Loading…
Evapotranspiration components and dual crop coefficients of coffee trees during crop production
▶ We determined ET components and Ke and Kcb of coffee trees during production phase. ▶ Regardless irrigation treatment, E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. ▶ Recommended Ke is 0.46 for sprinkler irrigation and 0.26 for drip. ▶ Kcb was recommended for both irrigated treatments as a funct...
Saved in:
Published in: | Agricultural water management 2011-03, Vol.98 (5), p.791-800 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dfea3c1abe2bea46bce0c6c64ad8b736e1a92f19d08a7ab05dd2efa05d80e7a83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dfea3c1abe2bea46bce0c6c64ad8b736e1a92f19d08a7ab05dd2efa05d80e7a83 |
container_end_page | 800 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 791 |
container_title | Agricultural water management |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Flumignan, Danilton Luiz de Faria, Rogério Teixeira Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi |
description | ▶ We determined ET components and Ke and Kcb of coffee trees during production phase. ▶ Regardless irrigation treatment, E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. ▶ Recommended Ke is 0.46 for sprinkler irrigation and 0.26 for drip. ▶ Kcb was recommended for both irrigated treatments as a function of daily ETo.
Quantifying crop water consumption is essential for many applications in agriculture, such as crop zoning, yield forecast and irrigation management. The objective of this study was to determine evaporation (E), transpiration (T) and dual crop coefficients (Ke and Kcb) of coffee trees during crop production (3rd and 4th year of cultivation), conducted under sprinkler and drip irrigation and no irrigation, in Londrina, Paraná State, Brazil. Crop evapotranspiration (ET) was measured by weighing lysimeters cultivated with plants of cultivar IAPAR 59, E was measured by microlysimeters installed on the lysimeters and T was obtained by the difference between ET and E. The crop coefficient (Kc) was determined for the irrigated treatments as the ratio between ET and the reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Similarly, evaporation coefficient (Ke) and basal crop coefficient (Kcb) were determined as the ratio of E and T, respectively, to the value of ETo, which was estimated by the ASCE Penman–Monteith method on an hourly basis. The values of E and Ke varied due to atmospheric demand and water application method. Those factors, in addition to crop phenology and leaf area evolution, also influenced T and Kcb. Regardless irrigation treatment, the measured values of E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. The recommended values of Ke were 0.46 and 0.26 for sprinkler and drip irrigation, respectively. The recommended values of Kcb were 0.52 and 0.82 for sprinkler-irrigated, and 0.5 and 0.65 for drip-irrigated treatments, varying as a function of daily ETo (ETo ≥ or |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.002 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864962244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378377410003811</els_id><sourcerecordid>864962244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dfea3c1abe2bea46bce0c6c64ad8b736e1a92f19d08a7ab05dd2efa05d80e7a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEEkvhF3AgF8Qpi782dg4cUFWgVSUO0LM1sceLV9k42Nmt-u-ZNFWPHMYje555PX5dVe8523LG28-HLezvYd4KtpyILWPiRbXhRstGCCNfVhsmtWmk1up19aaUA2NMMaU3lb06w5TmDGOZYoY5prF26TilEce51DD62p9gqF1OExUwhOjiYykF2oeAWM8ZsRCW47hfwSknf3KL2NvqVYCh4LunfFHdfbv6ffmjuf35_fry623j1K6dGx8QpOPQo-gRVNs7ZK51rQJvei1b5NCJwDvPDGjo2c57gQEoG4YajLyoPq26dPXfE5bZHmNxOAwwYjoVa1rVtUIoRaRcSZq0lIzBTjkeIT9Yzuzipj3YRzft4qblwpKb1HWzdmWc0D23ICLs4wKfrYTO0PJAQZ2cUqTYUUwUuuPWMGb_zEcS-_g0LBQHQyD3XSzPokJ2QgnJifuwcgESzZSJuftF2pLxTu06uYz1ZSWQvD1HzLYs3-PQx4xutj7F_z7rH9R7sV8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>864962244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evapotranspiration components and dual crop coefficients of coffee trees during crop production</title><source>ScienceDirect Additional Titles</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Flumignan, Danilton Luiz ; de Faria, Rogério Teixeira ; Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi</creator><creatorcontrib>Flumignan, Danilton Luiz ; de Faria, Rogério Teixeira ; Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi</creatorcontrib><description>▶ We determined ET components and Ke and Kcb of coffee trees during production phase. ▶ Regardless irrigation treatment, E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. ▶ Recommended Ke is 0.46 for sprinkler irrigation and 0.26 for drip. ▶ Kcb was recommended for both irrigated treatments as a function of daily ETo.
