Loading…

Relationship Between Acceptable Noise Level and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit

Anna K. Nabelek University of Tennessee, Knoxville Joanna W. Tampas University of Tennessee, Knoxville and James H. Quillen VA Medical Center, Mountain Home, TN Contact author: Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Department Speech, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3165, Ruston, LA 71272. E-mail: melinda{a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of speech, language, and hearing research language, and hearing research, 2008-02, Vol.51 (1), p.136-146
Main Authors: Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C, Nabelek, Anna K, Tampas, Joanna W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-83afb9e676ea95c5ed78ec9b19102027540517ab74cfb0a58870dbba9f2c33fe3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-83afb9e676ea95c5ed78ec9b19102027540517ab74cfb0a58870dbba9f2c33fe3
container_end_page 146
container_issue 1
container_start_page 136
container_title Journal of speech, language, and hearing research
container_volume 51
creator Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C
Nabelek, Anna K
Tampas, Joanna W
description Anna K. Nabelek University of Tennessee, Knoxville Joanna W. Tampas University of Tennessee, Knoxville and James H. Quillen VA Medical Center, Mountain Home, TN Contact author: Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Department Speech, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3165, Ruston, LA 71272. E-mail: melinda{at}latech.edu . Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between acceptable noise levels (ANLs) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB; R. M. Cox & G. C. Alexander, 1995). This study further examined the APHAB's ability to predict hearing aid use. Method: ANL and APHAB data were collected for 191 listeners with impaired hearing, separated into 3 groups based on hearing aid use: full-time, part-time, or nonuse. Results: Results demonstrated ANLs were not correlated with APHAB scores. Results further demonstrated 2 of the 4 APHAB subscales (Ease of Communication [EC] and Background Noise [BN]) predicted hearing aid success with 60% accuracy, which is 25% poorer than that observed using the ANL alone. When combining the ANL with the EC and BN subscales, accuracy of the prediction increased to 91%. Lastly, 3 of the 4 APHAB subscales (EC, BN, and Reverberation) enhanced the present prediction of hearing aid use for patients with mid-range ANLs. Conclusions: These results indicate that ANLs and APHAB scores provide unique information regarding hearing aid use. These results further indicate that the prediction can be enhanced by administering both the ANL and the EC and BN APHAB subscales. Lastly, some of the ambiguity of the prediction of hearing aid use for listeners with mid-range ANLs may be eliminated. KEY WORDS: Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, acceptable noise level, background noise, hearing aids, prediction of hearing aid success/use CiteULike     Connotea     Del.icio.us     Digg     Facebook     Reddit     Technorati     Twitter     What's this?
doi_str_mv 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/010)
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85663682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A174593593</galeid><ericid>EJ784135</ericid><sourcerecordid>A174593593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-83afb9e676ea95c5ed78ec9b19102027540517ab74cfb0a58870dbba9f2c33fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkm-L1DAQxoso3rn6CRQJvjgU7F3SNG36sh6npywqom8NSTrdZsk2Ncnecd_-Urv-5TKBhMxvhjw8k2VPCT4luCzPCG6KvKScvyww5meY4Ff3smPCGM8bgov76f6LOMoehbDFaZGyepgdEV5QzCtynH3_AlZG48YwmAm9gXgNMKJWa5iiVBbQR2cCoDVcgUVy7FAcALVKebgyMkKHPnvXm8S5Hl2C9GbcoNZ0qdMIvYmPswe9tAGeHM5V9u3txdfzy3z96d3783ada1awmHMqe9VAVVcgG6YZdDUH3SgyC8FFzUrMSC1VXepeYck4r3GnlGz6QlPaA11lJ0vfybsfewhR7EzQYK0cwe2D4KyqaJVUr7IX_4Fbt_dj-psoaIqmoThB-QJtpAVhxt5FL_UmSfLSullYem5JXbKGpp340zv4FB3sjL6z4OSvggGkjUNwdv_TiH_BYgG1dyF46MXkzU76G0GwmKdAzB6L2WMxT4FIU5CKnh807tUOuj8lB9cT8GwBwBv9O33xoeYloSylXy_pwWyGa-NBhAlAD8Pir9gGO3jBiEhBK3oLyTXDCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232329930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationship Between Acceptable Noise Level and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C ; Nabelek, Anna K ; Tampas, Joanna W</creator><creatorcontrib>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C ; Nabelek, Anna K ; Tampas, Joanna W</creatorcontrib><description>Anna K. Nabelek University of Tennessee, Knoxville Joanna W. Tampas University of Tennessee, Knoxville and James H. Quillen VA Medical Center, Mountain Home, TN Contact author: Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Department Speech, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3165, Ruston, LA 71272. E-mail: melinda{at}latech.edu . Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between acceptable noise levels (ANLs) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB; R. M. Cox &amp; G. C. Alexander, 1995). This study further examined the APHAB's ability to predict hearing aid use. Method: ANL and APHAB data were collected for 191 listeners with impaired hearing, separated into 3 groups based on hearing aid use: full-time, part-time, or nonuse. Results: Results demonstrated ANLs were not correlated with APHAB scores. Results further demonstrated 2 of the 4 APHAB subscales (Ease of Communication [EC] and Background Noise [BN]) predicted hearing aid success with 60% accuracy, which is 25% poorer than that observed using the ANL alone. When combining the ANL with the EC and BN subscales, accuracy of the prediction increased to 91%. Lastly, 3 of the 4 APHAB subscales (EC, BN, and Reverberation) enhanced the present prediction of hearing aid use for patients with mid-range ANLs. Conclusions: These results indicate that ANLs and APHAB scores provide unique information regarding hearing aid use. These results further indicate that the prediction can be enhanced by administering both the ANL and the EC and BN APHAB subscales. Lastly, some of the ambiguity of the prediction of hearing aid use for listeners with mid-range ANLs may be eliminated. KEY WORDS: Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, acceptable noise level, background noise, hearing aids, prediction of hearing aid success/use CiteULike     Connotea     Del.icio.us     Digg     Facebook     Reddit     Technorati     Twitter     What's this?</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-4388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/010)</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18230861</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: ASHA</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Acoustics ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Assistive Technology ; Auditory Perception ; Auditory Threshold ; Figurative Language ; Hearing Aids ; Hearing Impairments ; Hearing loss ; Hearing Loss - physiopathology ; Hearing Loss - therapy ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Influence ; Listening Comprehension ; Middle Aged ; Noise ; Outcome Measures ; Patient Compliance ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patients ; Prediction ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Profiles ; Social aspects ; Success</subject><ispartof>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2008-02, Vol.51 (1), p.136-146</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-83afb9e676ea95c5ed78ec9b19102027540517ab74cfb0a58870dbba9f2c33fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-83afb9e676ea95c5ed78ec9b19102027540517ab74cfb0a58870dbba9f2c33fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/232329930/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/232329930?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12851,21378,21382,21394,27924,27925,31269,31270,33611,33612,33877,33878,33911,33912,43733,43880,43896,74093,74269,74285</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ784135$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18230861$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabelek, Anna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tampas, Joanna W</creatorcontrib><title>Relationship Between Acceptable Noise Level and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit</title><title>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</title><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><description>Anna K. Nabelek University of Tennessee, Knoxville Joanna W. Tampas University of Tennessee, Knoxville and James H. Quillen VA Medical Center, Mountain Home, TN Contact author: Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Department Speech, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3165, Ruston, LA 71272. E-mail: melinda{at}latech.edu . Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between acceptable noise levels (ANLs) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB; R. M. Cox &amp; G. C. Alexander, 1995). This study further examined the APHAB's ability to predict hearing aid use. Method: ANL and APHAB data were collected for 191 listeners with impaired hearing, separated into 3 groups based on hearing aid use: full-time, part-time, or nonuse. Results: Results demonstrated ANLs were not correlated with APHAB scores. Results further demonstrated 2 of the 4 APHAB subscales (Ease of Communication [EC] and Background Noise [BN]) predicted hearing aid success with 60% accuracy, which is 25% poorer than that observed using the ANL alone. When combining the ANL with the EC and BN subscales, accuracy of the prediction increased to 91%. Lastly, 3 of the 4 APHAB subscales (EC, BN, and Reverberation) enhanced the present prediction of hearing aid use for patients with mid-range ANLs. Conclusions: These results indicate that ANLs and APHAB scores provide unique information regarding hearing aid use. These results further indicate that the prediction can be enhanced by administering both the ANL and the EC and BN APHAB subscales. Lastly, some of the ambiguity of the prediction of hearing aid use for listeners with mid-range ANLs may be eliminated. KEY WORDS: Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, acceptable noise level, background noise, hearing aids, prediction of hearing aid success/use CiteULike     Connotea     Del.icio.us     Digg     Facebook     Reddit     Technorati     Twitter     What's this?</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Assistive Technology</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Figurative Language</subject><subject>Hearing Aids</subject><subject>Hearing Impairments</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - therapy</subject><subject>Hearing Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>1092-4388</issn><issn>1558-9102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNptkm-L1DAQxoso3rn6CRQJvjgU7F3SNG36sh6npywqom8NSTrdZsk2Ncnecd_-Urv-5TKBhMxvhjw8k2VPCT4luCzPCG6KvKScvyww5meY4Ff3smPCGM8bgov76f6LOMoehbDFaZGyepgdEV5QzCtynH3_AlZG48YwmAm9gXgNMKJWa5iiVBbQR2cCoDVcgUVy7FAcALVKebgyMkKHPnvXm8S5Hl2C9GbcoNZ0qdMIvYmPswe9tAGeHM5V9u3txdfzy3z96d3783ada1awmHMqe9VAVVcgG6YZdDUH3SgyC8FFzUrMSC1VXepeYck4r3GnlGz6QlPaA11lJ0vfybsfewhR7EzQYK0cwe2D4KyqaJVUr7IX_4Fbt_dj-psoaIqmoThB-QJtpAVhxt5FL_UmSfLSullYem5JXbKGpp340zv4FB3sjL6z4OSvggGkjUNwdv_TiH_BYgG1dyF46MXkzU76G0GwmKdAzB6L2WMxT4FIU5CKnh807tUOuj8lB9cT8GwBwBv9O33xoeYloSylXy_pwWyGa-NBhAlAD8Pir9gGO3jBiEhBK3oLyTXDCw</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C</creator><creator>Nabelek, Anna K</creator><creator>Tampas, Joanna W</creator><general>ASHA</general><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)</general><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Relationship Between Acceptable Noise Level and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit</title><author>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C ; Nabelek, Anna K ; Tampas, Joanna W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-83afb9e676ea95c5ed78ec9b19102027540517ab74cfb0a58870dbba9f2c33fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Assistive Technology</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Figurative Language</topic><topic>Hearing Aids</topic><topic>Hearing Impairments</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - therapy</topic><topic>Hearing Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabelek, Anna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tampas, Joanna W</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C</au><au>Nabelek, Anna K</au><au>Tampas, Joanna W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ784135</ericid><atitle>Relationship Between Acceptable Noise Level and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit</atitle><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>136</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>136-146</pages><issn>1092-4388</issn><eissn>1558-9102</eissn><abstract>Anna K. Nabelek University of Tennessee, Knoxville Joanna W. Tampas University of Tennessee, Knoxville and James H. Quillen VA Medical Center, Mountain Home, TN Contact author: Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Department Speech, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3165, Ruston, LA 71272. E-mail: melinda{at}latech.edu . Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between acceptable noise levels (ANLs) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB; R. M. Cox &amp; G. C. Alexander, 1995). This study further examined the APHAB's ability to predict hearing aid use. Method: ANL and APHAB data were collected for 191 listeners with impaired hearing, separated into 3 groups based on hearing aid use: full-time, part-time, or nonuse. Results: Results demonstrated ANLs were not correlated with APHAB scores. Results further demonstrated 2 of the 4 APHAB subscales (Ease of Communication [EC] and Background Noise [BN]) predicted hearing aid success with 60% accuracy, which is 25% poorer than that observed using the ANL alone. When combining the ANL with the EC and BN subscales, accuracy of the prediction increased to 91%. Lastly, 3 of the 4 APHAB subscales (EC, BN, and Reverberation) enhanced the present prediction of hearing aid use for patients with mid-range ANLs. Conclusions: These results indicate that ANLs and APHAB scores provide unique information regarding hearing aid use. These results further indicate that the prediction can be enhanced by administering both the ANL and the EC and BN APHAB subscales. Lastly, some of the ambiguity of the prediction of hearing aid use for listeners with mid-range ANLs may be eliminated. KEY WORDS: Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, acceptable noise level, background noise, hearing aids, prediction of hearing aid success/use CiteULike     Connotea     Del.icio.us     Digg     Facebook     Reddit     Technorati     Twitter     What's this?</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>ASHA</pub><pmid>18230861</pmid><doi>10.1044/1092-4388(2008/010)</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1092-4388
ispartof Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2008-02, Vol.51 (1), p.136-146
issn 1092-4388
1558-9102
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85663682
source EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Linguistics Collection; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Accuracy
Acoustics
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Assistive Technology
Auditory Perception
Auditory Threshold
Figurative Language
Hearing Aids
Hearing Impairments
Hearing loss
Hearing Loss - physiopathology
Hearing Loss - therapy
Hearing Tests
Humans
Influence
Listening Comprehension
Middle Aged
Noise
Outcome Measures
Patient Compliance
Patient Satisfaction
Patients
Prediction
Predictive Value of Tests
Profiles
Social aspects
Success
title Relationship Between Acceptable Noise Level and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A13%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship%20Between%20Acceptable%20Noise%20Level%20and%20the%20Abbreviated%20Profile%20of%20Hearing%20Aid%20Benefit&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20speech,%20language,%20and%20hearing%20research&rft.au=Freyaldenhoven,%20Melinda%20C&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=136-146&rft.issn=1092-4388&rft.eissn=1558-9102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/010)&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA174593593%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-83afb9e676ea95c5ed78ec9b19102027540517ab74cfb0a58870dbba9f2c33fe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232329930&rft_id=info:pmid/18230861&rft_galeid=A174593593&rft_ericid=EJ784135&rfr_iscdi=true