Loading…

Placebos in Clinical Practice: Comparing Attitudes, Beliefs, and Patterns of Use between Academic Psychiatrists and Nonpsychiatrists

Controversial and ethically tenuous, the use of placebos is central to medicine but even more pivotal to psychosocial therapies. Scholars, researchers, and practitioners largely disagree about the conceptualization of placebos. While different professionals often confound the meanings of placebo eff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian journal of psychiatry 2011-04, Vol.56 (4), p.198-208
Main Authors: Raz, Amir, Campbell, Natasha, Guindi, Daniella, Holcroft, Christina, Déry, Catherine, Cukier, Olivia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-246957c84066833e00f99d0125fad1404ef26616e9a0f55f0b16901cf8801ee3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-246957c84066833e00f99d0125fad1404ef26616e9a0f55f0b16901cf8801ee3
container_end_page 208
container_issue 4
container_start_page 198
container_title Canadian journal of psychiatry
container_volume 56
creator Raz, Amir
Campbell, Natasha
Guindi, Daniella
Holcroft, Christina
Déry, Catherine
Cukier, Olivia
description Controversial and ethically tenuous, the use of placebos is central to medicine but even more pivotal to psychosocial therapies. Scholars, researchers, and practitioners largely disagree about the conceptualization of placebos. While different professionals often confound the meanings of placebo effects with placebo responses, physicians continue to prescribe placebos as part of clinical practice. Our study aims to review attitudes and beliefs concerning placebos outside of clinical research. Herein we compare patterns of placebo use reported by academic psychiatrists with those reported by physicians from different specialties across Canadian medical schools. Using a web-based tool, we circulated an online survey to all 17 Canadian medical schools, with a special emphasis on psychiatry departments therein and in university-affiliated teaching hospitals. A variation on earlier efforts, our 5-minute, 21-question survey was anonymous. Among the 606 respondents who completed our online survey, 257 were psychiatrists. Our analysis revealed that psychiatrists prescribed significantly more subtherapeutic doses of medication than physicians in other specialties, although about 20% of both psychiatrists and nonpsychiatrists prescribed placebos regularly as part of routine clinical practice. However, compared with 6% of nonpsychiatrists, only 2% of psychiatrists deemed placebos of no clinical benefit. In addition, more than 60% of psychiatrists either agreed or strongly agreed that placebos had therapeutic effects relative to fewer than 45% of other practitioners. Findings from this pan-Canadian survey suggest that, compared with other physicians, psychiatrists seem to better value the influence placebos wield on the mind and body and maintain more favourable beliefs and attitudes toward placebo phenomena.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/070674371105600403
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_863426936</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_070674371105600403</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2347118601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-246957c84066833e00f99d0125fad1404ef26616e9a0f55f0b16901cf8801ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFP3DAQhS1U1F1o_wAHZPXSSwNjx7ETbsuqtEgI9kDPkdcZL0aJs9iOEPf-cLIsLQgk5jKj0ffejPQIOWBwxJhSx6BAKpErxqCQAALyHTJlolIZACs-kekGyDbEhOzFeAtjcV5-JhPOClBcySn5u2i1wWUfqfN03jrvjG7pImiTnMETOu-7tQ7Or-gsJZeGBuMPeoqtQzsO2jd0oVPC4CPtLf0TkS4x3SN6OjO6wc4ZuogP5sbpFFxM8Uly2fv16-UXsmt1G_Hrc98n12c_r-e_s4urX-fz2UVmBMtTxoWsCmVKAVKWeY4AtqoaYLywumECBFouJZNYabBFYWHJZAXM2LIEhpjvk-9b23Xo7waMqe5cNNi22mM_xLqUueCyyuVIfntD3vZD8ONvIySFkLzkI8S3kAl9jAFtvQ6u0-GhZlBvAqrfBzSKDp-dh2WHzX_Jv0RG4HgLRL3Cl7MfWD4CmpOX4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>866446282</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Placebos in Clinical Practice: Comparing Attitudes, Beliefs, and Patterns of Use between Academic Psychiatrists and Nonpsychiatrists</title><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Raz, Amir ; Campbell, Natasha ; Guindi, Daniella ; Holcroft, Christina ; Déry, Catherine ; Cukier, Olivia</creator><creatorcontrib>Raz, Amir ; Campbell, Natasha ; Guindi, Daniella ; Holcroft, Christina ; Déry, Catherine ; Cukier, Olivia</creatorcontrib><description>Controversial and ethically tenuous, the use of placebos is central to medicine but even more pivotal to psychosocial