Loading…

Selecting healthcare information systems provided by third-party vendors: A mind map beyond the manuals

The selection of a new healthcare information system (HIS) has always been a daunting process for clinicians, health care providers and policy makers. The objective of this study is to present the lessons learned and the main findings from several relevant case studies to support this process. Data...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Informatics for health & social care 2010-01, Vol.35 (1), p.1-9
Main Author: Gortzis, Lefteris G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0868519a9d8fa31623e697db884e70a32a3439f0a2678b1fab47ef0c5211f943
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0868519a9d8fa31623e697db884e70a32a3439f0a2678b1fab47ef0c5211f943
container_end_page 9
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Informatics for health & social care
container_volume 35
creator Gortzis, Lefteris G.
description The selection of a new healthcare information system (HIS) has always been a daunting process for clinicians, health care providers and policy makers. The objective of this study is to present the lessons learned and the main findings from several relevant case studies to support this process. Data were collected by retrospectively reviewing the summative results of three well-established systems, acquiring feedback from two E.U. projects, and conducting semi-structured interviews with a number of collaborators involved in electronic healthcare interventions. Selection issues were identified and classified into the following five categories: (i) data creation, (ii) data management, (iii) data sharing, (iv) data presentation and (v) modules management. A mind map was also structured to provide a more manageable list of issues concerning the most common electronic clinical technologies (e-CT). The vendor manual is intended as an overview of the merchandise e-CT and therefore has limited potential in supporting effectively the selection process of a new HIS. The present classification and the mind map - based on lessons learned - provide a ready-to-use toolkit for supporting the HIS selection process when healthcare organisations are unable to employ research development groups to lay the groundwork for building a new HIS from scratch.
doi_str_mv 10.3109/17538150903123071
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860386364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733293031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0868519a9d8fa31623e697db884e70a32a3439f0a2678b1fab47ef0c5211f943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1rFTEUhoMo9kN_gBvJztXUk2QmH-qmFD8KBRfqeshMkt6UmeSaZFrm35vLvVZEalfnJDzvy4EHoVcEzhgB9ZaIjknSgQJGKANBnqDj3V8jCe-e3u-dOEInOd8AcAAqnqMjCgxoy7pjdP3NTnYsPlzjjdVT2Yw6WeyDi2nWxceA85qLnTPepnjrjTV4WHHZ-GSarU5lxbc2mJjyO3yOZx8MnvUWD3aNdS0bW59h0VN-gZ65OuzLwzxFPz59_H7xpbn6-vny4vyqGVuuSmNActkRpZWRTjPCKbNcCTNI2VoBmlHNWqYcaMqFHIjTQyusg7GjhDjVslP0Zt9bz_252Fz62efRTpMONi65lxyY5Iw_ToqWKgBo4XGSMapYdVBJsifHFHNO1vXb5Ged1p5Av1PW_6OsZl4f2pdhtuY-8dtRBT7sgYOVu5gm0xe9TjG5pMPo86774f73f8X_aO5v4pJCtfGf634B1Gm15g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733293031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selecting healthcare information systems provided by third-party vendors: A mind map beyond the manuals</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Gortzis, Lefteris G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gortzis, Lefteris G.</creatorcontrib><description>The selection of a new healthcare information system (HIS) has always been a daunting process for clinicians, health care providers and policy makers. The objective of this study is to present the lessons learned and the main findings from several relevant case studies to support this process. Data were collected by retrospectively reviewing the summative results of three well-established systems, acquiring feedback from two E.U. projects, and conducting semi-structured interviews with a number of collaborators involved in electronic healthcare interventions. Selection issues were identified and classified into the following five categories: (i) data creation, (ii) data management, (iii) data sharing, (iv) data presentation and (v) modules management. A mind map was also structured to provide a more manageable list of issues concerning the most common electronic clinical technologies (e-CT). The vendor manual is intended as an overview of the merchandise e-CT and therefore has limited potential in supporting effectively the selection process of a new HIS. The present classification and the mind map - based on lessons learned - provide a ready-to-use toolkit for supporting the HIS selection process when healthcare organisations are unable to employ research development groups to lay the groundwork for building a new HIS from scratch.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1753-8157</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1753-8165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3109/17538150903123071</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20302435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Consumer health information ; data management ; Database selection ; Decision Making ; E-health ; evaluation ; Health Services ; Humans ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Information Systems - organization &amp; administration ; mind map ; Retrospective Studies ; services selection ; Software Design ; systems ; User-Computer Interface</subject><ispartof>Informatics for health &amp; social care, 2010-01, Vol.35 (1), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>2010 Informa UK Ltd 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0868519a9d8fa31623e697db884e70a32a3439f0a2678b1fab47ef0c5211f943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0868519a9d8fa31623e697db884e70a32a3439f0a2678b1fab47ef0c5211f943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,34115</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20302435$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gortzis, Lefteris G.