How successful are plant species reintroductions?

• Published in: Biological conservation 2011-02, Vol.144 (2), p.672-682
• Main Authors: Godefroid, Sandrine, Piazza, Carole, Rossi, Graziano, Buord, Stéphane, Stevens, Albert-Dieter, Aguraiuja, Ruth, Cowell, Carly, Weekley, Carl W., Vogg, Gerd, Iriondo, José M., Johnson, Isabel, Dixon, Bob, Gordon, Doria, Magnanon, Sylvie, Valentin, Bertille, Bjureke, Kristina, Koopman, Rupert, Vicens, Magdalena, Virevaire, Myriam, Vanderborght, Thierry
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Applied ecology; Biological and medical sciences; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife; experimental design; flowering; fruiting; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; General aspects; genetic variation; monitoring; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking; Population augmentation; Population reinforcement; Population supplementation; questionnaires; recruitment; Restored populations; seedlings; seeds; site preparation; species differences; species reintroduction; Species translocation; surveys; survival rate
• ISSN: 0006-3207; 1873-2917
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.003

Reintroduction of native species has become increasingly important in conservation worldwide for recovery of rare species and restoration purposes. However, few studies have reported the outcome of reintroduction efforts in plant species. Using data from the literature combined with a questionnaire survey, this paper analyses 249 plant species reintroductions worldwide by assessing the methods used and the results obtained from these reintroduction experiments. The objectives were: (1) to examine how successful plant species reintroductions have been so far in establishing or significantly augmenting viable, self-sustaining populations in nature; (2) to determine the conditions under which we might expect plant species reintroductions to be most successful; (3) to make the results of this survey available for future plant reintroduction trials. Results indicate that survival, flowering and fruiting rates of reintroduced plants are generally quite low (on average 52%, 19% and 16%, respectively). Furthermore, our results show a success rate decline in individual experiments with time. Survival rates reported in the literature are also much higher (78% on average) than those mentioned by survey participants (33% on average). We identified various parameters that positively influence plant reintroduction outcomes, e.g., working in protected sites, using seedlings, increasing the number of reintroduced individuals, mixing material from diverse populations, using transplants from stable source populations, site preparation or management effort and knowledge of the genetic variation of the target species. This study also revealed shortcomings of common experimental designs that greatly limit the interpretation of plant reintroduction studies: (1) insufficient monitoring following reintroduction (usually ceasing after 4years); (2) inadequate documentation, which is especially acute for reintroductions that are regarded as failures; (3) lack of understanding of the underlying reasons for decline in existing plant populations; (4) overly optimistic evaluation of success based on short-term results; and (5) poorly defined success criteria for reintroduction projects. We therefore conclude that the value of plant reintroductions as a conservation tool could be improved by: (1) an increased focus on species biology; (2) using a higher number of transplants (preferring seedlings rather than seeds); (3) taking better account of seed production and recruitment when assess