Loading…
Cationic contrast agents improve quantification of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content by contrast enhanced CT imaging of cartilage
Minimally invasive and non‐destructive methods to quantify glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in articular cartilage extracellular matrix are of significant interest for the biochemical analysis of cartilage and diagnosis and tracking of osteoarthritis in vivo. Here, we report the use of cationic iodinated c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of orthopaedic research 2011-05, Vol.29 (5), p.704-709 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4632-d9bbac9d838f6a8791d5e31c191837b39506186903e6e9fbdff594c8a36de5cb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4632-d9bbac9d838f6a8791d5e31c191837b39506186903e6e9fbdff594c8a36de5cb3 |
container_end_page | 709 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 704 |
container_title | Journal of orthopaedic research |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Bansal, Prashant N. Joshi, Neel S. Entezari, Vahid Malone, Bethany C. Stewart, Rachel C. Snyder, Brian D. Grinstaff, Mark W. |
description | Minimally invasive and non‐destructive methods to quantify glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in articular cartilage extracellular matrix are of significant interest for the biochemical analysis of cartilage and diagnosis and tracking of osteoarthritis in vivo. Here, we report the use of cationic iodinated contrast agents in comparison to conventional anionic contrast agents for the quantitative monitoring of GAG concentrations with peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Using an ex vivo bovine osteochondral plug model, the cationic contrast agents were evaluated for their ability to distribute into articular cartilage and generate a positive relationship with GAG content. The cationic agents resulted in much higher equilibrium X‐ray attenuations in cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM) than anionic agents. Experiments with samples subjected to enzymatic GAG degradation demonstrated that the cationic agents were up to five times more sensitive (p = 0.0001) to changes in GAG content and had a 24% higher correlation (p = 0.002) compared to the anionic agent (R2 = 0.86, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jor.21312 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858781789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>858781789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4632-d9bbac9d838f6a8791d5e31c191837b39506186903e6e9fbdff594c8a36de5cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctOGzEYhS3UqgTooi9QedeyGLDH49syikoKQkWgcNlZHo8ndTqxwZ4AWfXVcS6kq678L77z_fYxAF8wOsEIlaezEE9KTHC5BwaY0qqgJX_4AAaIE1agkrF9cJDSDCHEcSk-gf0SV4TLSg7A35HuXfDOQBN8H3XqoZ5a3yfo5o8xPFv4tNC-d60zaxCGFk67pQlJz50Pq1F7-H08HB-vDTkK6-U_mfW_tTe2gaNJNuqp89OVwujYuy5vOgIfW90l-3l7HoLbsx-T0c_i8mp8PhpeFqZipCwaWdfayEYQ0TItuMQNtQQbLLEgvCaSIoYFk4hYZmVbN21LZWWEJqyx1NTkEHzbePOjnhY29WrukrFdp70Ni6QEFVxgLmQmjzekiSGlaFv1GPPN41JhpFZ1q1y3Wted2a9b66Ke22ZHvvebgdMN8OI6u_y_SV1c3bwri03Cpd6-7hI6_lGME07V_a-xus4_ObljF-qMvAGed5rZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>858781789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cationic contrast agents improve quantification of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content by contrast enhanced CT imaging of cartilage</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Bansal, Prashant N. ; Joshi, Neel S. ; Entezari, Vahid ; Malone, Bethany C. ; Stewart, Rachel C. ; Snyder, Brian D. ; Grinstaff, Mark W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bansal, Prashant N. ; Joshi, Neel S. ; Entezari, Vahid ; Malone, Bethany C. ; Stewart, Rachel C. ; Snyder, Brian D. ; Grinstaff, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><description>Minimally invasive and non‐destructive methods to quantify glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in articular cartilage extracellular matrix are of significant interest for the biochemical analysis of cartilage and diagnosis and tracking of osteoarthritis in vivo. Here, we report the use of cationic iodinated contrast agents in comparison to conventional anionic contrast agents for the quantitative monitoring of GAG concentrations with peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Using an ex vivo bovine osteochondral plug model, the cationic contrast agents were evaluated for their ability to distribute into articular cartilage and generate a positive relationship with GAG content. The cationic agents resulted in much higher equilibrium X‐ray attenuations in cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM) than anionic agents. Experiments with samples subjected to enzymatic GAG degradation demonstrated that the cationic agents were up to five times more sensitive (p = 0.0001) to changes in GAG content and had a 24% higher correlation (p = 0.002) compared to the anionic agent (R2 = 0.86, p < 0.0001 compared with R2 = 0.62, p = 0.004). The natural inhomogeneous distribution of GAGs in the ECM could