</creatorcontrib><title>Selecting healthcare information systems provided by third-party vendors: A mind map beyond the manuals</title><title>Informatics for health &amp; social care</title><addtitle>Inform Health Soc Care</addtitle><description>The selection of a new healthcare information system (HIS) has always been a daunting process for clinicians, health care providers and policy makers. The objective of this study is to present the lessons learned and the main findings from several relevant case studies to support this process. Data were collected by retrospectively reviewing the summative results of three well-established systems, acquiring feedback from two E.U. projects, and conducting semi-structured interviews with a number of collaborators involved in electronic healthcare interventions. Selection issues were identified and classified into the following five categories: (i) data creation, (ii) data management, (iii) data sharing, (iv) data presentation and (v) modules management. A mind map was also structured to provide a more manageable list of issues concerning the most common electronic clinical technologies (e-CT). The vendor manual is intended as an overview of the merchandise e-CT and therefore has limited potential in supporting effectively the selection process of a new HIS. The present classification and the mind map - based on lessons learned - provide a ready-to-use toolkit for supporting the HIS selection process when healthcare organisations are unable to employ research development groups to lay the groundwork for building a new HIS from scratch.</description><subject>Consumer health information</subject><subject>data management</subject><subject>Database selection</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>E-health</subject><subject>evaluation</subject><subject>Health Services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Information Systems - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>mind map</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>services selection</subject><subject>Software Design</subject><subject>systems</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><issn>1753-8157</issn><issn>1753-8165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1rFTEUhoMo9kN_gBvJztXUk2QmH-qmFD8KBRfqeshMkt6UmeSaZFrm35vLvVZEalfnJDzvy4EHoVcEzhgB9ZaIjknSgQJGKANBnqDj3V8jCe-e3u-dOEInOd8AcAAqnqMjCgxoy7pjdP3NTnYsPlzjjdVT2Yw6WeyDi2nWxceA85qLnTPepnjrjTV4WHHZ-GSarU5lxbc2mJjyO3yOZx8MnvUWD3aNdS0bW59h0VN-gZ65OuzLwzxFPz59_H7xpbn6-vny4vyqGVuuSmNActkRpZWRTjPCKbNcCTNI2VoBmlHNWqYcaMqFHIjTQyusg7GjhDjVslP0Zt9bz_252Fz62efRTpMONi65lxyY5Iw_ToqWKgBo4XGSMapYdVBJsifHFHNO1vXb5Ged1p5Av1PW_6OsZl4f2pdhtuY-8dtRBT7sgYOVu5gm0xe9TjG5pMPo86774f73f8X_aO5v4pJCtfGf634B1Gm15g</recordid><startdate>201001</startdate><enddate>201001</enddate><creator>Gortzis, Lefteris G.</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201001</creationdate><title>Selecting healthcare information systems provided by third-party vendors: A mind map beyond the manuals</title><author>Gortzis, Lefteris G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0868519a9d8fa31623e697db884e70a32a3439f0a2678b1fab47ef0c5211f943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Consumer health information</topic><topic>data management</topic><topic>Database selection</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>E-health</topic><topic>evaluation</topic><topic>Health Services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Information Systems - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>mind map</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>services selection</topic><topic>Software Design</topic><topic>systems</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gortzis, Lefteris G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Informatics for health &amp; social care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gortzis, Lefteris G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selecting healthcare information systems provided by third-party vendors: A mind map beyond the manuals</atitle><jtitle>Informatics for health &amp; social care</jtitle><addtitle>Inform Health Soc Care</addtitle><date>2010-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>1753-8157</issn><eissn>1753-8165</eissn><abstract>The selection of a new healthcare information system (HIS) has always been a daunting process for clinicians, health care providers and policy makers. The objective of this study is to present the lessons learned and the main findings from several relevant case studies to support this process. Data were collected by retrospectively reviewing the summative results of three well-established systems, acquiring feedback from two E.U. projects, and conducting semi-structured interviews with a number of collaborators involved in electronic healthcare interventions. Selection issues were identified and classified into the following five categories: (i) data creation, (ii) data management, (iii) data sharing, (iv) data presentation and (v) modules management. A mind map was also structured to provide a more manageable list of issues concerning the most common electronic clinical technologies (e-CT). The vendor manual is intended as an overview of the merchandise e-CT and therefore has limited potential in supporting effectively the selection process of a new HIS. The present classification and the mind map - based on lessons learned - provide a ready-to-use toolkit for supporting the HIS selection process when healthcare organisations are unable to employ research development groups to lay the groundwork for building a new HIS from scratch.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>20302435</pmid><doi>10.3109/17538150903123071</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1753-8157
ispartof Informatics for health & social care, 2010-01, Vol.35 (1), p.1-9
issn 1753-8157
1753-8165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_860386364
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects Consumer health information
data management
Database selection
Decision Making
E-health
evaluation
Health Services
Humans
Information Storage and Retrieval
Information Systems - organization & administration
mind map
Retrospective Studies
services selection
Software Design
systems
User-Computer Interface
title Selecting healthcare information systems provided by third-party vendors: A mind map beyond the manuals
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T12%3A12%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selecting%20healthcare%20information%20systems%20provided%20by%20third-party%20vendors:%20A%20mind%20map%20beyond%20the%20manuals&rft.jtitle=Informatics%20for%20health%20&%20social%20care&rft.au=Gortzis,%20Lefteris%20G.&rft.date=2010-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=1753-8157&rft.eissn=1753-8165&rft_id=info:doi/10.3109/17538150903123071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733293031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-d0868519a9d8fa31623e697db884e70a32a3439f0a2678b1fab47ef0c5211f943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733293031&rft_id=info:pmid/20302435&rfr_iscdi=true