Loading…
Diversity is More Than Grammatical Diversity: A Response to Terry Crowley's Review Article: Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific
A rejoinder to Terry Crowley's "Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific" (1999), suggests that the agenda of Muhlhausler's Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism in the Pacific Region (1996) was not to offer a politically correct interpretation of language los...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of sociolinguistics 1999-05, Vol.3 (2), p.255-288 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2314-5e74ab4999c2307ae830be47f3f7527d37e823a6770e12ceac84176d8ea0badb3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 288 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 255 |
container_title | Journal of sociolinguistics |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Muhlhausler, Peter |
description | A rejoinder to Terry Crowley's "Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific" (1999), suggests that the agenda of Muhlhausler's Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism in the Pacific Region (1996) was not to offer a politically correct interpretation of language loss in the Pacific, but to look for the truth of the situation. The simple contention of the volume is that the tools employed by most linguists are not suited for this task. Most linguists have sought merely to develop a grammar or lexicon of a language without asking questions about the role of humans in language making. For this reason, an ecological linguistic paradigm is needed. Crowley's contention that the book seeks to deny indigenous languages the right to change is refuted. Rather, the issue in question is the possibility of adaptive change in a context in which social & technological development has greatly reduced cultural & natural diversity. 11 References. D. Ryfe |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1467-9481.00074 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85687361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>61482558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2314-5e74ab4999c2307ae830be47f3f7527d37e823a6770e12ceac84176d8ea0badb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1PwyAYhxujiTo9e-WkpyoUCtTbnDo1czNzxiOh3VtF-zGhc-7kvy6zZvE2LvDC80B4f0FwRPAp8eOMMC7ChElyijEWbCvYa3ckI9t-TTkOOWNkN9h37s0jXMp4L_i-NJ9gnWmWyDh0X1tAk1ddob7VZakbk-kCrZFz1EVjcLO6coCaGk3A2iXq2XpRwPLE-bNPAwvUtd4r4BwNTPUyN85X6N8zFWpeAT3ozOQmOwh2cl04OPybO8HT9dWkdxMORv3bXncQZhElLIxBMJ2yJEl8jYUGSXEKTOQ0F3EkplSAjKjmQmAgUQY6898WfCpB41RPU9oJjtt7Z7b-mINrVGlcBkWhK6jnTsmYS0E52QhywmQUx9KDZy2Y2do5C7maWVNqu1QEq1UiatV_tUpE_SbiDdYaC-P7tQlXd6PHQauFreY7CV9rTdt3xQUVsXoe9tXF42XCxjJWQ_oDGOidHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>61482558</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diversity is More Than Grammatical Diversity: A Response to Terry Crowley's Review Article: Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific</title><source>Wiley</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Muhlhausler, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Muhlhausler, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>A rejoinder to Terry Crowley's "Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific" (1999), suggests that the agenda of Muhlhausler's Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism in the Pacific Region (1996) was not to offer a politically correct interpretation of language loss in the Pacific, but to look for the truth of the situation. The simple contention of the volume is that the tools employed by most linguists are not suited for this task. Most linguists have sought merely to develop a grammar or lexicon of a language without asking questions about the role of humans in language making. For this reason, an ecological linguistic paradigm is needed. Crowley's contention that the book seeks to deny indigenous languages the right to change is refuted. Rather, the issue in question is the possibility of adaptive change in a context in which social & technological development has greatly reduced cultural & natural diversity. 11 References. D. Ryfe</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-6441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-9481.00074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><subject>Language Maintenance ; Language Shift ; Language Varieties ; Linguistics ; Methodological Problems ; Methodology (Philosophical) ; Oceania</subject><ispartof>Journal of sociolinguistics, 1999-05, Vol.3 (2), p.255-288</ispartof><rights>Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1999</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2314-5e74ab4999c2307ae830be47f3f7527d37e823a6770e12ceac84176d8ea0badb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,31269,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muhlhausler, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Diversity is More Than Grammatical Diversity: A Response to Terry Crowley's Review Article: Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific</title><title>Journal of sociolinguistics</title><description>A rejoinder to Terry Crowley's "Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific" (1999), suggests that the agenda of Muhlhausler's Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism in the Pacific Region (1996) was not to offer a politically correct interpretation of language loss in the Pacific, but to look for the truth of the situation. The simple contention of the volume is that the tools employed by most linguists are not suited for this task. Most linguists have sought merely to develop a grammar or lexicon of a language without asking questions about the role of humans in language making. For this reason, an ecological linguistic paradigm is needed. Crowley's contention that the book seeks to deny indigenous languages the right to change is refuted. Rather, the issue in question is the possibility of adaptive change in a context in which social & technological development has greatly reduced cultural & natural diversity. 