Loading…

Diversity is More Than Grammatical Diversity: A Response to Terry Crowley's Review Article: Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific

A rejoinder to Terry Crowley's "Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific" (1999), suggests that the agenda of Muhlhausler's Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism in the Pacific Region (1996) was not to offer a politically correct interpretation of language los...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of sociolinguistics 1999-05, Vol.3 (2), p.255-288
Main Author: Muhlhausler, Peter
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2314-5e74ab4999c2307ae830be47f3f7527d37e823a6770e12ceac84176d8ea0badb3
cites
container_end_page 288
container_issue 2
container_start_page 255
container_title Journal of sociolinguistics
container_volume 3
creator Muhlhausler, Peter
description A rejoinder to Terry Crowley's "Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific" (1999), suggests that the agenda of Muhlhausler's Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism in the Pacific Region (1996) was not to offer a politically correct interpretation of language loss in the Pacific, but to look for the truth of the situation. The simple contention of the volume is that the tools employed by most linguists are not suited for this task. Most linguists have sought merely to develop a grammar or lexicon of a language without asking questions about the role of humans in language making. For this reason, an ecological linguistic paradigm is needed. Crowley's contention that the book seeks to deny indigenous languages the right to change is refuted. Rather, the issue in question is the possibility of adaptive change in a context in which social & technological development has greatly reduced cultural & natural diversity. 11 References. D. Ryfe
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-9481.00074
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85687361</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>61482558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2314-5e74ab4999c2307ae830be47f3f7527d37e823a6770e12ceac84176d8ea0badb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1PwyAYhxujiTo9e-WkpyoUCtTbnDo1czNzxiOh3VtF-zGhc-7kvy6zZvE2LvDC80B4f0FwRPAp8eOMMC7ChElyijEWbCvYa3ckI9t-TTkOOWNkN9h37s0jXMp4L_i-NJ9gnWmWyDh0X1tAk1ddob7VZakbk-kCrZFz1EVjcLO6coCaGk3A2iXq2XpRwPLE-bNPAwvUtd4r4BwNTPUyN85X6N8zFWpeAT3ozOQmOwh2cl04OPybO8HT9dWkdxMORv3bXncQZhElLIxBMJ2yJEl8jYUGSXEKTOQ0F3EkplSAjKjmQmAgUQY6898WfCpB41RPU9oJjtt7Z7b-mINrVGlcBkWhK6jnTsmYS0E52QhywmQUx9KDZy2Y2do5C7maWVNqu1QEq1UiatV_tUpE_SbiDdYaC-P7tQlXd6PHQauFreY7CV9rTdt3xQUVsXoe9tXF42XCxjJWQ_oDGOidHg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>61482558</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diversity is More Than Grammatical Diversity: A Response to Terry Crowley's Review Article: Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific</title><source>Wiley</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Muhlhausler, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Muhlhausler, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>A rejoinder to Terry Crowley's "Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific" (1999), suggests that the agenda of Muhlhausler's Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism in the Pacific Region (1996) was not to offer a politically correct interpretation of language loss in the Pacific, but to look for the truth of the situation. The simple contention of the volume is that the tools employed by most linguists are not suited for this task. Most linguists have sought merely to develop a grammar or lexicon of a language without asking questions about the role of humans in language making. For this reason, an ecological linguistic paradigm is needed. Crowley's contention that the book seeks to deny indigenous languages the right to change is refuted. Rather, the issue in question is the possibility of adaptive change in a context in which social &amp; technological development has greatly reduced cultural &amp; natural diversity. 11 References. D. Ryfe</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-6441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-9481.00074</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><subject>Language Maintenance ; Language Shift ; Language Varieties ; Linguistics ; Methodological Problems ; Methodology (Philosophical) ; Oceania</subject><ispartof>Journal of sociolinguistics, 1999-05, Vol.3 (2), p.255-288</ispartof><rights>Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1999</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2314-5e74ab4999c2307ae830be47f3f7527d37e823a6770e12ceac84176d8ea0badb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,31269,33774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muhlhausler, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Diversity is More Than Grammatical Diversity: A Response to Terry Crowley's Review Article: Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific</title><title>Journal of sociolinguistics</title><description>A rejoinder to Terry Crowley's "Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific" (1999), suggests that the agenda of Muhlhausler's Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism in the Pacific Region (1996) was not to offer a politically correct interpretation of language loss in the Pacific, but to look for the truth of the situation. The simple contention of the volume is that the tools employed by most linguists are not suited for this task. Most linguists have sought merely to develop a grammar or lexicon of a language without asking questions about the role of humans in language making. For this reason, an ecological linguistic paradigm is needed. Crowley's contention that the book seeks to deny indigenous languages the right to change is refuted. Rather, the issue in question is the possibility of adaptive change in a context in which social &amp; technological development has greatly reduced cultural &amp; natural diversity. 