Loading…
Self-masking: Listening during vocalization. Normal hearing
What underlying mechanisms are involved in the ability to talk and listen simultaneously and what role does self-masking play under conditions of hearing impairment? The purpose of the present series of studies is to describe a technique for assessment of masked thresholds during vocalization, to de...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2009-06, Vol.125 (6), p.3871-3881 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1858c14bba1ed8ba9ee2c948942428b965dc21b6a7da56af50ebfe1d335a13f53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1858c14bba1ed8ba9ee2c948942428b965dc21b6a7da56af50ebfe1d335a13f53 |
container_end_page | 3881 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 3871 |
container_title | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America |
container_volume | 125 |
creator | BORG, Erik BERGKVIST, Christina GUSTAFSSON, Dan |
description | What underlying mechanisms are involved in the ability to talk and listen simultaneously and what role does self-masking play under conditions of hearing impairment? The purpose of the present series of studies is to describe a technique for assessment of masked thresholds during vocalization, to describe normative data for males and females, and to focus on hearing impairment. The masking effect of vocalized [a:] on narrow-band noise pulses (250-8000 Hz) was studied using the maximum vocalization method. An amplitude-modulated series of sound pulses, which sounded like a steam engine, was masked until the criterion of halving the perceived pulse rate was reached. For masking of continuous reading, a just-follow-conversation criterion was applied. Intra-session test-retest reproducibility and inter-session variability were calculated. The results showed that female voices were more efficient in masking high frequency noise bursts than male voices and more efficient in masking both a male and a female test reading. The male had to vocalize 4 dBA louder than the female to produce the same masking effect on the test reading. It is concluded that the method is relatively simple to apply and has small intra-session and fair inter-session variability. Interesting gender differences were observed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1121/1.3124773 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85706165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20218663</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1858c14bba1ed8ba9ee2c948942428b965dc21b6a7da56af50ebfe1d335a13f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0EtLw0AQB_BFFFurB7-A9KLgIXVn36snKb6g6EE9h0my0WgeupsI-ulNaNBjTzPD_BiYPyGHQBcADM5gwYEJrfkWmYJkNDKSiW0ypZRCJKxSE7IXwls_SsPtLpmAlVRbTafk4tGVeVRheC_ql_P5qgitq_t2nnV-KF9NimXxg23R1Iv5feMrLOevDoflPtnJsQzuYKwz8nx99bS8jVYPN3fLy1WUci3bCIw0KYgkQXCZSdA6x1IrjBVMMJNYJbOUQaJQZygV5pK6JHeQcS4ReC75jJys73745rNzoY2rIqSuLLF2TRdiIzVVoDZDpbmwVouNkFEGRinew9M1TH0Tgnd5_OGLCv13DDQeso8hHrPv7dF4tEsql_3LMeweHI8AQ59q7rFOi_Dn2PCClJT_As96idM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20218663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self-masking: Listening during vocalization. Normal hearing</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>BORG, Erik ; BERGKVIST, Christina ; GUSTAFSSON, Dan</creator><creatorcontrib>BORG, Erik ; BERGKVIST, Christina ; GUSTAFSSON, Dan</creatorcontrib><description>What underlying mechanisms are involved in the ability to talk and listen simultaneously and what role does self-masking play under conditions of hearing impairment? The purpose of the present series of studies is to describe a technique for assessment of masked thresholds during vocalization, to describe normative data for males and females, and to focus on hearing impairment. The masking effect of vocalized [a:] on narrow-band noise pulses (250-8000 Hz) was studied using the maximum vocalization method. An amplitude-modulated series of sound pulses, which sounded like a steam engine, was masked until the criterion of halving the perceived pulse rate was reached. For masking of continuous reading, a just-follow-conversation criterion was applied. Intra-session test-retest reproducibility and inter-session variability were calculated. The results showed that female voices were more efficient in masking high frequency noise bursts than male voices and more efficient in masking both a male and a female test reading. The male had to vocalize 4 dBA louder than the female to produce the same masking effect on the test reading. It is concluded that the method is relatively simple to apply and has small intra-session and fair inter-session variability. Interesting gender differences were observed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-4966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-8524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1121/1.3124773</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19507970</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JASMAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville, NY: Acoustical Society of America</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adult ; Audition ; Auditory Perception ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Perception ; Perceptual Masking ; Psychoacoustics ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reading ; Regression Analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sex Characteristics ; Speech ; Speech Acoustics ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2009-06, Vol.125 (6), p.3871-3881</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1858c14bba1ed8ba9ee2c948942428b965dc21b6a7da56af50ebfe1d335a13f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1858c14bba1ed8ba9ee2c948942428b965dc21b6a7da56af50ebfe1d335a13f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,31269</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21653550$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19507970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>BORG, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERGKVIST, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUSTAFSSON, Dan</creatorcontrib><title>Self-masking: Listening during vocalization. Normal hearing</title><title>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</title><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><description>What underlying mechanisms are involved in the ability to talk and listen simultaneously and what role does self-masking play under conditions of hearing impairment? The purpose of the present series of studies is to describe a technique for assessment of masked thresholds during vocalization, to describe normative data for males and females, and to focus on hearing impairment. The masking effect of vocalized [a:] on narrow-band noise pulses (250-8000 Hz) was studied using the maximum vocalization method. An amplitude-modulated series of sound pulses, which sounded like a steam engine, was masked until the criterion of halving the perceived pulse rate was reached. For masking of continuous reading, a just-follow-conversation criterion was applied. Intra-session test-retest reproducibility and inter-session variability were calculated. The results showed that female voices were more efficient in masking high frequency noise bursts than male voices and more efficient in masking both a male and a female test reading. The male had to vocalize 4 dBA louder than the female to produce the same masking effect on the test reading. It is concluded that the method is relatively simple to apply and has small intra-session and fair inter-session variability. Interesting gender differences were observed.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Audition</subject><subject>Auditory Perception</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptual Masking</subject><subject>Psychoacoustics</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-4966</issn><issn>1520-8524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0EtLw0AQB_BFFFurB7-A9KLgIXVn36snKb6g6EE9h0my0WgeupsI-ulNaNBjTzPD_BiYPyGHQBcADM5gwYEJrfkWmYJkNDKSiW0ypZRCJKxSE7IXwls_SsPtLpmAlVRbTafk4tGVeVRheC_ql_P5qgitq_t2nnV-KF9NimXxg23R1Iv5feMrLOevDoflPtnJsQzuYKwz8nx99bS8jVYPN3fLy1WUci3bCIw0KYgkQXCZSdA6x1IrjBVMMJNYJbOUQaJQZygV5pK6JHeQcS4ReC75jJys73745rNzoY2rIqSuLLF2TRdiIzVVoDZDpbmwVouNkFEGRinew9M1TH0Tgnd5_OGLCv13DDQeso8hHrPv7dF4tEsql_3LMeweHI8AQ59q7rFOi_Dn2PCClJT_As96idM</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>BORG, Erik</creator><creator>BERGKVIST, Christina</creator><creator>GUSTAFSSON, Dan</creator><general>Acoustical Society of America</general><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Self-masking: Listening during vocalization. Normal hearing</title><author>BORG, Erik ; BERGKVIST, Christina ; GUSTAFSSON, Dan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1858c14bba1ed8ba9ee2c948942428b965dc21b6a7da56af50ebfe1d335a13f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Audition</topic><topic>Auditory Perception</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptual Masking</topic><topic>Psychoacoustics</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BORG, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERGKVIST, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUSTAFSSON, Dan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BORG, Erik</au><au>BERGKVIST, Christina</au><au>GUSTAFSSON, Dan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self-masking: Listening during vocalization. Normal hearing</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America</jtitle><addtitle>J Acoust Soc Am</addtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>3871</spage><epage>3881</epage><pages>3871-3881</pages><issn>0001-4966</issn><eissn>1520-8524</eissn><coden>JASMAN</coden><abstract>What underlying mechanisms are involved in the ability to talk and listen simultaneously and what role does self-masking play under conditions of hearing impairment? The purpose of the present series of studies is to describe a technique for assessment of masked thresholds during vocalization, to describe normative data for males and females, and to focus on hearing impairment. The masking effect of vocalized [a:] on narrow-band noise pulses (250-8000 Hz) was studied using the maximum vocalization method. An amplitude-modulated series of sound pulses, which sounded like a steam engine, was masked until the criterion of halving the perceived pulse rate was reached. For masking of continuous reading, a just-follow-conversation criterion was applied. Intra-session test-retest reproducibility and inter-session variability were calculated. The results showed that female voices were more efficient in masking high frequency noise bursts than male voices and more efficient in masking both a male and a female test reading. The male had to vocalize 4 dBA louder than the female to produce the same masking effect on the test reading. It is concluded that the method is relatively simple to apply and has small intra-session and fair inter-session variability. Interesting gender differences were observed.</abstract><cop>Melville, NY</cop><pub>Acoustical Society of America</pub><pmid>19507970</pmid><doi>10.1121/1.3124773</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-4966 |
ispartof | The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2009-06, Vol.125 (6), p.3871-3881 |
issn | 0001-4966 1520-8524 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85706165 |
source | American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list); Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Adult Audition Auditory Perception Biological and medical sciences Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Middle Aged Perception Perceptual Masking Psychoacoustics Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reading Regression Analysis Reproducibility of Results Sex Characteristics Speech Speech Acoustics Young Adult |
title | Self-masking: Listening during vocalization. Normal hearing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T22%3A36%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self-masking:%20Listening%20during%20vocalization.%20Normal%20hearing&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20the%20Acoustical%20Society%20of%20America&rft.au=BORG,%20Erik&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3871&rft.epage=3881&rft.pages=3871-3881&rft.issn=0001-4966&rft.eissn=1520-8524&rft.coden=JASMAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1121/1.3124773&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20218663%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1858c14bba1ed8ba9ee2c948942428b965dc21b6a7da56af50ebfe1d335a13f53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20218663&rft_id=info:pmid/19507970&rfr_iscdi=true |