clearly be identified in undegraded samples. © 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:704–709, 2011</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-0266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-527X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jor.21312</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21437949</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Animals ; Benzamides ; Cartilage, Articular - chemistry ; Cartilage, Articular - diagnostic imaging ; cationic ; Cations ; Cattle ; computed tomography (CT) ; contrast agent ; Contrast Media ; Extracellular Matrix - chemistry ; glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) ; Glycosaminoglycans - analysis ; proteoglycans ; Rabbits ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Triiodobenzoic Acids</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic research, 2011-05, Vol.29 (5), p.704-709</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4632-d9bbac9d838f6a8791d5e31c191837b39506186903e6e9fbdff594c8a36de5cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4632-d9bbac9d838f6a8791d5e31c191837b39506186903e6e9fbdff594c8a36de5cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21437949$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bansal, Prashant N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Neel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Entezari, Vahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Bethany C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Rachel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grinstaff, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><title>Cationic contrast agents improve quantification of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content by contrast enhanced CT imaging of cartilage</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic research</title><addtitle>J. Orthop. Res</addtitle><description>Minimally invasive and non‐destructive methods to quantify glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in articular cartilage extracellular matrix are of significant interest for the biochemical analysis of cartilage and diagnosis and tracking of osteoarthritis in vivo. Here, we report the use of cationic iodinated contrast agents in comparison to conventional anionic contrast agents for the quantitative monitoring of GAG concentrations with peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Using an ex vivo bovine osteochondral plug model, the cationic contrast agents were evaluated for their ability to distribute into articular cartilage and generate a positive relationship with GAG content. The cationic agents resulted in much higher equilibrium X‐ray attenuations in cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM) than anionic agents. Experiments with samples subjected to enzymatic GAG degradation demonstrated that the cationic agents were up to five times more sensitive (p = 0.0001) to changes in GAG content and had a 24% higher correlation (p = 0.002) compared to the anionic agent (R2 = 0.86, p < 0.0001 compared with R2 = 0.62, p = 0.004). The natural inhomogeneous distribution of GAGs in the ECM could clearly be identified in undegraded samples. © 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:704–709, 2011</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Benzamides</subject><subject>Cartilage, Articular - chemistry</subject><subject>Cartilage, Articular - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>cationic</subject><subject>Cations</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>computed tomography (CT)</subject><subject>contrast agent</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Extracellular Matrix - chemistry</subject><subject>glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)</subject><subject>Glycosaminoglycans - analysis</subject><subject>proteoglycans</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Triiodobenzoic Acids</subject><issn>0736-0266</issn><issn>1554-527X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctOGzEYhS3UqgTooi9QedeyGLDH49syikoKQkWgcNlZHo8ndTqxwZ4AWfXVcS6kq678L77z_fYxAF8wOsEIlaezEE9KTHC5BwaY0qqgJX_4AAaIE1agkrF9cJDSDCHEcSk-gf0SV4TLSg7A35HuXfDOQBN8H3XqoZ5a3yfo5o8xPFv4tNC-d60zaxCGFk67pQlJz50Pq1F7-H08HB-vDTkK6-U_mfW_tTe2gaNJNuqp89OVwujYuy5vOgIfW90l-3l7HoLbsx-T0c_i8mp8PhpeFqZipCwaWdfayEYQ0TItuMQNtQQbLLEgvCaSIoYFk4hYZmVbN21LZWWEJqyx1NTkEHzbePOjnhY29WrukrFdp70Ni6QEFVxgLmQmjzekiSGlaFv1GPPN41JhpFZ1q1y3Wted2a9b66Ke22ZHvvebgdMN8OI6u_y_SV1c3bwri03Cpd6-7hI6_lGME07V_a-xus4_ObljF-qMvAGed5rZ</recordid><startdate>201105</startdate><enddate>201105</enddate><creator>Bansal, Prashant N.</creator><creator>Joshi, Neel S.</creator><creator>Entezari, Vahid</creator><creator>Malone, Bethany C.</creator><creator>Stewart, Rachel C.</creator><creator>Snyder, Brian D.</creator><creator>Grinstaff, Mark W.