Loading…

Impact of a Subcutaneous Insulin Protocol in the Emergency Department: Rush Emergency Department Hyperglycemia Intervention (REDHI)

Abstract Objective: We evaluated a hyperglycemia treatment protocol for use in the Emergency Department (ED) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) before admission to the hospital or discharge home. Methods: Fifty-four consecutive patients with a history of DM and an ED admission blood glucose (BG...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of emergency medicine 2011-05, Vol.40 (5), p.493-498
Main Authors: Munoz, Christina, FNP, Villanueva, Grace, ND, Fogg, Louis, PHD, Johnson, Tricia, PHD, Hannold, Katherine, RN, BSN, Agruss, Janyce, PHD, APN/CNP, Baldwin, David, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-db4c074eb6e880c4abcabed62a728039b84b9b70a4476977f1006fc9bee2716f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-db4c074eb6e880c4abcabed62a728039b84b9b70a4476977f1006fc9bee2716f3
container_end_page 498
container_issue 5
container_start_page 493
container_title The Journal of emergency medicine
container_volume 40
creator Munoz, Christina, FNP
Villanueva, Grace, ND
Fogg, Louis, PHD
Johnson, Tricia, PHD
Hannold, Katherine, RN, BSN
Agruss, Janyce, PHD, APN/CNP
Baldwin, David, MD
description Abstract Objective: We evaluated a hyperglycemia treatment protocol for use in the Emergency Department (ED) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) before admission to the hospital or discharge home. Methods: Fifty-four consecutive patients with a history of DM and an ED admission blood glucose (BG) > 200 mg/dL were treated with subcutaneous (SQ) insulin aspart every 2 h until BG was < 200 mg/dL. Point-of-care BG was measured immediately on ED admission and every 2 h until discharge home or hospital admission. The intervention group was compared with 54 historical controls with DM and an ED admission BG > 200 mg/dL. Results: One hundred percent of intervention patients received insulin aspart, whereas only 35% of historical controls received insulin therapy. In the intervention group, mean BG declined from 333 ± 104 mg/dL on ED admission to 158 ± 68 mg/dL on ED discharge. In the historical control group, mean BG decline was significantly less, from 322 ± 126 mg/dL on admission to 242 ± 79 mg/dL on discharge ( p < 0.001). Sixty-nine percent of intervention patients and 67% of controls were subsequently admitted to the hospital. Mean hospital length of stay (LOS) in the intervention group was significantly less, 3.8 ± 3.3 days, compared with 5.3 ± 4.1 days in the control group ( p < 0.05). Four intervention patients (7.4%) developed a BG < 70 mg/dL. Conclusion: A protocol for the treatment of acute hyperglycemia in the ED can be safely implemented. Subsequent inpatient LOS was reduced. Further randomized clinical trials of this intervention are warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.03.017
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_867323278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S073646790800365X</els_id><sourcerecordid>867323278</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-db4c074eb6e880c4abcabed62a728039b84b9b70a4476977f1006fc9bee2716f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFksFu1DAQhiMEokvhFSrfgEPC2MnaDgcEahd2pUqgFiRuluNMaEISB9uplDMvjqNdOCAkTrZm_plf880kyQWFjALlr7qswwHdgHXGAGQGeQZUPEg2LN-ydAusfJhsQOQ8Lbgoz5In3ncQFSDp4-SMSslKBttN8vMwTNoEYhuiye1cmTnoEe3syWH0c9-O5JOzwRrbk_gPd0h20fYbjmYhVzhpFwYcw2tyM_u7f6bIfplitF8MDq2OXQO6-xhv7Uhe3Oyu9oeXT5NHje49Pju958mX97vPl_v0-uOHw-W769QUjIW0rgoDosCKo5RgCl0ZXWHNmRZMQl5WsqjKSoAuCsFLIRoKwBtTVohMUN7k58nzY9_J2R8z-qCG1hvs--PESnKRs5wJGZX8qDTOeu-wUZNrB-0WRUGt_FWnfvNXK38FuYp0Y-HFyWKu1tyfshPwKHh7FGAc9L5Fp7xpIzKsW4cmqNq2__d481cLE_fUGt1_xwV9Z2c3RoyKKs8UqNv1CtYjAAmQ8-3X_BcpPrEC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>867323278</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of a Subcutaneous Insulin Protocol in the Emergency Department: Rush Emergency Department Hyperglycemia Intervention (REDHI)</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Munoz, Christina, FNP ; Villanueva, Grace, ND ; Fogg, Louis, PHD ; Johnson, Tricia, PHD ; Hannold, Katherine, RN, BSN ; Agruss, Janyce, PHD, APN/CNP ; Baldwin, David, MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Munoz, Christina, FNP ; Villanueva, Grace, ND ; Fogg, Louis, PHD ; Johnson, Tricia, PHD ; Hannold, Katherine, RN, BSN ; Agruss, Janyce, PHD, APN/CNP ; Baldwin, David, MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective: We evaluated a hyperglycemia treatment protocol for use in the Emergency Department (ED) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) before admission to the hospital or discharge home. Methods: Fifty-four consecutive patients with a history of DM and an ED admission blood glucose (BG) &gt; 200 mg/dL were treated with subcutaneous (SQ) insulin aspart every 2 h until BG was &lt; 200 mg/dL. Point-of-care BG was measured immediately on ED admission and every 2 h until discharge home or hospital admission. The intervention group was compared with 54 historical controls with DM and an ED admission BG &gt; 200 mg/dL. Results: One hundred percent of intervention patients received insulin aspart, whereas only 35% of historical controls received insulin therapy. In the intervention group, mean BG declined from 333 ± 104 mg/dL on ED admission to 158 ± 68 mg/dL on ED discharge. In the historical control group, mean BG decline was significantly less, from 322 ± 126 mg/dL on admission to 242 ± 79 mg/dL on discharge ( p &lt; 0.001). Sixty-nine percent of intervention patients and 67% of controls were subsequently admitted to the hospital. Mean hospital length of stay (LOS) in the intervention group was significantly less, 3.8 ± 3.3 days, compared with 5.3 ± 4.1 days in the control group ( p &lt; 0.05). Four intervention patients (7.4%) developed a BG &lt; 70 mg/dL. Conclusion: A protocol for the treatment of acute hyperglycemia in the ED can be safely implemented. Subsequent inpatient LOS was reduced. Further randomized clinical trials of this intervention are warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-4679</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.03.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18829205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Clinical Protocols ; diabetes ; Diabetes Complications - drug therapy ; Emergency ; Emergency Department ; Emergency Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration ; Female ; Humans ; hyperglycemia ; Hyperglycemia - drug therapy ; Hypoglycemic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; insulin ; Insulin - administration &amp; dosage ; Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pilot Projects ; Point-of-Care Systems ; protocols ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of emergency medicine, 2011-05, Vol.40 (5), p.493-498</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-db4c074eb6e880c4abcabed62a728039b84b9b70a4476977f1006fc9bee2716f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-db4c074eb6e880c4abcabed62a728039b84b9b70a4476977f1006fc9bee2716f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18829205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Munoz, Christina, FNP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villanueva, Grace, ND</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fogg, Louis, PHD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Tricia, PHD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannold, Katherine, RN, BSN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agruss, Janyce, PHD, APN/CNP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, David, MD</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of a Subcutaneous Insulin Protocol in the Emergency Department: Rush Emergency Department Hyperglycemia Intervention (REDHI)</title><title>The Journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective: We evaluated a hyperglycemia treatment protocol for use in the Emergency Department (ED) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) before admission to the hospital or discharge home. Methods: Fifty-four consecutive patients with a history of DM and an ED admission blood glucose (BG) &gt; 200 mg/dL were treated with subcutaneous (SQ) insulin aspart every 2 h until BG was &lt; 200 mg/dL. Point-of-care BG was measured immediately on ED admission and every 2 h until discharge home or hospital admission. The intervention group was compared with 54 historical controls with DM and an ED admission BG &gt; 200 mg/dL. Results: One hundred percent of intervention patients received insulin aspart, whereas only 35% of historical controls received insulin therapy. In the intervention group, mean BG declined from 333 ± 104 mg/dL on ED admission to 158 ± 68 mg/dL on ED discharge. In the historical control group, mean BG decline was significantly less, from 322 ± 126 mg/dL on admission to 242 ± 79 mg/dL on discharge ( p &lt; 0.001). Sixty-nine percent of intervention patients and 67% of controls were subsequently admitted to the hospital. Mean hospital length of stay (LOS) in the intervention group was significantly less, 3.8 ± 3.3 days, compared with 5.3 ± 4.1 days in the control group ( p &lt; 0.05). Four intervention patients (7.4%) developed a BG &lt; 70 mg/dL. Conclusion: A protocol for the treatment of acute hyperglycemia in the ED can be safely implemented. Subsequent inpatient LOS was reduced. Further randomized clinical trials of this intervention are warranted.</description><subject>Blood Glucose - analysis</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes Complications - drug therapy</subject><subject>Emergency</subject><subject>Emergency Department</subject><subject>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hyperglycemia</subject><subject>Hyperglycemia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Hypoglycemic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>insulin</subject><subject>Insulin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Systems</subject><subject>protocols</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0736-4679</issn><issn>2352-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFksFu1DAQhiMEokvhFSrfgEPC2MnaDgcEahd2pUqgFiRuluNMaEISB9uplDMvjqNdOCAkTrZm_plf880kyQWFjALlr7qswwHdgHXGAGQGeQZUPEg2LN-ydAusfJhsQOQ8Lbgoz5In3ncQFSDp4-SMSslKBttN8vMwTNoEYhuiye1cmTnoEe3syWH0c9-O5JOzwRrbk_gPd0h20fYbjmYhVzhpFwYcw2tyM_u7f6bIfplitF8MDq2OXQO6-xhv7Uhe3Oyu9oeXT5NHje49Pju958mX97vPl_v0-uOHw-W769QUjIW0rgoDosCKo5RgCl0ZXWHNmRZMQl5WsqjKSoAuCsFLIRoKwBtTVohMUN7k58nzY9_J2R8z-qCG1hvs--PESnKRs5wJGZX8qDTOeu-wUZNrB-0WRUGt_FWnfvNXK38FuYp0Y-HFyWKu1tyfshPwKHh7FGAc9L5Fp7xpIzKsW4cmqNq2__d481cLE_fUGt1_xwV9Z2c3RoyKKs8UqNv1CtYjAAmQ8-3X_BcpPrEC</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Munoz, Christina, FNP</creator><creator>Villanueva, Grace, ND</creator><creator>Fogg, Louis, PHD</creator><creator>Johnson, Tricia, PHD</creator><creator>Hannold, Katherine, RN, BSN</creator><creator>Agruss, Janyce, PHD, APN/CNP</creator><creator>Baldwin, David, MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Impact of a Subcutaneous Insulin Protocol in the Emergency Department: Rush Emergency Department Hyperglycemia Intervention (REDHI)</title><author>Munoz, Christina, FNP ; Villanueva, Grace, ND ; Fogg, Louis, PHD ; Johnson, Tricia, PHD ; Hannold, Katherine, RN, BSN ; Agruss, Janyce, PHD, APN/CNP ; Baldwin, David, MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-db4c074eb6e880c4abcabed62a728039b84b9b70a4476977f1006fc9bee2716f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Blood Glucose - analysis</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes Complications - drug therapy</topic><topic>Emergency</topic><topic>Emergency Department</topic><topic>Emergency Service, Hospital - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hyperglycemia</topic><topic>Hyperglycemia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Hypoglycemic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>insulin</topic><topic>Insulin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Systems</topic><topic>protocols</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Munoz, Christina, FNP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villanueva, Grace, ND</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fogg, Louis, PHD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Tricia, PHD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hannold, Katherine, RN, BSN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agruss, Janyce, PHD, APN/CNP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, David, MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Munoz, Christina, FNP</au><au>Villanueva, Grace, ND</au><au>Fogg, Louis, PHD</au><au>Johnson, Tricia, PHD</au><au>Hannold, Katherine, RN, BSN</au><au>Agruss, Janyce, PHD, APN/CNP</au><au>Baldwin, David, MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of a Subcutaneous Insulin Protocol in the Emergency Department: Rush Emergency Department Hyperglycemia Intervention (REDHI)</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>498</epage><pages>493-498</pages><issn>0736-4679</issn><eissn>2352-5029</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective: We evaluated a hyperglycemia treatment protocol for use in the Emergency Department (ED) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) before admission to the hospital or discharge home. Methods: Fifty-four consecutive patients with a history of DM and an ED admission blood glucose (BG) &gt; 200 mg/dL were treated with subcutaneous (SQ) insulin aspart every 2 h until BG was &lt; 200 mg/dL. Point-of-care BG was measured immediately on ED admission and every 2 h until discharge home or hospital admission. The intervention group was compared with 54 historical controls with DM and an ED admission BG &gt; 200 mg/dL. Results: One hundred percent of intervention patients received insulin aspart, whereas only 35% of historical controls received insulin therapy. In the intervention group, mean BG declined from 333 ± 104 mg/dL on ED admission to 158 ± 68 mg/dL on ED discharge. In the historical control group, mean BG decline was significantly less, from 322 ± 126 mg/dL on admission to 242 ± 79 mg/dL on discharge ( p &lt; 0.001). Sixty-nine percent of intervention patients and 67% of controls were subsequently admitted to the hospital. Mean hospital length of stay (LOS) in the intervention group was significantly less, 3.8 ± 3.3 days, compared with 5.3 ± 4.1 days in the control group ( p &lt; 0.05). Four intervention patients (7.4%) developed a BG &lt; 70 mg/dL. Conclusion: A protocol for the treatment of acute hyperglycemia in the ED can be safely implemented. Subsequent inpatient LOS was reduced. Further randomized clinical trials of this intervention are warranted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>18829205</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.03.017</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0736-4679
ispartof The Journal of emergency medicine, 2011-05, Vol.40 (5), p.493-498
issn 0736-4679
2352-5029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_867323278
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Blood Glucose - analysis
Chi-Square Distribution
Clinical Protocols
diabetes
Diabetes Complications - drug therapy
Emergency
Emergency Department
Emergency Service, Hospital - organization & administration
Female
Humans
hyperglycemia
Hyperglycemia - drug therapy
Hypoglycemic Agents - administration & dosage
insulin
Insulin - administration & dosage
Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Pilot Projects
Point-of-Care Systems
protocols
Treatment Outcome
title Impact of a Subcutaneous Insulin Protocol in the Emergency Department: Rush Emergency Department Hyperglycemia Intervention (REDHI)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A04%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20a%20Subcutaneous%20Insulin%20Protocol%20in%20the%20Emergency%20Department:%20Rush%20Emergency%20Department%20Hyperglycemia%20Intervention%20(REDHI)&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Munoz,%20Christina,%20FNP&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=498&rft.pages=493-498&rft.issn=0736-4679&rft.eissn=2352-5029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.03.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E867323278%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-db4c074eb6e880c4abcabed62a728039b84b9b70a4476977f1006fc9bee2716f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=867323278&rft_id=info:pmid/18829205&rfr_iscdi=true