Loading…
Differences in the cognitive demands of word order, plural, and subject-verb agreement constructions
The syntactic devices of subject-verb-object word order, regular plurals, and subject-verb agreement differ in age of acquisition and susceptibility to error within language-disordered populations. In the present article, the performance of adults on a grammaticality judgment task is used to explore...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychonomic bulletin & review 2008-10, Vol.15 (5), p.980-984 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-681f8f7c393d7d01288bb26a598f771294011e6e0f7efa347b8318a80b83ba1e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-681f8f7c393d7d01288bb26a598f771294011e6e0f7efa347b8318a80b83ba1e3 |
container_end_page | 984 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 980 |
container_title | Psychonomic bulletin & review |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Mcdonald, Janet L. |
description | The syntactic devices of subject-verb-object word order, regular plurals, and subject-verb agreement differ in age of acquisition and susceptibility to error within language-disordered populations. In the present article, the performance of adults on a grammaticality judgment task is used to explore whether such differences are related to working memory (both in terms of an externally imposed load and individual differences in capacity) and phonological ability. The results show that word order, the earliest acquired and most resilient device, is not affected by load, memory span, or phonological ability. Plurals are affected marginally by load and significantly by phonological ability. Agreement, the last acquired and least resilient device, is affected by load, memory span, and phonological ability. Thus, consistent with a processing-based explanation, later acquired and less resilient devices have higher working memory and phonological demands. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/PBR.15.5.980 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85705155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85705155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-681f8f7c393d7d01288bb26a598f771294011e6e0f7efa347b8318a80b83ba1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd9r2zAQx8VYWdJub3suYtA-xZl-WLb02GZbWwh0jPZZyPIpc7DlVLIz-t9XIWGBUujDcYfuw_dO90XoKyVzXgr5_ff1nzkVczFXknxAUyo4zQRn5GOqSaEyxWU-QacxrgkholDFJzShUrFCKTZF9Y_GOQjgLUTceDz8BWz7lW-GZgu4hs74OuLe4X99qHEKCDO8acdg2hlOPRzHag12yLYQKmxWAaADPyQNH4cw2qFJxWd04kwb4cshn6HHXz8fFrfZ8v7mbnG1zGwu-JAVkjrpSssVr8uaUCZlVbHCCJVeS8pUTiiFAogrwRmel5XkVBpJUq4MBX6GLve6m9A_jRAH3TXRQtsaD_0YtRQlEVSId8F0pZJRwRL47RW47sfg0yc0I7niLFd5gmZ7yIY-xgBOb0LTmfCsKdE7j3TySFOhhU4eJfz8oDlWHdRH-GBKAi4OgInWtC4Yb5v4n2NEMi7Jbm6252Jq-RWE43JvDn4BYVGniA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204932494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in the cognitive demands of word order, plural, and subject-verb agreement constructions</title><source>Springer Link</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Mcdonald, Janet L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mcdonald, Janet L.</creatorcontrib><description>The syntactic devices of subject-verb-object word order, regular plurals, and subject-verb agreement differ in age of acquisition and susceptibility to error within language-disordered populations. In the present article, the performance of adults on a grammaticality judgment task is used to explore whether such differences are related to working memory (both in terms of an externally imposed load and individual differences in capacity) and phonological ability. The results show that word order, the earliest acquired and most resilient device, is not affected by load, memory span, or phonological ability. Plurals are affected marginally by load and significantly by phonological ability. Agreement, the last acquired and least resilient device, is affected by load, memory span, and phonological ability. Thus, consistent with a processing-based explanation, later acquired and less resilient devices have higher working memory and phonological demands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.980</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18926992</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBUREN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brief Reports ; Children & youth ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive Psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Language ; Linguistics - statistics & numerical data ; Memory ; Miscellaneous ; Phonetics ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Studies ; Verbal Behavior ; Vocabulary ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2008-10, Vol.15 (5), p.980-984</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media Oct 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-681f8f7c393d7d01288bb26a598f771294011e6e0f7efa347b8318a80b83ba1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-681f8f7c393d7d01288bb26a598f771294011e6e0f7efa347b8318a80b83ba1e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,31268</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20823804$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18926992$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mcdonald, Janet L.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in the cognitive demands of word order, plural, and subject-verb agreement constructions</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin & review</title><addtitle>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review</addtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>The syntactic devices of subject-verb-object word order, regular plurals, and subject-verb agreement differ in age of acquisition and susceptibility to error within language-disordered populations. In the present article, the performance of adults on a grammaticality judgment task is used to explore whether such differences are related to working memory (both in terms of an externally imposed load and individual differences in capacity) and phonological ability. The results show that word order, the earliest acquired and most resilient device, is not affected by load, memory span, or phonological ability. Plurals are affected marginally by load and significantly by phonological ability. Agreement, the last acquired and least resilient device, is affected by load, memory span, and phonological ability. Thus, consistent with a processing-based explanation, later acquired and less resilient devices have higher working memory and phonological demands.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brief Reports</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd9r2zAQx8VYWdJub3suYtA-xZl-WLb02GZbWwh0jPZZyPIpc7DlVLIz-t9XIWGBUujDcYfuw_dO90XoKyVzXgr5_ff1nzkVczFXknxAUyo4zQRn5GOqSaEyxWU-QacxrgkholDFJzShUrFCKTZF9Y_GOQjgLUTceDz8BWz7lW-GZgu4hs74OuLe4X99qHEKCDO8acdg2hlOPRzHag12yLYQKmxWAaADPyQNH4cw2qFJxWd04kwb4cshn6HHXz8fFrfZ8v7mbnG1zGwu-JAVkjrpSssVr8uaUCZlVbHCCJVeS8pUTiiFAogrwRmel5XkVBpJUq4MBX6GLve6m9A_jRAH3TXRQtsaD_0YtRQlEVSId8F0pZJRwRL47RW47sfg0yc0I7niLFd5gmZ7yIY-xgBOb0LTmfCsKdE7j3TySFOhhU4eJfz8oDlWHdRH-GBKAi4OgInWtC4Yb5v4n2NEMi7Jbm6252Jq-RWE43JvDn4BYVGniA</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Mcdonald, Janet L.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Psychonomic Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Differences in the cognitive demands of word order, plural, and subject-verb agreement constructions</title><author>Mcdonald, Janet L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-681f8f7c393d7d01288bb26a598f771294011e6e0f7efa347b8318a80b83ba1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brief Reports</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mcdonald, Janet L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mcdonald, Janet L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in the cognitive demands of word order, plural, and subject-verb agreement constructions</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin & review</jtitle><stitle>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review</stitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>980</spage><epage>984</epage><pages>980-984</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><coden>PBUREN</coden><abstract>The syntactic devices of subject-verb-object word order, regular plurals, and subject-verb agreement differ in age of acquisition and susceptibility to error within language-disordered populations. In the present article, the performance of adults on a grammaticality judgment task is used to explore whether such differences are related to working memory (both in terms of an externally imposed load and individual differences in capacity) and phonological ability. The results show that word order, the earliest acquired and most resilient device, is not affected by load, memory span, or phonological ability. Plurals are affected marginally by load and significantly by phonological ability. Agreement, the last acquired and least resilient device, is affected by load, memory span, and phonological ability. Thus, consistent with a processing-based explanation, later acquired and less resilient devices have higher working memory and phonological demands.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>18926992</pmid><doi>10.3758/PBR.15.5.980</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1069-9384 |
ispartof | Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2008-10, Vol.15 (5), p.980-984 |
issn | 1069-9384 1531-5320 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85705155 |
source | Springer Link; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Behavioral Science and Psychology Biological and medical sciences Brief Reports Children & youth Cognition Cognition & reasoning Cognitive Psychology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Language Linguistics - statistics & numerical data Memory Miscellaneous Phonetics Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Studies Verbal Behavior Vocabulary Young Adult |
title | Differences in the cognitive demands of word order, plural, and subject-verb agreement constructions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A27%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20the%20cognitive%20demands%20of%20word%20order,%20plural,%20and%20subject-verb%20agreement%20constructions&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=Mcdonald,%20Janet%20L.&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=980&rft.epage=984&rft.pages=980-984&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft.coden=PBUREN&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/PBR.15.5.980&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85705155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-681f8f7c393d7d01288bb26a598f771294011e6e0f7efa347b8318a80b83ba1e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204932494&rft_id=info:pmid/18926992&rfr_iscdi=true |