Loading…
Relationship Between Acceptable Noise Level and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit
Anna K. Nabelek University of Tennessee, Knoxville Joanna W. Tampas University of Tennessee, Knoxville and James H. Quillen VA Medical Center, Mountain Home, TN Contact author: Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Department Speech, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3165, Ruston, LA 71272. E-mail: melinda{a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of speech, language, and hearing research language, and hearing research, 2008-02, Vol.51 (1), p.136-146 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-83afb9e676ea95c5ed78ec9b19102027540517ab74cfb0a58870dbba9f2c33fe3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-83afb9e676ea95c5ed78ec9b19102027540517ab74cfb0a58870dbba9f2c33fe3 |
container_end_page | 146 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 136 |
container_title | Journal of speech, language, and hearing research |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C Nabelek, Anna K Tampas, Joanna W |
description | Anna K. Nabelek
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Joanna W. Tampas
University of Tennessee, Knoxville and James H. Quillen VA Medical Center, Mountain Home, TN
Contact author: Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Department Speech, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3165, Ruston, LA 71272. E-mail: melinda{at}latech.edu .
Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between acceptable noise levels (ANLs) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB; R. M. Cox & G. C. Alexander, 1995). This study further examined the APHAB's ability to predict hearing aid use.
Method: ANL and APHAB data were collected for 191 listeners with impaired hearing, separated into 3 groups based on hearing aid use: full-time, part-time, or nonuse.
Results: Results demonstrated ANLs were not correlated with APHAB scores. Results further demonstrated 2 of the 4 APHAB subscales (Ease of Communication [EC] and Background Noise [BN]) predicted hearing aid success with 60% accuracy, which is 25% poorer than that observed using the ANL alone. When combining the ANL with the EC and BN subscales, accuracy of the prediction increased to 91%. Lastly, 3 of the 4 APHAB subscales (EC, BN, and Reverberation) enhanced the present prediction of hearing aid use for patients with mid-range ANLs.
Conclusions: These results indicate that ANLs and APHAB scores provide unique information regarding hearing aid use. These results further indicate that the prediction can be enhanced by administering both the ANL and the EC and BN APHAB subscales. Lastly, some of the ambiguity of the prediction of hearing aid use for listeners with mid-range ANLs may be eliminated.
KEY WORDS: Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, acceptable noise level, background noise, hearing aids, prediction of hearing aid success/use
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this? |
doi_str_mv | 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/010) |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85663682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A174593593</galeid><ericid>EJ784135</ericid><sourcerecordid>A174593593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-83afb9e676ea95c5ed78ec9b19102027540517ab74cfb0a58870dbba9f2c33fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkm-L1DAQxoso3rn6CRQJvjgU7F3SNG36sh6npywqom8NSTrdZsk2Ncnecd_-Urv-5TKBhMxvhjw8k2VPCT4luCzPCG6KvKScvyww5meY4Ff3smPCGM8bgov76f6LOMoehbDFaZGyepgdEV5QzCtynH3_AlZG48YwmAm9gXgNMKJWa5iiVBbQR2cCoDVcgUVy7FAcALVKebgyMkKHPnvXm8S5Hl2C9GbcoNZ0qdMIvYmPswe9tAGeHM5V9u3txdfzy3z96d3783ada1awmHMqe9VAVVcgG6YZdDUH3SgyC8FFzUrMSC1VXepeYck4r3GnlGz6QlPaA11lJ0vfybsfewhR7EzQYK0cwe2D4KyqaJVUr7IX_4Fbt_dj-psoaIqmoThB-QJtpAVhxt5FL_UmSfLSullYem5JXbKGpp340zv4FB3sjL6z4OSvggGkjUNwdv_TiH_BYgG1dyF46MXkzU76G0GwmKdAzB6L2WMxT4FIU5CKnh807tUOuj8lB9cT8GwBwBv9O33xoeYloSylXy_pwWyGa-NBhAlAD8Pir9gGO3jBiEhBK3oLyTXDCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232329930</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationship Between Acceptable Noise Level and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C ; Nabelek, Anna K ; Tampas, Joanna W</creator><creatorcontrib>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C ; Nabelek, Anna K ; Tampas, Joanna W</creatorcontrib><description>Anna K. Nabelek
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Joanna W. Tampas
University of Tennessee, Knoxville and James H. Quillen VA Medical Center, Mountain Home, TN
Contact author: Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Department Speech, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3165, Ruston, LA 71272. E-mail: melinda{at}latech.edu .
Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between acceptable noise levels (ANLs) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB; R. M. Cox & G. C. Alexander, 1995). This study further examined the APHAB's ability to predict hearing aid use.
Method: ANL and APHAB data were collected for 191 listeners with impaired hearing, separated into 3 groups based on hearing aid use: full-time, part-time, or nonuse.
