Loading…
Goal attainment in urban ecology research: A bibliometric review 1975–2004
We analyze a core literature of urban ecology (all articles published in Urban Ecology and Urban Ecosystems from 1975–2004, n = 261) to support a reflexive analysis of the field. We structure this critical analysis based on criteria derived from programmatic statements made by scientific societies,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Urban ecosystems 2006-09, Vol.9 (3), p.179-193 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65b0497f89a61c05c85d82c18b499e5d74b4d3ea5d0445b63e2f452a08ad4863 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65b0497f89a61c05c85d82c18b499e5d74b4d3ea5d0445b63e2f452a08ad4863 |
container_end_page | 193 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 179 |
container_title | Urban ecosystems |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Young, R. F Wolf, S. A |
description | We analyze a core literature of urban ecology (all articles published in Urban Ecology and Urban Ecosystems from 1975–2004, n = 261) to support a reflexive analysis of the field. We structure this critical analysis based on criteria derived from programmatic statements made by scientific societies, research funding organizations and academic institutions regarding what urban ecology should be. Specifically, we assess the extent to which the literature reflects, and has evolved to reflect, a commitment to strengthen and expand the discipline of ecology create a transdisciplinary enterprise, and contribute to social and ecological wellbeing through applied research and policy engagement. Findings indicate that the literature strongly reflects these commitments, as these three tenets usefully describe the field and its evolution. We do, however, identify a tendency over time toward a more strictly disciplinary orientation. Ecological science is increasingly dominant and threatens to crowd out other scientific perspectives. This trend suggests that the field is maturing in the institutional sense, but perhaps at the cost of intellectual diversity, which many believe to be the basis of innovative solutions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11252-006-8589-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860372182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>860372182</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65b0497f89a61c05c85d82c18b499e5d74b4d3ea5d0445b63e2f452a08ad4863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1OwzAQRi0EEqVwAFZEbFgZxr9x2FUIClIlFpS15ThOcZXExU5A3XEHbshJSFVWrGaked-n0UPonMA1AchvEiFUUAwgsRKqwPQATYjIGSaS08NxB8WwIkIco5OU1gBjSqkJWsyDaTLT98Z3rev6zHfZEEvTZc6GJqy2WXTJmWjfbrNZVvqy8aF1ffR2PHx495mRIhc_X98UgJ-io9o0yZ39zSlaPtwv7x7x4nn-dDdbYEs567EUJfAir1VhJLEgrBKVopaokheFE1XOS14xZ0QFnItSMkdrLqgBZSquJJuiq33tJob3waVetz5Z1zSmc2FIWklgOSWKjuTlP3IdhtiNv-lcMuBCgRghsodsDClFV-tN9K2JW01A7-TqvVw9ytU7uXpXfLHP1CZos4o-6dcXCkQAUEoIY-wXRRBz0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>763045805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Goal attainment in urban ecology research: A bibliometric review 1975–2004</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Young, R. F ; Wolf, S. A</creator><creatorcontrib>Young, R. F ; Wolf, S. A</creatorcontrib><description>We analyze a core literature of urban ecology (all articles published in Urban Ecology and Urban Ecosystems from 1975–2004, n = 261) to support a reflexive analysis of the field. We structure this critical analysis based on criteria derived from programmatic statements made by scientific societies, research funding organizations and academic institutions regarding what urban ecology should be. Specifically, we assess the extent to which the literature reflects, and has evolved to reflect, a commitment to strengthen and expand the discipline of ecology create a transdisciplinary enterprise, and contribute to social and ecological wellbeing through applied research and policy engagement. Findings indicate that the literature strongly reflects these commitments, as these three tenets usefully describe the field and its evolution. We do, however, identify a tendency over time toward a more strictly disciplinary orientation. Ecological science is increasingly dominant and threatens to crowd out other scientific perspectives. This trend suggests that the field is maturing in the institutional sense, but perhaps at the cost of intellectual diversity, which many believe to be the basis of innovative solutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1083-8155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1642</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11252-006-8589-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Salzburg: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; business enterprises ; Ecological research ; Ecology ; ecosystems ; educational institutions ; evolution ; research policy ; research support</subject><ispartof>Urban ecosystems, 2006-09, Vol.9 (3), p.179-193</ispartof><rights>Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65b0497f89a61c05c85d82c18b499e5d74b4d3ea5d0445b63e2f452a08ad4863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65b0497f89a61c05c85d82c18b499e5d74b4d3ea5d0445b63e2f452a08ad4863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/763045805/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/763045805?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,21387,21394,27924,27925,33611,33612,33985,33986,36060,36061,43733,43948,44363,74221,74468,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Young, R. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, S. A</creatorcontrib><title>Goal attainment in urban ecology research: A bibliometric review 1975–2004</title><title>Urban ecosystems</title><description>We analyze a core literature of urban ecology (all articles published in Urban Ecology and Urban Ecosystems from 1975–2004, n = 261) to support a reflexive analysis of the field. We structure this critical analysis based on criteria derived from programmatic statements made by scientific societies, research funding organizations and academic institutions regarding what urban ecology should be. Specifically, we assess the extent to which the literature reflects, and has evolved to reflect, a commitment to strengthen and expand the discipline of ecology create a transdisciplinary enterprise, and contribute to social and ecological wellbeing through applied research and policy engagement. Findings indicate that the literature strongly reflects these commitments, as these three tenets usefully describe the field and its evolution. We do, however, identify a tendency over time toward a more strictly disciplinary orientation. Ecological science is increasingly dominant and threatens to crowd out other scientific perspectives. This trend suggests that the field is maturing in the institutional sense, but perhaps at the cost of intellectual diversity, which many believe to be the basis of innovative solutions.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>business enterprises</subject><subject>Ecological research</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>ecosystems</subject><subject>educational institutions</subject><subject>evolution</subject><subject>research policy</subject><subject>research support</subject><issn>1083-8155</issn><issn>1573-1642</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1OwzAQRi0EEqVwAFZEbFgZxr9x2FUIClIlFpS15ThOcZXExU5A3XEHbshJSFVWrGaked-n0UPonMA1AchvEiFUUAwgsRKqwPQATYjIGSaS08NxB8WwIkIco5OU1gBjSqkJWsyDaTLT98Z3rev6zHfZEEvTZc6GJqy2WXTJmWjfbrNZVvqy8aF1ffR2PHx495mRIhc_X98UgJ-io9o0yZ39zSlaPtwv7x7x4nn-dDdbYEs567EUJfAir1VhJLEgrBKVopaokheFE1XOS14xZ0QFnItSMkdrLqgBZSquJJuiq33tJob3waVetz5Z1zSmc2FIWklgOSWKjuTlP3IdhtiNv-lcMuBCgRghsodsDClFV-tN9K2JW01A7-TqvVw9ytU7uXpXfLHP1CZos4o-6dcXCkQAUEoIY-wXRRBz0w</recordid><startdate>200609</startdate><enddate>200609</enddate><creator>Young, R. F</creator><creator>Wolf, S. A</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200609</creationdate><title>Goal attainment in urban ecology research: A bibliometric review 1975–2004</title><author>Young, R. F ; Wolf, S. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65b0497f89a61c05c85d82c18b499e5d74b4d3ea5d0445b63e2f452a08ad4863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>business enterprises</topic><topic>Ecological research</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>ecosystems</topic><topic>educational institutions</topic><topic>evolution</topic><topic>research policy</topic><topic>research support</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Young, R. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, S. A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep (ProQuest)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Urban ecosystems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Young, R. F</au><au>Wolf, S. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Goal attainment in urban ecology research: A bibliometric review 1975–2004</atitle><jtitle>Urban ecosystems</jtitle><date>2006-09</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>179</spage><epage>193</epage><pages>179-193</pages><issn>1083-8155</issn><eissn>1573-1642</eissn><abstract>We analyze a core literature of urban ecology (all articles published in Urban Ecology and Urban Ecosystems from 1975–2004, n = 261) to support a reflexive analysis of the field. We structure this critical analysis based on criteria derived from programmatic statements made by scientific societies, research funding organizations and academic institutions regarding what urban ecology should be. Specifically, we assess the extent to which the literature reflects, and has evolved to reflect, a commitment to strengthen and expand the discipline of ecology create a transdisciplinary enterprise, and contribute to social and ecological wellbeing through applied research and policy engagement. Findings indicate that the literature strongly reflects these commitments, as these three tenets usefully describe the field and its evolution. We do, however, identify a tendency over time toward a more strictly disciplinary orientation. Ecological science is increasingly dominant and threatens to crowd out other scientific perspectives. This trend suggests that the field is maturing in the institutional sense, but perhaps at the cost of intellectual diversity, which many believe to be the basis of innovative solutions.</abstract><cop>Salzburg</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1007/s11252-006-8589-2</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1083-8155 |
ispartof | Urban ecosystems, 2006-09, Vol.9 (3), p.179-193 |
issn | 1083-8155 1573-1642 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860372182 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Politics Collection; Springer Nature; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | Bibliometrics business enterprises Ecological research Ecology ecosystems educational institutions evolution research policy research support |
title | Goal attainment in urban ecology research: A bibliometric review 1975–2004 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T13%3A18%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Goal%20attainment%20in%20urban%20ecology%20research:%20A%20bibliometric%20review%201975%E2%80%932004&rft.jtitle=Urban%20ecosystems&rft.au=Young,%20R.%20F&rft.date=2006-09&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=179&rft.epage=193&rft.pages=179-193&rft.issn=1083-8155&rft.eissn=1573-1642&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11252-006-8589-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E860372182%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-65b0497f89a61c05c85d82c18b499e5d74b4d3ea5d0445b63e2f452a08ad4863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=763045805&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |