Loading…
Deformed microstructures of two-phase Zr–2.5Nb alloy: Effects of the second phase hardness
Two types, A and B, of Zr–2.5Nb samples were subjected to compression tests. Both samples consisted of similar microstructure – hexagonal closed packed (hcp) α phase (the primary phase) and grain boundary bcc (body centered cubic) β phase. However, the hardness of the β phase differed between the sa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of nuclear materials 2010-09, Vol.404 (3), p.222-230 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Two types, A and B, of Zr–2.5Nb samples were subjected to compression tests. Both samples consisted of similar microstructure – hexagonal closed packed (hcp) α phase (the primary phase) and grain boundary bcc (body centered cubic) β phase. However, the hardness of the β phase differed between the samples – respectively being hard (sample A) and soft (sample B) relative to the primary phase. This difference was caused by the presence of fine ω precipitates. The relative hardness of β phase determined almost all aspects of deformed microstructure developments. In sample A, the primary phase had higher lattice strain and in-grain misorientation developments. In sample B, on the other hand, the softer β phase was clearly linked to more deformation twinning and associated grain size refinement and ‘texturing’ of the hcp α phase. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-3115 1873-4820 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.07.028 |