Loading…

On the adjoint-consistent formulation of interface conditions in goal-oriented error estimation and adaptivity for fluid–structure interaction

The numerical solution of fluid–structure-interaction problems poses a paradox in that most of the computational resources are consumed by the subsystem of least practical interest, viz., the fluid. Goal-oriented adaptive discretization methods provide a paradigm to bypass this paradox. Based on the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering 2010-12, Vol.199 (49-52), p.3369-3385
Main Authors: Fick, Peter W., van Brummelen, E. Harald, van der Zee, Kristoffer G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b9a654b50e582c8551a4a059ccde37c52bbed0406b342af7d2a0a2d803c0c5853
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b9a654b50e582c8551a4a059ccde37c52bbed0406b342af7d2a0a2d803c0c5853
container_end_page 3385
container_issue 49-52
container_start_page 3369
container_title Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering
container_volume 199
creator Fick, Peter W.
van Brummelen, E. Harald
van der Zee, Kristoffer G.
description The numerical solution of fluid–structure-interaction problems poses a paradox in that most of the computational resources are consumed by the subsystem of least practical interest, viz., the fluid. Goal-oriented adaptive discretization methods provide a paradigm to bypass this paradox. Based on the solution of a dual problem, the contribution of local residuals to the error in a specific goal functional is estimated, and only the regions that yield a dominant contribution are refined. In the present work, we address a fundamental complication in the application of goal-oriented adaptivity to fluid–structure-interaction problems, namely, that the treatment of the interface conditions has nontrivial consequences for the properties of the dual problem. In the context of a linearized model problem, we consider two equivalent discretizations differing only on the formulation of the interface coupling terms. By means of an adjoint consistency analysis, we show that only one of these discretizations is adjoint consistent. Numerical experiments convey that the two discretizations behave very differently for the dual problem, and that the adjoint-consistent discretization yields more reliable error estimates. Based on the adjoint-consistent discretization, we finally present some h- and hp-adaptive results, confirming that tremendous savings in computational cost can be realized through the use of goal-oriented refinement strategies. The numerical experiments illustrate that the goal-oriented approach effectively equilibrates the error contributions of the fluid and structure subsystems, which is imperative for efficiently resolving the coupled fluid–structure-interaction problem, and which cannot be accomplished by uniform or residual-based refinement strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cma.2010.07.009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864383781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045782510002215</els_id><sourcerecordid>864383781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b9a654b50e582c8551a4a059ccde37c52bbed0406b342af7d2a0a2d803c0c5853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE2O1DAQhS0EEs3AAdh5g1il8U-cOGKFRvxJI80G1lalXAG30nFjOyPNjiMgcUNOgqOMWOKN5fJ7X1U9xl5KcZRCdm9ORzzDUYn6Fv1RiOERO0jbD42S2j5mByFa0_RWmafsWc4nUY-V6sB-3S68fCcO_hTDUhqMSw650FL4FNN5naGEuPA48fpLaQIkXjU-bOVci_xbhLmJKVQLeU4pxcQpl3DenbD4CodLCXeh3G9QPs1r8H9-_s4lrVjWRDsbcDM8Z08mmDO9eLiv2NcP779cf2pubj9-vn5306A2Q2nGATrTjkaQsQqtMRJaEGZA9KR7NGocyYtWdKNuFUy9VyBAeSs0CjTW6Cv2eudeUvyx1oHdOWSkeYaF4pqd7VptdW9lVcpdiSnmnGhyl1S3S_dOCreF706uhu-28J3oXQ2_el490CEjzFOCBUP-Z1S6050auqp7u-uornoXKLmMNUkkHxJhcT6G_3T5C2qbnws</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>864383781</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the adjoint-consistent formulation of interface conditions in goal-oriented error estimation and adaptivity for fluid–structure interaction</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fick, Peter W. ; van Brummelen, E. Harald ; van der Zee, Kristoffer G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fick, Peter W. ; van Brummelen, E. Harald ; van der Zee, Kristoffer G.</creatorcontrib><description>The numerical solution of fluid–structure-interaction problems poses a paradox in that most of the computational resources are consumed by the subsystem of least practical interest, viz., the fluid. Goal-oriented adaptive discretization methods provide a paradigm to bypass this paradox. Based on the solution of a dual problem, the contribution of local residuals to the error in a specific goal functional is estimated, and only the regions that yield a dominant contribution are refined. In the present work, we address a fundamental complication in the application of goal-oriented adaptivity to fluid–structure-interaction problems, namely, that the treatment of the interface conditions has nontrivial consequences for the properties of the dual problem. In the context of a linearized model problem, we consider two equivalent discretizations differing only on the formulation of the interface coupling terms. By means of an adjoint consistency analysis, we show that only one of these discretizations is adjoint consistent. Numerical experiments convey that the two discretizations behave very differently for the dual problem, and that the adjoint-consistent