Loading…

Radar observations and the shape of near-Earth ASTEROID 2008 EV5

► We observed 2008 EV5 with Arecibo, Goldstone, and the VLBA in December 2008. ► EV5 rotates retrograde and its overall shape is a 400 ± 50 m oblate spheroid. ► EV5 has an equatorial ridge that is broken by a 150-m concavity. ► The equatorial ridge is consistent with YORP spin-up reconfiguring the a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Icarus (New York, N.Y. 1962) N.Y. 1962), 2011-04, Vol.212 (2), p.649-660
Main Authors: Busch, Michael W., Ostro, Steven J., Benner, Lance A.M., Brozovic, Marina, Giorgini, Jon D., Jao, Joseph S., Scheeres, Daniel J., Magri, Christopher, Nolan, Michael C., Howell, Ellen S., Taylor, Patrick A., Margot, Jean-Luc, Brisken, Walter
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:► We observed 2008 EV5 with Arecibo, Goldstone, and the VLBA in December 2008. ► EV5 rotates retrograde and its overall shape is a 400 ± 50 m oblate spheroid. ► EV5 has an equatorial ridge that is broken by a 150-m concavity. ► The equatorial ridge is consistent with YORP spin-up reconfiguring the asteroid. ► We interpret the concavity as an impact crater. We observed the near-Earth ASTEROID 2008 EV5 with the Arecibo and Goldstone planetary radars and the Very Long Baseline Array during December 2008. EV5 rotates retrograde and its overall shape is a 400 ± 50 m oblate spheroid. The most prominent surface feature is a ridge parallel to the asteroid’s equator that is broken by a concavity about 150 m in diameter. Otherwise the asteroid’s surface is notably smooth on decameter scales. EV5’s radar and optical albedos are consistent with either rocky or stony-iron composition. The equatorial ridge is similar to structure seen on the rubble-pile near-Earth asteroid (66391) 1999 KW4 and is consistent with YORP spin-up reconfiguring the asteroid in the past. We interpret the concavity as an impact crater. Shaking during the impact and later regolith redistribution may have erased smaller features, explaining the general lack of decameter-scale surface structure.
ISSN:0019-1035
1090-2643
DOI:10.1016/j.icarus.2011.01.013