Loading…

Goal attainment in urban ecology research: A bibliometric review 1975–2004

We analyze a core literature of urban ecology (all articles published in Urban Ecology and Urban Ecosystems from 1975–2004, n = 261) to support a reflexive analysis of the field. We structure this critical analysis based on criteria derived from programmatic statements made by scientific societies,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Urban ecosystems 2006-09, Vol.9 (3), p.179-193
Main Authors: Young, R. F, Wolf, S. A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65b0497f89a61c05c85d82c18b499e5d74b4d3ea5d0445b63e2f452a08ad4863
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65b0497f89a61c05c85d82c18b499e5d74b4d3ea5d0445b63e2f452a08ad4863
container_end_page 193
container_issue 3
container_start_page 179
container_title Urban ecosystems
container_volume 9
creator Young, R. F
Wolf, S. A
description We analyze a core literature of urban ecology (all articles published in Urban Ecology and Urban Ecosystems from 1975–2004, n = 261) to support a reflexive analysis of the field. We structure this critical analysis based on criteria derived from programmatic statements made by scientific societies, research funding organizations and academic institutions regarding what urban ecology should be. Specifically, we assess the extent to which the literature reflects, and has evolved to reflect, a commitment to strengthen and expand the discipline of ecology create a transdisciplinary enterprise, and contribute to social and ecological wellbeing through applied research and policy engagement. Findings indicate that the literature strongly reflects these commitments, as these three tenets usefully describe the field and its evolution. We do, however, identify a tendency over time toward a more strictly disciplinary orientation. Ecological science is increasingly dominant and threatens to crowd out other scientific perspectives. This trend suggests that the field is maturing in the institutional sense, but perhaps at the cost of intellectual diversity, which many believe to be the basis of innovative solutions.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11252-006-8589-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860372182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>860372182</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65b0497f89a61c05c85d82c18b499e5d74b4d3ea5d0445b63e2f452a08ad4863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1OwzAQRi0EEqVwAFZEbFgZxr9x2FUIClIlFpS15ThOcZXExU5A3XEHbshJSFVWrGaked-n0UPonMA1AchvEiFUUAwgsRKqwPQATYjIGSaS08NxB8WwIkIco5OU1gBjSqkJWsyDaTLT98Z3rev6zHfZEEvTZc6GJqy2WXTJmWjfbrNZVvqy8aF1ffR2PHx495mRIhc_X98UgJ-io9o0yZ39zSlaPtwv7x7x4nn-dDdbYEs567EUJfAir1VhJLEgrBKVopaokheFE1XOS14xZ0QFnItSMkdrLqgBZSquJJuiq33tJob3waVetz5Z1zSmc2FIWklgOSWKjuTlP3IdhtiNv-lcMuBCgRghsodsDClFV-tN9K2JW01A7-TqvVw9ytU7uXpXfLHP1CZos4o-6dcXCkQAUEoIY-wXRRBz0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>763045805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Goal attainment in urban ecology research: A bibliometric review 1975–2004</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Young, R. F ; Wolf, S. A</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, R. F ; Wolf, S. A</creatorcontrib><description>We analyze a core literature of urban ecology (all articles published in Urban Ecology and Urban Ecosystems from 1975–2004, n = 261) to support a reflexive analysis of the field. We structure this critical analysis based on criteria derived from programmatic statements made by scientific societies, research funding organizations and academic institutions regarding what urban ecology should be. Specifically, we assess the extent to which the literature reflects, and has evolved to reflect, a commitment to strengthen and expand the discipline of ecology create a transdisciplinary enterprise, and contribute to social and ecological wellbeing through applied research and policy engagement. Findings indicate that the literature strongly reflects these commitments, as these three tenets usefully describe the field and its evolution. We do, however, identify a tendency over time toward a more strictly disciplinary orientation. Ecological science is increasingly dominant and threatens to crowd out other scientific perspectives. This trend suggests that the field is maturing in the institutional sense, but perhaps at the cost of intellectual diversity, which many believe to be the basis of innovative solutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1083-8155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11252-006-8589-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Salzburg: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; business enterprises ; Ecological research ; Ecology ; ecosystems ; educational institutions ; evolution ; research policy ; research support</subject><ispartof>Urban ecosystems, 2006-09, Vol.9 (3), p.179-193</ispartof><rights>Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65b0497f89a61c05c85d82c18b499e5d74b4d3ea5d0445b63e2f452a08ad4863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65b0497f89a61c05c85d82c18b499e5d74b4d3ea5d0445b63e2f452a08ad4863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/763045805/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/763045805?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,21387,21394,27924,27925,33611,33612,33985,33986,36060,36061,43733,43948,44363,74221,74468,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, R. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, S. A</creatorcontrib><title>Goal attainment in urban ecology research: A bibliometric review 1975–2004</title><title>Urban ecosystems</title><description>We analyze a core literature of urban ecology (all articles published in Urban Ecology and Urban Ecosystems from 1975–2004, n = 261) to support a reflexive analysis of the field. We structure this critical analysis based on criteria derived from programmatic statements made by scientific societies, research funding organizations and academic institutions regarding what urban ecology should be. Specifically, we assess the extent to which the literature reflects, and has evolved to reflect, a commitment to strengthen and expand the discipline of ecology create a transdisciplinary enterprise, and contribute to social and ecological wellbeing through applied research and policy engagement. Findings indicate that the literature strongly reflects these commitments, as these three tenets usefully describe the field and its evolution. We do, however, identify a tendency over time toward a more strictly disciplinary orientation. Ecological science is increasingly dominant and threatens to crowd out other scientific perspectives. This trend suggests that the field is maturing in the institutional sense, but perhaps at the cost of intellectual diversity, which many believe to be the basis of innovative solutions.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>business enterprises</subject><subject>Ecological research</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>educational institutions</subject><subject>evolution</subject><subject>research policy</subject><subject>research support</subject><issn>1083-8155</issn><issn>1573-1642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1OwzAQRi0EEqVwAFZEbFgZxr9x2FUIClIlFpS15ThOcZXExU5A3XEHbshJSFVWrGaked-n0UPonMA1AchvEiFUUAwgsRKqwPQATYjIGSaS08NxB8WwIkIco5OU1gBjSqkJWsyDaTLT98Z3rev6zHfZEEvTZc6GJqy2WXTJmWjfbrNZVvqy8aF1ffR2PHx495mRIhc_X98UgJ-io9o0yZ39zSlaPtwv7x7x4nn-dDdbYEs567EUJfAir1VhJLEgrBKVopaokheFE1XOS14xZ0QFnItSMkdrLqgBZSquJJuiq33tJob3waVetz5Z1zSmc2FIWklgOSWKjuTlP3IdhtiNv-lcMuBCgRghsodsDClFV-tN9K2JW01A7-TqvVw9ytU7uXpXfLHP1CZos4o-6dcXCkQAUEoIY-wXRRBz0w</recordid><startdate>200609</startdate><enddate>200609</enddate><creator>Young, R. F</creator><creator>Wolf, S. A</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200609</creationdate><title>Goal attainment in urban ecology research: A bibliometric review 1975–2004</title><author>Young, R. F ; Wolf, S. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65b0497f89a61c05c85d82c18b499e5d74b4d3ea5d0445b63e2f452a08ad4863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>business enterprises</topic><topic>Ecological research</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>educational institutions</topic><topic>evolution</topic><topic>research policy</topic><topic>research support</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, R. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, S. A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep (ProQuest)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Urban ecosystems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, R. F</au><au>Wolf, S. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Goal attainment in urban ecology research: A bibliometric review 1975–2004</atitle><jtitle>Urban ecosystems</jtitle><date>2006-09</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>193</epage><pages>179-193</pages><issn>1083-8155</issn><eissn>1573-1642</eissn><abstract>We analyze a core literature of urban ecology (all articles published in Urban Ecology and Urban Ecosystems from 1975–2004, n = 261) to support a reflexive analysis of the field. We structure this critical analysis based on criteria derived from programmatic statements made by scientific societies, research funding organizations and academic institutions regarding what urban ecology should be. Specifically, we assess the extent to which the literature reflects, and has evolved to reflect, a commitment to strengthen and expand the discipline of ecology create a transdisciplinary enterprise, and contribute to social and ecological wellbeing through applied research and policy engagement. Findings indicate that the literature strongly reflects these commitments, as these three tenets usefully describe the field and its evolution. We do, however, identify a tendency over time toward a more strictly disciplinary orientation. Ecological science is increasingly dominant and threatens to crowd out other scientific perspectives. This trend suggests that the field is maturing in the institutional sense, but perhaps at the cost of intellectual diversity, which many believe to be the basis of innovative solutions.</abstract><cop>Salzburg</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1007/s11252-006-8589-2</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1083-8155
ispartof Urban ecosystems, 2006-09, Vol.9 (3), p.179-193
issn 1083-8155
1573-1642
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860372182
source ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Politics Collection; Springer Nature; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)
subjects Bibliometrics
business enterprises
Ecological research
Ecology
ecosystems
educational institutions
evolution
research policy
research support
title Goal attainment in urban ecology research: A bibliometric review 1975–2004
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T13%3A18%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Goal%20attainment%20in%20urban%20ecology%20research:%20A%20bibliometric%20review%201975%E2%80%932004&rft.jtitle=Urban%20ecosystems&rft.au=Young,%20R.%20F&rft.date=2006-09&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=193&rft.pages=179-193&rft.issn=1083-8155&rft.eissn=1573-1642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11252-006-8589-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E860372182%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65b0497f89a61c05c85d82c18b499e5d74b4d3ea5d0445b63e2f452a08ad4863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=763045805&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true