11 References. D. Ryfe</description><subject>Language Maintenance</subject><subject>Language Shift</subject><subject>Language Varieties</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Methodological Problems</subject><subject>Methodology (Philosophical)</subject><subject>Oceania</subject><issn>1360-6441</issn><issn>1467-9841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1PwyAYhxujiTo9e-WkpyoUCtTbnDo1czNzxiOh3VtF-zGhc-7kvy6zZvE2LvDC80B4f0FwRPAp8eOMMC7ChElyijEWbCvYa3ckI9t-TTkOOWNkN9h37s0jXMp4L_i-NJ9gnWmWyDh0X1tAk1ddob7VZakbk-kCrZFz1EVjcLO6coCaGk3A2iXq2XpRwPLE-bNPAwvUtd4r4BwNTPUyN85X6N8zFWpeAT3ozOQmOwh2cl04OPybO8HT9dWkdxMORv3bXncQZhElLIxBMJ2yJEl8jYUGSXEKTOQ0F3EkplSAjKjmQmAgUQY6898WfCpB41RPU9oJjtt7Z7b-mINrVGlcBkWhK6jnTsmYS0E52QhywmQUx9KDZy2Y2do5C7maWVNqu1QEq1UiatV_tUpE_SbiDdYaC-P7tQlXd6PHQauFreY7CV9rTdt3xQUVsXoe9tXF42XCxjJWQ_oDGOidHg</recordid><startdate>199905</startdate><enddate>199905</enddate><creator>Muhlhausler, Peter</creator><general>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199905</creationdate><title>Diversity is More Than Grammatical Diversity: A Response to Terry Crowley's Review Article: Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific</title><author>Muhlhausler, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2314-5e74ab4999c2307ae830be47f3f7527d37e823a6770e12ceac84176d8ea0badb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Language Maintenance</topic><topic>Language Shift</topic><topic>Language Varieties</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Methodological Problems</topic><topic>Methodology (Philosophical)</topic><topic>Oceania</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muhlhausler, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Journal of sociolinguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muhlhausler, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diversity is More Than Grammatical Diversity: A Response to Terry Crowley's Review Article: Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific</atitle><jtitle>Journal of sociolinguistics</jtitle><date>1999-05</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>255</spage><epage>288</epage><pages>255-288</pages><issn>1360-6441</issn><eissn>1467-9841</eissn><abstract>A rejoinder to Terry Crowley's "Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific" (1999), suggests that the agenda of Muhlhausler's Linguistic Ecology: Language Change and Linguistic Imperialism in the Pacific Region (1996) was not to offer a politically correct interpretation of language loss in the Pacific, but to look for the truth of the situation. The simple contention of the volume is that the tools employed by most linguists are not suited for this task. Most linguists have sought merely to develop a grammar or lexicon of a language without asking questions about the role of humans in language making. For this reason, an ecological linguistic paradigm is needed. Crowley's contention that the book seeks to deny indigenous languages the right to change is refuted. Rather, the issue in question is the possibility of adaptive change in a context in which social &amp; technological development has greatly reduced cultural &amp; natural diversity. 11 References. D. Ryfe</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-9481.00074</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1360-6441
ispartof Journal of sociolinguistics, 1999-05, Vol.3 (2), p.255-288
issn 1360-6441
1467-9841
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85687361
source Wiley; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Sociological Abstracts
subjects Language Maintenance
Language Shift
Language Varieties
Linguistics
Methodological Problems
Methodology (Philosophical)
Oceania
title Diversity is More Than Grammatical Diversity: A Response to Terry Crowley's Review Article: Linguistic Diversity in the Pacific
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A07%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diversity%20is%20More%20Than%20Grammatical%20Diversity:%20A%20Response%20to%20Terry%20Crowley's%20Review%20Article:%20Linguistic%20Diversity%20in%20the%20Pacific&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20sociolinguistics&rft.au=Muhlhausler,%20Peter&rft.date=1999-05&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=255&rft.epage=288&rft.pages=255-288&rft.issn=1360-6441&rft.eissn=1467-9841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-9481.00074&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E61482558%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2314-5e74ab4999c2307ae830be47f3f7527d37e823a6770e12ceac84176d8ea0badb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=61482558&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true