Loading…
Placebos in Clinical Practice: Comparing Attitudes, Beliefs, and Patterns of Use between Academic Psychiatrists and Nonpsychiatrists
Controversial and ethically tenuous, the use of placebos is central to medicine but even more pivotal to psychosocial therapies. Scholars, researchers, and practitioners largely disagree about the conceptualization of placebos. While different professionals often confound the meanings of placebo eff...
Saved in:
Published in: | Canadian journal of psychiatry 2011-04, Vol.56 (4), p.198-208 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-246957c84066833e00f99d0125fad1404ef26616e9a0f55f0b16901cf8801ee3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-246957c84066833e00f99d0125fad1404ef26616e9a0f55f0b16901cf8801ee3 |
container_end_page | 208 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 198 |
container_title | Canadian journal of psychiatry |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Raz, Amir Campbell, Natasha Guindi, Daniella Holcroft, Christina Déry, Catherine Cukier, Olivia |
description | Controversial and ethically tenuous, the use of placebos is central to medicine but even more pivotal to psychosocial therapies. Scholars, researchers, and practitioners largely disagree about the conceptualization of placebos. While different professionals often confound the meanings of placebo effects with placebo responses, physicians continue to prescribe placebos as part of clinical practice. Our study aims to review attitudes and beliefs concerning placebos outside of clinical research. Herein we compare patterns of placebo use reported by academic psychiatrists with those reported by physicians from different specialties across Canadian medical schools. Using a web-based tool, we circulated an online survey to all 17 Canadian medical schools, with a special emphasis on psychiatry departments therein and in university-affiliated teaching hospitals. A variation on earlier efforts, our 5-minute, 21-question survey was anonymous. Among the 606 respondents who completed our online survey, 257 were psychiatrists. Our analysis revealed that psychiatrists prescribed significantly more subtherapeutic doses of medication than physicians in other specialties, although about 20% of both psychiatrists and nonpsychiatrists prescribed placebos regularly as part of routine clinical practice. However, compared with 6% of nonpsychiatrists, only 2% of psychiatrists deemed placebos of no clinical benefit. In addition, more than 60% of psychiatrists either agreed or strongly agreed that placebos had therapeutic effects relative to fewer than 45% of other practitioners. Findings from this pan-Canadian survey suggest that, compared with other physicians, psychiatrists seem to better value the influence placebos wield on the mind and body and maintain more favourable beliefs and attitudes toward placebo phenomena. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/070674371105600403 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_863426936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_070674371105600403</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2347118601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-246957c84066833e00f99d0125fad1404ef26616e9a0f55f0b16901cf8801ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFP3DAQhS1U1F1o_wAHZPXSSwNjx7ETbsuqtEgI9kDPkdcZL0aJs9iOEPf-cLIsLQgk5jKj0ffejPQIOWBwxJhSx6BAKpErxqCQAALyHTJlolIZACs-kekGyDbEhOzFeAtjcV5-JhPOClBcySn5u2i1wWUfqfN03jrvjG7pImiTnMETOu-7tQ7Or-gsJZeGBuMPeoqtQzsO2jd0oVPC4CPtLf0TkS4x3SN6OjO6wc4ZuogP5sbpFFxM8Uly2fv16-UXsmt1G_Hrc98n12c_r-e_s4urX-fz2UVmBMtTxoWsCmVKAVKWeY4AtqoaYLywumECBFouJZNYabBFYWHJZAXM2LIEhpjvk-9b23Xo7waMqe5cNNi22mM_xLqUueCyyuVIfntD3vZD8ONvIySFkLzkI8S3kAl9jAFtvQ6u0-GhZlBvAqrfBzSKDp-dh2WHzX_Jv0RG4HgLRL3Cl7MfWD4CmpOX4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>866446282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Placebos in Clinical Practice: Comparing Attitudes, Beliefs, and Patterns of Use between Academic Psychiatrists and Nonpsychiatrists</title><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Raz, Amir ; Campbell, Natasha ; Guindi, Daniella ; Holcroft, Christina ; Déry, Catherine ; Cukier, Olivia</creator><creatorcontrib>Raz, Amir ; Campbell, Natasha ; Guindi, Daniella ; Holcroft, Christina ; Déry, Catherine ; Cukier, Olivia</creatorcontrib><description>Controversial and ethically tenuous, the use of placebos is central to medicine but even more pivotal to psychosocial therapies. Scholars, researchers, and practitioners largely disagree about the conceptualization of placebos. While different professionals often confound the meanings of placebo effects with placebo responses, physicians continue to prescribe placebos as part of clinical practice. Our study aims to review attitudes and beliefs concerning placebos outside of clinical research. Herein we compare patterns of placebo use reported by academic psychiatrists with those reported by physicians from different specialties across Canadian medical schools. Using a web-based tool, we circulated an online survey to all 17 Canadian medical schools, with a special emphasis on psychiatry departments therein and in university-affiliated teaching hospitals. A variation on earlier efforts, our 5-minute, 21-question survey was anonymous. Among the 606 respondents who completed our online survey, 257 were psychiatrists. Our analysis revealed that psychiatrists prescribed significantly more subtherapeutic doses of medication than physicians in other specialties, although about 20% of both psychiatrists and nonpsychiatrists prescribed placebos regularly as part of routine clinical practice. However, compared with 6% of nonpsychiatrists, only 2% of psychiatrists deemed placebos of no clinical benefit. In addition, more than 60% of psychiatrists either agreed or strongly agreed that placebos had therapeutic effects relative to fewer than 45% of other practitioners. Findings from this pan-Canadian survey suggest that, compared with other physicians, psychiatrists seem to better value the influence placebos wield on the mind and body and maintain more favourable beliefs and attitudes toward placebo phenomena.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0706-7437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1497-0015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/070674371105600403</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21507276</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Clinical Medicine - methods ; Clinical Medicine - standards ; Complementary Therapies - ethics ; Complementary Therapies - methods ; Complementary Therapies - standards ; Culture ; Data Collection ; Ethics, Medical ; General Practitioners - ethics ; General Practitioners - psychology ; Health Services Research ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Medical research ; Physicians ; Placebo Effect ; Placebos - therapeutic use ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - ethics ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards ; Psychiatric Department, Hospital ; Psychiatry ; Psychiatry - ethics ; Psychiatry - methods ; Psychiatry - standards ; Science ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of psychiatry, 2011-04, Vol.56 (4), p.198-208</ispartof><rights>2011 Canadian Psychiatric Association</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Psychiatric Association Apr 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-246957c84066833e00f99d0125fad1404ef26616e9a0f55f0b16901cf8801ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-246957c84066833e00f99d0125fad1404ef26616e9a0f55f0b16901cf8801ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,27922,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21507276$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raz, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guindi, Daniella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holcroft, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Déry, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cukier, Olivia</creatorcontrib><title>Placebos in Clinical Practice: Comparing Attitudes, Beliefs, and Patterns of Use between Academic Psychiatrists and Nonpsychiatrists</title><title>Canadian journal of psychiatry</title><addtitle>Can J Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Controversial and ethically tenuous, the use of placebos is central to medicine but even more pivotal to psychosocial therapies. Scholars, researchers, and practitioners largely disagree about the conceptualization of placebos. While different professionals often confound the meanings of placebo effects with placebo responses, physicians continue to prescribe placebos as part of clinical practice. Our study aims to review attitudes and beliefs concerning placebos outside of clinical research. Herein we compare patterns of placebo use reported by academic psychiatrists with those reported by physicians from different specialties across Canadian medical schools. Using a web-based tool, we circulated an online survey to all 17 Canadian medical schools, with a special emphasis on psychiatry departments therein and in university-affiliated teaching hospitals. A variation on earlier efforts, our 5-minute, 21-question survey was anonymous. Among the 606 respondents who completed our online survey, 257 were psychiatrists. Our analysis revealed that psychiatrists prescribed significantly more subtherapeutic doses of medication than physicians in other specialties, although about 20% of both psychiatrists and nonpsychiatrists prescribed placebos regularly as part of routine clinical practice. However, compared with 6% of nonpsychiatrists, only 2% of psychiatrists deemed placebos of no clinical benefit. In addition, more than 60% of psychiatrists either agreed or strongly agreed that placebos had therapeutic effects relative to fewer than 45% of other practitioners. Findings from this pan-Canadian survey suggest that, compared with other physicians, psychiatrists seem to better value the influence placebos wield on the mind and body and maintain more favourable beliefs and attitudes toward placebo phenomena.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Clinical Medicine - methods</subject><subject>Clinical Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Complementary Therapies - ethics</subject><subject>Complementary Therapies - methods</subject><subject>Complementary Therapies - standards</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Ethics, Medical</subject><subject>General Practitioners - ethics</subject><subject>General Practitioners - psychology</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Hospitals, University</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Placebo Effect</subject><subject>Placebos - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - ethics</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards</subject><subject>Psychiatric Department, Hospital</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychiatry - ethics</subject><subject>Psychiatry - methods</subject><subject>Psychiatry - standards</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0706-7437</issn><issn>1497-0015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFP3DAQhS1U1F1o_wAHZPXSSwNjx7ETbsuqtEgI9kDPkdcZL0aJs9iOEPf-cLIsLQgk5jKj0ffejPQIOWBwxJhSx6BAKpErxqCQAALyHTJlolIZACs-kekGyDbEhOzFeAtjcV5-JhPOClBcySn5u2i1wWUfqfN03jrvjG7pImiTnMETOu-7tQ7Or-gsJZeGBuMPeoqtQzsO2jd0oVPC4CPtLf0TkS4x3SN6OjO6wc4ZuogP5sbpFFxM8Uly2fv16-UXsmt1G_Hrc98n12c_r-e_s4urX-fz2UVmBMtTxoWsCmVKAVKWeY4AtqoaYLywumECBFouJZNYabBFYWHJZAXM2LIEhpjvk-9b23Xo7waMqe5cNNi22mM_xLqUueCyyuVIfntD3vZD8ONvIySFkLzkI8S3kAl9jAFtvQ6u0-GhZlBvAqrfBzSKDp-dh2WHzX_Jv0RG4HgLRL3Cl7MfWD4CmpOX4w</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Raz, Amir</creator><creator>Campbell, Natasha</creator><creator>Guindi, Daniella</creator><creator>Holcroft, Christina</creator><creator>Déry, Catherine</creator><creator>Cukier, Olivia</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Placebos