Loading…
Resource allocation within academic units: DEA and goal programming approach with an application to an Arabian Gulf university
Purpose - To develop a methodology for faculty salary adjustment through market adjustment based on market demand for business PhDs and merit adjustment based on faculty members' performance levels in the areas of teaching, research and service. Design/methodology/approach - The methodology is...
Saved in:
Published in: | Benchmarking : an international journal 2007-01, Vol.14 (2), p.202-210 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-15474533907eb31097e7833ce26222993d2b35b72e762225b4cb5d3d89fe82f43 |
container_end_page | 210 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 202 |
container_title | Benchmarking : an international journal |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Sunil Dharmapala, P. Saber, Hussein M. |
description | Purpose - To develop a methodology for faculty salary adjustment through market adjustment based on market demand for business PhDs and merit adjustment based on faculty members' performance levels in the areas of teaching, research and service. Design/methodology/approach - The methodology is composed of two models: one for market adjustment and the other for merit adjustment. The market adjustment is handled through goal programming and the merit adjustment through data envelopment analysis (DEA). Findings - The approach when applied to a sample of faculty salaries shows that the adjusted salary of each faculty member is higher than his/her current actual salary, and each faculty member in the particular discipline deserves a salary increase that reflects market demand and merit factors. Research limitations/implications - The DEA model used in this research does not impose restrictions on the weights. Realistically, one may impose bounds on the weights and exclude unreasonable solutions from DEA analysis and also set multiple goals instead of the single goal used in the goal programming model. Practical implications - Based on a goal programming model that addresses the market demand and a DEA model that addresses the merit-based performances, this methodology may be implemented as a solution procedure for restructuring faculty salaries. Originality/value - The novelty in this approach is that DEA is being used as a benchmarking technique for merit adjustment of faculty salaries. In that sense, this research work may be the first, where benchmarking has been used in "faculty salary equity adjustment." [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/14635770710740396 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864401787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1247983681</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-15474533907eb31097e7833ce26222993d2b35b72e762225b4cb5d3d89fe82f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG_Fg-KhOsmkmeQoy_oHFgTRc0jTFLt027VpEb-9WdaTgqcZZn68x3uMnXO44Rz0LZcKCyIgDiQBjTpgM06FziUYeZj29M8TwI_ZSYxrAFBcixm7fgmxnwYfMte2vXdj03fZZzO-N13mvKvCpvHZ1DVjPGVHtWtjOPuZc_Z2v3xdPOar54enxd0q90LTmPNCkiwQDVAokYOhQBrRB6GEEMZgJUosShKBdoeilL4sKqy0qYMWtcQ5u9rrbof-YwpxtJsm-tC2rgv9FK1WUgInTYm8_JdEMFqqZDlnF7_AdcrcpRRWcEKFAiBBfA_5oY9xCLXdDs3GDV-Wg911bP90jN8xHGr_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217363200</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resource allocation within academic units: DEA and goal programming approach with an application to an Arabian Gulf university</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Sunil Dharmapala, P. ; Saber, Hussein M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sunil Dharmapala, P. ; Saber, Hussein M.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose - To develop a methodology for faculty salary adjustment through market adjustment based on market demand for business PhDs and merit adjustment based on faculty members' performance levels in the areas of teaching, research and service. Design/methodology/approach - The methodology is composed of two models: one for market adjustment and the other for merit adjustment. The market adjustment is handled through goal programming and the merit adjustment through data envelopment analysis (DEA). Findings - The approach when applied to a sample of faculty salaries shows that the adjusted salary of each faculty member is higher than his/her current actual salary, and each faculty member in the particular discipline deserves a salary increase that reflects market demand and merit factors. Research limitations/implications - The DEA model used in this research does not impose restrictions on the weights. Realistically, one may impose bounds on the weights and exclude unreasonable solutions from DEA analysis and also set multiple goals instead of the single goal used in the goal programming model. Practical implications - Based on a goal programming model that addresses the market demand and a DEA model that addresses the merit-based performances, this methodology may be implemented as a solution procedure for restructuring faculty salaries. Originality/value - The novelty in this approach is that DEA is being used as a benchmarking technique for merit adjustment of faculty salaries. In that sense, this research work may be the first, where benchmarking has been used in "faculty salary equity adjustment." [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-5771</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4094</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/14635770710740396</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; Benchmarks ; Branch banking ; Data envelopment analysis ; Demand ; Equity ; Goal programming ; Labor market ; Marketing ; Markets ; Mathematical models ; Mathematical programming ; Measurement techniques ; Methodology ; Parameter estimation ; Salaries ; School faculty ; Studies ; Wages & salaries</subject><ispartof>Benchmarking : an international journal, 2007-01, Vol.14 (2), p.202-210</ispartof><rights>Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-15474533907eb31097e7833ce26222993d2b35b72e762225b4cb5d3d89fe82f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/217363200?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,27901,27902,36037,36038,44339</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sunil Dharmapala, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saber, Hussein M.