Loading…
Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context?
This paper is based on a study which attempted to examine the efficacy of instruction at the pragmatic level. Specifically, the main purpose of the study was to investigate to what extent two instructional paradigms – explicit versus implicit instruction – affected learners’ knowledge and ability to...
Saved in:
Published in: | System (Linköping) 2005-09, Vol.33 (3), p.417-435 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-57108d9fc35bf80c3f6f2d6030ed28a18ae9e2f1854101a839e938b54d1370b13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-57108d9fc35bf80c3f6f2d6030ed28a18ae9e2f1854101a839e938b54d1370b13 |
container_end_page | 435 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 417 |
container_title | System (Linköping) |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Alcon Soler, Eva |
description | This paper is based on a study which attempted to examine the efficacy of instruction at the pragmatic level. Specifically, the main purpose of the study was to investigate to what extent two instructional paradigms – explicit versus implicit instruction – affected learners’ knowledge and ability to use request strategies. One hundred and thirty-two students were randomly assigned to three groups (explicit, implicit and control). The three groups were exposed to excerpts including requests taken from different episodes of the TV series
Stargate. However, while the explicit group received instruction by means of direct awareness-raising tasks and written metapragmatic feedback on the use of appropriate requests, the implicit group was provided with typographical enhancement of request strategies and a set of implicit awareness-raising tasks. Results of the study illustrate that learners’ awareness of requests benefit from both explicit and implicit instruction. However, in line with previous research, our study illustrates that, although an improvement in learners’ appropriate use of requests did take place after the instructional period, the explicit group showed an advantage over the implicit one. The empirical study also provides insight into interlanguage pragmatic pedagogy and presents suggestions for future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85644035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ803879</ericid><els_id>S0346251X05000394</els_id><sourcerecordid>85644035</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-57108d9fc35bf80c3f6f2d6030ed28a18ae9e2f1854101a839e938b54d1370b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwDzpkYku4tvNwFlAFLQ9VYgGJzXKdm-KSxMV2gf57UqViZDrDeUjnI2RCIaFA86t14nc-YJswgCyBPOnliIyoKMqYM8GOyQh4mscso2-n5Mz7NQCkZcFHZHpn0Uem88FtdTC2i76t-4hq66IGletMt4o2Tq1aFYzeB6PwjtFsvoi07QL-hJtzclKrxuPFQcfkdT57uX2IF8_3j7fTRaxYmYc4KyiIqqw1z5a1AM3rvGZVDhywYkJRobBEVlORpf0nJXiJJRfLLK0oL2BJ-ZhcDrsbZz-36INsjdfYNKpDu_VSZHmaAs_6YDoEtbPeO6zlxplWuZ2kIPe85FoOvOSel4Rc9tLXJkMNndF_ldmTAN5z7O3rg91__DLopNcGO42VcaiDrKz5f_8XBFN-kA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85644035</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context?</title><source>Elsevier</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Alcon Soler, Eva</creator><creatorcontrib>Alcon Soler, Eva</creatorcontrib><description>This paper is based on a study which attempted to examine the efficacy of instruction at the pragmatic level. Specifically, the main purpose of the study was to investigate to what extent two instructional paradigms – explicit versus implicit instruction – affected learners’ knowledge and ability to use request strategies. One hundred and thirty-two students were randomly assigned to three groups (explicit, implicit and control). The three groups were exposed to excerpts including requests taken from different episodes of the TV series
Stargate. However, while the explicit group received instruction by means of direct awareness-raising tasks and written metapragmatic feedback on the use of appropriate requests, the implicit group was provided with typographical enhancement of request strategies and a set of implicit awareness-raising tasks. Results of the study illustrate that learners’ awareness of requests benefit from both explicit and implicit instruction. However, in line with previous research, our study illustrates that, although an improvement in learners’ appropriate use of requests did take place after the instructional period, the explicit group showed an advantage over the implicit one. The empirical study also provides insight into interlanguage pragmatic pedagogy and presents suggestions for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0346-251X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3282</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SYTMBO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>English (Second Language) ; Foreign language learning ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Instructional effects ; Interlanguage ; Pragmatics ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning</subject><ispartof>System (Linköping), 2005-09, Vol.33 (3), p.417-435</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-57108d9fc35bf80c3f6f2d6030ed28a18ae9e2f1854101a839e938b54d1370b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-57108d9fc35bf80c3f6f2d6030ed28a18ae9e2f1854101a839e938b54d1370b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,31247</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ803879$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alcon Soler, Eva</creatorcontrib><title>Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context?</title><title>System (Linköping)</title><description>This paper is based on a study which attempted to examine the efficacy of instruction at the pragmatic level. Specifically, the main purpose of the study was to investigate to what extent two instructional paradigms – explicit versus implicit instruction – affected learners’ knowledge and ability to use request strategies. One hundred and thirty-two students were randomly assigned to three groups (explicit, implicit and control). The three groups were exposed to excerpts including requests taken from different episodes of the TV series
