Influence of different surface conditioning protocols on microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin

• Published in: The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2011-04, Vol.105 (4), p.227-235
• Main Authors: Pisani-Proença, Jatyr, DDS, MSc, PhD, Erhardt, Maria Carolina Guilherme, DDS, MSc, PhD, Amaral, Regina, DDS, MSc, Valandro, Luiz Felipe, DDS, MSc, PhD, Bottino, Marco Antonio, DDS, PhD, Del Castillo-Salmerón, Ramón, DDS, PhD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acid Etching, Dental - methods; Dental Bonding - methods; Dental Restoration Failure; Dental Stress Analysis; Dentin - drug effects; Dentin-Bonding Agents - pharmacology; Dentistry; Edetic Acid - pharmacology; Humans; Methacrylates - pharmacology; Phosphoric Acids - pharmacology; Resin Cements - pharmacology; Tensile Strength; Tooth Preparation - methods
• ISSN: 0022-3913; 1097-6841
• DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60037-1

Statement of problem According to manufacturers, bonding with self-adhesive resin cements can be achieved without any pretreatment steps such as etching, priming, or bonding. However, the benefit of saving time with these simplified luting systems may be realized at the expense of compromising the bonding capacity. Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess whether different dentin conditioning protocols influence the bond performance of self-adhesive resin cements to dentin. Material and methods Flat dentin surfaces from 48 human molars were divided into 4 groups (n=12): 1) control, no conditioning; 2) H3 PO4 , etching with 37% H3 PO4 for 15 seconds; 3) SEBond, bonding with self-etching primer adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond); and 4) EDTA, etching with 0.1M EDTA for 60 seconds. The specimens from each dentin pre-treatment were bonded using the self-adhesive cements RelyX Unicem, Maxcem or Multilink Sprint (n=4). The resin-cement-dentin specimens were stored in water at 37°C for 7 days, and serially sectioned to produce beam specimens of 1.0 mm2 cross-sectional area. Microtensile bond strength (μTBS) testing was performed at 1.0 mm/min. Data (MPa) were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparisons test (α=.05). Fractured specimens were examined with a stereomicroscope (x40) and classified as adhesive, mixed, or cohesive. Additional bonded interfaces were evaluated under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results Cement-dentin μTBS was affected by the dentin conditioning approach ( P