Loading…
Does the Pareto distribution adequately describe the size-distribution of lakes?
When it comes to evaluating lakes at regional and global scales, a key need is accurate estimates of the abundance and size-distribution of lakes, which are usually described with the Pareto distribution. We demonstrate the considerable uncertainty that truncation in the lower tail of the Pareto dis...
Saved in:
Published in: | Limnology and oceanography 2011-01, Vol.56 (1), p.350-356 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4490-3725c358a0edfe8d753ec31af9ef9fe0f6428a4e954af9cb683b399efd4bf763 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 356 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 350 |
container_title | Limnology and oceanography |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Seekell, David A. Pace, Michael L. |
description | When it comes to evaluating lakes at regional and global scales, a key need is accurate estimates of the abundance and size-distribution of lakes, which are usually described with the Pareto distribution. We demonstrate the considerable uncertainty that truncation in the lower tail of the Pareto distribution introduces into lake abundance estimates and the selection of the lake size-distribution. Truncation in the lower tail eliminates lakes below a certain size and is generally performed because small lakes are not accurately represented on maps. When simulated data are truncated to mimic available lake size data, non-Pareto distributions are visually and statistically indistinguishable from the Pareto distribution. The Pareto distribution may be one of many possible forms that mimic the global lake size-distribution in the upper tail, but the fit of the Pareto to the lower tail is uncertain, largely because the abundance of small lakes is uncertain. Some other potential size-distributions, such as the lognormal distribution, predict abundances of small lakes to be orders of magnitude lower than do the Pareto distribution predictions. Highly resolved regional lake size data for the Adirondack Mountains of New York and the Northern Highland Lake District of Wisconsin do not conform to the Pareto distribution. Lake sizes on Mars also do not conform to the Pareto. Uncertainty in the lake size-distribution seriously limits understanding of the significance of lakes as repositories of organic carbon as well as the calculation of global greenhouse gas emissions from these systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4319/lo.2011.56.1.0350 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862784147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26953868</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26953868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4490-3725c358a0edfe8d753ec31af9ef9fe0f6428a4e954af9cb683b399efd4bf763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwAzgg5YI4JdjxI_EBIVSeUkV76N1ykrVIcevWToTKrychFYgTp12Nv5mVB6FzghNGiby2LkkxIQkXCUkw5fgAjYikMuZc4kM0wjhlMe32Y3QSwhJjLDnnIzS_dxCi5g2iufbQuKiqQ-Prom1qt450BdtWN2B3UQWh7HT4ZkP9CfEf0pnI6ncIt6foyGgb4Gw_x2jx-LCYPMfT2dPL5G4aa8YkjmmW8pLyXGOoDORVximUlGgjwUgD2AiW5pqB5KzTykLktKCye6xYYTJBx-hqiN14t20hNGpVhxKs1WtwbVC5SLOcEZZ1JBnI0rsQPBi18fVK-50iWPXdKetU353iQhHVd9d5LvfpOpTaGq_XZR1-jCnNckow67ibgfuoLez-D1bT11mvcEH2dy4G_zI0zv_mC8lp3n35C32WjAI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>862784147</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the Pareto distribution adequately describe the size-distribution of lakes?</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Seekell, David A. ; Pace, Michael L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Seekell, David A. ; Pace, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><description>When it comes to evaluating lakes at regional and global scales, a key need is accurate estimates of the abundance and size-distribution of lakes, which are usually described with the Pareto distribution. We demonstrate the considerable uncertainty that truncation in the lower tail of the Pareto distribution introduces into lake abundance estimates and the selection of the lake size-distribution. Truncation in the lower tail eliminates lakes below a certain size and is generally performed because small lakes are not accurately represented on maps. When simulated data are truncated to mimic available lake size data, non-Pareto distributions are visually and statistically indistinguishable from the Pareto distribution. The Pareto distribution may be one of many possible forms that mimic the global lake size-distribution in the upper tail, but the fit of the Pareto to the lower tail is uncertain, largely because the abundance of small lakes is uncertain. Some other potential size-distributions, such as the lognormal distribution, predict abundances of small lakes to be orders of magnitude lower than do the Pareto distribution predictions. Highly resolved regional lake size data for the Adirondack Mountains of New York and the Northern Highland Lake District of Wisconsin do not conform to the Pareto distribution. Lake sizes on Mars also do not conform to the Pareto. Uncertainty in the lake size-distribution seriously limits understanding of the significance of lakes as repositories of organic carbon as well as the calculation of global greenhouse gas emissions from these systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0024-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5590</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4319/lo.2011.56.1.0350</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LIOCAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Waco, TX: John Wiley and Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Areal geology ; Areal geology. Maps ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Freshwater ; Geologic maps, cartography ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Marine</subject><ispartof>Limnology and oceanography, 2011-01, Vol.56 (1), p.350-356</ispartof><rights>2011, by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.</rights><rights>2011, by the Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4490-3725c358a0edfe8d753ec31af9ef9fe0f6428a4e954af9cb683b399efd4bf763</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26953868$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26953868$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,58213,58446</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23783104$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seekell, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pace, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><title>Does the Pareto distribution adequately describe the size-distribution of lakes?