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201105</creationdate><title>Cationic contrast agents improve quantification of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content by contrast enhanced CT imaging of cartilage</title><author>Bansal, Prashant N. ; Joshi, Neel S. ; Entezari, Vahid ; Malone, Bethany C. ; Stewart, Rachel C. ; Snyder, Brian D. ; Grinstaff, Mark W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4632-d9bbac9d838f6a8791d5e31c191837b39506186903e6e9fbdff594c8a36de5cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Benzamides</topic><topic>Cartilage, Articular - chemistry</topic><topic>Cartilage, Articular - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>cationic</topic><topic>Cations</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>computed tomography (CT)</topic><topic>contrast agent</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Extracellular Matrix - chemistry</topic><topic>glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)</topic><topic>Glycosaminoglycans - analysis</topic><topic>proteoglycans</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Triiodobenzoic Acids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bansal, Prashant N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Neel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Entezari, Vahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malone, Bethany C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Rachel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grinstaff, Mark W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bansal, Prashant N.</au><au>Joshi, Neel S.</au><au>Entezari, Vahid</au><au>Malone, Bethany C.</au><au>Stewart, Rachel C.</au><au>Snyder, Brian D.</au><au>Grinstaff, Mark W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cationic contrast agents improve quantification of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content by contrast enhanced CT imaging of cartilage</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Orthop. Res</addtitle><date>2011-05</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>704</spage><epage>709</epage><pages>704-709</pages><issn>0736-0266</issn><eissn>1554-527X</eissn><abstract>Minimally invasive and non‐destructive methods to quantify glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in articular cartilage extracellular matrix are of significant interest for the biochemical analysis of cartilage and diagnosis and tracking of osteoarthritis in vivo. Here, we report the use of cationic iodinated contrast agents in comparison to conventional anionic contrast agents for the quantitative monitoring of GAG concentrations with peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Using an ex vivo bovine osteochondral plug model, the cationic contrast agents were evaluated for their ability to distribute into articular cartilage and generate a positive relationship with GAG content. The cationic agents resulted in much higher equilibrium X‐ray attenuations in cartilage extracellular matrix (ECM) than anionic agents. Experiments with samples subjected to enzymatic GAG degradation demonstrated that the cationic agents were up to five times more sensitive (p = 0.0001) to changes in GAG content and had a 24% higher correlation (p = 0.002) compared to the anionic agent (R2 = 0.86, p < 0.0001 compared with R2 = 0.62, p = 0.004). The natural inhomogeneous distribution of GAGs in the ECM could clearly be identified in undegraded samples. © 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 29:704–709, 2011</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>21437949</pmid><doi>10.1002/jor.21312</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0736-0266 |
ispartof | Journal of orthopaedic research, 2011-05, Vol.29 (5), p.704-709 |
issn | 0736-0266 1554-527X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_858781789 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Animals Benzamides Cartilage, Articular - chemistry Cartilage, Articular - diagnostic imaging cationic Cations Cattle computed tomography (CT) contrast agent Contrast Media Extracellular Matrix - chemistry glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) Glycosaminoglycans - analysis proteoglycans Rabbits Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Triiodobenzoic Acids |
title | Cationic contrast agents improve quantification of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content by contrast enhanced CT imaging of cartilage |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T17%3A26%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cationic%20contrast%20agents%20improve%20quantification%20of%20glycosaminoglycan%20(GAG)%20content%20by%20contrast%20enhanced%20CT%20imaging%20of%20cartilage&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20research&rft.au=Bansal,%20Prashant%20N.&rft.date=2011-05&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=704&rft.epage=709&rft.pages=704-709&rft.issn=0736-0266&rft.eissn=1554-527X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jor.21312&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E858781789%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4632-d9bbac9d838f6a8791d5e31c191837b39506186903e6e9fbdff594c8a36de5cb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=858781789&rft_id=info:pmid/21437949&rfr_iscdi=true |