Results: Results demonstrated ANLs were not correlated with APHAB scores. Results further demonstrated 2 of the 4 APHAB subscales (Ease of Communication [EC] and Background Noise [BN]) predicted hearing aid success with 60% accuracy, which is 25% poorer than that observed using the ANL alone. When combining the ANL with the EC and BN subscales, accuracy of the prediction increased to 91%. Lastly, 3 of the 4 APHAB subscales (EC, BN, and Reverberation) enhanced the present prediction of hearing aid use for patients with mid-range ANLs.
Conclusions: These results indicate that ANLs and APHAB scores provide unique information regarding hearing aid use. These results further indicate that the prediction can be enhanced by administering both the ANL and the EC and BN APHAB subscales. Lastly, some of the ambiguity of the prediction of hearing aid use for listeners with mid-range ANLs may be eliminated.
KEY WORDS: Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, acceptable noise level, background noise, hearing aids, prediction of hearing aid success/use
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?</description><identifier>ISSN: 1092-4388</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-9102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/010)</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18230861</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: ASHA</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Acoustics ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Assistive Technology ; Auditory Perception ; Auditory Threshold ; Figurative Language ; Hearing Aids ; Hearing Impairments ; Hearing loss ; Hearing Loss - physiopathology ; Hearing Loss - therapy ; Hearing Tests ; Humans ; Influence ; Listening Comprehension ; Middle Aged ; Noise ; Outcome Measures ; Patient Compliance ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patients ; Prediction ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Profiles ; Social aspects ; Success</subject><ispartof>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2008-02, Vol.51 (1), p.136-146</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-83afb9e676ea95c5ed78ec9b19102027540517ab74cfb0a58870dbba9f2c33fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-83afb9e676ea95c5ed78ec9b19102027540517ab74cfb0a58870dbba9f2c33fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/232329930/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/232329930?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12851,21378,21382,21394,27924,27925,31269,31270,33611,33612,33877,33878,33911,33912,43733,43880,43896,74093,74269,74285</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ784135$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18230861$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabelek, Anna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tampas, Joanna W</creatorcontrib><title>Relationship Between Acceptable Noise Level and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit</title><title>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</title><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><description>Anna K. Nabelek
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Joanna W. Tampas
University of Tennessee, Knoxville and James H. Quillen VA Medical Center, Mountain Home, TN
Contact author: Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Department Speech, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3165, Ruston, LA 71272. E-mail: melinda{at}latech.edu .
Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between acceptable noise levels (ANLs) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB; R. M. Cox & G. C. Alexander, 1995). This study further examined the APHAB's ability to predict hearing aid use.
Method: ANL and APHAB data were collected for 191 listeners with impaired hearing, separated into 3 groups based on hearing aid use: full-time, part-time, or nonuse.
Results: Results demonstrated ANLs were not correlated with APHAB scores. Results further demonstrated 2 of the 4 APHAB subscales (Ease of Communication [EC] and Background Noise [BN]) predicted hearing aid success with 60% accuracy, which is 25% poorer than that observed using the ANL alone. When combining the ANL with the EC and BN subscales, accuracy of the prediction increased to 91%. Lastly, 3 of the 4 APHAB subscales (EC, BN, and Reverberation) enhanced the present prediction of hearing aid use for patients with mid-range ANLs.
Conclusions: These results indicate that ANLs and APHAB scores provide unique information regarding hearing aid use. These results further indicate that the prediction can be enhanced by administering both the ANL and the EC and BN APHAB subscales. Lastly, some of the ambiguity of the prediction of hearing aid use for listeners with mid-range ANLs may be eliminated.
KEY WORDS: Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, acceptable noise level, background noise, hearing aids, prediction of hearing aid success/use
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Assistive Technology</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold</subject><subject>Figurative Language</subject><subject>Hearing Aids</subject><subject>Hearing Impairments</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hearing Loss - therapy</subject><subject>Hearing Tests</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prediction</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>1092-4388</issn><issn>1558-9102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNptkm-L1DAQxoso3rn6CRQJvjgU7F3SNG36sh6npywqom8NSTrdZsk2Ncnecd_-Urv-5TKBhMxvhjw8k2VPCT4luCzPCG6KvKScvyww5meY4Ff3smPCGM8bgov76f6LOMoehbDFaZGyepgdEV5QzCtynH3_AlZG48YwmAm9gXgNMKJWa5iiVBbQR2cCoDVcgUVy7FAcALVKebgyMkKHPnvXm8S5Hl2C9GbcoNZ0qdMIvYmPswe9tAGeHM5V9u3txdfzy3z96d3783ada1awmHMqe9VAVVcgG6YZdDUH3SgyC8FFzUrMSC1VXepeYck4r3GnlGz6QlPaA11lJ0vfybsfewhR7EzQYK0cwe2D4KyqaJVUr7IX_4Fbt_dj-psoaIqmoThB-QJtpAVhxt5FL_UmSfLSullYem5JXbKGpp340zv4FB3sjL6z4OSvggGkjUNwdv_TiH_BYgG1dyF46MXkzU76G0GwmKdAzB6L2WMxT4FIU5CKnh807tUOuj8lB9cT8GwBwBv9O33xoeYloSylXy_pwWyGa-NBhAlAD8Pir9gGO3jBiEhBK3oLyTXDCw</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C</creator><creator>Nabelek, Anna K</creator><creator>Tampas, Joanna W</creator><general>ASHA</general><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)</general><general>American Speech-Language-Hearing Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Relationship Between Acceptable Noise Level and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit</title><author>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C ; Nabelek, Anna K ; Tampas, Joanna W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-83afb9e676ea95c5ed78ec9b19102027540517ab74cfb0a58870dbba9f2c33fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Assistive Technology</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold</topic><topic>Figurative Language</topic><topic>Hearing Aids</topic><topic>Hearing Impairments</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hearing Loss - therapy</topic><topic>Hearing Tests</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prediction</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabelek, Anna K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tampas, Joanna W</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freyaldenhoven, Melinda C</au><au>Nabelek, Anna K</au><au>Tampas, Joanna W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ784135</ericid><atitle>Relationship Between Acceptable Noise Level and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit</atitle><jtitle>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research</jtitle><addtitle>J Speech Lang Hear Res</addtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>136</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>136-146</pages><issn>1092-4388</issn><eissn>1558-9102</eissn><abstract>Anna K. Nabelek
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Joanna W. Tampas
University of Tennessee, Knoxville and James H. Quillen VA Medical Center, Mountain Home, TN
Contact author: Melinda C. Freyaldenhoven, Department Speech, Louisiana Tech University, P.O. Box 3165, Ruston, LA 71272. E-mail: melinda{at}latech.edu .
Purpose: This study investigated the relationship between acceptable noise levels (ANLs) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB; R. M. Cox & G. C. Alexander, 1995). This study further examined the APHAB's ability to predict hearing aid use.
Method: ANL and APHAB data were collected for 191 listeners with impaired hearing, separated into 3 groups based on hearing aid use: full-time, part-time, or nonuse.
Results: Results demonstrated ANLs were not correlated with APHAB scores. Results further demonstrated 2 of the 4 APHAB subscales (Ease of Communication [EC] and Background Noise [BN]) predicted hearing aid success with 60% accuracy, which is 25% poorer than that observed using the ANL alone. When combining the ANL with the EC and BN subscales, accuracy of the prediction increased to 91%. Lastly, 3 of the 4 APHAB subscales (EC, BN, and Reverberation) enhanced the present prediction of hearing aid use for patients with mid-range ANLs.
Conclusions: These results indicate that ANLs and APHAB scores provide unique information regarding hearing aid use. These results further indicate that the prediction can be enhanced by administering both the ANL and the EC and BN APHAB subscales. Lastly, some of the ambiguity of the prediction of hearing aid use for listeners with mid-range ANLs may be eliminated.
KEY WORDS: Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, acceptable noise level, background noise, hearing aids, prediction of hearing aid success/use
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>ASHA</pub><pmid>18230861</pmid><doi>10.1044/1092-4388(2008/010)</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1092-4388 |
ispartof | Journal of speech, language, and hearing research, 2008-02, Vol.51 (1), p.136-146 |
issn | 1092-4388 1558-9102 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85663682 |
source | EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Linguistics Collection; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Accuracy Acoustics Aged Aged, 80 and over Assistive Technology Auditory Perception Auditory Threshold Figurative Language Hearing Aids Hearing Impairments Hearing loss Hearing Loss - physiopathology Hearing Loss - therapy Hearing Tests Humans Influence Listening Comprehension Middle Aged Noise Outcome Measures Patient Compliance Patient Satisfaction Patients Prediction Predictive Value of Tests Profiles Social aspects Success |
title | Relationship Between Acceptable Noise Level and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A13%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship%20Between%20Acceptable%20Noise%20Level%20and%20the%20Abbreviated%20Profile%20of%20Hearing%20Aid%20Benefit&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20speech,%20language,%20and%20hearing%20research&rft.au=Freyaldenhoven,%20Melinda%20C&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=136-146&rft.issn=1092-4388&rft.eissn=1558-9102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/010)&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA174593593%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-83afb9e676ea95c5ed78ec9b19102027540517ab74cfb0a58870dbba9f2c33fe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232329930&rft_id=info:pmid/18230861&rft_galeid=A174593593&rft_ericid=EJ784135&rfr_iscdi=true |