Loading…

Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context?

This paper is based on a study which attempted to examine the efficacy of instruction at the pragmatic level. Specifically, the main purpose of the study was to investigate to what extent two instructional paradigms – explicit versus implicit instruction – affected learners’ knowledge and ability to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:System (Linköping) 2005-09, Vol.33 (3), p.417-435
Main Author: Alcon Soler, Eva
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-57108d9fc35bf80c3f6f2d6030ed28a18ae9e2f1854101a839e938b54d1370b13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-57108d9fc35bf80c3f6f2d6030ed28a18ae9e2f1854101a839e938b54d1370b13
container_end_page 435
container_issue 3
container_start_page 417
container_title System (Linköping)
container_volume 33
creator Alcon Soler, Eva
description This paper is based on a study which attempted to examine the efficacy of instruction at the pragmatic level. Specifically, the main purpose of the study was to investigate to what extent two instructional paradigms – explicit versus implicit instruction – affected learners’ knowledge and ability to use request strategies. One hundred and thirty-two students were randomly assigned to three groups (explicit, implicit and control). The three groups were exposed to excerpts including requests taken from different episodes of the TV series Stargate. However, while the explicit group received instruction by means of direct awareness-raising tasks and written metapragmatic feedback on the use of appropriate requests, the implicit group was provided with typographical enhancement of request strategies and a set of implicit awareness-raising tasks. Results of the study illustrate that learners’ awareness of requests benefit from both explicit and implicit instruction. However, in line with previous research, our study illustrates that, although an improvement in learners’ appropriate use of requests did take place after the instructional period, the explicit group showed an advantage over the implicit one. The empirical study also provides insight into interlanguage pragmatic pedagogy and presents suggestions for future research.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85644035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ803879</ericid><els_id>S0346251X05000394</els_id><sourcerecordid>85644035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-57108d9fc35bf80c3f6f2d6030ed28a18ae9e2f1854101a839e938b54d1370b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwDzpkYku4tvNwFlAFLQ9VYgGJzXKdm-KSxMV2gf57UqViZDrDeUjnI2RCIaFA86t14nc-YJswgCyBPOnliIyoKMqYM8GOyQh4mscso2-n5Mz7NQCkZcFHZHpn0Uem88FtdTC2i76t-4hq66IGletMt4o2Tq1aFYzeB6PwjtFsvoi07QL-hJtzclKrxuPFQcfkdT57uX2IF8_3j7fTRaxYmYc4KyiIqqw1z5a1AM3rvGZVDhywYkJRobBEVlORpf0nJXiJJRfLLK0oL2BJ-ZhcDrsbZz-36INsjdfYNKpDu_VSZHmaAs_6YDoEtbPeO6zlxplWuZ2kIPe85FoOvOSel4Rc9tLXJkMNndF_ldmTAN5z7O3rg91__DLopNcGO42VcaiDrKz5f_8XBFN-kA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85644035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context?</title><source>Elsevier</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Alcon Soler, Eva</creator><creatorcontrib>Alcon Soler, Eva</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is based on a study which attempted to examine the efficacy of instruction at the pragmatic level. Specifically, the main purpose of the study was to investigate to what extent two instructional paradigms – explicit versus implicit instruction – affected learners’ knowledge and ability to use request strategies. One hundred and thirty-two students were randomly assigned to three groups (explicit, implicit and control). The three groups were exposed to excerpts including requests taken from different episodes of the TV series Stargate. However, while the explicit group received instruction by means of direct awareness-raising tasks and written metapragmatic feedback on the use of appropriate requests, the implicit group was provided with typographical enhancement of request strategies and a set of implicit awareness-raising tasks. Results of the study illustrate that learners’ awareness of requests benefit from both explicit and implicit instruction. However, in line with previous research, our study illustrates that, although an improvement in learners’ appropriate use of requests did take place after the instructional period, the explicit group showed an advantage over the implicit one. The empirical study also provides insight into interlanguage pragmatic pedagogy and presents suggestions for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0346-251X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SYTMBO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>English (Second Language) ; Foreign language learning ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Instructional effects ; Interlanguage ; Pragmatics ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning</subject><ispartof>System (Linköping), 2005-09, Vol.33 (3), p.417-435</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-57108d9fc35bf80c3f6f2d6030ed28a18ae9e2f1854101a839e938b54d1370b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-57108d9fc35bf80c3f6f2d6030ed28a18ae9e2f1854101a839e938b54d1370b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,31247</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ803879$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alcon Soler, Eva</creatorcontrib><title>Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context?