therapies. Scholars, researchers, and practitioners largely disagree about the conceptualization of placebos. While different professionals often confound the meanings of placebo effects with placebo responses, physicians continue to prescribe placebos as part of clinical practice. Our study aims to review attitudes and beliefs concerning placebos outside of clinical research. Herein we compare patterns of placebo use reported by academic psychiatrists with those reported by physicians from different specialties across Canadian medical schools. Using a web-based tool, we circulated an online survey to all 17 Canadian medical schools, with a special emphasis on psychiatry departments therein and in university-affiliated teaching hospitals. A variation on earlier efforts, our 5-minute, 21-question survey was anonymous. Among the 606 respondents who completed our online survey, 257 were psychiatrists. Our analysis revealed that psychiatrists prescribed significantly more subtherapeutic doses of medication than physicians in other specialties, although about 20% of both psychiatrists and nonpsychiatrists prescribed placebos regularly as part of routine clinical practice. However, compared with 6% of nonpsychiatrists, only 2% of psychiatrists deemed placebos of no clinical benefit. In addition, more than 60% of psychiatrists either agreed or strongly agreed that placebos had therapeutic effects relative to fewer than 45% of other practitioners. Findings from this pan-Canadian survey suggest that, compared with other physicians, psychiatrists seem to better value the influence placebos wield on the mind and body and maintain more favourable beliefs and attitudes toward placebo phenomena.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0706-7437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1497-0015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/070674371105600403</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21507276</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Clinical Medicine - methods ; Clinical Medicine - standards ; Complementary Therapies - ethics ; Complementary Therapies - methods ; Complementary Therapies - standards ; Culture ; Data Collection ; Ethics, Medical ; General Practitioners - ethics ; General Practitioners - psychology ; Health Services Research ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Medical research ; Physicians ; Placebo Effect ; Placebos - therapeutic use ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - ethics ; Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards ; Psychiatric Department, Hospital ; Psychiatry ; Psychiatry - ethics ; Psychiatry - methods ; Psychiatry - standards ; Science ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of psychiatry, 2011-04, Vol.56 (4), p.198-208</ispartof><rights>2011 Canadian Psychiatric Association</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Psychiatric Association Apr 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-246957c84066833e00f99d0125fad1404ef26616e9a0f55f0b16901cf8801ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-246957c84066833e00f99d0125fad1404ef26616e9a0f55f0b16901cf8801ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,27922,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21507276$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raz, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guindi, Daniella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holcroft, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Déry, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cukier, Olivia</creatorcontrib><title>Placebos in Clinical Practice: Comparing Attitudes, Beliefs, and Patterns of Use between Academic Psychiatrists and Nonpsychiatrists</title><title>Canadian journal of psychiatry</title><addtitle>Can J Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Controversial and ethically tenuous, the use of placebos is central to medicine but even more pivotal to psychosocial therapies. Scholars, researchers, and practitioners largely disagree about the conceptualization of placebos. While different professionals often confound the meanings of placebo effects with placebo responses, physicians continue to prescribe placebos as part of clinical practice. Our study aims to review attitudes and beliefs concerning placebos outside of clinical research. Herein we compare patterns of placebo use reported by academic psychiatrists with those reported by physicians from different specialties across Canadian medical schools. Using a web-based tool, we