</creatorcontrib><title>Resource allocation within academic units: DEA and goal programming approach with an application to an Arabian Gulf university</title><title>Benchmarking : an international journal</title><description>Purpose - To develop a methodology for faculty salary adjustment through market adjustment based on market demand for business PhDs and merit adjustment based on faculty members' performance levels in the areas of teaching, research and service. Design/methodology/approach - The methodology is composed of two models: one for market adjustment and the other for merit adjustment. The market adjustment is handled through goal programming and the merit adjustment through data envelopment analysis (DEA). Findings - The approach when applied to a sample of faculty salaries shows that the adjusted salary of each faculty member is higher than his/her current actual salary, and each faculty member in the particular discipline deserves a salary increase that reflects market demand and merit factors. Research limitations/implications - The DEA model used in this research does not impose restrictions on the weights. Realistically, one may impose bounds on the weights and exclude unreasonable solutions from DEA analysis and also set multiple goals instead of the single goal used in the goal programming model. Practical implications - Based on a goal programming model that addresses the market demand and a DEA model that addresses the merit-based performances, this methodology may be implemented as a solution procedure for restructuring faculty salaries. Originality/value - The novelty in this approach is that DEA is being used as a benchmarking technique for merit adjustment of faculty salaries. In that sense, this research work may be the first, where benchmarking has been used in "faculty salary equity adjustment." [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Benchmarks</subject><subject>Branch banking</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Equity</subject><subject>Goal programming</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mathematical programming</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Salaries</subject><subject>School faculty</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Wages & salaries</subject><issn>1463-5771</issn><issn>1758-4094</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AG_Fg-KhOsmkmeQoy_oHFgTRc0jTFLt027VpEb-9WdaTgqcZZn68x3uMnXO44Rz0LZcKCyIgDiQBjTpgM06FziUYeZj29M8TwI_ZSYxrAFBcixm7fgmxnwYfMte2vXdj03fZZzO-N13mvKvCpvHZ1DVjPGVHtWtjOPuZc_Z2v3xdPOar54enxd0q90LTmPNCkiwQDVAokYOhQBrRB6GEEMZgJUosShKBdoeilL4sKqy0qYMWtcQ5u9rrbof-YwpxtJsm-tC2rgv9FK1WUgInTYm8_JdEMFqqZDlnF7_AdcrcpRRWcEKFAiBBfA_5oY9xCLXdDs3GDV-Wg911bP90jN8xHGr_</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Sunil Dharmapala, P.</creator><creator>Saber, Hussein M.</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>Resource allocation within academic units</title><author>Sunil Dharmapala, P. ; Saber, Hussein M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-15474533907eb31097e7833ce26222993d2b35b72e762225b4cb5d3d89fe82f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Benchmarks</topic><topic>Branch banking</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Equity</topic><topic>Goal programming</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mathematical programming</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Salaries</topic><topic>School faculty</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Wages & salaries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sunil Dharmapala, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saber, Hussein M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ProQuest_ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Proquest Entrepreneurship</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health Management Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Benchmarking : an international journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sunil Dharmapala, P.</au><au>Saber, Hussein M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resource allocation within academic units: DEA and goal programming approach with an application to an Arabian Gulf university</atitle><jtitle>Benchmarking : an international journal</jtitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>202</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>202-210</pages><issn>1463-5771</issn><eissn>1758-4094</eissn><abstract>Purpose - To develop a methodology for faculty salary adjustment through market adjustment based on market demand for business PhDs and merit adjustment based on faculty members' performance levels in the areas of teaching, research and service. Design/methodology/approach - The methodology is composed of two models: one for market adjustment and the other for merit adjustment. The market adjustment is handled through goal programming and the merit adjustment through data envelopment analysis (DEA). Findings - The approach when applied to a sample of faculty salaries shows that the adjusted salary of each faculty member is higher than his/her current actual salary, and each faculty member in the particular discipline deserves a salary increase that reflects market demand and merit factors. Research limitations/implications - The DEA model used in this research does not impose restrictions on the weights. Realistically, one may impose bounds on the weights and exclude unreasonable solutions from DEA analysis and also set multiple goals instead of the single goal used in the goal programming model. Practical implications - Based on a goal programming model that addresses the market demand and a DEA model that addresses the merit-based performances, this methodology may be implemented as a solution procedure for restructuring faculty salaries. Originality/value - The novelty in this approach is that DEA is being used as a benchmarking technique for merit adjustment of faculty salaries. In that sense, this research work may be the first, where benchmarking has been used in "faculty salary equity adjustment." [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/14635770710740396</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1463-5771 |
ispartof | Benchmarking : an international journal, 2007-01, Vol.14 (2), p.202-210 |
issn | 1463-5771 1758-4094 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864401787 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list) |
subjects | Benchmarking Benchmarks Branch banking Data envelopment analysis Demand Equity Goal programming Labor market Marketing Markets Mathematical models Mathematical programming Measurement techniques Methodology Parameter estimation Salaries School faculty Studies Wages & salaries |
title | Resource allocation within academic units: DEA and goal programming approach with an application to an Arabian Gulf university |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T13%3A02%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resource%20allocation%20within%20academic%20units:%20DEA%20and%20goal%20programming%20approach%20with%20an%20application%20to%20an%20Arabian%20Gulf%20university&rft.jtitle=Benchmarking%20:%20an%20international%20journal&rft.au=Sunil%20Dharmapala,%20P.&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=202&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=202-210&rft.issn=1463-5771&rft.eissn=1758-4094&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/14635770710740396&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1247983681%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-15474533907eb31097e7833ce26222993d2b35b72e762225b4cb5d3d89fe82f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217363200&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |