Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension

In two experiments, we investigated how reading time was affected by the plausibility of the prepositional phrase in subject-verb-noun-phrase-prepositional-phrase sentences, and the status of the prepositional phrase as argument versus adjunct of the verb. Highly plausible prepositional phrases were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Memory & cognition 1998-09, Vol.26 (5), p.965-978
Main Authors: SPEER, S. R, CLIFTON, C. JR
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Biological and medical sciences
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Educational Measurement
Experiments
Eye Movements
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Language
Language Tests
Production and perception of written language
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reading
Semantics
Time Factors
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-882cd8630e0e27ac37b7421d4cf9a02306dab0da7677678aefb60a2643e8bef33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-882cd8630e0e27ac37b7421d4cf9a02306dab0da7677678aefb60a2643e8bef33
container_end_page 978
container_issue 5
container_start_page 965
container_title Memory & cognition
container_volume 26
creator SPEER, S. R
CLIFTON, C. JR
description In two experiments, we investigated how reading time was affected by the plausibility of the prepositional phrase in subject-verb-noun-phrase-prepositional-phrase sentences, and the status of the prepositional phrase as argument versus adjunct of the verb. Highly plausible prepositional phrases were read faster than less plausible ones, and argument prepositional phrases were read faster than adjuncts. These effects appeared both in a self-paced reading experiment and in an experiment that measured eye movements during normal reading. The effects of plausibility were substantially larger and longer lasting than the effects of argument status, but both appeared very early in the reading of the prepositional phrase. The implications of these effects for models of parsing and sentence interpretation are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/BF03201177
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85684423</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>38982978</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-882cd8630e0e27ac37b7421d4cf9a02306dab0da7677678aefb60a2643e8bef33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0ctKxTAQBuAgih4vG_dCUXEhVCf3dOFCxRsIulBwV9J0qpU2PSbtwrc34kFBEGEgMPMxTPgJ2aZwxLU0x2eXwBlQqvUSmVHJWS4LoZbJDKCAXAJ7WiPrMb4CgJSFWiWrhS4U4zAjJ_ednWJbtV07vmfW15kNz1OPfsziGCY3TgGz1mcxddA7zNzQzwO-oI_t4DfJSmO7iFuLd4M8Xl48nF_nt3dXN-ent7kTnI-5MczVRnFAQKat47rSgtFauKawkO5Qta2gtlrpVMZiUymwTAmOpsKG8w1y8LV3Hoa3CeNY9m102HXW4zDF0khlhGD_Qw1AjdSQ4O4v-DpMwadPlIxqIQGESGjvL0SN1qB1UbCkDr-UC0OMAZtyHtrehveSQvmZT_mTT8I7i5VT1WP9TReBpPn-Ym6js10TrHdt_GZMpPuF5B_mFpUW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877077992</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension</title><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>SPEER, S. R ; CLIFTON, C. JR</creator><creatorcontrib>SPEER, S. R ; CLIFTON, C. JR</creatorcontrib><description>In two experiments, we investigated how reading time was affected by the plausibility of the prepositional phrase in subject-verb-noun-phrase-prepositional-phrase sentences, and the status of the prepositional phrase as argument versus adjunct of the verb. Highly plausible prepositional phrases were read faster than less plausible ones, and argument prepositional phrases were read faster than adjuncts. These effects appeared both in a self-paced reading experiment and in an experiment that measured eye movements during normal reading. The effects of plausibility were substantially larger and longer lasting than the effects of argument status, but both appeared very early in the reading of the prepositional phrase. The implications of these effects for models of parsing and sentence interpretation are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-502X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/BF03201177</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9796230</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MYCGAO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Austin, TX: Psychonomic Society</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Educational Measurement ; Experiments ; Eye Movements ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Language ; Language Tests ; Production and perception of written language ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reading ; Semantics ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Memory &amp; cognition, 1998-09, Vol.26 (5), p.965-978</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media Sep 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-882cd8630e0e27ac37b7421d4cf9a02306dab0da7677678aefb60a2643e8bef33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-882cd8630e0e27ac37b7421d4cf9a02306dab0da7677678aefb60a2643e8bef33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31270</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2401845$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9796230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SPEER, S. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLIFTON, C. JR</creatorcontrib><title>Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension</title><title>Memory &amp; cognition</title><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><description>In two experiments, we investigated how reading time was affected by the plausibility of the prepositional phrase in subject-verb-noun-phrase-prepositional-phrase sentences, and the status of the prepositional phrase as argument versus adjunct of the verb. Highly plausible prepositional phrases were read faster than less plausible ones, and argument prepositional phrases were read faster than adjuncts. These effects appeared both in a self-paced reading experiment and in an experiment that measured eye movements during normal reading. The effects of plausibility were substantially larger and longer lasting than the effects of argument status, but both appeared very early in the reading of the prepositional phrase. The implications of these effects for models of parsing and sentence interpretation are discussed.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Eye Movements</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Production and perception of written language</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0090-502X</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0ctKxTAQBuAgih4vG_dCUXEhVCf3dOFCxRsIulBwV9J0qpU2PSbtwrc34kFBEGEgMPMxTPgJ2aZwxLU0x2eXwBlQqvUSmVHJWS4LoZbJDKCAXAJ7WiPrMb4CgJSFWiWrhS4U4zAjJ_ednWJbtV07vmfW15kNz1OPfsziGCY3TgGz1mcxddA7zNzQzwO-oI_t4DfJSmO7iFuLd4M8Xl48nF_nt3dXN-ent7kTnI-5MczVRnFAQKat47rSgtFauKawkO5Qta2gtlrpVMZiUymwTAmOpsKG8w1y8LV3Hoa3CeNY9m102HXW4zDF0khlhGD_Qw1AjdSQ4O4v-DpMwadPlIxqIQGESGjvL0SN1qB1UbCkDr-UC0OMAZtyHtrehveSQvmZT_mTT8I7i5VT1WP9TReBpPn-Ym6js10TrHdt_GZMpPuF5B_mFpUW</recordid><startdate>19980901</startdate><enddate>19980901</enddate><creator>SPEER, S. R</creator><creator>CLIFTON, C. JR</creator><general>Psychonomic Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SDSKB</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980901</creationdate><title>Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension</title><author>SPEER, S. R ; CLIFTON, C. JR</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-882cd8630e0e27ac37b7421d4cf9a02306dab0da7677678aefb60a2643e8bef33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Eye Movements</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Production and perception of written language</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SPEER, S. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CLIFTON, C. JR</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 43</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Memory &amp; cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SPEER, S. R</au><au>CLIFTON, C. JR</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension</atitle><jtitle>Memory &amp; cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><date>1998-09-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>965</spage><epage>978</epage><pages>965-978</pages><issn>0090-502X</issn><eissn>1532-5946</eissn><coden>MYCGAO</coden><abstract>In two experiments, we investigated how reading time was affected by the plausibility of the prepositional phrase in subject-verb-noun-phrase-prepositional-phrase sentences, and the status of the prepositional phrase as argument versus adjunct of the verb. Highly plausible prepositional phrases were read faster than less plausible ones, and argument prepositional phrases were read faster than adjuncts. These effects appeared both in a self-paced reading experiment and in an experiment that measured eye movements during normal reading. The effects of plausibility were substantially larger and longer lasting than the effects of argument status, but both appeared very early in the reading of the prepositional phrase. The implications of these effects for models of parsing and sentence interpretation are discussed.</abstract><cop>Austin, TX</cop><pub>Psychonomic Society</pub><pmid>9796230</pmid><doi>10.3758/BF03201177</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-502X
ispartof Memory & cognition, 1998-09, Vol.26 (5), p.965-978
issn 0090-502X
1532-5946
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85684423
source Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Educational Measurement
Experiments
Eye Movements
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Language
Language Tests
Production and perception of written language
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reading
Semantics
Time Factors
title Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T00%3A58%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plausibility%20and%20argument%20structure%20in%20sentence%20comprehension&rft.jtitle=Memory%20&%20cognition&rft.au=SPEER,%20S.%20R&rft.date=1998-09-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=965&rft.epage=978&rft.pages=965-978&rft.issn=0090-502X&rft.eissn=1532-5946&rft.coden=MYCGAO&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/BF03201177&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E38982978%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-882cd8630e0e27ac37b7421d4cf9a02306dab0da7677678aefb60a2643e8bef33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877077992&rft_id=info:pmid/9796230&rfr_iscdi=true