Stargate. However, while the explicit group received instruction by means of direct awareness-raising tasks and written metapragmatic feedback on the use of appropriate requests, the implicit group was provided with typographical enhancement of request strategies and a set of implicit awareness-raising tasks. Results of the study illustrate that learners’ awareness of requests benefit from both explicit and implicit instruction. However, in line with previous research, our study illustrates that, although an improvement in learners’ appropriate use of requests did take place after the instructional period, the explicit group showed an advantage over the implicit one. The empirical study also provides insight into interlanguage pragmatic pedagogy and presents suggestions for future research.</description><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>Foreign language learning</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Instructional effects</subject><subject>Interlanguage</subject><subject>Pragmatics</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><issn>0346-251X</issn><issn>1879-3282</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EEqXwDzpkYku4tvNwFlAFLQ9VYgGJzXKdm-KSxMV2gf57UqViZDrDeUjnI2RCIaFA86t14nc-YJswgCyBPOnliIyoKMqYM8GOyQh4mscso2-n5Mz7NQCkZcFHZHpn0Uem88FtdTC2i76t-4hq66IGletMt4o2Tq1aFYzeB6PwjtFsvoi07QL-hJtzclKrxuPFQcfkdT57uX2IF8_3j7fTRaxYmYc4KyiIqqw1z5a1AM3rvGZVDhywYkJRobBEVlORpf0nJXiJJRfLLK0oL2BJ-ZhcDrsbZz-36INsjdfYNKpDu_VSZHmaAs_6YDoEtbPeO6zlxplWuZ2kIPe85FoOvOSel4Rc9tLXJkMNndF_ldmTAN5z7O3rg91__DLopNcGO42VcaiDrKz5f_8XBFN-kA</recordid><startdate>200509</startdate><enddate>200509</enddate><creator>Alcon Soler, Eva</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200509</creationdate><title>Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context?</title><author>Alcon Soler, Eva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-57108d9fc35bf80c3f6f2d6030ed28a18ae9e2f1854101a839e938b54d1370b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>Foreign language learning</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Instructional effects</topic><topic>Interlanguage</topic><topic>Pragmatics</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alcon Soler, Eva</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>System (Linköping)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alcon Soler, Eva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ803879</ericid><atitle>Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context?</atitle><jtitle>System (Linköping)</jtitle><date>2005-09</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>417</spage><epage>435</epage><pages>417-435</pages><issn>0346-251X</issn><eissn>1879-3282</eissn><coden>SYTMBO</coden><abstract>This paper is based on a study which attempted to examine the efficacy of instruction at the pragmatic level. Specifically, the main purpose of the study was to investigate to what extent two instructional paradigms – explicit versus implicit instruction – affected learners’ knowledge and ability to use request strategies. One hundred and thirty-two students were randomly assigned to three groups (explicit, implicit and control). The three groups were exposed to excerpts including requests taken from different episodes of the TV series
Stargate. However, while the explicit group received instruction by means of direct awareness-raising tasks and written metapragmatic feedback on the use of appropriate requests, the implicit group was provided with typographical enhancement of request strategies and a set of implicit awareness-raising tasks. Results of the study illustrate that learners’ awareness of requests benefit from both explicit and implicit instruction. However, in line with previous research, our study illustrates that, although an improvement in learners’ appropriate use of requests did take place after the instructional period, the explicit group showed an advantage over the implicit one. The empirical study also provides insight into interlanguage pragmatic pedagogy and presents suggestions for future research.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0346-251X |
ispartof | System (Linköping), 2005-09, Vol.33 (3), p.417-435 |
issn | 0346-251X 1879-3282 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85644035 |
source | Elsevier; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | English (Second Language) Foreign language learning Instructional Effectiveness Instructional effects Interlanguage Pragmatics Second Language Instruction Second Language Learning |
title | Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T20%3A37%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20instruction%20work%20for%20learning%20pragmatics%20in%20the%20EFL%20context?&rft.jtitle=System%20(Link%C3%B6ping)&rft.au=Alcon%20Soler,%20Eva&rft.date=2005-09&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=435&rft.pages=417-435&rft.issn=0346-251X&rft.eissn=1879-3282&rft.coden=SYTMBO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.system.2005.06.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85644035%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a296t-57108d9fc35bf80c3f6f2d6030ed28a18ae9e2f1854101a839e938b54d1370b13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85644035&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ803879&rfr_iscdi=true |