Language-specific and universal influences in children’s syntactic packaging of Manner and Path: A comparison of English, Japanese, and Turkish

• Published in: Cognition 2007, Vol.102 (1), p.16-48
• Main Authors: Allen, Shanley, Özyürek, Aslı, Kita, Sotaro, Brown, Amanda, Furman, Reyhan, Ishizuka, Tomoko, Fujii, Mihoko
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Biological and medical sciences; Child; Child development; Child Language; Child, Preschool; Children; Cognitive Mapping; Contrastive Linguistics; Cross-Cultural Comparison; Crosslinguistic comparison; Culture; Development of syntax; Developmental psychology; English; English language; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Humans; Japan; Japanese; Japanese language; Language; Language Acquisition; Language Patterns; Linguistics; Male; Motion events; Motion Perception; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Semantics; Space Perception; Spatial Ability; Spatial language; Syntax; Turkey; Turkish; Turkish language; United States; Vocabulary
• ISSN: 0010-0277; 1873-7838
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.006

Different languages map semantic elements of spatial relations onto different lexical and syntactic units. These crosslinguistic differences raise important questions for language development in terms of how this variation is learned by children. We investigated how Turkish-, English-, and Japanese-speaking children (mean age 3;8) package the semantic elements of Manner and Path onto syntactic units when both the Manner and the Path of the moving Figure occur simultaneously and are salient in the event depicted. Both universal and language-specific patterns were evident in our data. Children used the semantic-syntactic mappings preferred by adult speakers of their own languages, and even expressed subtle syntactic differences that encode different relations between Manner and Path in the same way as their adult counterparts (i.e., Manner causing vs. incidental to Path). However, not all types of semantics-syntax mappings were easy for children to learn (e.g., expressing Manner and Path elements in two verbal clauses). In such cases, Turkish- and Japanese-speaking children frequently used syntactic patterns that were not typical in the target language but were similar to patterns used by English-speaking children, suggesting some universal influence. Thus, both language-specific and universal tendencies guide the development of complex spatial expressions.