11 References. D. Ryfe</description><subject>Language Maintenance</subject><subject>Language Shift</subject><subject>Language Varieties</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Methodological Problems</subject><subject>Methodology (Philosophical)</subject><subject>Oceania</subject><issn>1360-6441</issn><issn>1467-9841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1PwyAYhxujiTo9e-WkpyoUCtTbnDo1czNzxiOh3VtF-zGhc-7kvy6zZvE2LvDC80B4f0FwRPAp8eOMMC7ChElyijEWbCvYa3ckI9t-TTkOOWNkN9h37s0jXMp4L_i-NJ9gnWmWyDh0X1tAk1ddob7VZakbk-kCrZFz1EVjcLO6coCaGk3A2iXq2XpRwPLE-bNPAwvUtd4r4BwNTPUyN85X6N8zFWpeAT3ozOQmOwh2cl04OPybO8HT9dWkdxMORv3bXncQZhElLIxBMJ2yJEl8jYUGSXEKTOQ0F3EkplSAjKjmQmAgUQY6898WfCpB41RPU9oJjtt7Z7b-mINrVGlcBkWhK6jnTsmYS0E52QhywmQUx9KDZy2Y2do5C7maWVNqu1QEq1UiatV_tUpE_SbiDdYaC-P7tQlXd6PHQauFreY7CV9rTdt3xQUVsXoe9tXF42XCxjJWQ_oDGOidHg</recordid><startdate>199905</startdate><enddate>199905</enddate><creator>Muhlhausler, Peter</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199905</creationdate><title>Diversity is More Than Grammatical Diversity: A Response to Terry Crowley's Review Article: Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific</title><author>Muhlhausler, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2314-5e74ab4999c2307ae830be47f3f7527d37e823a6770e12ceac84176d8ea0badb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Language Maintenance</topic><topic>Language Shift</topic><topic>Language Varieties</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Methodological Problems</topic><topic>Methodology (Philosophical)</topic><topic>Oceania</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muhlhausler, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of sociolinguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muhlhausler, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diversity is More Than Grammatical Diversity: A Response to Terry Crowley's Review Article: Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sociolinguistics</jtitle><date>1999-05</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>255-288</pages><issn>1360-6441</issn><eissn>1467-9841</eissn><abstract>A rejoinder to Terry Crowley's "Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific" (1999), suggests that the agenda of Muhlhausler's Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism in the Pacific Region (1996) was not to offer a politically correct interpretation of language loss in the Pacific, but to look for the truth of the situation. The simple contention of the volume is that the tools employed by most linguists are not suited for this task. Most linguists have sought merely to develop a grammar or lexicon of a language without asking questions about the role of humans in language making. For this reason, an ecological linguistic paradigm is needed. Crowley's contention that the book seeks to deny indigenous languages the right to change is refuted. Rather, the issue in question is the possibility of adaptive change in a context in which social & technological development has greatly reduced cultural & natural diversity. 11 References. D. Ryfe</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-9481.00074</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1360-6441 |
ispartof | Journal of sociolinguistics, 1999-05, Vol.3 (2), p.255-288 |
issn | 1360-6441 1467-9841 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85687361 |
source | Wiley; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Language Maintenance Language Shift Language Varieties Linguistics Methodological Problems Methodology (Philosophical) Oceania |
title | Diversity is More Than Grammatical Diversity: A Response to Terry Crowley's Review Article: Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A07%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diversity%20is%20More%20Than%20Grammatical%20Diversity:%20A%20Response%20to%20Terry%20Crowley's%20Review%20Article:%20Linguistic%20Diversity%20in%20the%20Pacific&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sociolinguistics&rft.au=Muhlhausler,%20Peter&rft.date=1999-05&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=255-288&rft.issn=1360-6441&rft.eissn=1467-9841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-9481.00074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61482558%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2314-5e74ab4999c2307ae830be47f3f7527d37e823a6770e12ceac84176d8ea0badb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=61482558&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |