Loading…

EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF BRAZIL'S BOLSA FAMÍLIA: Cash Transfer Programs in Comparative Perspective

This note reviews the targeting performance of Bolsa Família and its impact on inequality, poverty, consumption, education, health care, and labor force participation. Bolsa Família has several design and implementation characteristics that distance it from a pure human-capital-based conditional cas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Latin American research review 2010-01, Vol.45 (2), p.173-190
Main Authors: Soares, Fábio Veras, Ribas, Rafael Perez, Osório, Rafael Guerreiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-afafd7e8aa2726ae2895f69ac891a0944e2ac37ad4f9a7e392b4aa63edd79f693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-afafd7e8aa2726ae2895f69ac891a0944e2ac37ad4f9a7e392b4aa63edd79f693
container_end_page 190
container_issue 2
container_start_page 173
container_title Latin American research review
container_volume 45
creator Soares, Fábio Veras
Ribas, Rafael Perez
Osório, Rafael Guerreiro
description This note reviews the targeting performance of Bolsa Família and its impact on inequality, poverty, consumption, education, health care, and labor force participation. Bolsa Família has several design and implementation characteristics that distance it from a pure human-capital-based conditional cash transfer model. For that reason, we compare the impact of Bolsa Família to that of other conditional cash transfer programs in Latin America, such as in Mexico, Colombia, Ecuador, and Chile. We show that, as have other programs, Bolsa Família has helped reduce inequality and extreme poverty and has improved education outcomes, without having a negative impact on labor force participation. Where the program has failed to have its intended impact, in health and nutrition, supply-side constraints seem to be the principal problem. Esta nota resume a performance do Programa Bolsa Família em termos de sua focalização e seu impacto sobre desigualdade, pobreza, consumo, educação, saúde e participação na força de trabalho. O desenho e a implementação do Bolsa Família apresenta características que o distanciam de um programa "puro"de transferência condicionada de renda baseado no capital humano. Por este motivo, nós comparamos o impacto do Bolsa Família com o de outros programas de transferências condicionadas da América Latina, como aqueles do México, Colômbia, Equador e Chile. Nós mostramos que assim como outros programas, o Bolsa Família ajudou a reduzir a desigualdade e a extrema pobreza e teve impactos positivos sobre indicadores educacionais, sem apresentar resultados negativos sobre a participação na força de trabalho. Nas áreas onde resultados positivos não foram encontrados como saúde e nutrição, restrições da oferta parecem ser o principal problem.a
doi_str_mv 10.1017/s0023879100009390
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857123013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27919200</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27919200</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-afafd7e8aa2726ae2895f69ac891a0944e2ac37ad4f9a7e392b4aa63edd79f693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1OwzAQhS0EEqVwABZIFhtWAf8lttmFqC2RUlrRwIJNNKQOtGqaYrdIHIJTcTEcFYHUFbPxSPO9Z3seQqeUXFJC5ZUjhHElNSW-NNdkD3VoKFggmFT7qNOOg3Z-iI6cm3soVDzqoLL3GGcPcZ7eDXB-28PpcBwnOR718c19_JRmFxN8M8omMe7Hw6_PLI2vcQLuFecWlq4yFo9t82Khdni2xElTr8DCevZu8NhYtzJl2x-jgwoWzpz8nF300O_lyW2QjQZpEmdBGQqxDqCCaiqNAmCSRWCY0mEVaSiVpkC0EIZBySVMRaVBGq7ZswCIuJlOpfYg76KLre_KNm8b49ZFPXOlWSxgaZqNK1QoKeOE8n-QnHGqOP0HybTfrVSePN8h583GLv2HCykiwXw8oYfoFipt45w1VbGysxrsR0FJ0QZZTHaD9Brxazz3G603zvx5CxLxKCwmbdht1pQwL1Tty8-2srlbN_b3HuattUf4N6ZMpYI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>746422385</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF BRAZIL'S BOLSA FAMÍLIA: Cash Transfer Programs in Comparative Perspective</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Soares, Fábio Veras ; Ribas, Rafael Perez ; Osório, Rafael Guerreiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Soares, Fábio Veras ; Ribas, Rafael Perez ; Osório, Rafael Guerreiro</creatorcontrib><description>This note reviews the targeting performance of Bolsa Família and its impact on inequality, poverty, consumption, education, health care, and labor force participation. Bolsa Família has several design and implementation characteristics that distance it from a pure human-capital-based conditional cash transfer model. For that reason, we compare the impact of Bolsa Família to that of other conditional cash transfer programs in Latin America, such as in Mexico, Colombia, Ecuador, and Chile. We show that, as have other programs, Bolsa Família has helped reduce inequality and extreme poverty and has improved education outcomes, without having a negative impact on labor force