discretization yields more reliable error estimates. Based on the adjoint-consistent discretization, we finally present some h- and hp-adaptive results, confirming that tremendous savings in computational cost can be realized through the use of goal-oriented refinement strategies. The numerical experiments illustrate that the goal-oriented approach effectively equilibrates the error contributions of the fluid and structure subsystems, which is imperative for efficiently resolving the coupled fluid–structure-interaction problem, and which cannot be accomplished by uniform or residual-based refinement strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-7825</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2010.07.009</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMMECC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adjoint consistency ; Adjoints ; Coupled problems ; Discretization ; Errors ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluid flow ; Fluids ; Fluid–structure interaction ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Goal-oriented error estimation ; hp-Adaptive finite element methods ; Mathematical models ; Multiphysics ; Paradoxes ; Physics ; Solid mechanics ; Strategy ; Structural and continuum mechanics ; Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)</subject><ispartof>Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 2010-12, Vol.199 (49-52), p.3369-3385</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b9a654b50e582c8551a4a059ccde37c52bbed0406b342af7d2a0a2d803c0c5853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b9a654b50e582c8551a4a059ccde37c52bbed0406b342af7d2a0a2d803c0c5853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23636296$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fick, Peter W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Brummelen, E. Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Zee, Kristoffer G.</creatorcontrib><title>On the adjoint-consistent formulation of interface conditions in goal-oriented error estimation and adaptivity for fluid–structure interaction</title><title>Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering</title><description>The numerical solution of fluid–structure-interaction problems poses a paradox in that most of the computational resources are consumed by the subsystem of least practical interest, viz., the fluid. Goal-oriented adaptive discretization methods provide a paradigm to bypass this paradox. Based on the solution of a dual problem, the contribution of local residuals to the error in a specific goal functional is estimated, and only the regions that yield a dominant contribution are refined. In the present work, we address a fundamental complication in the application of goal-oriented adaptivity to fluid–structure-interaction problems, namely, that the treatment of the interface conditions has nontrivial consequences for the properties of the dual problem. In the context of a linearized model problem, we consider two equivalent discretizations differing only on the formulation of the interface coupling terms. By means of an adjoint consistency analysis, we show that only one of these discretizations is adjoint consistent. Numerical experiments convey that the two discretizations behave very differently for the dual problem, and that the adjoint-consistent discretization yields more reliable error estimates. Based on the adjoint-consistent discretization, we finally present some h- and hp-adaptive results, confirming that tremendous savings in computational cost can be realized through the use of goal-oriented refinement strategies. The numerical experiments illustrate that the goal-oriented approach effectively equilibrates the error contributions of the fluid and structure subsystems, which is imperative for efficiently resolving the coupled fluid–structure-interaction problem, and which cannot be accomplished by uniform or residual-based refinement strategies.</description><subject>Adjoint consistency</subject><subject>Adjoints</subject><subject>Coupled problems</subject><subject>Discretization</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fluids</subject><subject>Fluid–structure interaction</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Goal-oriented error estimation</subject><subject>hp-Adaptive finite element methods</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Multiphysics</subject><subject>Paradoxes</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Solid mechanics</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><subject>Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)</subject><issn>0045-7825</issn><issn>1879-2138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE2O1DAQhS0EEs3AAdh5g1il8U-cOGKFRvxJI80G1lalXAG30nFjOyPNjiMgcUNOgqOMWOKN5fJ7X1U9xl5KcZRCdm9ORzzDUYn6Fv1RiOERO0jbD42S2j5mByFa0_RWmafsWc4nUY-V6sB-3S68fCcO_hTDUhqMSw650FL4FNN5naGEuPA48fpLaQIkXjU-bOVci_xbhLmJKVQLeU4pxcQpl3DenbD4CodLCXeh3G9QPs1r8H9-_s4lrVjWRDsbcDM8Z08mmDO9eLiv2NcP779cf2pubj9-vn5306A2Q2nGATrTjkaQsQqtMRJaEGZA9KR7NGocyYtWdKNuFUy9VyBAeSs0CjTW6Cv2eudeUvyx1oHdOWSkeYaF4pqd7VptdW9lVcpdiSnmnGhyl1S3S_dOCreF706uhu-28J3oXQ2_el490CEjzFOCBUP-Z1S6050auqp7u-uornoXKLmMNUkkHxJhcT6G_3T5C2qbnws</recordid><startdate>20101215</startdate><enddate>20101215</enddate><creator>Fick, Peter W.</creator><creator>van Brummelen, E. Harald</creator><creator>van der Zee, Kristoffer G.