Loading…

Evapotranspiration components and dual crop coefficients of coffee trees during crop production

▶ We determined ET components and Ke and Kcb of coffee trees during production phase. ▶ Regardless irrigation treatment, E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. ▶ Recommended Ke is 0.46 for sprinkler irrigation and 0.26 for drip. ▶ Kcb was recommended for both irrigated treatments as a funct...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agricultural water management 2011-03, Vol.98 (5), p.791-800
Main Authors: Flumignan, Danilton Luiz, de Faria, Rogério Teixeira, Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dfea3c1abe2bea46bce0c6c64ad8b736e1a92f19d08a7ab05dd2efa05d80e7a83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dfea3c1abe2bea46bce0c6c64ad8b736e1a92f19d08a7ab05dd2efa05d80e7a83
container_end_page 800
container_issue 5
container_start_page 791
container_title Agricultural water management
container_volume 98
creator Flumignan, Danilton Luiz
de Faria, Rogério Teixeira
Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi
description ▶ We determined ET components and Ke and Kcb of coffee trees during production phase. ▶ Regardless irrigation treatment, E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. ▶ Recommended Ke is 0.46 for sprinkler irrigation and 0.26 for drip. ▶ Kcb was recommended for both irrigated treatments as a function of daily ETo. Quantifying crop water consumption is essential for many applications in agriculture, such as crop zoning, yield forecast and irrigation management. The objective of this study was to determine evaporation (E), transpiration (T) and dual crop coefficients (Ke and Kcb) of coffee trees during crop production (3rd and 4th year of cultivation), conducted under sprinkler and drip irrigation and no irrigation, in Londrina, Paraná State, Brazil. Crop evapotranspiration (ET) was measured by weighing lysimeters cultivated with plants of cultivar IAPAR 59, E was measured by microlysimeters installed on the lysimeters and T was obtained by the difference between ET and E. The crop coefficient (Kc) was determined for the irrigated treatments as the ratio between ET and the reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Similarly, evaporation coefficient (Ke) and basal crop coefficient (Kcb) were determined as the ratio of E and T, respectively, to the value of ETo, which was estimated by the ASCE Penman–Monteith method on an hourly basis. The values of E and Ke varied due to atmospheric demand and water application method. Those factors, in addition to crop phenology and leaf area evolution, also influenced T and Kcb. Regardless irrigation treatment, the measured values of E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. The recommended values of Ke were 0.46 and 0.26 for sprinkler and drip irrigation, respectively. The recommended values of Kcb were 0.52 and 0.82 for sprinkler-irrigated, and 0.5 and 0.65 for drip-irrigated treatments, varying as a function of daily ETo (ETo ≥ or
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864962244</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378377410003811</els_id><sourcerecordid>864962244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dfea3c1abe2bea46bce0c6c64ad8b736e1a92f19d08a7ab05dd2efa05d80e7a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEEkvhF3AgF8Qpi782dg4cUFWgVSUO0LM1sceLV9k42Nmt-u-ZNFWPHMYje555PX5dVe8523LG28-HLezvYd4KtpyILWPiRbXhRstGCCNfVhsmtWmk1up19aaUA2NMMaU3lb06w5TmDGOZYoY5prF26TilEce51DD62p9gqF1OExUwhOjiYykF2oeAWM8ZsRCW47hfwSknf3KL2NvqVYCh4LunfFHdfbv6ffmjuf35_fry623j1K6dGx8QpOPQo-gRVNs7ZK51rQJvei1b5NCJwDvPDGjo2c57gQEoG4YajLyoPq26dPXfE5bZHmNxOAwwYjoVa1rVtUIoRaRcSZq0lIzBTjkeIT9Yzuzipj3YRzft4qblwpKb1HWzdmWc0D23ICLs4wKfrYTO0PJAQZ2cUqTYUUwUuuPWMGb_zEcS-_g0LBQHQyD3XSzPokJ2QgnJifuwcgESzZSJuftF2pLxTu06uYz1ZSWQvD1HzLYs3-PQx4xutj7F_z7rH9R7sV8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>864962244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evapotranspiration components and dual crop coefficients of coffee trees during crop production</title><source>ScienceDirect Additional Titles</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Flumignan, Danilton Luiz ; de Faria, Rogério Teixeira ; Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi</creator><creatorcontrib>Flumignan, Danilton Luiz ; de Faria, Rogério Teixeira ; Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi</creatorcontrib><description>▶ We determined ET components and Ke and Kcb of coffee trees during production phase. ▶ Regardless irrigation treatment, E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. ▶ Recommended Ke is 0.46 for sprinkler irrigation and 0.26 for drip. ▶ Kcb was recommended for both irrigated treatments as a function of daily ETo. Quantifying crop water consumption is essential for many applications in agriculture, such as crop zoning, yield forecast and irrigation management. The objective of this study was to determine evaporation (E), transpiration (T) and dual crop coefficients (Ke and Kcb) of coffee trees during crop production (3rd and 4th year of cultivation), conducted under sprinkler and drip irrigation and no irrigation, in Londrina, Paraná State, Brazil. Crop evapotranspiration (ET) was measured by weighing lysimeters cultivated with plants of cultivar IAPAR 59, E was measured by microlysimeters installed on the lysimeters and T was obtained by the difference between ET and E. The crop coefficient (Kc) was determined for the irrigated treatments as the ratio between ET and the reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Similarly, evaporation coefficient (Ke) and basal crop coefficient (Kcb) were determined as the ratio of E and T, respectively, to the value of ETo, which was estimated by the ASCE Penman–Monteith method on an hourly basis. The values of E and Ke varied due to atmospheric demand and water application method. Those factors, in addition to crop phenology and leaf area evolution, also influenced T and Kcb. Regardless irrigation treatment, the measured values of E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. The recommended values of Ke were 0.46 and 0.26 for sprinkler and drip irrigation, respectively. The recommended values of Kcb were 0.52 and 0.82 for sprinkler-irrigated, and 0.5 and 0.65 for drip-irrigated treatments, varying as a function of daily ETo (ETo ≥ or &lt;3 mm day −1, respectively).