Loading…

Subcision Versus 100% Trichloroacetic Acid in the Treatment of Rolling Acne Scars

BACKGROUND Acne scarring is common but surprisingly difficult to treat. Newer techniques and modifications to older ones may make this refractory problem more manageable. The 100% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) method is a safe and effective single modality...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dermatologic surgery 2011-05, Vol.37 (5), p.626-633
Main Authors: RAMADAN, SHAHIRA ABD EL‐RAHMAN, EL‐KOMY, MOHAMED HUSSEIN MEDHAT, BASSIOUNY, DALIA AHMED, EL‐TOBSHY, SEHAM AHMED
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND Acne scarring is common but surprisingly difficult to treat. Newer techniques and modifications to older ones may make this refractory problem more manageable. The 100% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) chemical reconstruction of skin scars (CROSS) method is a safe and effective single modality for the treatment of atrophic acne scars, whereas subcision appears to be a safe technique that provides significant improvement for rolling acne scars. OBJECTIVE To compare the effect of the 100% TCA CROSS method with subcision in treating rolling acne scars. METHODS Twenty patients of skin types III and IV with bilateral rolling acne scars received one to three sessions of the 100% TCA CROSS technique for scars on the left side of the face and subcision for scars on the right side. RESULTS The mean decrease in size and depth of scars was significantly greater for the subcision side than the 100% TCA CROSS (p
ISSN:1076-0512
1524-4725
DOI:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.01954.x