Loading…
The time-course of morphological constraints: Evidence from eye-movements during reading
Lexical compounds in English are constrained in that the non-head noun can be an irregular but not a regular plural (e.g. mice eater vs. * rats eater), a contrast that has been argued to derive from a morphological constraint on modifiers inside compounds. In addition, bare nouns are preferred over...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cognition 2007-09, Vol.104 (3), p.476-494 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Lexical compounds in English are constrained in that the non-head noun can be an irregular but not a regular plural (e.g.
mice eater vs. *
rats eater), a contrast that has been argued to derive from a
morphological constraint on modifiers inside compounds. In addition, bare nouns are preferred over plural forms inside compounds (e.g.
mouse eater vs.
mice eater), a contrast that has been ascribed to the
semantics of compounds. Measuring eye-movements during reading, this study examined how morphological and semantic information become available over time during the processing of a compound. We found that the morphological constraint affected both early and late eye-movement measures, whereas the semantic constraint for singular non-heads only affected late measures of processing. These results indicate that morphological information becomes available earlier than semantic information during the processing of compounds. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0010-0277 1873-7838 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.010 |