</title><title>System (Linköping)</title><description>This paper is based on a study which attempted to examine the efficacy of instruction at the pragmatic level. Specifically, the main purpose of the study was to investigate to what extent two instructional paradigms – explicit versus implicit instruction – affected learners’ knowledge and ability to use request strategies. One hundred and thirty-two students were randomly assigned to three groups (explicit, implicit and control). The three groups were exposed to excerpts including requests taken from different episodes of the TV series Stargate. However, while the explicit group received instruction by means of direct awareness-raising tasks and written metapragmatic feedback on the use of appropriate requests, the implicit group was provided with typographical enhancement of request strategies and a set of implicit awareness-raising tasks. Results of the study illustrate that learners’ awareness of requests benefit from both explicit and implicit instruction. However, in line with previous research, our study illustrates that, although an improvement in learners’ appropriate use of requests did take place after the instructional period, the explicit group showed an advantage over the implicit one. The empirical study also provides insight into interlanguage pragmatic pedagogy and presents suggestions for future research.</description><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>Foreign language learning</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Instructional effects</subject><subject>Interlanguage</subject><subject>Pragmatics</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><issn>0346-251X</issn><issn>1879-3282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwDzpkYku4tvNwFlAFLQ9VYgGJzXKdm-KSxMV2gf57UqViZDrDeUjnI2RCIaFA86t14nc-YJswgCyBPOnliIyoKMqYM8GOyQh4mscso2-n5Mz7NQCkZcFHZHpn0Uem88FtdTC2i76t-4hq66IGletMt4o2Tq1aFYzeB6PwjtFsvoi07QL-hJtzclKrxuPFQcfkdT57uX2IF8_3j7fTRaxYmYc4KyiIqqw1z5a1AM3rvGZVDhywYkJRobBEVlORpf0nJXiJJRfLLK0oL2BJ-ZhcDrsbZz-36INsjdfYNKpDu_VSZHmaAs_6YDoEtbPeO6zlxplWuZ2kIPe85FoOvOSel4Rc9tLXJkMNndF_ldmTAN5z7O3rg91__DLopNcGO42VcaiDrKz5f_8XBFN-kA</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Alcon Soler, Eva</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context?</title><author>Alcon Soler, Eva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-57108d9fc35bf80c3f6f2d6030ed28a18ae9e2f1854101a839e938b54d1370b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>Foreign language learning</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Instructional effects</topic><topic>Interlanguage</topic><topic>Pragmatics</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alcon Soler, Eva</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>System (Linköping)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alcon Soler, Eva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ803879</ericid><atitle>Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context?</atitle><jtitle>System (Linköping)</jtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>417</spage><epage>435</epage><pages>417-435</pages><issn>0346-251X</issn><eissn>1879-3282</eissn><coden>SYTMBO</coden><abstract>This paper is based on a study which attempted to examine the efficacy of instruction at the pragmatic level. Specifically, the main purpose of the study was to investigate to what extent two instructional paradigms – explicit versus implicit instruction – affected learners’ knowledge and ability to use request strategies. One hundred and thirty-two students were randomly assigned to three groups (explicit, implicit and control). The three groups were exposed to excerpts including requests taken from different episodes of the TV series Stargate. However, while the explicit group received instruction by means of direct awareness-raising tasks and written metapragmatic feedback on the use of appropriate requests, the implicit group was provided with typographical enhancement of request strategies and a set of implicit awareness-raising tasks. Results of the study illustrate that learners’ awareness of requests benefit from both explicit and implicit instruction. However, in line with previous research, our study illustrates that, although an improvement in learners’ appropriate use of requests did take place after the instructional period, the explicit group showed an advantage over the implicit one. The empirical study also provides insight into interlanguage pragmatic pedagogy and presents suggestions for future research.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0346-251X
ispartof System (Linköping), 2005-09, Vol.33 (3), p.417-435
issn 0346-251X
1879-3282
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85644035
source Elsevier; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects English (Second Language)
Foreign language learning
Instructional Effectiveness
Instructional effects
Interlanguage
Pragmatics
Second Language Instruction
Second Language Learning
title Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T20%3A37%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20instruction%20work%20for%20learning%20pragmatics%20in%20the%20EFL%20context?&rft.jtitle=System%20(Link%C3%B6ping)&rft.au=Alcon%20Soler,%20Eva&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=435&rft.pages=417-435&rft.issn=0346-251X&rft.eissn=1879-3282&rft.coden=SYTMBO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85644035%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-57108d9fc35bf80c3f6f2d6030ed28a18ae9e2f1854101a839e938b54d1370b13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85644035&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ803879&rfr_iscdi=true