Argument Structure and Event Structure: The Case of Korean Imperfective Constructions

This paper uncovers a systematic correlation between semantics of aspect and syntactic argument structure as manifested in the difference between two imperfective aspect markers -ko iss and -a iss in Korean. Unlike the common assumption that the -ko iss form is a progressive marker, while the -a iss...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of East Asian linguistics 2008-06, Vol.17 (2), p.117-139
Main Author: Lee, EunHee
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adjectivals
Chinese
Comparative Linguistics
Grammatical aspect
Houses
Intransitive verbs
Japanese
Language and Literature
Linguistics
Predicates
Semantics
Social Sciences
Syntactics
Theoretical Linguistics
Transitive verbs
Verbs
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper uncovers a systematic correlation between semantics of aspect and syntactic argument structure as manifested in the difference between two imperfective aspect markers -ko iss and -a iss in Korean. Unlike the common assumption that the -ko iss form is a progressive marker, while the -a iss form is a resultative marker, this paper argues that the difference between the two derives from their different argument structure: -ko iss selects transitive and unergative verbs, which have an external argument, while -a iss selects unaccusative and passive verbs, which only have an internal theme argument. It is argued that the difference in argument structure is determined by semantic event structure depending on agentivity in Korean. The results of the paper have broader implications for the issues of syntax and semantics interface and unaccusativity.
ISSN:0925-8558
1572-8560
DOI:10.1007/s10831-008-9022-z