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20101215</creationdate><title>On the adjoint-consistent formulation of interface conditions in goal-oriented error estimation and adaptivity for fluid–structure interaction</title><author>Fick, Peter W. ; van Brummelen, E. Harald ; van der Zee, Kristoffer G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b9a654b50e582c8551a4a059ccde37c52bbed0406b342af7d2a0a2d803c0c5853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adjoint consistency</topic><topic>Adjoints</topic><topic>Coupled problems</topic><topic>Discretization</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fluids</topic><topic>Fluid–structure interaction</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Goal-oriented error estimation</topic><topic>hp-Adaptive finite element methods</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Multiphysics</topic><topic>Paradoxes</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Solid mechanics</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Structural and continuum mechanics</topic><topic>Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fick, Peter W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Brummelen, E. Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Zee, Kristoffer G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fick, Peter W.</au><au>van Brummelen, E. Harald</au><au>van der Zee, Kristoffer G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the adjoint-consistent formulation of interface conditions in goal-oriented error estimation and adaptivity for fluid–structure interaction</atitle><jtitle>Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering</jtitle><date>2010-12-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>199</volume><issue>49-52</issue><spage>3369</spage><epage>3385</epage><pages>3369-3385</pages><issn>0045-7825</issn><eissn>1879-2138</eissn><coden>CMMECC</coden><abstract>The numerical solution of fluid–structure-interaction problems poses a paradox in that most of the computational resources are consumed by the subsystem of least practical interest, viz., the fluid. Goal-oriented adaptive discretization methods provide a paradigm to bypass this paradox. Based on the solution of a dual problem, the contribution of local residuals to the error in a specific goal functional is estimated, and only the regions that yield a dominant contribution are refined. In the present work, we address a fundamental complication in the application of goal-oriented adaptivity to fluid–structure-interaction problems, namely, that the treatment of the interface conditions has nontrivial consequences for the properties of the dual problem. In the context of a linearized model problem, we consider two equivalent discretizations differing only on the formulation of the interface coupling terms. By means of an adjoint consistency analysis, we show that only one of these discretizations is adjoint consistent. Numerical experiments convey that the two discretizations behave very differently for the dual problem, and that the adjoint-consistent discretization yields more reliable error estimates. Based on the adjoint-consistent discretization, we finally present some h- and hp-adaptive results, confirming that tremendous savings in computational cost can be realized through the use of goal-oriented refinement strategies. The numerical experiments illustrate that the goal-oriented approach effectively equilibrates the error contributions of the fluid and structure subsystems, which is imperative for efficiently resolving the coupled fluid–structure-interaction problem, and which cannot be accomplished by uniform or residual-based refinement strategies.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cma.2010.07.009</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0045-7825
ispartof Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 2010-12, Vol.199 (49-52), p.3369-3385
issn 0045-7825
1879-2138
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864383781
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adjoint consistency
Adjoints
Coupled problems
Discretization
Errors
Exact sciences and technology
Fluid flow
Fluids
Fluid–structure interaction
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Goal-oriented error estimation
hp-Adaptive finite element methods
Mathematical models
Multiphysics
Paradoxes
Physics
Solid mechanics
Strategy
Structural and continuum mechanics
Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)
title On the adjoint-consistent formulation of interface conditions in goal-oriented error estimation and adaptivity for fluid–structure interaction
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A16%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20adjoint-consistent%20formulation%20of%20interface%20conditions%20in%20goal-oriented%20error%20estimation%20and%20adaptivity%20for%20fluid%E2%80%93structure%20interaction&rft.jtitle=Computer%20methods%20in%20applied%20mechanics%20and%20engineering&rft.au=Fick,%20Peter%20W.&rft.date=2010-12-15&rft.volume=199&rft.issue=49-52&rft.spage=3369&rft.epage=3385&rft.pages=3369-3385&rft.issn=0045-7825&rft.eissn=1879-2138&rft.coden=CMMECC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cma.2010.07.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E864383781%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-b9a654b50e582c8551a4a059ccde37c52bbed0406b342af7d2a0a2d803c0c5853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=864383781&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true