Loading…
Evidence of mnemonic ability selectively affecting truthful and deceptive response dynamics
In the executive model of deception, the telling of a lie necessitates the inhibition of a veridical prepotent response (the truth), and such inhibition incurs a temporal penalty, manifest as a longer response time. If memory processes are engaged in generating such truths, then memory function shou...
Saved in:
| Published in: | The American journal of psychology 2010-12, Vol.123 (4), p.447-453 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-dbf8b03889738de01d9bb88ba797e2bfd922eba1c298b3edd4ce0171d0b98dec3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-dbf8b03889738de01d9bb88ba797e2bfd922eba1c298b3edd4ce0171d0b98dec3 |
| container_end_page | 453 |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 447 |
| container_title | The American journal of psychology |
| container_volume | 123 |
| creator | FARROW, TOM F. D. HOPWOOD, MARIE-CLARE PARKS, RANDOLPH W. HUNTER, MICHAEL D. SPENCE, SEAN A. |
| description | In the executive model of deception, the telling of a lie necessitates the inhibition of a veridical prepotent response (the truth), and such inhibition incurs a temporal penalty, manifest as a longer response time. If memory processes are engaged in generating such truths, then memory function should affect truthful and deceptive response times. To investigate this we examined the relationship between performance on a semantic knowledge deception task and a test of verbal memory in 40 college students. We found that verbal memory performance differentially affects the temporal parameters of truth and deception. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.4.0447 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858421679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A336671417</galeid><jstor_id>10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.4.0447</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A336671417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-dbf8b03889738de01d9bb88ba797e2bfd922eba1c298b3edd4ce0171d0b98dec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN089v0zAUB_AIgVgp_AcIRUyAOKTYsZPYx6kaA6nSLnDiYDn2S5vi2MFOJvrf46hlo6hsKIf80OebF-f5JclLjBYFReUH2YHf9mGnFjgnC7pAlFaPkhnmhGcs5-xxMkMI5RkvivIseRbCNt4izPDT5CzHOce4xLPk2-VNq8EqSF2TdhY6Z1uVyro17bBLAxhQQ3sDZpfKppmu7Tod_DhsmtGk0upUg4J-IqmH0DsbINU7K7tWhefJk0aaAC8O53ny9ePll-WnbHV99Xl5scpURdmQ6bphNSKM8YowDQhrXteM1bLiFeR1o3meQy2xiouqCWhNVUQV1qjm0SsyT97t39t792OEMIiuDQqMkRbcGAQrGM1xWfGHJeWUoJKwhyXhRcmraOfJ67_k1o3exgULhllBYz-mwuf_QgQRxKoKM3an1tKAaG3jBi_VVFhcEFKWFaa4iio7odZgwUvjLDRtfHzkFyd8PDTELp0MvD8KRDPAz2EtxxDXdLW672MOVjljYA0i9nl5fezf_uE3IM2wCc6MQxu3zjGke6i8C8FDI3rfdtLvBEZiGgBxOwAiDoCgYhqAGHt1-NFj3YG-Df3e8RG8OQAZlDSNl1a14c6R2NOCTW3Fe7cNg_P_WzzfZ_T4HcY-DkQQoVf3h34Br_AtcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3030877188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence of mnemonic ability selectively affecting truthful and deceptive response dynamics</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>FARROW, TOM F. D. ; HOPWOOD, MARIE-CLARE ; PARKS, RANDOLPH W. ; HUNTER, MICHAEL D. ; SPENCE, SEAN A.</creator><creatorcontrib>FARROW, TOM F. D. ; HOPWOOD, MARIE-CLARE ; PARKS, RANDOLPH W. ; HUNTER, MICHAEL D. ; SPENCE, SEAN A.</creatorcontrib><description>In the executive model of deception, the telling of a lie necessitates the inhibition of a veridical prepotent response (the truth), and such inhibition incurs a temporal penalty, manifest as a longer response time. If memory processes are engaged in generating such truths, then memory function should affect truthful and deceptive response times. To investigate this we examined the relationship between performance on a semantic knowledge deception task and a test of verbal memory in 40 college students. We found that verbal memory performance differentially affects the temporal parameters of truth and deception.