Loading…

Automatic activation of categorical and abstract analogical relations in analogical reasoning

We examined activation of concepts during analogical reasoning. Subjects made either analogical judgments or categorical judgments about four-word sets. After each four-word set, they named the ink color of a single word in a modified Stroop task. Words that referred to category relations were prime...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Memory & cognition 2006-10, Vol.34 (7), p.1414-1421
Main Authors: GREEN, Adam E, FUGELSANG, Jonathan A, DUNBAR, Kevin N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-7e0c27cb675569d33b16f98d5776169b85e94958dd28aa321c1070d232e3b63b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-7e0c27cb675569d33b16f98d5776169b85e94958dd28aa321c1070d232e3b63b3
container_end_page 1421
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1414
container_title Memory & cognition
container_volume 34
creator GREEN, Adam E
FUGELSANG, Jonathan A
DUNBAR, Kevin N
description We examined activation of concepts during analogical reasoning. Subjects made either analogical judgments or categorical judgments about four-word sets. After each four-word set, they named the ink color of a single word in a modified Stroop task. Words that referred to category relations were primed (as indicated by longer response times on Stroop color naming) subsequent to analogical judgments and categorical judgments. This finding suggests that activation of category concepts plays a fundamental role in analogical thinking. When colored words referred to analogical relations, priming occurred subsequent to analogical judgments, but not to categorical judgments, even though identical four-word stimuli were used for both types of judgments. This finding lends empirical support to the hypothesis that, when people comprehend the analogy between two items, they activate an abstract analogical relation that is distinct from the specific content items that compose the analogy.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/bf03195906
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85666778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1203393691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-7e0c27cb675569d33b16f98d5776169b85e94958dd28aa321c1070d232e3b63b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1LxDAQBuAgiq6rF3-AFEEPQnWSNJPkuIpfsOBFwYuUNE2XSrfRpBX890ZdEb14ymR4GJh5CdmjcMKlUKdVA5xqoQHXyIQKznKhC1wnEwANuQD2sEW2Y3wCACE0bpItKhlyQJyQx9k4-KUZWpsZO7SvqfJ95pvMmsEtfGit6TLT15mp4hASSR_T-cVnP7ju08es7X_3TfR92y92yEZjuuh2V--U3F9e3J1f5_Pbq5vz2Ty3hRRDLh1YJm2FUgjUNecVxUarWkiJFHWlhNOFFqqumTKGM2opSKgZZ45XyCs-JUdfc5-DfxldHMplG63rOtM7P8ZSCUSUUv0LUXFQDGSCB3_gkx9DWjGWjMoCmUJM6PgL2eBjDK4pn0O7NOGtpFB-RFOeXX5Hk_D-auJYLV39Q1dZJHC4AiamKzbB9LaNP04VFAqu-TtUHpUM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217462866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automatic activation of categorical and abstract analogical relations in analogical reasoning</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>GREEN, Adam E ; FUGELSANG, Jonathan A ; DUNBAR, Kevin N</creator><creatorcontrib>GREEN, Adam E ; FUGELSANG, Jonathan A ; DUNBAR, Kevin N</creatorcontrib><description>We examined activation of concepts during analogical reasoning. Subjects made either analogical judgments or categorical judgments about four-word sets. After each four-word set, they named the ink color of a single word in a modified Stroop task. Words that referred to category relations were primed (as indicated by longer response times on Stroop color naming) subsequent to analogical judgments and categorical judgments. This finding suggests that activation of category concepts plays a fundamental role in analogical thinking. When colored words referred to analogical relations, priming occurred subsequent to analogical judgments, but not to categorical judgments, even though identical four-word stimuli were used for both types of judgments. This finding lends empirical support to the hypothesis that, when people comprehend the analogy between two items, they activate an abstract analogical relation that is distinct from the specific content items that compose the analogy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-502X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/bf03195906</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17263066</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MYCGAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Automatism ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Intelligence tests ; Judgment ; Male ; Paradigms ; Problem Solving ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Reasoning. Problem solving ; Roles ; Semantic relations ; Semantics</subject><ispartof>Memory &amp; cognition, 2006-10, Vol.34 (7), p.1414-1421</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media Oct 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-7e0c27cb675569d33b16f98d5776169b85e94958dd28aa321c1070d232e3b63b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-7e0c27cb675569d33b16f98d5776169b85e94958dd28aa321c1070d232e3b63b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31270</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18410439$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17263066$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GREEN, Adam E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUGELSANG, Jonathan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUNBAR, Kevin N</creatorcontrib><title>Automatic activation of categorical and abstract analogical relations in analogical reasoning</title><title>Memory &amp; cognition</title><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><description>We examined activation of concepts during analogical reasoning. Subjects made either analogical judgments or categorical judgments about four-word sets. After each four-word set, they named the ink color of a single word in a modified Stroop task. Words that referred to category relations were primed (as indicated by longer response times on Stroop color naming) subsequent to analogical judgments and categorical judgments. This finding suggests that activation of category concepts plays a fundamental role in analogical thinking. When colored words referred to analogical relations, priming occurred subsequent to analogical judgments, but not to categorical judgments, even though identical four-word stimuli were used for both types of judgments. This finding lends empirical support to the hypothesis that, when people comprehend the analogy between two items, they activate an abstract analogical relation that is distinct from the specific content items that compose the analogy.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Automatism</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Intelligence tests</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Paradigms</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reasoning. Problem solving</subject><subject>Roles</subject><subject>Semantic relations</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><issn>0090-502X</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1LxDAQBuAgiq6rF3-AFEEPQnWSNJPkuIpfsOBFwYuUNE2XSrfRpBX890ZdEb14ymR4GJh5CdmjcMKlUKdVA5xqoQHXyIQKznKhC1wnEwANuQD2sEW2Y3wCACE0bpItKhlyQJyQx9k4-KUZWpsZO7SvqfJ95pvMmsEtfGit6TLT15mp4hASSR_T-cVnP7ju08es7X_3TfR92y92yEZjuuh2V--U3F9e3J1f5_Pbq5vz2Ty3hRRDLh1YJm2FUgjUNecVxUarWkiJFHWlhNOFFqqumTKGM2opSKgZZ45XyCs-JUdfc5-DfxldHMplG63rOtM7P8ZSCUSUUv0LUXFQDGSCB3_gkx9DWjGWjMoCmUJM6PgL2eBjDK4pn0O7NOGtpFB-RFOeXX5Hk_D-auJYLV39Q1dZJHC4AiamKzbB9LaNP04VFAqu-TtUHpUM</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>GREEN, Adam E</creator><creator>FUGELSANG, Jonathan A</creator><creator>DUNBAR, Kevin N</creator><general>Psychonomic Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Automatic activation of categorical and abstract analogical relations in analogical reasoning</title><author>GREEN, Adam E ; FUGELSANG, Jonathan A ; DUNBAR, Kevin N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-7e0c27cb675569d33b16f98d5776169b85e94958dd28aa321c1070d232e3b63b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Automatism</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Intelligence tests</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Paradigms</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reasoning. Problem solving</topic><topic>Roles</topic><topic>Semantic relations</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GREEN, Adam E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUGELSANG, Jonathan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUNBAR, Kevin N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Memory &amp; cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GREEN, Adam E</au><au>FUGELSANG, Jonathan A</au><au>DUNBAR, Kevin N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automatic activation of categorical and abstract analogical relations in analogical reasoning</atitle><jtitle>Memory &amp; cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1414</spage><epage>1421</epage><pages>1414-1421</pages><issn>0090-502X</issn><eissn>1532-5946</eissn><coden>MYCGAO</coden><abstract>We examined activation of concepts during analogical reasoning. Subjects made either analogical judgments or categorical judgments about four-word sets. After each four-word set, they named the ink color of a single word in a modified Stroop task. Words that referred to category relations were primed (as indicated by longer response times on Stroop color naming) subsequent to analogical judgments and categorical judgments. This finding suggests that activation of category concepts plays a fundamental role in analogical thinking. When colored words referred to analogical relations, priming occurred subsequent to analogical judgments, but not to categorical judgments, even though identical four-word stimuli were used for both types of judgments. This finding lends empirical support to the hypothesis that, when people comprehend the analogy between two items, they activate an abstract analogical relation that is distinct from the specific content items that compose the analogy.</abstract><cop>Austin, TX</cop><pub>Psychonomic Society</pub><pmid>17263066</pmid><doi>10.3758/bf03195906</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-502X
ispartof Memory & cognition, 2006-10, Vol.34 (7), p.1414-1421
issn 0090-502X
1532-5946
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85666778
source Springer Nature; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Automatism
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognition. Intelligence
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Hypotheses
Intelligence tests
Judgment
Male
Paradigms
Problem Solving
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reaction Time
Reasoning. Problem solving
Roles
Semantic relations
Semantics
title Automatic activation of categorical and abstract analogical relations in analogical reasoning
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A53%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automatic%20activation%20of%20categorical%20and%20abstract%20analogical%20relations%20in%20analogical%20reasoning&rft.jtitle=Memory%20&%20cognition&rft.au=GREEN,%20Adam%20E&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1414&rft.epage=1421&rft.pages=1414-1421&rft.issn=0090-502X&rft.eissn=1532-5946&rft.coden=MYCGAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/bf03195906&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1203393691%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-7e0c27cb675569d33b16f98d5776169b85e94958dd28aa321c1070d232e3b63b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217462866&rft_id=info:pmid/17263066&rfr_iscdi=true