learning strategy (LLS) preferences and English proficiency among Chinese university students. Oxford's (1990) Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) and an institutional version (ITP) of the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) were administered to 168 third‐year English majors. Multiple regression analysis revealed that SILL strategies accounted for only 4% of the variation in ITP‐TOEFL score. Results of a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated no significant differences between males and females on eight measures of learning strategy preferences and proficiency. Findings suggest a need for further research examining other factors that may account for variation in proficiency among Chinese learners. The authors recommend a closer examination of the relationship between learning strategies and proficiency, and the possible interplay of learner autonomy, across diverse cultural settings.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02457.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-718X |
ispartof | Foreign language annals, 2005-03, Vol.38 (1), p.100-107 |
issn | 0015-718X 1944-9720 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85631532 |
source | Wiley; Linguistics Collection; ProQuest One Literature; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection |
subjects | China Chinese languages College Students Cultural differences English (Second Language) English as a second language English as a second language learning English as a second language tests English proficiency Foreign Countries Foreign language learning Foreign students Gender Differences Language Acquisition Language Proficiency Language Tests Learning Strategies Majors (Students) Measures (Individuals) Multiple Regression Analysis Second Language Learning Second Languages Statistical Analysis Strategy Inventory for Language Learning Test of English as a Foreign Language |
title | Language Learning Strategies and English Proficiency of Chinese University Students |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T12%3A30%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Language%20Learning%20Strategies%20and%20English%20Proficiency%20of%20Chinese%20University%20Students&rft.jtitle=Foreign%20language%20annals&rft.au=Nisbet,%20Deanna%20L.&rft.date=2005-03&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=100&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=100-107&rft.issn=0015-718X&rft.eissn=1944-9720&rft.coden=FLGAAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02457.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85631532%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4360-395334f84a4a2bf10326122a7e2af2c90de311c3c687b47b7d24562cb3836d9a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216021844&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ741801&rfr_iscdi=true |