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9556</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-8298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.4.0447</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21291161</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPCAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; College students ; Correlation analysis ; Credibility ; Deception ; Executive Function ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Inhibition ; Intelligence ; Intelligence quotient ; Learning. Memory ; Lying ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Male ; Memory ; Memory recall ; Mental Recall ; Mental task performance ; Prefrontal cortex ; Psychological aspects ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Reaction times ; Semantics ; Social Sciences ; Test ranges ; Truth ; Truth Disclosure ; Verbal Learning ; Verbal memory ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>The American journal of psychology, 2010-12, Vol.123 (4), p.447-453</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2010 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 University of Illinois Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 University of Illinois Press</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois 2010</rights><rights>Copyright University of Illinois Press Winter 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-dbf8b03889738de01d9bb88ba797e2bfd922eba1c298b3edd4ce0171d0b98dec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-dbf8b03889738de01d9bb88ba797e2bfd922eba1c298b3edd4ce0171d0b98dec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23706586$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21291161$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FARROW, TOM F. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOPWOOD, MARIE-CLARE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARKS, RANDOLPH W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNTER, MICHAEL D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPENCE, SEAN A.</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence of mnemonic ability selectively affecting truthful and deceptive response dynamics</title><title>The American journal of psychology</title><addtitle>Am J Psychol</addtitle><description>In the executive model of deception, the telling of a lie necessitates the inhibition of a veridical prepotent response (the truth), and such inhibition incurs a temporal penalty, manifest as a longer response time. If memory processes are engaged in generating such truths, then memory function should affect truthful and deceptive response times. To investigate this we examined the relationship between performance on a semantic knowledge deception task and a test of verbal memory in 40 college students. We found that verbal memory performance differentially affects the temporal parameters of truth and deception.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Deception</subject><subject>Executive Function</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Intelligence quotient</subject><subject>Learning. Memory</subject><subject>Lying</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Memory recall</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Mental task performance</subject><subject>Prefrontal cortex</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reaction times</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Test ranges</subject><subject>Truth</subject><subject>Truth Disclosure</subject><subject>Verbal Learning</subject><subject>Verbal memory</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0002-9556</issn><issn>1939-8298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN089v0zAUB_AIgVgp_AcIRUyAOKTYsZPYx6kaA6nSLnDiYDn2S5vi2MFOJvrf46hlo6hsKIf80OebF-f5JclLjBYFReUH2YHf9mGnFjgnC7pAlFaPkhnmhGcs5-xxMkMI5RkvivIseRbCNt4izPDT5CzHOce4xLPk2-VNq8EqSF2TdhY6Z1uVyro17bBLAxhQQ3sDZpfKppmu7Tod_DhsmtGk0upUg4J-IqmH0DsbINU7K7tWhefJk0aaAC8O53ny9ePll-WnbHV99Xl5scpURdmQ6bphNSKM8YowDQhrXteM1bLiFeR1o3meQy2xiouqCWhNVUQV1qjm0SsyT97t39t792OEMIiuDQqMkRbcGAQrGM1xWfGHJeWUoJKwhyXhRcmraOfJ67_k1o3exgULhllBYz-mwuf_QgQRxKoKM3an1tKAaG3jBi_VVFhcEFKWFaa4iio7odZgwUvjLDRtfHzkFyd8PDTELp0MvD8KRDPAz2EtxxDXdLW672MOVjljYA0i9nl5fezf_uE3IM2wCc6MQxu3zjGke6i8C8FDI3rfdtLvBEZiGgBxOwAiDoCgYhqAGHt1-NFj3YG-Df3e8RG8OQAZlDSNl1a14c6R2NOCTW3Fe7cNg_P_WzzfZ_T4HcY-DkQQoVf3h34Br_AtcQ</recordid><startdate>20101222</startdate><enddate>20101222</enddate><creator>FARROW, TOM F. D.</creator><creator>HOPWOOD, MARIE-CLARE</creator><creator>PARKS, RANDOLPH W.</creator><creator>HUNTER, MICHAEL D.</creator><creator>SPENCE, SEAN A.