in Clinical Practice: Comparing Attitudes, Beliefs, and Patterns of Use between Academic Psychiatrists and Nonpsychiatrists</title><author>Raz, Amir ; Campbell, Natasha ; Guindi, Daniella ; Holcroft, Christina ; Déry, Catherine ; Cukier, Olivia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-246957c84066833e00f99d0125fad1404ef26616e9a0f55f0b16901cf8801ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Clinical Medicine - methods</topic><topic>Clinical Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Complementary Therapies - ethics</topic><topic>Complementary Therapies - methods</topic><topic>Complementary Therapies - standards</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Ethics, Medical</topic><topic>General Practitioners - ethics</topic><topic>General Practitioners - psychology</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Hospitals, University</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Placebo Effect</topic><topic>Placebos - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - ethics</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards</topic><topic>Psychiatric Department, Hospital</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychiatry - ethics</topic><topic>Psychiatry - methods</topic><topic>Psychiatry - standards</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raz, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guindi, Daniella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holcroft, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Déry, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cukier, Olivia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raz, Amir</au><au>Campbell, Natasha</au><au>Guindi, Daniella</au><au>Holcroft, Christina</au><au>Déry, Catherine</au><au>Cukier, Olivia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Placebos in Clinical Practice: Comparing Attitudes, Beliefs, and Patterns of Use between Academic Psychiatrists and Nonpsychiatrists</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>208</epage><pages>198-208</pages><issn>0706-7437</issn><eissn>1497-0015</eissn><abstract>Controversial and ethically tenuous, the use of placebos is central to medicine but even more pivotal to psychosocial therapies. Scholars, researchers, and practitioners largely disagree about the conceptualization of placebos. While different professionals often confound the meanings of placebo effects with placebo responses, physicians continue to prescribe placebos as part of clinical practice. Our study aims to review attitudes and beliefs concerning placebos outside of clinical research. Herein we compare patterns of placebo use reported by academic psychiatrists with those reported by physicians from different specialties across Canadian medical schools. Using a web-based tool, we circulated an online survey to all 17 Canadian medical schools, with a special emphasis on psychiatry departments therein and in university-affiliated teaching hospitals. A variation on earlier efforts, our 5-minute, 21-question survey was anonymous. Among the 606 respondents who completed our online survey, 257 were psychiatrists. Our analysis revealed that psychiatrists prescribed significantly more subtherapeutic doses of medication than physicians in other specialties, although about 20% of both psychiatrists and nonpsychiatrists prescribed placebos regularly as part of routine clinical practice. However, compared with 6% of nonpsychiatrists, only 2% of psychiatrists deemed placebos of no clinical benefit. In addition, more than 60% of psychiatrists either agreed or strongly agreed that placebos had therapeutic effects relative to fewer than 45% of other practitioners. Findings from this pan-Canadian survey suggest that, compared with other physicians, psychiatrists seem to better value the influence placebos wield on the mind and body and maintain more favourable beliefs and attitudes toward placebo phenomena.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21507276</pmid><doi>10.1177/070674371105600403</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0706-7437 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of psychiatry, 2011-04, Vol.56 (4), p.198-208 |
issn | 0706-7437 1497-0015 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_863426936 |
source | SAGE Journals |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Clinical Medicine - methods Clinical Medicine - standards Complementary Therapies - ethics Complementary Therapies - methods Complementary Therapies - standards Culture Data Collection Ethics, Medical General Practitioners - ethics General Practitioners - psychology Health Services Research Hospitals, University Humans Medical research Physicians Placebo Effect Placebos - therapeutic use Practice Patterns, Physicians' - ethics Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards Psychiatric Department, Hospital Psychiatry Psychiatry - ethics Psychiatry - methods Psychiatry - standards Science Studies Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Placebos in Clinical Practice: Comparing Attitudes, Beliefs, and Patterns of Use between Academic Psychiatrists and Nonpsychiatrists |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T17%3A32%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Placebos%20in%20Clinical%20Practice:%20Comparing%20Attitudes,%20Beliefs,%20and%20Patterns%20of%20Use%20between%20Academic%20Psychiatrists%20and%20Nonpsychiatrists&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20psychiatry&rft.au=Raz,%20Amir&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=208&rft.pages=198-208&rft.issn=0706-7437&rft.eissn=1497-0015&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/070674371105600403&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2347118601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-246957c84066833e00f99d0125fad1404ef26616e9a0f55f0b16901cf8801ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=866446282&rft_id=info:pmid/21507276&rft_sage_id=10.1177_070674371105600403&rfr_iscdi=true |