participation. Where the program has failed to have its intended impact, in health and nutrition, supply-side constraints seem to be the principal problem. Esta nota resume a performance do Programa Bolsa Família em termos de sua focalização e seu impacto sobre desigualdade, pobreza, consumo, educação, saúde e participação na força de trabalho. O desenho e a implementação do Bolsa Família apresenta características que o distanciam de um programa "puro"de transferência condicionada de renda baseado no capital humano. Por este motivo, nós comparamos o impacto do Bolsa Família com o de outros programas de transferências condicionadas da América Latina, como aqueles do México, Colômbia, Equador e Chile. Nós mostramos que assim como outros programas, o Bolsa Família ajudou a reduzir a desigualdade e a extrema pobreza e teve impactos positivos sobre indicadores educacionais, sem apresentar resultados negativos sobre a participação na força de trabalho. Nas áreas onde resultados positivos não foram encontrados como saúde e nutrição, restrições da oferta parecem ser o principal problem.a</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-8791</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-4278</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/s0023879100009390</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LARRBM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Pittsburgh: Latin American Studies Association</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Antipoverty programs ; Brazil ; Capital ; Capital movement ; Cash transfers ; Child labor ; Child nutrition ; Chile ; Citizenship ; Colombia ; Conditional cash transfer programs ; Consumption ; Economic models ; Ecuador ; Education ; Health care policy ; Health Care Services ; Health education ; Health facilities ; Health Problems ; Health services ; Households ; Human capital ; Immunization ; Implementation ; Income inequality ; Inequality ; Labor force ; Labor Force Participation ; Labour force ; Mexico ; Money ; Nutrition ; Poverty ; Poverty alleviation ; Principals ; Public health ; RESEARCH NOTES ; Research review studies ; School age children ; School attendance ; Social movements ; Studies ; Welfare ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Latin American research review, 2010-01, Vol.45 (2), p.173-190</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2010 Latin American Studies Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2008 the University of Texas Press.</rights><rights>Copyright Latin American Studies Association 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-afafd7e8aa2726ae2895f69ac891a0944e2ac37ad4f9a7e392b4aa63edd79f693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-afafd7e8aa2726ae2895f69ac891a0944e2ac37ad4f9a7e392b4aa63edd79f693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27919200$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/746422385?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11687,12844,12846,12860,21386,21393,21394,27343,27923,27924,33222,33223,33610,33611,33773,33774,33984,33985,34529,34530,34774,34775,36059,36060,43732,43947,44114,44199,44362,58237,58470,62660,62661,62663,62676</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soares, Fábio Veras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribas, Rafael Perez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osório, Rafael Guerreiro</creatorcontrib><title>EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF BRAZIL'S BOLSA FAMÍLIA: Cash Transfer Programs in Comparative Perspective</title><title>Latin American research review</title><description>This note reviews the targeting performance of Bolsa Família and its impact on inequality, poverty, consumption, education, health care, and labor force participation. Bolsa Família has several design and implementation characteristics that distance it from a pure human-capital-based conditional cash transfer model. For that reason, we compare the impact of Bolsa Família to that of other conditional cash transfer programs in Latin America, such as in Mexico, Colombia, Ecuador, and Chile. We show that, as have other programs, Bolsa Família has helped reduce inequality and extreme poverty and has improved education outcomes, without having a negative impact on labor force participation. Where the program has failed to have its intended impact, in health and nutrition, supply-side constraints seem to be the principal problem. Esta nota resume a performance do Programa Bolsa Família em termos de sua focalização e seu impacto sobre desigualdade, pobreza, consumo, educação, saúde e participação na força de trabalho. O desenho e a implementação do Bolsa Família apresenta características que o distanciam de um programa "puro"de transferência condicionada de renda baseado no capital humano. Por este motivo, nós comparamos o impacto do Bolsa Família com o de outros programas de transferências condicionadas da América Latina, como aqueles do México, Colômbia, Equador e Chile. Nós mostramos que assim como outros programas, o Bolsa Família ajudou a reduzir a desigualdade e a extrema pobreza e teve impactos positivos sobre indicadores educacionais, sem apresentar resultados negativos sobre a participação na força de trabalho. Nas áreas onde resultados positivos não foram encontrados como saúde e nutrição, restrições da oferta parecem ser o principal problem.a</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Antipoverty programs</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Capital movement</subject><subject>Cash transfers</subject><subject>Child labor</subject><subject>Child nutrition</subject><subject>Chile</subject><subject>Citizenship</subject><subject>Colombia</subject><subject>Conditional cash transfer programs</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Ecuador</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health Care Services</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Health facilities</subject><subject>Health Problems</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Labor force</subject><subject>Labor Force Participation</subject><subject>Labour force</subject><subject>Mexico</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Poverty</subject><subject>Poverty alleviation</subject><subject>Principals</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>RESEARCH NOTES</subject><subject>Research review studies</subject><subject>School age children</subject><subject>School attendance</subject><subject>Social movements</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Welfare</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0023-8791</issn><issn>1542-4278</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1OwzAQhS0EEqVwABZIFhtWAf8lttmFqC2RUlrRwIJNNKQOtGqaYrdIHIJTcTEcFYHUFbPxSPO9Z3seQqeUXFJC5ZUjhHElNSW-NNdkD3VoKFggmFT7qNOOg3Z-iI6cm3soVDzqoLL3GGcPcZ7eDXB-28PpcBwnOR718c19_JRmFxN8M8omMe7Hw6_PLI2vcQLuFecWlq4yFo9t82Khdni2xElTr8DCevZu8NhYtzJl2x-jgwoWzpz8nF300O_lyW2QjQZpEmdBGQqxDqCCaiqNAmCSRWCY0mEVaSiVpkC0EIZBySVMRaVBGq7ZswCIuJlOpfYg76KLre_KNm8b49ZFPXOlWSxgaZqNK1QoKeOE8n-QnHGqOP0HybTfrVSePN8h583GLv2HCykiwXw8oYfoFipt45w1VbGysxrsR0FJ0QZZTHaD9Brxazz3G603zvx5CxLxKCwmbdht1pQwL1Tty8-2srlbN_b3HuattUf4N6ZMpYI</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Soares, Fábio Veras</creator><creator>Ribas, Rafael Perez</creator><creator>Osório, Rafael Guerreiro</creator><general>Latin American Studies Association</general><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>89V</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8BY</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BSCPQ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LD-</scope><scope>LD.</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>QXPDG</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>UXAQP</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF BRAZIL'S BOLSA FAMÍLIA: Cash Transfer Programs in Comparative Perspective</title><author>Soares, Fábio Veras ; Ribas, Rafael Perez ; Osório, Rafael Guerreiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-afafd7e8aa2726ae2895f69ac891a0944e2ac37ad4f9a7e392b4aa63edd79f693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Antipoverty programs</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Capital movement</topic><topic>Cash transfers</topic><topic>Child labor</topic><topic>Child nutrition</topic><topic>Chile</topic><topic>Citizenship</topic><topic>Colombia</topic><topic>Conditional cash transfer programs</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Ecuador</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health Care Services</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Health facilities</topic><topic>Health Problems</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Labor force</topic><topic>Labor Force Participation</topic><topic>Labour force</topic><topic>Mexico</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Poverty</topic><topic>Poverty alleviation</topic><topic>Principals</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>RESEARCH NOTES</topic><topic>Research review studies</topic><topic>School age children</topic><topic>School attendance</topic><topic>Social movements</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Welfare</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soares, Fábio Veras</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribas, Rafael Perez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osório, Rafael Guerreiro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PRISMA Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PRISMA Database with HAPI Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Black Studies Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch</collection><collection>Ethnic NewsWatch (Alumni)</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>ProQuest Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Diversity Collection</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>ProQuest Black Studies</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Latin American research review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soares, Fábio Veras</au><au>Ribas, Rafael Perez</au><au>Osório, Rafael Guerreiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF BRAZIL'S BOLSA FAMÍLIA: Cash Transfer Programs in Comparative Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Latin American research review</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>190</epage><pages>173-190</pages><issn>0023-8791</issn><eissn>1542-4278</eissn><coden>LARRBM</coden><abstract>This note reviews the targeting performance of Bolsa Família and its impact on inequality, poverty, consumption, education, health care, and labor force participation. Bolsa Família has several design and implementation characteristics that distance it from a pure human-capital-based conditional cash transfer model. For that reason, we compare the impact of Bolsa Família to that of other conditional cash transfer programs in Latin America, such as in Mexico, Colombia, Ecuador, and Chile. We show that, as have other programs, Bolsa Família has helped reduce inequality and extreme poverty and has improved education outcomes, without having a negative impact on labor force participation. Where the program has failed to have its intended impact, in health and nutrition, supply-side constraints seem to be the principal problem. Esta nota resume a performance do Programa Bolsa Família em termos de sua focalização e seu impacto sobre desigualdade, pobreza, consumo, educação, saúde e participação na força de trabalho. O desenho e a implementação do Bolsa Família apresenta características que o distanciam de um programa "puro"de transferência condicionada de renda baseado no capital humano. Por este motivo, nós comparamos o impacto do Bolsa Família com o de outros programas de transferências condicionadas da América Latina, como aqueles do México, Colômbia, Equador e Chile. Nós mostramos que assim como outros programas, o Bolsa Família ajudou a reduzir a desigualdade e a extrema pobreza e teve impactos positivos sobre indicadores educacionais, sem apresentar resultados negativos sobre a participação na força de trabalho. Nas áreas onde resultados positivos não foram encontrados como saúde e nutrição, restrições da oferta parecem ser o principal problem.a</abstract><cop>Pittsburgh</cop><pub>Latin American Studies Association</pub><doi>10.1017/s0023879100009390</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-8791
ispartof Latin American research review, 2010-01, Vol.45 (2), p.173-190
issn 0023-8791
1542-4278
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_857123013
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Art, Design and Architecture Collection; Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Sociology Collection; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; ProQuest One Literature; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR
subjects Academic Achievement
Antipoverty programs
Brazil
Capital
Capital movement
Cash transfers
Child labor
Child nutrition
Chile
Citizenship
Colombia
Conditional cash transfer programs
Consumption
Economic models
Ecuador
Education
Health care policy
Health Care Services
Health education
Health facilities
Health Problems
Health services
Households
Human capital
Immunization
Implementation
Income inequality
Inequality
Labor force
Labor Force Participation
Labour force
Mexico
Money
Nutrition
Poverty
Poverty alleviation
Principals
Public health
RESEARCH NOTES
Research review studies
School age children
School attendance
Social movements
Studies
Welfare
Workforce
title EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF BRAZIL'S BOLSA FAMÍLIA: Cash Transfer Programs in Comparative Perspective
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T02%3A43%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EVALUATING%20THE%20IMPACT%20OF%20BRAZIL'S%20BOLSA%20FAM%C3%8DLIA:%20Cash%20Transfer%20Programs%20in%20Comparative%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Latin%20American%20research%20review&rft.au=Soares,%20F%C3%A1bio%20Veras&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=190&rft.pages=173-190&rft.issn=0023-8791&rft.eissn=1542-4278&rft.coden=LARRBM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/s0023879100009390&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27919200%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c544t-afafd7e8aa2726ae2895f69ac891a0944e2ac37ad4f9a7e392b4aa63edd79f693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=746422385&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27919200&rfr_iscdi=true