Loading…
Selecting healthcare information systems provided by third-party vendors: A mind map beyond the manuals
The selection of a new healthcare information system (HIS) has always been a daunting process for clinicians, health care providers and policy makers. The objective of this study is to present the lessons learned and the main findings from several relevant case studies to support this process. Data...
Saved in:
Published in: | Informatics for health & social care 2010-01, Vol.35 (1), p.1-9 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0868519a9d8fa31623e697db884e70a32a3439f0a2678b1fab47ef0c5211f943 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0868519a9d8fa31623e697db884e70a32a3439f0a2678b1fab47ef0c5211f943 |
container_end_page | 9 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Informatics for health & social care |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Gortzis, Lefteris G. |
description | The selection of a new healthcare information system (HIS) has always been a daunting process for clinicians, health care providers and policy makers. The objective of this study is to present the lessons learned and the main findings from several relevant case studies to support this process. Data were collected by retrospectively reviewing the summative results of three well-established systems, acquiring feedback from two E.U. projects, and conducting semi-structured interviews with a number of collaborators involved in electronic healthcare interventions. Selection issues were identified and classified into the following five categories: (i) data creation, (ii) data management, (iii) data sharing, (iv) data presentation and (v) modules management. A mind map was also structured to provide a more manageable list of issues concerning the most common electronic clinical technologies (e-CT). The vendor manual is intended as an overview of the merchandise e-CT and therefore has limited potential in supporting effectively the selection process of a new HIS. The present classification and the mind map - based on lessons learned - provide a ready-to-use toolkit for supporting the HIS selection process when healthcare organisations are unable to employ research development groups to lay the groundwork for building a new HIS from scratch. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3109/17538150903123071 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860386364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733293031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0868519a9d8fa31623e697db884e70a32a3439f0a2678b1fab47ef0c5211f943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rFTEUhoMo9kN_gBvJztXUk2QmH-qmFD8KBRfqeshMkt6UmeSaZFrm35vLvVZEalfnJDzvy4EHoVcEzhgB9ZaIjknSgQJGKANBnqDj3V8jCe-e3u-dOEInOd8AcAAqnqMjCgxoy7pjdP3NTnYsPlzjjdVT2Yw6WeyDi2nWxceA85qLnTPepnjrjTV4WHHZ-GSarU5lxbc2mJjyO3yOZx8MnvUWD3aNdS0bW59h0VN-gZ65OuzLwzxFPz59_H7xpbn6-vny4vyqGVuuSmNActkRpZWRTjPCKbNcCTNI2VoBmlHNWqYcaMqFHIjTQyusg7GjhDjVslP0Zt9bz_252Fz62efRTpMONi65lxyY5Iw_ToqWKgBo4XGSMapYdVBJsifHFHNO1vXb5Ged1p5Av1PW_6OsZl4f2pdhtuY-8dtRBT7sgYOVu5gm0xe9TjG5pMPo86774f73f8X_aO5v4pJCtfGf634B1Gm15g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733293031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selecting healthcare information systems provided by third-party vendors: A mind map beyond the manuals</title><source>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Gortzis, Lefteris G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gortzis, Lefteris G.</creatorcontrib><description>The selection of a new healthcare information system (HIS) has always been a daunting process for clinicians, health care providers and policy makers. The objective of this study is to present the lessons learned and the main findings from several relevant case studies to support this process. Data were collected by retrospectively reviewing the summative results of three well-established systems, acquiring feedback from two E.U. projects, and conducting semi-structured interviews with a number of collaborators involved in electronic healthcare interventions. Selection issues were identified and classified into the following five categories: (i) data creation, (ii) data management, (iii) data sharing, (iv) data presentation and (v) modules management. A mind map was also structured to provide a more manageable list of issues concerning the most common electronic clinical technologies (e-CT). The vendor manual is intended as an overview of the merchandise e-CT and therefore has limited potential in supporting effectively the selection process of a new HIS. The present classification and the mind map - based on lessons learned - provide a ready-to-use toolkit for supporting the HIS selection process when healthcare organisations are unable to employ research development groups to lay the groundwork for building a new HIS from scratch.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1753-8157</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-8165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/17538150903123071</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20302435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Consumer health information ; data management ; Database selection ; Decision Making ; E-health ; evaluation ; Health Services ; Humans ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Information Systems - organization & administration ; mind map ; Retrospective Studies ; services selection ; Software Design ; systems ; User-Computer Interface</subject><ispartof>Informatics for health & social care, 2010-01, Vol.35 (1), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>2010 Informa UK Ltd 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0868519a9d8fa31623e697db884e70a32a3439f0a2678b1fab47ef0c5211f943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0868519a9d8fa31623e697db884e70a32a3439f0a2678b1fab47ef0c5211f943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,34115</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20302435$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gortzis, Lefteris G.</creatorcontrib><title>Selecting healthcare information systems provided by third-party vendors: A mind map beyond the manuals</title><title>Informatics for health & social care</title><addtitle>Inform Health Soc Care</addtitle><description>The selection of a new healthcare information system (HIS) has always been a daunting process for clinicians, health care providers and policy makers. The objective of this study is to present the lessons learned and the main findings from several relevant case studies to support this process. Data were collected by retrospectively reviewing the summative results of three well-established systems, acquiring feedback from two E.U. projects, and conducting semi-structured interviews with a number of collaborators involved in electronic healthcare interventions. Selection issues were identified and classified into the following five categories: (i) data creation, (ii) data management, (iii) data sharing, (iv) data presentation and (v) modules management. A mind map was also structured to provide a more manageable list of issues concerning the most common electronic clinical technologies (e-CT). The vendor manual is intended as an overview of the merchandise e-CT and therefore has limited potential in supporting effectively the selection process of a new HIS. The present classification and the mind map - based on lessons learned - provide a ready-to-use toolkit for supporting the HIS selection process when healthcare organisations are unable to employ research development groups to lay the groundwork for building a new HIS from scratch.</description><subject>Consumer health information</subject><subject>data management</subject><subject>Database selection</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>E-health</subject><subject>evaluation</subject><subject>Health Services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Information Systems - organization & administration</subject><subject>mind map</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>services selection</subject><subject>Software Design</subject><subject>systems</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><issn>1753-8157</issn><issn>1753-8165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1rFTEUhoMo9kN_gBvJztXUk2QmH-qmFD8KBRfqeshMkt6UmeSaZFrm35vLvVZEalfnJDzvy4EHoVcEzhgB9ZaIjknSgQJGKANBnqDj3V8jCe-e3u-dOEInOd8AcAAqnqMjCgxoy7pjdP3NTnYsPlzjjdVT2Yw6WeyDi2nWxceA85qLnTPepnjrjTV4WHHZ-GSarU5lxbc2mJjyO3yOZx8MnvUWD3aNdS0bW59h0VN-gZ65OuzLwzxFPz59_H7xpbn6-vny4vyqGVuuSmNActkRpZWRTjPCKbNcCTNI2VoBmlHNWqYcaMqFHIjTQyusg7GjhDjVslP0Zt9bz_252Fz62efRTpMONi65lxyY5Iw_ToqWKgBo4XGSMapYdVBJsifHFHNO1vXb5Ged1p5Av1PW_6OsZl4f2pdhtuY-8dtRBT7sgYOVu5gm0xe9TjG5pMPo86774f73f8X_aO5v4pJCtfGf634B1Gm15g</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Gortzis, Lefteris G.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Selecting healthcare information systems provided by third-party vendors: A mind map beyond the manuals</title><author>Gortzis, Lefteris G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0868519a9d8fa31623e697db884e70a32a3439f0a2678b1fab47ef0c5211f943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Consumer health information</topic><topic>data management</topic><topic>Database selection</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>E-health</topic><topic>evaluation</topic><topic>Health Services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Information Systems - organization & administration</topic><topic>mind map</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>services selection</topic><topic>Software Design</topic><topic>systems</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gortzis, Lefteris G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Informatics for health & social care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gortzis, Lefteris G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selecting healthcare information systems provided by third-party vendors: A mind map beyond the manuals</atitle><jtitle>Informatics for health & social care</jtitle><addtitle>Inform Health Soc Care</addtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>1753-8157</issn><eissn>1753-8165</eissn><abstract>The selection of a new healthcare information system (HIS) has always been a daunting process for clinicians, health care providers and policy makers. The objective of this study is to present the lessons learned and the main findings from several relevant case studies to support this process. Data were collected by retrospectively reviewing the summative results of three well-established systems, acquiring feedback from two E.U. projects, and conducting semi-structured interviews with a number of collaborators involved in electronic healthcare interventions. Selection issues were identified and classified into the following five categories: (i) data creation, (ii) data management, (iii) data sharing, (iv) data presentation and (v) modules management. A mind map was also structured to provide a more manageable list of issues concerning the most common electronic clinical technologies (e-CT). The vendor manual is intended as an overview of the merchandise e-CT and therefore has limited potential in supporting effectively the selection process of a new HIS. The present classification and the mind map - based on lessons learned - provide a ready-to-use toolkit for supporting the HIS selection process when healthcare organisations are unable to employ research development groups to lay the groundwork for building a new HIS from scratch.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>20302435</pmid><doi>10.3109/17538150903123071</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1753-8157 |
ispartof | Informatics for health & social care, 2010-01, Vol.35 (1), p.1-9 |
issn | 1753-8157 1753-8165 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860386364 |
source | Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list) |
subjects | Consumer health information data management Database selection Decision Making E-health evaluation Health Services Humans Information Storage and Retrieval Information Systems - organization & administration mind map Retrospective Studies services selection Software Design systems User-Computer Interface |
title | Selecting healthcare information systems provided by third-party vendors: A mind map beyond the manuals |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T12%3A12%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selecting%20healthcare%20information%20systems%20provided%20by%20third-party%20vendors:%20A%20mind%20map%20beyond%20the%20manuals&rft.jtitle=Informatics%20for%20health%20&%20social%20care&rft.au=Gortzis,%20Lefteris%20G.&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=1753-8157&rft.eissn=1753-8165&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/17538150903123071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733293031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0868519a9d8fa31623e697db884e70a32a3439f0a2678b1fab47ef0c5211f943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733293031&rft_id=info:pmid/20302435&rfr_iscdi=true |