Loading…

Deformed microstructures of two-phase Zr–2.5Nb alloy: Effects of the second phase hardness

Two types, A and B, of Zr–2.5Nb samples were subjected to compression tests. Both samples consisted of similar microstructure – hexagonal closed packed (hcp) α phase (the primary phase) and grain boundary bcc (body centered cubic) β phase. However, the hardness of the β phase differed between the sa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of nuclear materials 2010-09, Vol.404 (3), p.222-230
Main Authors: Sahoo, S.K., Hiwarkar, V.D., Jain, L., Samajdar, I., Pant, P., Dey, G.K., Srivastav, D., Tewari, R., Banerjee, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two types, A and B, of Zr–2.5Nb samples were subjected to compression tests. Both samples consisted of similar microstructure – hexagonal closed packed (hcp) α phase (the primary phase) and grain boundary bcc (body centered cubic) β phase. However, the hardness of the β phase differed between the samples – respectively being hard (sample A) and soft (sample B) relative to the primary phase. This difference was caused by the presence of fine ω precipitates. The relative hardness of β phase determined almost all aspects of deformed microstructure developments. In sample A, the primary phase had higher lattice strain and in-grain misorientation developments. In sample B, on the other hand, the softer β phase was clearly linked to more deformation twinning and associated grain size refinement and ‘texturing’ of the hcp α phase.
ISSN:0022-3115
1873-4820
DOI:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.07.028