</creator><general>University of Illinois Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101222</creationdate><title>Evidence of mnemonic ability selectively affecting truthful and deceptive response dynamics</title><author>FARROW, TOM F. D. ; HOPWOOD, MARIE-CLARE ; PARKS, RANDOLPH W. ; HUNTER, MICHAEL D. ; SPENCE, SEAN A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-dbf8b03889738de01d9bb88ba797e2bfd922eba1c298b3edd4ce0171d0b98dec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Deception</topic><topic>Executive Function</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Intelligence quotient</topic><topic>Learning. Memory</topic><topic>Lying</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Memory recall</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Mental task performance</topic><topic>Prefrontal cortex</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reaction times</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Test ranges</topic><topic>Truth</topic><topic>Truth Disclosure</topic><topic>Verbal Learning</topic><topic>Verbal memory</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FARROW, TOM F. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOPWOOD, MARIE-CLARE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PARKS, RANDOLPH W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNTER, MICHAEL D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SPENCE, SEAN A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FARROW, TOM F. D.</au><au>HOPWOOD, MARIE-CLARE</au><au>PARKS, RANDOLPH W.</au><au>HUNTER, MICHAEL D.</au><au>SPENCE, SEAN A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence of mnemonic ability selectively affecting truthful and deceptive response dynamics</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Psychol</addtitle><date>2010-12-22</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>447</spage><epage>453</epage><pages>447-453</pages><issn>0002-9556</issn><eissn>1939-8298</eissn><coden>AJPCAA</coden><abstract>In the executive model of deception, the telling of a lie necessitates the inhibition of a veridical prepotent response (the truth), and such inhibition incurs a temporal penalty, manifest as a longer response time. If memory processes are engaged in generating such truths, then memory function should affect truthful and deceptive response times. To investigate this we examined the relationship between performance on a semantic knowledge deception task and a test of verbal memory in 40 college students. We found that verbal memory performance differentially affects the temporal parameters of truth and deception.</abstract><cop>Champaign, IL</cop><pub>University of Illinois Press</pub><pmid>21291161</pmid><doi>10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.4.0447</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9556 |
| ispartof | The American journal of psychology, 2010-12, Vol.123 (4), p.447-453 |
| issn | 0002-9556 1939-8298 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858421679 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Biological and medical sciences College students Correlation analysis Credibility Deception Executive Function Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Inhibition Intelligence Intelligence quotient Learning. Memory Lying Magnetic resonance imaging Male Memory Memory recall Mental Recall Mental task performance Prefrontal cortex Psychological aspects Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time Reaction times Semantics Social Sciences Test ranges Truth Truth Disclosure Verbal Learning Verbal memory Young Adult |
| title | Evidence of mnemonic ability selectively affecting truthful and deceptive response dynamics |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T03%3A05%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20of%20mnemonic%20ability%20selectively%20affecting%20truthful%20and%20deceptive%20response%20dynamics&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20psychology&rft.au=FARROW,%20TOM%20F.%20D.&rft.date=2010-12-22&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=447&rft.epage=453&rft.pages=447-453&rft.issn=0002-9556&rft.eissn=1939-8298&rft.coden=AJPCAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.4.0447&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA336671417%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c748t-dbf8b03889738de01d9bb88ba797e2bfd922eba1c298b3edd4ce0171d0b98dec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3030877188&rft_id=info:pmid/21291161&rft_galeid=A336671417&rft_jstor_id=10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.4.0447&rfr_iscdi=true |