Seasonal changes in a cactus-hoverfly (Diptera: Syrphidae) network

1. We analysed a cacti‐syrphid community focusing on the exploitation of decaying cacti resources by the flies, i.e. if exploitation exhibited a nested topology as a structural pattern, or whether it was temporally random. If availability of cactus resources was predictable during the rainy season,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological entomology 2010-12, Vol.35 (6), p.754-759
Main Authors: MARTÍNEZ-FALCÓN, ANA P., ÁNGELES MARCOS-GARCÍA, M., DÍAZ-CASTELAZO, CECILIA, RICO-GRAY, VICTOR
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Consumer-resource interactions
Copestylum
Diptera
Mexico
mutualistic networks
nestedness
Saprophagous hoverflies
Syrphidae
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:1. We analysed a cacti‐syrphid community focusing on the exploitation of decaying cacti resources by the flies, i.e. if exploitation exhibited a nested topology as a structural pattern, or whether it was temporally random. If availability of cactus resources was predictable during the rainy season, it would then be exploited by a more structured community, or as resource availability would be unpredictable during the dry season, we should expect it to be exploited by a random community. 2. We registered 12 Copestylum species (9 in dry and 11 in rainy season). Four cactus species were recorded per season, three were shared between seasons. 3. The community of Copestylum larvae in the rainy season was not randomly assembled but highly nested, revealing a highly structured pattern of resource use. It exhibited a random organization for the dry season. The high nestedness value obtained for the rainy season suggests that factors along with competition must play a major role in determining community structure. 4. Succession in the cacti‐syrphid community mediated by microorganisms involved in necrosis is an important factor structuring nested subsets. The studied networks were small, which may limit the power of the analysis, and strong conclusions could also be limited.
ISSN:0307-6946
1365-2311
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01236.x