Quantifying crop water consumption is essential for many applications in agriculture, such as crop zoning, yield forecast and irrigation management. The objective of this study was to determine evaporation (E), transpiration (T) and dual crop coefficients (Ke and Kcb) of coffee trees during crop production (3rd and 4th year of cultivation), conducted under sprinkler and drip irrigation and no irrigation, in Londrina, Paraná State, Brazil. Crop evapotranspiration (ET) was measured by weighing lysimeters cultivated with plants of cultivar IAPAR 59, E was measured by microlysimeters installed on the lysimeters and T was obtained by the difference between ET and E. The crop coefficient (Kc) was determined for the irrigated treatments as the ratio between ET and the reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Similarly, evaporation coefficient (Ke) and basal crop coefficient (Kcb) were determined as the ratio of E and T, respectively, to the value of ETo, which was estimated by the ASCE Penman–Monteith method on an hourly basis. The values of E and Ke varied due to atmospheric demand and water application method. Those factors, in addition to crop phenology and leaf area evolution, also influenced T and Kcb. Regardless irrigation treatment, the measured values of E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. The recommended values of Ke were 0.46 and 0.26 for sprinkler and drip irrigation, respectively. The recommended values of Kcb were 0.52 and 0.82 for sprinkler-irrigated, and 0.5 and 0.65 for drip-irrigated treatments, varying as a function of daily ETo (ETo ≥ or <3
mm
day
−1, respectively).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-3774</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AWMADF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agricultural and forest meteorology ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Atmospherics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Coffea arabica ; Coffee ; Crops ; Evaporation ; Evapotranspiration ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Irrigation ; Lysimeter ; Lysimeter Microlysimeter Evaporation Transpiration Coffea arabica ; Lysimeters ; Microlysimeter ; Sprinklers ; Transpiration ; Trees ; Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration</subject><ispartof>Agricultural water management, 2011-03, Vol.98 (5), p.791-800</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dfea3c1abe2bea46bce0c6c64ad8b736e1a92f19d08a7ab05dd2efa05d80e7a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dfea3c1abe2bea46bce0c6c64ad8b736e1a92f19d08a7ab05dd2efa05d80e7a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377410003811$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3547,27923,27924,45779</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23924231$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeagiwat/v_3a98_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a5_3ap_3a791-800.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flumignan, Danilton Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Faria, Rogério Teixeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi</creatorcontrib><title>Evapotranspiration components and dual crop coefficients of coffee trees during crop production</title><title>Agricultural water management</title><description>▶ We determined ET components and Ke and Kcb of coffee trees during production phase. ▶ Regardless irrigation treatment, E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. ▶ Recommended Ke is 0.46 for sprinkler irrigation and 0.26 for drip. ▶ Kcb was recommended for both irrigated treatments as a function of daily ETo.
Quantifying crop water consumption is essential for many applications in agriculture, such as crop zoning, yield forecast and irrigation management. The objective of this study was to determine evaporation (E), transpiration (T) and dual crop coefficients (Ke and Kcb) of coffee trees during crop production (3rd and 4th year of cultivation), conducted under sprinkler and drip irrigation and no irrigation, in Londrina, Paraná State, Brazil. Crop evapotranspiration (ET) was measured by weighing lysimeters cultivated with plants of cultivar IAPAR 59, E was measured by microlysimeters installed on the lysimeters and T was obtained by the difference between ET and E. The crop coefficient (Kc) was determined for the irrigated treatments as the ratio between ET and the reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Similarly, evaporation coefficient (Ke) and basal crop coefficient (Kcb) were determined as the ratio of E and T, respectively, to the value of ETo, which was estimated by the ASCE Penman–Monteith method on an hourly basis. The values of E and Ke varied due to atmospheric demand and water application method. Those factors, in addition to crop phenology and leaf area evolution, also influenced T and Kcb. Regardless irrigation treatment, the measured values of E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. The recommended values of Ke were 0.46 and 0.26 for sprinkler and drip irrigation, respectively. The recommended values of Kcb were 0.52 and 0.82 for sprinkler-irrigated, and 0.5 and 0.65 for drip-irrigated treatments, varying as a function of daily ETo (ETo ≥ or <3
mm
day
−1, respectively).</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agricultural and forest meteorology</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Coffea arabica</subject><subject>Coffee</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Lysimeter</subject><subject>Lysimeter Microlysimeter Evaporation Transpiration Coffea arabica</subject><subject>Lysimeters</subject><subject>Microlysimeter</subject><subject>Sprinklers</subject><subject>Transpiration</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration</subject><issn>0378-3774</issn><issn>1873-2283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEEkvhF3AgF8Qpi782dg4cUFWgVSUO0LM1sceLV9k42Nmt-u-ZNFWPHMYje555PX5dVe8523LG28-HLezvYd4KtpyILWPiRbXhRstGCCNfVhsmtWmk1up19aaUA2NMMaU3lb06w5TmDGOZYoY5prF26TilEce51DD62p9gqF1OExUwhOjiYykF2oeAWM8ZsRCW47hfwSknf3KL2NvqVYCh4LunfFHdfbv6ffmjuf35_fry623j1K6dGx8QpOPQo-gRVNs7ZK51rQJvei1b5NCJwDvPDGjo2c57gQEoG4YajLyoPq26dPXfE5bZHmNxOAwwYjoVa1rVtUIoRaRcSZq0lIzBTjkeIT9Yzuzipj3YRzft4qblwpKb1HWzdmWc0D23ICLs4wKfrYTO0PJAQZ2cUqTYUUwUuuPWMGb_zEcS-_g0LBQHQyD3XSzPokJ2QgnJifuwcgESzZSJuftF2pLxTu06uYz1ZSWQvD1HzLYs3-PQx4xutj7F_z7rH9R7sV8</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>Flumignan, Danilton Luiz</creator><creator>de Faria, Rogério Teixeira</creator><creator>Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>Evapotranspiration components and dual crop coefficients of coffee trees during crop production</title><author>Flumignan, Danilton Luiz ; de Faria, Rogério Teixeira ; Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dfea3c1abe2bea46bce0c6c64ad8b736e1a92f19d08a7ab05dd2efa05d80e7a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agricultural and forest meteorology</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Coffea arabica</topic><topic>Coffee</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Lysimeter</topic><topic>Lysimeter Microlysimeter Evaporation Transpiration Coffea arabica</topic><topic>Lysimeters</topic><topic>Microlysimeter</topic><topic>Sprinklers</topic><topic>Transpiration</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flumignan, Danilton Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Faria, Rogério Teixeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agricultural water management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flumignan, Danilton Luiz</au><au>de Faria, Rogério Teixeira</au><au>Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evapotranspiration components and dual crop coefficients of coffee trees during crop production</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural water management</jtitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>791</spage><epage>800</epage><pages>791-800</pages><issn>0378-3774</issn><eissn>1873-2283</eissn><coden>AWMADF</coden><abstract>▶ We determined ET components and Ke and Kcb of coffee trees during production phase. ▶ Regardless irrigation treatment, E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. ▶ Recommended Ke is 0.46 for sprinkler irrigation and 0.26 for drip. ▶ Kcb was recommended for both irrigated treatments as a function of daily ETo.
Quantifying crop water consumption is essential for many applications in agriculture, such as crop zoning, yield forecast and irrigation management. The objective of this study was to determine evaporation (E), transpiration (T) and dual crop coefficients (Ke and Kcb) of coffee trees during crop production (3rd and 4th year of cultivation), conducted under sprinkler and drip irrigation and no irrigation, in Londrina, Paraná State, Brazil. Crop evapotranspiration (ET) was measured by weighing lysimeters cultivated with plants of cultivar IAPAR 59, E was measured by microlysimeters installed on the lysimeters and T was obtained by the difference between ET and E. The crop coefficient (Kc) was determined for the irrigated treatments as the ratio between ET and the reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Similarly, evaporation coefficient (Ke) and basal crop coefficient (Kcb) were determined as the ratio of E and T, respectively, to the value of ETo, which was estimated by the ASCE Penman–Monteith method on an hourly basis. The values of E and Ke varied due to atmospheric demand and water application method. Those factors, in addition to crop phenology and leaf area evolution, also influenced T and Kcb. Regardless irrigation treatment, the measured values of E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. The recommended values of Ke were 0.46 and 0.26 for sprinkler and drip irrigation, respectively. The recommended values of Kcb were 0.52 and 0.82 for sprinkler-irrigated, and 0.5 and 0.65 for drip-irrigated treatments, varying as a function of daily ETo (ETo ≥ or <3
mm
day
−1, respectively).</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.002</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-3774 |
ispartof | Agricultural water management, 2011-03, Vol.98 (5), p.791-800 |
issn | 0378-3774 1873-2283 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864962244 |
source | ScienceDirect Additional Titles; Elsevier |
subjects | Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage Agricultural and forest meteorology Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Atmospherics Biological and medical sciences Coffea arabica Coffee Crops Evaporation Evapotranspiration Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production Irrigation Lysimeter Lysimeter Microlysimeter Evaporation Transpiration Coffea arabica Lysimeters Microlysimeter Sprinklers Transpiration Trees Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration |
title | Evapotranspiration components and dual crop coefficients of coffee trees during crop production |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T09%3A23%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evapotranspiration%20components%20and%20dual%20crop%20coefficients%20of%20coffee%20trees%20during%20crop%20production&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20water%20management&rft.au=Flumignan,%20Danilton%20Luiz&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=791&rft.epage=800&rft.pages=791-800&rft.issn=0378-3774&rft.eissn=1873-2283&rft.coden=AWMADF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E864962244%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dfea3c1abe2bea46bce0c6c64ad8b736e1a92f19d08a7ab05dd2efa05d80e7a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=864962244&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |