Loading…
Automatic activation of categorical and abstract analogical relations in analogical reasoning
We examined activation of concepts during analogical reasoning. Subjects made either analogical judgments or categorical judgments about four-word sets. After each four-word set, they named the ink color of a single word in a modified Stroop task. Words that referred to category relations were prime...
Saved in:
Published in: | Memory & cognition 2006-10, Vol.34 (7), p.1414-1421 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-7e0c27cb675569d33b16f98d5776169b85e94958dd28aa321c1070d232e3b63b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-7e0c27cb675569d33b16f98d5776169b85e94958dd28aa321c1070d232e3b63b3 |
container_end_page | 1421 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1414 |
container_title | Memory & cognition |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | GREEN, Adam E FUGELSANG, Jonathan A DUNBAR, Kevin N |
description | We examined activation of concepts during analogical reasoning. Subjects made either analogical judgments or categorical judgments about four-word sets. After each four-word set, they named the ink color of a single word in a modified Stroop task. Words that referred to category relations were primed (as indicated by longer response times on Stroop color naming) subsequent to analogical judgments and categorical judgments. This finding suggests that activation of category concepts plays a fundamental role in analogical thinking. When colored words referred to analogical relations, priming occurred subsequent to analogical judgments, but not to categorical judgments, even though identical four-word stimuli were used for both types of judgments. This finding lends empirical support to the hypothesis that, when people comprehend the analogy between two items, they activate an abstract analogical relation that is distinct from the specific content items that compose the analogy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/bf03195906 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85666778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1203393691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-7e0c27cb675569d33b16f98d5776169b85e94958dd28aa321c1070d232e3b63b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1LxDAQBuAgiq6rF3-AFEEPQnWSNJPkuIpfsOBFwYuUNE2XSrfRpBX890ZdEb14ymR4GJh5CdmjcMKlUKdVA5xqoQHXyIQKznKhC1wnEwANuQD2sEW2Y3wCACE0bpItKhlyQJyQx9k4-KUZWpsZO7SvqfJ95pvMmsEtfGit6TLT15mp4hASSR_T-cVnP7ju08es7X_3TfR92y92yEZjuuh2V--U3F9e3J1f5_Pbq5vz2Ty3hRRDLh1YJm2FUgjUNecVxUarWkiJFHWlhNOFFqqumTKGM2opSKgZZ45XyCs-JUdfc5-DfxldHMplG63rOtM7P8ZSCUSUUv0LUXFQDGSCB3_gkx9DWjGWjMoCmUJM6PgL2eBjDK4pn0O7NOGtpFB-RFOeXX5Hk_D-auJYLV39Q1dZJHC4AiamKzbB9LaNP04VFAqu-TtUHpUM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217462866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automatic activation of categorical and abstract analogical relations in analogical reasoning</title><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>GREEN, Adam E ; FUGELSANG, Jonathan A ; DUNBAR, Kevin N</creator><creatorcontrib>GREEN, Adam E ; FUGELSANG, Jonathan A ; DUNBAR, Kevin N</creatorcontrib><description>We examined activation of concepts during analogical reasoning. Subjects made either analogical judgments or categorical judgments about four-word sets. After each four-word set, they named the ink color of a single word in a modified Stroop task. Words that referred to category relations were primed (as indicated by longer response times on Stroop color naming) subsequent to analogical judgments and categorical judgments. This finding suggests that activation of category concepts plays a fundamental role in analogical thinking. When colored words referred to analogical relations, priming occurred subsequent to analogical judgments, but not to categorical judgments, even though identical four-word stimuli were used for both types of judgments. This finding lends empirical support to the hypothesis that, when people comprehend the analogy between two items, they activate an abstract analogical relation that is distinct from the specific content items that compose the analogy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-502X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/bf03195906</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17263066</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MYCGAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Automatism ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognition. Intelligence ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Intelligence tests ; Judgment ; Male ; Paradigms ; Problem Solving ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Reasoning. Problem solving ; Roles ; Semantic relations ; Semantics</subject><ispartof>Memory & cognition, 2006-10, Vol.34 (7), p.1414-1421</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Oct 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-7e0c27cb675569d33b16f98d5776169b85e94958dd28aa321c1070d232e3b63b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-7e0c27cb675569d33b16f98d5776169b85e94958dd28aa321c1070d232e3b63b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31270</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18410439$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17263066$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GREEN, Adam E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUGELSANG, Jonathan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUNBAR, Kevin N</creatorcontrib><title>Automatic activation of categorical and abstract analogical relations in analogical reasoning</title><title>Memory & cognition</title><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><description>We examined activation of concepts during analogical reasoning. Subjects made either analogical judgments or categorical judgments about four-word sets. After each four-word set, they named the ink color of a single word in a modified Stroop task. Words that referred to category relations were primed (as indicated by longer response times on Stroop color naming) subsequent to analogical judgments and categorical judgments. This finding suggests that activation of category concepts plays a fundamental role in analogical thinking. When colored words referred to analogical relations, priming occurred subsequent to analogical judgments, but not to categorical judgments, even though identical four-word stimuli were used for both types of judgments. This finding lends empirical support to the hypothesis that, when people comprehend the analogy between two items, they activate an abstract analogical relation that is distinct from the specific content items that compose the analogy.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Automatism</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition. Intelligence</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Intelligence tests</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Paradigms</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reasoning. Problem solving</subject><subject>Roles</subject><subject>Semantic relations</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><issn>0090-502X</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1LxDAQBuAgiq6rF3-AFEEPQnWSNJPkuIpfsOBFwYuUNE2XSrfRpBX890ZdEb14ymR4GJh5CdmjcMKlUKdVA5xqoQHXyIQKznKhC1wnEwANuQD2sEW2Y3wCACE0bpItKhlyQJyQx9k4-KUZWpsZO7SvqfJ95pvMmsEtfGit6TLT15mp4hASSR_T-cVnP7ju08es7X_3TfR92y92yEZjuuh2V--U3F9e3J1f5_Pbq5vz2Ty3hRRDLh1YJm2FUgjUNecVxUarWkiJFHWlhNOFFqqumTKGM2opSKgZZ45XyCs-JUdfc5-DfxldHMplG63rOtM7P8ZSCUSUUv0LUXFQDGSCB3_gkx9DWjGWjMoCmUJM6PgL2eBjDK4pn0O7NOGtpFB-RFOeXX5Hk_D-auJYLV39Q1dZJHC4AiamKzbB9LaNP04VFAqu-TtUHpUM</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>GREEN, Adam E</creator><creator>FUGELSANG, Jonathan A</creator><creator>DUNBAR, Kevin N</creator><general>Psychonomic Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Automatic activation of categorical and abstract analogical relations in analogical reasoning</title><author>GREEN, Adam E ; FUGELSANG, Jonathan A ; DUNBAR, Kevin N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-7e0c27cb675569d33b16f98d5776169b85e94958dd28aa321c1070d232e3b63b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Automatism</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition. Intelligence</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Intelligence tests</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Paradigms</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reasoning. Problem solving</topic><topic>Roles</topic><topic>Semantic relations</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GREEN, Adam E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FUGELSANG, Jonathan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DUNBAR, Kevin N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GREEN, Adam E</au><au>FUGELSANG, Jonathan A</au><au>DUNBAR, Kevin N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automatic activation of categorical and abstract analogical relations in analogical reasoning</atitle><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1414</spage><epage>1421</epage><pages>1414-1421</pages><issn>0090-502X</issn><eissn>1532-5946</eissn><coden>MYCGAO</coden><abstract>We examined activation of concepts during analogical reasoning. Subjects made either analogical judgments or categorical judgments about four-word sets. After each four-word set, they named the ink color of a single word in a modified Stroop task. Words that referred to category relations were primed (as indicated by longer response times on Stroop color naming) subsequent to analogical judgments and categorical judgments. This finding suggests that activation of category concepts plays a fundamental role in analogical thinking. When colored words referred to analogical relations, priming occurred subsequent to analogical judgments, but not to categorical judgments, even though identical four-word stimuli were used for both types of judgments. This finding lends empirical support to the hypothesis that, when people comprehend the analogy between two items, they activate an abstract analogical relation that is distinct from the specific content items that compose the analogy.</abstract><cop>Austin, TX</cop><pub>Psychonomic Society</pub><pmid>17263066</pmid><doi>10.3758/bf03195906</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-502X |
ispartof | Memory & cognition, 2006-10, Vol.34 (7), p.1414-1421 |
issn | 0090-502X 1532-5946 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85666778 |
source | Springer Nature; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Automatism Biological and medical sciences Cognition Cognition & reasoning Cognition. Intelligence Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Hypotheses Intelligence tests Judgment Male Paradigms Problem Solving Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time Reasoning. Problem solving Roles Semantic relations Semantics |
title | Automatic activation of categorical and abstract analogical relations in analogical reasoning |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A53%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automatic%20activation%20of%20categorical%20and%20abstract%20analogical%20relations%20in%20analogical%20reasoning&rft.jtitle=Memory%20&%20cognition&rft.au=GREEN,%20Adam%20E&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1414&rft.epage=1421&rft.pages=1414-1421&rft.issn=0090-502X&rft.eissn=1532-5946&rft.coden=MYCGAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/bf03195906&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1203393691%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c475t-7e0c27cb675569d33b16f98d5776169b85e94958dd28aa321c1070d232e3b63b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217462866&rft_id=info:pmid/17263066&rfr_iscdi=true |