circulated an online survey to all 17 Canadian medical schools, with a special emphasis on psychiatry departments therein and in university-affiliated teaching hospitals. A variation on earlier efforts, our 5-minute, 21-question survey was anonymous. Among the 606 respondents who completed our online survey, 257 were psychiatrists. Our analysis revealed that psychiatrists prescribed significantly more subtherapeutic doses of medication than physicians in other specialties, although about 20% of both psychiatrists and nonpsychiatrists prescribed placebos regularly as part of routine clinical practice. However, compared with 6% of nonpsychiatrists, only 2% of psychiatrists deemed placebos of no clinical benefit. In addition, more than 60% of psychiatrists either agreed or strongly agreed that placebos had therapeutic effects relative to fewer than 45% of other practitioners. Findings from this pan-Canadian survey suggest that, compared with other physicians, psychiatrists seem to better value the influence placebos wield on the mind and body and maintain more favourable beliefs and attitudes toward placebo phenomena.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Clinical Medicine - methods</subject><subject>Clinical Medicine - standards</subject><subject>Complementary Therapies - ethics</subject><subject>Complementary Therapies - methods</subject><subject>Complementary Therapies - standards</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Ethics, Medical</subject><subject>General Practitioners - ethics</subject><subject>General Practitioners - psychology</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Hospitals, University</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Placebo Effect</subject><subject>Placebos - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - ethics</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards</subject><subject>Psychiatric Department, Hospital</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychiatry - ethics</subject><subject>Psychiatry - methods</subject><subject>Psychiatry - standards</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0706-7437</issn><issn>1497-0015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUFP3DAQhS1U1F1o_wAHZPXSSwNjx7ETbsuqtEgI9kDPkdcZL0aJs9iOEPf-cLIsLQgk5jKj0ffejPQIOWBwxJhSx6BAKpErxqCQAALyHTJlolIZACs-kekGyDbEhOzFeAtjcV5-JhPOClBcySn5u2i1wWUfqfN03jrvjG7pImiTnMETOu-7tQ7Or-gsJZeGBuMPeoqtQzsO2jd0oVPC4CPtLf0TkS4x3SN6OjO6wc4ZuogP5sbpFFxM8Uly2fv16-UXsmt1G_Hrc98n12c_r-e_s4urX-fz2UVmBMtTxoWsCmVKAVKWeY4AtqoaYLywumECBFouJZNYabBFYWHJZAXM2LIEhpjvk-9b23Xo7waMqe5cNNi22mM_xLqUueCyyuVIfntD3vZD8ONvIySFkLzkI8S3kAl9jAFtvQ6u0-GhZlBvAqrfBzSKDp-dh2WHzX_Jv0RG4HgLRL3Cl7MfWD4CmpOX4w</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Raz, Amir</creator><creator>Campbell, Natasha</creator><creator>Guindi, Daniella</creator><creator>Holcroft, Christina</creator><creator>Déry, Catherine</creator><creator>Cukier, Olivia</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Placebos in Clinical Practice: Comparing Attitudes, Beliefs, and Patterns of Use between Academic Psychiatrists and Nonpsychiatrists</title><author>Raz, Amir ; Campbell, Natasha ; Guindi, Daniella ; Holcroft, Christina ; Déry, Catherine ; Cukier, Olivia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-246957c84066833e00f99d0125fad1404ef26616e9a0f55f0b16901cf8801ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Clinical Medicine - methods</topic><topic>Clinical Medicine - standards</topic><topic>Complementary Therapies - ethics</topic><topic>Complementary Therapies - methods</topic><topic>Complementary Therapies - standards</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Ethics, Medical</topic><topic>General Practitioners - ethics</topic><topic>General Practitioners - psychology</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Hospitals, University</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Placebo Effect</topic><topic>Placebos - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - ethics</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards</topic><topic>Psychiatric Department, Hospital</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychiatry - ethics</topic><topic>Psychiatry - methods</topic><topic>Psychiatry - standards</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raz, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Natasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guindi, Daniella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holcroft, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Déry, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cukier, Olivia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business &amp; Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>CBCA Reference &amp; Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raz, Amir</au><au>Campbell, Natasha</au><au>Guindi, Daniella</au><au>Holcroft, Christina</au><au>Déry, Catherine</au><au>Cukier, Olivia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Placebos in Clinical Practice: Comparing Attitudes, Beliefs, and Patterns of Use between Academic Psychiatrists and Nonpsychiatrists</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>208</epage><pages>198-208</pages><issn>0706-7437</issn><eissn>1497-0015</eissn><abstract>Controversial and ethically tenuous, the use of placebos is central to medicine but even more pivotal to psychosocial therapies. Scholars, researchers, and practitioners largely disagree about the conceptualization of placebos. While different professionals often confound the meanings of placebo effects with placebo responses, physicians continue to prescribe placebos as part of clinical practice. Our study aims to review attitudes and beliefs concerning placebos outside of clinical research. Herein we compare patterns of placebo use reported by academic psychiatrists with those reported by physicians from different specialties across Canadian medical schools. Using a web-based tool, we circulated an online survey to all 17 Canadian medical schools, with a special emphasis on psychiatry departments therein and in university-affiliated teaching hospitals. A variation on earlier efforts, our 5-minute, 21-question survey was anonymous. Among the 606 respondents who completed our online survey, 257 were psychiatrists. Our analysis revealed that psychiatrists prescribed significantly more subtherapeutic doses of medication than physicians in other specialties, although about 20% of both psychiatrists and nonpsychiatrists prescribed placebos regularly as part of routine clinical practice. However, compared with 6% of nonpsychiatrists, only 2% of psychiatrists deemed placebos of no clinical benefit. In addition, more than 60% of psychiatrists either agreed or strongly agreed that placebos had therapeutic effects relative to fewer than 45% of other practitioners. Findings from this pan-Canadian survey suggest that, compared with other physicians, psychiatrists seem to better value the influence placebos wield on the mind and body and maintain more favourable beliefs and attitudes toward placebo phenomena.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21507276</pmid><doi>10.1177/070674371105600403</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0706-7437
ispartof Canadian journal of psychiatry, 2011-04, Vol.56 (4), p.198-208
issn 0706-7437
1497-0015
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_863426936
source SAGE Journals
subjects Attitude of Health Personnel
Clinical Medicine - methods
Clinical Medicine - standards
Complementary Therapies - ethics
Complementary Therapies - methods
Complementary Therapies - standards
Culture
Data Collection
Ethics, Medical
General Practitioners - ethics
General Practitioners - psychology
Health Services Research
Hospitals, University
Humans
Medical research
Physicians
Placebo Effect
Placebos - therapeutic use
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - ethics
Practice Patterns, Physicians' - standards
Psychiatric Department, Hospital
Psychiatry
Psychiatry - ethics
Psychiatry - methods
Psychiatry - standards
Science
Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Placebos in Clinical Practice: Comparing Attitudes, Beliefs, and Patterns of Use between Academic Psychiatrists and Nonpsychiatrists
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T17%3A32%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Placebos%20in%20Clinical%20Practice:%20Comparing%20Attitudes,%20Beliefs,%20and%20Patterns%20of%20Use%20between%20Academic%20Psychiatrists%20and%20Nonpsychiatrists&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20psychiatry&rft.au=Raz,%20Amir&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=208&rft.pages=198-208&rft.issn=0706-7437&rft.eissn=1497-0015&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/070674371105600403&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2347118601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-246957c84066833e00f99d0125fad1404ef26616e9a0f55f0b16901cf8801ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=866446282&rft_id=info:pmid/21507276&rft_sage_id=10.1177_070674371105600403&rfr_iscdi=true