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-3774</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AWMADF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage ; Agricultural and forest meteorology ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Atmospherics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Coffea arabica ; Coffee ; Crops ; Evaporation ; Evapotranspiration ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Irrigation ; Lysimeter ; Lysimeter Microlysimeter Evaporation Transpiration Coffea arabica ; Lysimeters ; Microlysimeter ; Sprinklers ; Transpiration ; Trees ; Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration</subject><ispartof>Agricultural water management, 2011-03, Vol.98 (5), p.791-800</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dfea3c1abe2bea46bce0c6c64ad8b736e1a92f19d08a7ab05dd2efa05d80e7a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dfea3c1abe2bea46bce0c6c64ad8b736e1a92f19d08a7ab05dd2efa05d80e7a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377410003811$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3547,27923,27924,45779</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23924231$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeagiwat/v_3a98_3ay_3a2011_3ai_3a5_3ap_3a791-800.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flumignan, Danilton Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Faria, Rogério Teixeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi</creatorcontrib><title>Evapotranspiration components and dual crop coefficients of coffee trees during crop production</title><title>Agricultural water management</title><description>▶ We determined ET components and Ke and Kcb of coffee trees during production phase. ▶ Regardless irrigation treatment, E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. ▶ Recommended Ke is 0.46 for sprinkler irrigation and 0.26 for drip. ▶ Kcb was recommended for both irrigated treatments as a function of daily ETo. Quantifying crop water consumption is essential for many applications in agriculture, such as crop zoning, yield forecast and irrigation management. The objective of this study was to determine evaporation (E), transpiration (T) and dual crop coefficients (Ke and Kcb) of coffee trees during crop production (3rd and 4th year of cultivation), conducted under sprinkler and drip irrigation and no irrigation, in Londrina, Paraná State, Brazil. Crop evapotranspiration (ET) was measured by weighing lysimeters cultivated with plants of cultivar IAPAR 59, E was measured by microlysimeters installed on the lysimeters and T was obtained by the difference between ET and E. The crop coefficient (Kc) was determined for the irrigated treatments as the ratio between ET and the reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Similarly, evaporation coefficient (Ke) and basal crop coefficient (Kcb) were determined as the ratio of E and T, respectively, to the value of ETo, which was estimated by the ASCE Penman–Monteith method on an hourly basis. The values of E and Ke varied due to atmospheric demand and water application method. Those factors, in addition to crop phenology and leaf area evolution, also influenced T and Kcb. Regardless irrigation treatment, the measured values of E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. The recommended values of Ke were 0.46 and 0.26 for sprinkler and drip irrigation, respectively. The recommended values of Kcb were 0.52 and 0.82 for sprinkler-irrigated, and 0.5 and 0.65 for drip-irrigated treatments, varying as a function of daily ETo (ETo ≥ or &lt;3 mm day −1, respectively).</description><subject>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</subject><subject>Agricultural and forest meteorology</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Atmospherics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Coffea arabica</subject><subject>Coffee</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Lysimeter</subject><subject>Lysimeter Microlysimeter Evaporation Transpiration Coffea arabica</subject><subject>Lysimeters</subject><subject>Microlysimeter</subject><subject>Sprinklers</subject><subject>Transpiration</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration</subject><issn>0378-3774</issn><issn>1873-2283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhiMEEkvhF3AgF8Qpi782dg4cUFWgVSUO0LM1sceLV9k42Nmt-u-ZNFWPHMYje555PX5dVe8523LG28-HLezvYd4KtpyILWPiRbXhRstGCCNfVhsmtWmk1up19aaUA2NMMaU3lb06w5TmDGOZYoY5prF26TilEce51DD62p9gqF1OExUwhOjiYykF2oeAWM8ZsRCW47hfwSknf3KL2NvqVYCh4LunfFHdfbv6ffmjuf35_fry623j1K6dGx8QpOPQo-gRVNs7ZK51rQJvei1b5NCJwDvPDGjo2c57gQEoG4YajLyoPq26dPXfE5bZHmNxOAwwYjoVa1rVtUIoRaRcSZq0lIzBTjkeIT9Yzuzipj3YRzft4qblwpKb1HWzdmWc0D23ICLs4wKfrYTO0PJAQZ2cUqTYUUwUuuPWMGb_zEcS-_g0LBQHQyD3XSzPokJ2QgnJifuwcgESzZSJuftF2pLxTu06uYz1ZSWQvD1HzLYs3-PQx4xutj7F_z7rH9R7sV8</recordid><startdate>20110301</startdate><enddate>20110301</enddate><creator>Flumignan, Danilton Luiz</creator><creator>de Faria, Rogério Teixeira</creator><creator>Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Amsterdam; New York: Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110301</creationdate><title>Evapotranspiration components and dual crop coefficients of coffee trees during crop production</title><author>Flumignan, Danilton Luiz ; de Faria, Rogério Teixeira ; Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dfea3c1abe2bea46bce0c6c64ad8b736e1a92f19d08a7ab05dd2efa05d80e7a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage</topic><topic>Agricultural and forest meteorology</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Atmospherics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Coffea arabica</topic><topic>Coffee</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Lysimeter</topic><topic>Lysimeter Microlysimeter Evaporation Transpiration Coffea arabica</topic><topic>Lysimeters</topic><topic>Microlysimeter</topic><topic>Sprinklers</topic><topic>Transpiration</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flumignan, Danilton Luiz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Faria, Rogério Teixeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agricultural water management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flumignan, Danilton Luiz</au><au>de Faria, Rogério Teixeira</au><au>Prete, Cássio Egídio Cavenaghi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evapotranspiration components and dual crop coefficients of coffee trees during crop production</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural water management</jtitle><date>2011-03-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>791</spage><epage>800</epage><pages>791-800</pages><issn>0378-3774</issn><eissn>1873-2283</eissn><coden>AWMADF</coden><abstract>▶ We determined ET components and Ke and Kcb of coffee trees during production phase. ▶ Regardless irrigation treatment, E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. ▶ Recommended Ke is 0.46 for sprinkler irrigation and 0.26 for drip. ▶ Kcb was recommended for both irrigated treatments as a function of daily ETo. Quantifying crop water consumption is essential for many applications in agriculture, such as crop zoning, yield forecast and irrigation management. The objective of this study was to determine evaporation (E), transpiration (T) and dual crop coefficients (Ke and Kcb) of coffee trees during crop production (3rd and 4th year of cultivation), conducted under sprinkler and drip irrigation and no irrigation, in Londrina, Paraná State, Brazil. Crop evapotranspiration (ET) was measured by weighing lysimeters cultivated with plants of cultivar IAPAR 59, E was measured by microlysimeters installed on the lysimeters and T was obtained by the difference between ET and E. The crop coefficient (Kc) was determined for the irrigated treatments as the ratio between ET and the reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Similarly, evaporation coefficient (Ke) and basal crop coefficient (Kcb) were determined as the ratio of E and T, respectively, to the value of ETo, which was estimated by the ASCE Penman–Monteith method on an hourly basis. The values of E and Ke varied due to atmospheric demand and water application method. Those factors, in addition to crop phenology and leaf area evolution, also influenced T and Kcb. Regardless irrigation treatment, the measured values of E represented 35% of ET, while T was 65% of ET. The recommended values of Ke were 0.46 and 0.26 for sprinkler and drip irrigation, respectively. The recommended values of Kcb were 0.52 and 0.82 for sprinkler-irrigated, and 0.5 and 0.65 for drip-irrigated treatments, varying as a function of daily ETo (ETo ≥ or &lt;3 mm day −1, respectively).</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.002</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-3774
ispartof Agricultural water management, 2011-03, Vol.98 (5), p.791-800
issn 0378-3774
1873-2283
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_864962244
source ScienceDirect Additional Titles; Elsevier
subjects Agricultural and forest climatology and meteorology. Irrigation. Drainage
Agricultural and forest meteorology
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Atmospherics
Biological and medical sciences
Coffea arabica
Coffee
Crops
Evaporation
Evapotranspiration
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
Irrigation
Lysimeter
Lysimeter Microlysimeter Evaporation Transpiration Coffea arabica
Lysimeters
Microlysimeter
Sprinklers
Transpiration
Trees
Water balance and requirements. Evapotranspiration
title Evapotranspiration components and dual crop coefficients of coffee trees during crop production
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T09%3A23%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evapotranspiration%20components%20and%20dual%20crop%20coefficients%20of%20coffee%20trees%20during%20crop%20production&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20water%20management&rft.au=Flumignan,%20Danilton%20Luiz&rft.date=2011-03-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=791&rft.epage=800&rft.pages=791-800&rft.issn=0378-3774&rft.eissn=1873-2283&rft.coden=AWMADF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.12.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E864962244%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-dfea3c1abe2bea46bce0c6c64ad8b736e1a92f19d08a7ab05dd2efa05d80e7a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=864962244&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true