Loading…

Native English speakers and Arabic pharyngealization contrasts: Perceptual and acoustic data

Arabic contrasts nonpharyngealized (e.g., /t/) and pharyngealized (e.g., /T/, with a secondary pharyngeal articulation) consonants. These contrasts are manifested acoustically by native Arabic speakers primarily via manipulation of F2 onset and steady-state values for adjacent vowels (vowels adjacen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2007-05, Vol.121 (5_Supplement), p.3071-3071
Main Author: Zaba, Aleksandra M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1053-4b5d0d442fd24336f687d8d6fc01bec00db3df4ef254419ff0c6287d485df1063
cites
container_end_page 3071
container_issue 5_Supplement
container_start_page 3071
container_title The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
container_volume 121
creator Zaba, Aleksandra M.
description Arabic contrasts nonpharyngealized (e.g., /t/) and pharyngealized (e.g., /T/, with a secondary pharyngeal articulation) consonants. These contrasts are manifested acoustically by native Arabic speakers primarily via manipulation of F2 onset and steady-state values for adjacent vowels (vowels adjacent to pharyngealized consonants have lower F2 values than those adjacent to nonpharyngealized consonants). Additionally, consonant duration, following vowel onset and steady-state F1 and F3 values, and burst duration have also been reported in the literature as relevant cues. Because vowels adjacent to pharyngealized consonants tend to have lower F2 values, native English listeners may be able to exploit their sensitivity to English front-back vowel contrasts to detect Arabic pharyngealization contrasts. For example, the vowel in /ta:/ may be perceived by English listeners as closer to English /ae/ and the vowel in /Ta:/ may be perceived as closer to English /a/. We report the results of discrimination and vowel identification experiments in native English listeners’ ability to discriminate pharyngealization contrasts. These experiments examine the contributions of several acoustic cues, in particular those relevant to English vowel contrasts. We also report intertalker/dialect differences among Arabic speakers in the manipulation of acoustic cues to pharyngealization contrasts.
doi_str_mv 10.1121/1.4781871
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85666163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85666163</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1053-4b5d0d442fd24336f687d8d6fc01bec00db3df4ef254419ff0c6287d485df1063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL_0FWgoupuXk1dVdKfUBRF7oTQiaPdnQ6MyapoL_eqF1dDnzncO5B6BzIBIDCFUz4VIGawgEagaCkUoLyQzQihEDFZ1Ieo5OU3ooUis1G6PXB5ObT42W3bpu0wWnw5t3HhE3n8DyaurF42Jj41a29aZvvQvcdtn2Xo0k5XeMnH60f8s60fxZj-13KxeRMNqfoKJg2-bP9HaOXm-Xz4q5aPd7eL-arygIRrOK1cMRxToOjnDEZpJo65WSwBGpvCXE1c4H7QAXnMAuBWEkLwpVwAYhkY3TxnzvE_mPnU9bbJlnftqbzpY5WQkoJkhXw8h-0sU8p-qCH2GzLdxqI_t1Pg97vx34Ao7djBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>85666163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Native English speakers and Arabic pharyngealization contrasts: Perceptual and acoustic data</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Zaba, Aleksandra M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zaba, Aleksandra M.</creatorcontrib><description>Arabic contrasts nonpharyngealized (e.g., /t/) and pharyngealized (e.g., /T/, with a secondary pharyngeal articulation) consonants. These contrasts are manifested acoustically by native Arabic speakers primarily via manipulation of F2 onset and steady-state values for adjacent vowels (vowels adjacent to pharyngealized consonants have lower F2 values than those adjacent to nonpharyngealized consonants). Additionally, consonant duration, following vowel onset and steady-state F1 and F3 values, and burst duration have also been reported in the literature as relevant cues. Because vowels adjacent to pharyngealized consonants tend to have lower F2 values, native English listeners may be able to exploit their sensitivity to English front-back vowel contrasts to detect Arabic pharyngealization contrasts. For example, the vowel in /ta:/ may be perceived by English listeners as closer to English /ae/ and the vowel in /Ta:/ may be perceived as closer to English /a/. We report the results of discrimination and vowel identification experiments in native English listeners’ ability to discriminate pharyngealization contrasts. These experiments examine the contributions of several acoustic cues, in particular those relevant to English vowel contrasts. We also report intertalker/dialect differences among Arabic speakers in the manipulation of acoustic cues to pharyngealization contrasts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.4781871</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2007-05, Vol.121 (5_Supplement), p.3071-3071</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1053-4b5d0d442fd24336f687d8d6fc01bec00db3df4ef254419ff0c6287d485df1063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27906,27907,31252</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zaba, Aleksandra M.</creatorcontrib><title>Native English speakers and Arabic pharyngealization contrasts: Perceptual and acoustic data</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><description>Arabic contrasts nonpharyngealized (e.g., /t/) and pharyngealized (e.g., /T/, with a secondary pharyngeal articulation) consonants. These contrasts are manifested acoustically by native Arabic speakers primarily via manipulation of F2 onset and steady-state values for adjacent vowels (vowels adjacent to pharyngealized consonants have lower F2 values than those adjacent to nonpharyngealized consonants). Additionally, consonant duration, following vowel onset and steady-state F1 and F3 values, and burst duration have also been reported in the literature as relevant cues. Because vowels adjacent to pharyngealized consonants tend to have lower F2 values, native English listeners may be able to exploit their sensitivity to English front-back vowel contrasts to detect Arabic pharyngealization contrasts. For example, the vowel in /ta:/ may be perceived by English listeners as closer to English /ae/ and the vowel in /Ta:/ may be perceived as closer to English /a/. We report the results of discrimination and vowel identification experiments in native English listeners’ ability to discriminate pharyngealization contrasts. These experiments examine the contributions of several acoustic cues, in particular those relevant to English vowel contrasts. We also report intertalker/dialect differences among Arabic speakers in the manipulation of acoustic cues to pharyngealization contrasts.</description><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL_0FWgoupuXk1dVdKfUBRF7oTQiaPdnQ6MyapoL_eqF1dDnzncO5B6BzIBIDCFUz4VIGawgEagaCkUoLyQzQihEDFZ1Ieo5OU3ooUis1G6PXB5ObT42W3bpu0wWnw5t3HhE3n8DyaurF42Jj41a29aZvvQvcdtn2Xo0k5XeMnH60f8s60fxZj-13KxeRMNqfoKJg2-bP9HaOXm-Xz4q5aPd7eL-arygIRrOK1cMRxToOjnDEZpJo65WSwBGpvCXE1c4H7QAXnMAuBWEkLwpVwAYhkY3TxnzvE_mPnU9bbJlnftqbzpY5WQkoJkhXw8h-0sU8p-qCH2GzLdxqI_t1Pg97vx34Ao7djBQ</recordid><startdate>20070501</startdate><enddate>20070501</enddate><creator>Zaba, Aleksandra M.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070501</creationdate><title>Native English speakers and Arabic pharyngealization contrasts: Perceptual and acoustic data</title><author>Zaba, Aleksandra M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1053-4b5d0d442fd24336f687d8d6fc01bec00db3df4ef254419ff0c6287d485df1063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zaba, Aleksandra M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zaba, Aleksandra M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Native English speakers and Arabic pharyngealization contrasts: Perceptual and acoustic data</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><date>2007-05-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>5_Supplement</issue><spage>3071</spage><epage>3071</epage><pages>3071-3071</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>Arabic contrasts nonpharyngealized (e.g., /t/) and pharyngealized (e.g., /T/, with a secondary pharyngeal articulation) consonants. These contrasts are manifested acoustically by native Arabic speakers primarily via manipulation of F2 onset and steady-state values for adjacent vowels (vowels adjacent to pharyngealized consonants have lower F2 values than those adjacent to nonpharyngealized consonants). Additionally, consonant duration, following vowel onset and steady-state F1 and F3 values, and burst duration have also been reported in the literature as relevant cues. Because vowels adjacent to pharyngealized consonants tend to have lower F2 values, native English listeners may be able to exploit their sensitivity to English front-back vowel contrasts to detect Arabic pharyngealization contrasts. For example, the vowel in /ta:/ may be perceived by English listeners as closer to English /ae/ and the vowel in /Ta:/ may be perceived as closer to English /a/. We report the results of discrimination and vowel identification experiments in native English listeners’ ability to discriminate pharyngealization contrasts. These experiments examine the contributions of several acoustic cues, in particular those relevant to English vowel contrasts. We also report intertalker/dialect differences among Arabic speakers in the manipulation of acoustic cues to pharyngealization contrasts.</abstract><doi>10.1121/1.4781871</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-4966
ispartof The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2007-05, Vol.121 (5_Supplement), p.3071-3071
issn 0001-4966
1520-8524
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85666163
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list); Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
title Native English speakers and Arabic pharyngealization contrasts: Perceptual and acoustic data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T08%3A52%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Native%20English%20speakers%20and%20Arabic%20pharyngealization%20contrasts:%20Perceptual%20and%20acoustic%20data&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=Zaba,%20Aleksandra%20M.&rft.date=2007-05-01&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=5_Supplement&rft.spage=3071&rft.epage=3071&rft.pages=3071-3071&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.4781871&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85666163%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1053-4b5d0d442fd24336f687d8d6fc01bec00db3df4ef254419ff0c6287d485df1063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=85666163&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true