</title><title>Limnology and oceanography</title><description>When it comes to evaluating lakes at regional and global scales, a key need is accurate estimates of the abundance and size-distribution of lakes, which are usually described with the Pareto distribution. We demonstrate the considerable uncertainty that truncation in the lower tail of the Pareto distribution introduces into lake abundance estimates and the selection of the lake size-distribution. Truncation in the lower tail eliminates lakes below a certain size and is generally performed because small lakes are not accurately represented on maps. When simulated data are truncated to mimic available lake size data, non-Pareto distributions are visually and statistically indistinguishable from the Pareto distribution. The Pareto distribution may be one of many possible forms that mimic the global lake size-distribution in the upper tail, but the fit of the Pareto to the lower tail is uncertain, largely because the abundance of small lakes is uncertain. Some other potential size-distributions, such as the lognormal distribution, predict abundances of small lakes to be orders of magnitude lower than do the Pareto distribution predictions. Highly resolved regional lake size data for the Adirondack Mountains of New York and the Northern Highland Lake District of Wisconsin do not conform to the Pareto distribution. Lake sizes on Mars also do not conform to the Pareto. Uncertainty in the lake size-distribution seriously limits understanding of the significance of lakes as repositories of organic carbon as well as the calculation of global greenhouse gas emissions from these systems.</description><subject>Areal geology</subject><subject>Areal geology. Maps</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Geologic maps, cartography</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Marine</subject><issn>0024-3590</issn><issn>1939-5590</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwAzgg5YI4JdjxI_EBIVSeUkV76N1ykrVIcevWToTKrychFYgTp12Nv5mVB6FzghNGiby2LkkxIQkXCUkw5fgAjYikMuZc4kM0wjhlMe32Y3QSwhJjLDnnIzS_dxCi5g2iufbQuKiqQ-Prom1qt450BdtWN2B3UQWh7HT4ZkP9CfEf0pnI6ncIt6foyGgb4Gw_x2jx-LCYPMfT2dPL5G4aa8YkjmmW8pLyXGOoDORVximUlGgjwUgD2AiW5pqB5KzTykLktKCye6xYYTJBx-hqiN14t20hNGpVhxKs1WtwbVC5SLOcEZZ1JBnI0rsQPBi18fVK-50iWPXdKetU353iQhHVd9d5LvfpOpTaGq_XZR1-jCnNckow67ibgfuoLez-D1bT11mvcEH2dy4G_zI0zv_mC8lp3n35C32WjAI</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Seekell, David A.</creator><creator>Pace, Michael L.</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</general><general>American Society of Limnology and Oceanography</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Does the Pareto distribution adequately describe the size-distribution of lakes?</title><author>Seekell, David A. ; Pace, Michael L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4490-3725c358a0edfe8d753ec31af9ef9fe0f6428a4e954af9cb683b399efd4bf763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Areal geology</topic><topic>Areal geology. Maps</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Geologic maps, cartography</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Marine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seekell, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pace, Michael L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seekell, David A.</au><au>Pace, Michael L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the Pareto distribution adequately describe the size-distribution of lakes?</atitle><jtitle>Limnology and oceanography</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>350</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>350-356</pages><issn>0024-3590</issn><eissn>1939-5590</eissn><coden>LIOCAH</coden><abstract>When it comes to evaluating lakes at regional and global scales, a key need is accurate estimates of the abundance and size-distribution of lakes, which are usually described with the Pareto distribution. We demonstrate the considerable uncertainty that truncation in the lower tail of the Pareto distribution introduces into lake abundance estimates and the selection of the lake size-distribution. Truncation in the lower tail eliminates lakes below a certain size and is generally performed because small lakes are not accurately represented on maps. When simulated data are truncated to mimic available lake size data, non-Pareto distributions are visually and statistically indistinguishable from the Pareto distribution. The Pareto distribution may be one of many possible forms that mimic the global lake size-distribution in the upper tail, but the fit of the Pareto to the lower tail is uncertain, largely because the abundance of small lakes is uncertain. Some other potential size-distributions, such as the lognormal distribution, predict abundances of small lakes to be orders of magnitude lower than do the Pareto distribution predictions. Highly resolved regional lake size data for the Adirondack Mountains of New York and the Northern Highland Lake District of Wisconsin do not conform to the Pareto distribution. Lake sizes on Mars also do not conform to the Pareto. Uncertainty in the lake size-distribution seriously limits understanding of the significance of lakes as repositories of organic carbon as well as the calculation of global greenhouse gas emissions from these systems.</abstract><cop>Waco, TX</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.4319/lo.2011.56.1.0350</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0024-3590 |
ispartof | Limnology and oceanography, 2011-01, Vol.56 (1), p.350-356 |
issn | 0024-3590 1939-5590 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_862784147 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Areal geology Areal geology. Maps Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology Freshwater Geologic maps, cartography Hydrology Hydrology. Hydrogeology Marine |
title | Does the Pareto distribution adequately describe the size-distribution of lakes? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A42%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20Pareto%20distribution%20adequately%20describe%20the%20size-distribution%20of%20lakes?&rft.jtitle=Limnology%20and%20oceanography&rft.au=Seekell,%20David%20A.&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=350&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=350-356&rft.issn=0024-3590&rft.eissn=1939-5590&rft.coden=LIOCAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.4319/lo.2011.56.1.0350&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26953868%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4490-3725c358a0edfe8d753ec31af9ef9fe0f6428a4e954af9cb683b399efd4bf763%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=862784147&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26953868&rfr_iscdi=true |