Loading…
Subcision Versus 100% Trichloroacetic Acid in the Treatment of Rolling Acne Scars
BACKGROUND Acne scarring is common but surprisingly difficult to treat. Newer techniques and modifications to older ones may make this refractory problem more manageable. The 100% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) method is a safe and effective single modality...
Saved in:
Published in: | Dermatologic surgery 2011-05, Vol.37 (5), p.626-633 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | BACKGROUND
Acne scarring is common but surprisingly difficult to treat. Newer techniques and modifications to older ones may make this refractory problem more manageable. The 100% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) method is a safe and effective single modality for the treatment of atrophic acne scars, whereas subcision appears to be a safe technique that provides significant improvement for rolling acne scars.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the effect of the 100% TCA CROSS method with subcision in treating rolling acne scars.
METHODS
Twenty patients of skin types III and IV with bilateral rolling acne scars received one to three sessions of the 100% TCA CROSS technique for scars on the left side of the face and subcision for scars on the right side.
RESULTS
The mean decrease in size and depth of scars was significantly greater for the subcision side than the 100% TCA CROSS (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1076-0512 1524-4725 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.01954.x |