Loading…

Differences in the cognitive demands of word order, plural, and subject-verb agreement constructions

The syntactic devices of subject-verb-object word order, regular plurals, and subject-verb agreement differ in age of acquisition and susceptibility to error within language-disordered populations. In the present article, the performance of adults on a grammaticality judgment task is used to explore...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychonomic bulletin & review 2008-10, Vol.15 (5), p.980-984
Main Author: Mcdonald, Janet L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-681f8f7c393d7d01288bb26a598f771294011e6e0f7efa347b8318a80b83ba1e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-681f8f7c393d7d01288bb26a598f771294011e6e0f7efa347b8318a80b83ba1e3
container_end_page 984
container_issue 5
container_start_page 980
container_title Psychonomic bulletin & review
container_volume 15
creator Mcdonald, Janet L.
description The syntactic devices of subject-verb-object word order, regular plurals, and subject-verb agreement differ in age of acquisition and susceptibility to error within language-disordered populations. In the present article, the performance of adults on a grammaticality judgment task is used to explore whether such differences are related to working memory (both in terms of an externally imposed load and individual differences in capacity) and phonological ability. The results show that word order, the earliest acquired and most resilient device, is not affected by load, memory span, or phonological ability. Plurals are affected marginally by load and significantly by phonological ability. Agreement, the last acquired and least resilient device, is affected by load, memory span, and phonological ability. Thus, consistent with a processing-based explanation, later acquired and less resilient devices have higher working memory and phonological demands.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/PBR.15.5.980
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85705155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85705155</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-681f8f7c393d7d01288bb26a598f771294011e6e0f7efa347b8318a80b83ba1e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd9r2zAQx8VYWdJub3suYtA-xZl-WLb02GZbWwh0jPZZyPIpc7DlVLIz-t9XIWGBUujDcYfuw_dO90XoKyVzXgr5_ff1nzkVczFXknxAUyo4zQRn5GOqSaEyxWU-QacxrgkholDFJzShUrFCKTZF9Y_GOQjgLUTceDz8BWz7lW-GZgu4hs74OuLe4X99qHEKCDO8acdg2hlOPRzHag12yLYQKmxWAaADPyQNH4cw2qFJxWd04kwb4cshn6HHXz8fFrfZ8v7mbnG1zGwu-JAVkjrpSssVr8uaUCZlVbHCCJVeS8pUTiiFAogrwRmel5XkVBpJUq4MBX6GLve6m9A_jRAH3TXRQtsaD_0YtRQlEVSId8F0pZJRwRL47RW47sfg0yc0I7niLFd5gmZ7yIY-xgBOb0LTmfCsKdE7j3TySFOhhU4eJfz8oDlWHdRH-GBKAi4OgInWtC4Yb5v4n2NEMi7Jbm6252Jq-RWE43JvDn4BYVGniA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>204932494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in the cognitive demands of word order, plural, and subject-verb agreement constructions</title><source>Springer Link</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Mcdonald, Janet L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mcdonald, Janet L.</creatorcontrib><description>The syntactic devices of subject-verb-object word order, regular plurals, and subject-verb agreement differ in age of acquisition and susceptibility to error within language-disordered populations. In the present article, the performance of adults on a grammaticality judgment task is used to explore whether such differences are related to working memory (both in terms of an externally imposed load and individual differences in capacity) and phonological ability. The results show that word order, the earliest acquired and most resilient device, is not affected by load, memory span, or phonological ability. Plurals are affected marginally by load and significantly by phonological ability. Agreement, the last acquired and least resilient device, is affected by load, memory span, and phonological ability. Thus, consistent with a processing-based explanation, later acquired and less resilient devices have higher working memory and phonological demands.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.980</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18926992</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PBUREN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brief Reports ; Children &amp; youth ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive Psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Language ; Linguistics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Memory ; Miscellaneous ; Phonetics ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Studies ; Verbal Behavior ; Vocabulary ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review, 2008-10, Vol.15 (5), p.980-984</ispartof><rights>Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science &amp; Business Media Oct 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-681f8f7c393d7d01288bb26a598f771294011e6e0f7efa347b8318a80b83ba1e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-681f8f7c393d7d01288bb26a598f771294011e6e0f7efa347b8318a80b83ba1e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,31268</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20823804$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18926992$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mcdonald, Janet L.</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in the cognitive demands of word order, plural, and subject-verb agreement constructions</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</title><addtitle>Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review</addtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>The syntactic devices of subject-verb-object word order, regular plurals, and subject-verb agreement differ in age of acquisition and susceptibility to error within language-disordered populations. In the present article, the performance of adults on a grammaticality judgment task is used to explore whether such differences are related to working memory (both in terms of an externally imposed load and individual differences in capacity) and phonological ability. The results show that word order, the earliest acquired and most resilient device, is not affected by load, memory span, or phonological ability. Plurals are affected marginally by load and significantly by phonological ability. Agreement, the last acquired and least resilient device, is affected by load, memory span, and phonological ability. Thus, consistent with a processing-based explanation, later acquired and less resilient devices have higher working memory and phonological demands.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brief Reports</subject><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Verbal Behavior</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd9r2zAQx8VYWdJub3suYtA-xZl-WLb02GZbWwh0jPZZyPIpc7DlVLIz-t9XIWGBUujDcYfuw_dO90XoKyVzXgr5_ff1nzkVczFXknxAUyo4zQRn5GOqSaEyxWU-QacxrgkholDFJzShUrFCKTZF9Y_GOQjgLUTceDz8BWz7lW-GZgu4hs74OuLe4X99qHEKCDO8acdg2hlOPRzHag12yLYQKmxWAaADPyQNH4cw2qFJxWd04kwb4cshn6HHXz8fFrfZ8v7mbnG1zGwu-JAVkjrpSssVr8uaUCZlVbHCCJVeS8pUTiiFAogrwRmel5XkVBpJUq4MBX6GLve6m9A_jRAH3TXRQtsaD_0YtRQlEVSId8F0pZJRwRL47RW47sfg0yc0I7niLFd5gmZ7yIY-xgBOb0LTmfCsKdE7j3TySFOhhU4eJfz8oDlWHdRH-GBKAi4OgInWtC4Yb5v4n2NEMi7Jbm6252Jq-RWE43JvDn4BYVGniA</recordid><startdate>20081001</startdate><enddate>20081001</enddate><creator>Mcdonald, Janet L.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Psychonomic Society</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081001</creationdate><title>Differences in the cognitive demands of word order, plural, and subject-verb agreement constructions</title><author>Mcdonald, Janet L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-681f8f7c393d7d01288bb26a598f771294011e6e0f7efa347b8318a80b83ba1e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brief Reports</topic><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Verbal Behavior</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mcdonald, Janet L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mcdonald, Janet L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in the cognitive demands of word order, plural, and subject-verb agreement constructions</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle><stitle>Psychonomic Bulletin &amp; Review</stitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2008-10-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>980</spage><epage>984</epage><pages>980-984</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><coden>PBUREN</coden><abstract>The syntactic devices of subject-verb-object word order, regular plurals, and subject-verb agreement differ in age of acquisition and susceptibility to error within language-disordered populations. In the present article, the performance of adults on a grammaticality judgment task is used to explore whether such differences are related to working memory (both in terms of an externally imposed load and individual differences in capacity) and phonological ability. The results show that word order, the earliest acquired and most resilient device, is not affected by load, memory span, or phonological ability. Plurals are affected marginally by load and significantly by phonological ability. Agreement, the last acquired and least resilient device, is affected by load, memory span, and phonological ability. Thus, consistent with a processing-based explanation, later acquired and less resilient devices have higher working memory and phonological demands.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>18926992</pmid><doi>10.3758/PBR.15.5.980</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-9384
ispartof Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2008-10, Vol.15 (5), p.980-984
issn 1069-9384
1531-5320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85705155
source Springer Link; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Biological and medical sciences
Brief Reports
Children & youth
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive Psychology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Language
Linguistics - statistics & numerical data
Memory
Miscellaneous
Phonetics
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Studies
Verbal Behavior
Vocabulary
Young Adult
title Differences in the cognitive demands of word order, plural, and subject-verb agreement constructions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A27%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20the%20cognitive%20demands%20of%20word%20order,%20plural,%20and%20subject-verb%20agreement%20constructions&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=Mcdonald,%20Janet%20L.&rft.date=2008-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=980&rft.epage=984&rft.pages=980-984&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft.coden=PBUREN&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/PBR.15.5.980&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85705155%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-681f8f7c393d7d01288bb26a598f771294011e6e0f7efa347b8318a80b83ba1e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=204932494&rft_id=info:pmid/18926992&rfr_iscdi=true