Loading…

Donor-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Donor-Recipient Matching in Liver Transplantation

Abstract Background The product between donor (D) age and recipient (R) Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at the moment of liver transplantation (LT) has been proposed as a potential D-R matching tool to reduce the risk of “futile” LT from using the MELD score as the main allocation too...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transplantation proceedings 2011-05, Vol.43 (4), p.974-976
Main Authors: Vitale, A, Ramirez Morales, R, dalla Bona, E, Scopelliti, M, Zanus, G, Neri, D, d'Amico, F, Gringeri, E, Russo, F, Burra, P, Angeli, P, Cillo, U
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d74e3cb953532b6b600e7ab57db38d43abe0448b20a1182fe4d2d6122769e5e13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d74e3cb953532b6b600e7ab57db38d43abe0448b20a1182fe4d2d6122769e5e13
container_end_page 976
container_issue 4
container_start_page 974
container_title Transplantation proceedings
container_volume 43
creator Vitale, A
Ramirez Morales, R
dalla Bona, E
Scopelliti, M
Zanus, G
Neri, D
d'Amico, F
Gringeri, E
Russo, F
Burra, P
Angeli, P
Cillo, U
description Abstract Background The product between donor (D) age and recipient (R) Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at the moment of liver transplantation (LT) has been proposed as a potential D-R matching tool to reduce the risk of “futile” LT from using the MELD score as the main allocation tool. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic ability of D-MELD among a cohort of Italian patients already selected for LT on the basis of a D-R matching philosophy. Methods We studied 303 consecutive adult patients undergoing first LT for chronic liver diseases with available D-MELD at the moment of LT from 2003 to 2009. Optimal donors were assigned to more severe cirrhotic patients (MELD ≥20); suboptimal organs were allocated to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not responsive to bridging therapies (specific priority score) or other exceptions with MELD 70 years, severe steatosis by ultrasound, and/or body mass index >30 kg/m2 , partial liver, or hepatitis C (HCV) or B virus positivity. Results Characteristics of the study group were a median age of 55 years (range, 27–68 years), HCV positivity in 164 patients (54%), HCC in 134 patients (44%), partial liver use in 25 (8%), MELD 15 (range, 6–40), D-age of 56 years (range, 18–87 years), and median D-MELD score 826 (range, 126–2,988). Overall graft survival was 84%, 79%, and 77% at 1, 3, and 5 years after LT, respectively. Logistic regression did not show a significant correlation between graft failure and D-MELD score in the absence of a significant D-MELD cutoff. Cox regression with D-MELD as the continuous variable showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99–1.00; P = NS); and with D-MELD as a dichotomic variable (≥0 to
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.138
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869408879</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0041134511002223</els_id><sourcerecordid>869408879</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d74e3cb953532b6b600e7ab57db38d43abe0448b20a1182fe4d2d6122769e5e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhoModq3-BRkE8WrGnCTz5YUg3doWthRsvZSQSc7UrLPJmmQL_fdm3C0Vr3oVQp7znpeHEPIOaAUUmo_rKgXl4jZ4jWgqRgEqChXw7hlZQNfykjWMPycLSgWUwEV9RF7FuKb5zgR_SY4YNIxS1i_Ij6V3PpSX3uBUjD4Up86U10ndYrGydxiKpY2oIhbKmWLPfkNttxZdKi5V0j-tuy2sO9A3f4tNyiWVrHevyYtRTRHfHM5j8v3r6c3Jebm6Ors4-bIqtWhEKk0rkOuhr3nN2dAMDaXYqqFuzcA7I7gakArRDYwqgI6NKAwzDTDWNj3WCPyYfNjnZie_dxiT3NioccpF0O-i7Jpe0K5r-0x-2pM6-BgDjnIb7EaFewlUznblWv5rV852JQWZ7ebht4c1u2GT3x5GH3Rm4P0BUFGracxB2sZHTrAcx-a-yz2HWcqdxSCjzkY1GhtQJ2m8fVqfz__F6Mk6mzf_wnuMa78LLmuXICOTVF7P_2H-DgC5LWOc_wHmcbOD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>869408879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Donor-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Donor-Recipient Matching in Liver Transplantation</title><source>Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Vitale, A ; Ramirez Morales, R ; dalla Bona, E ; Scopelliti, M ; Zanus, G ; Neri, D ; d'Amico, F ; Gringeri, E ; Russo, F ; Burra, P ; Angeli, P ; Cillo, U</creator><creatorcontrib>Vitale, A ; Ramirez Morales, R ; dalla Bona, E ; Scopelliti, M ; Zanus, G ; Neri, D ; d'Amico, F ; Gringeri, E ; Russo, F ; Burra, P ; Angeli, P ; Cillo, U</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The product between donor (D) age and recipient (R) Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at the moment of liver transplantation (LT) has been proposed as a potential D-R matching tool to reduce the risk of “futile” LT from using the MELD score as the main allocation tool. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic ability of D-MELD among a cohort of Italian patients already selected for LT on the basis of a D-R matching philosophy. Methods We studied 303 consecutive adult patients undergoing first LT for chronic liver diseases with available D-MELD at the moment of LT from 2003 to 2009. Optimal donors were assigned to more severe cirrhotic patients (MELD ≥20); suboptimal organs were allocated to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not responsive to bridging therapies (specific priority score) or other exceptions with MELD &lt;20. A suboptimal donor had age &gt;70 years, severe steatosis by ultrasound, and/or body mass index &gt;30 kg/m2 , partial liver, or hepatitis C (HCV) or B virus positivity. Results Characteristics of the study group were a median age of 55 years (range, 27–68 years), HCV positivity in 164 patients (54%), HCC in 134 patients (44%), partial liver use in 25 (8%), MELD 15 (range, 6–40), D-age of 56 years (range, 18–87 years), and median D-MELD score 826 (range, 126–2,988). Overall graft survival was 84%, 79%, and 77% at 1, 3, and 5 years after LT, respectively. Logistic regression did not show a significant correlation between graft failure and D-MELD score in the absence of a significant D-MELD cutoff. Cox regression with D-MELD as the continuous variable showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99–1.00; P = NS); and with D-MELD as a dichotomic variable (≥0 to &lt;1,600) an HR of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.63–1.77; P = NS). Conclusion The prognostic ability of D-MELD fails in OLT centers that use a more complex D-R matching policy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.138</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21620029</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRPPA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Mass Index ; Chronic Disease ; Decision Support Techniques ; Donor Selection ; Fatty Liver - complications ; Fatty Liver - diagnostic imaging ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Fundamental immunology ; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen ; Graft Survival ; Health Status Indicators ; Hepatitis B - complications ; Hepatitis B - diagnosis ; Hepatitis C - complications ; Hepatitis C - diagnosis ; Humans ; Italy ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Liver Diseases - diagnosis ; Liver Diseases - surgery ; Liver Transplantation - adverse effects ; Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen ; Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Other diseases. Semiology ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Severity of Illness Index ; Surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Time Factors ; Tissue Donors - supply &amp; distribution ; Tissue, organ and graft immunology ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Transplantation proceedings, 2011-05, Vol.43 (4), p.974-976</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2011 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d74e3cb953532b6b600e7ab57db38d43abe0448b20a1182fe4d2d6122769e5e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d74e3cb953532b6b600e7ab57db38d43abe0448b20a1182fe4d2d6122769e5e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24220121$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21620029$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vitale, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez Morales, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dalla Bona, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scopelliti, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanus, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neri, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>d'Amico, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gringeri, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burra, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angeli, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cillo, U</creatorcontrib><title>Donor-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Donor-Recipient Matching in Liver Transplantation</title><title>Transplantation proceedings</title><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The product between donor (D) age and recipient (R) Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at the moment of liver transplantation (LT) has been proposed as a potential D-R matching tool to reduce the risk of “futile” LT from using the MELD score as the main allocation tool. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic ability of D-MELD among a cohort of Italian patients already selected for LT on the basis of a D-R matching philosophy. Methods We studied 303 consecutive adult patients undergoing first LT for chronic liver diseases with available D-MELD at the moment of LT from 2003 to 2009. Optimal donors were assigned to more severe cirrhotic patients (MELD ≥20); suboptimal organs were allocated to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not responsive to bridging therapies (specific priority score) or other exceptions with MELD &lt;20. A suboptimal donor had age &gt;70 years, severe steatosis by ultrasound, and/or body mass index &gt;30 kg/m2 , partial liver, or hepatitis C (HCV) or B virus positivity. Results Characteristics of the study group were a median age of 55 years (range, 27–68 years), HCV positivity in 164 patients (54%), HCC in 134 patients (44%), partial liver use in 25 (8%), MELD 15 (range, 6–40), D-age of 56 years (range, 18–87 years), and median D-MELD score 826 (range, 126–2,988). Overall graft survival was 84%, 79%, and 77% at 1, 3, and 5 years after LT, respectively. Logistic regression did not show a significant correlation between graft failure and D-MELD score in the absence of a significant D-MELD cutoff. Cox regression with D-MELD as the continuous variable showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99–1.00; P = NS); and with D-MELD as a dichotomic variable (≥0 to &lt;1,600) an HR of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.63–1.77; P = NS). Conclusion The prognostic ability of D-MELD fails in OLT centers that use a more complex D-R matching policy.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Donor Selection</subject><subject>Fatty Liver - complications</subject><subject>Fatty Liver - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental immunology</subject><subject>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Health Status Indicators</subject><subject>Hepatitis B - complications</subject><subject>Hepatitis B - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hepatitis C - complications</subject><subject>Hepatitis C - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Liver Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Liver Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</subject><subject>Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Other diseases. Semiology</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tissue Donors - supply &amp; distribution</subject><subject>Tissue, organ and graft immunology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0041-1345</issn><issn>1873-2623</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhoModq3-BRkE8WrGnCTz5YUg3doWthRsvZSQSc7UrLPJmmQL_fdm3C0Vr3oVQp7znpeHEPIOaAUUmo_rKgXl4jZ4jWgqRgEqChXw7hlZQNfykjWMPycLSgWUwEV9RF7FuKb5zgR_SY4YNIxS1i_Ij6V3PpSX3uBUjD4Up86U10ndYrGydxiKpY2oIhbKmWLPfkNttxZdKi5V0j-tuy2sO9A3f4tNyiWVrHevyYtRTRHfHM5j8v3r6c3Jebm6Ors4-bIqtWhEKk0rkOuhr3nN2dAMDaXYqqFuzcA7I7gakArRDYwqgI6NKAwzDTDWNj3WCPyYfNjnZie_dxiT3NioccpF0O-i7Jpe0K5r-0x-2pM6-BgDjnIb7EaFewlUznblWv5rV852JQWZ7ebht4c1u2GT3x5GH3Rm4P0BUFGracxB2sZHTrAcx-a-yz2HWcqdxSCjzkY1GhtQJ2m8fVqfz__F6Mk6mzf_wnuMa78LLmuXICOTVF7P_2H-DgC5LWOc_wHmcbOD</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Vitale, A</creator><creator>Ramirez Morales, R</creator><creator>dalla Bona, E</creator><creator>Scopelliti, M</creator><creator>Zanus, G</creator><creator>Neri, D</creator><creator>d'Amico, F</creator><creator>Gringeri, E</creator><creator>Russo, F</creator><creator>Burra, P</creator><creator>Angeli, P</creator><creator>Cillo, U</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Donor-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Donor-Recipient Matching in Liver Transplantation</title><author>Vitale, A ; Ramirez Morales, R ; dalla Bona, E ; Scopelliti, M ; Zanus, G ; Neri, D ; d'Amico, F ; Gringeri, E ; Russo, F ; Burra, P ; Angeli, P ; Cillo, U</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d74e3cb953532b6b600e7ab57db38d43abe0448b20a1182fe4d2d6122769e5e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Donor Selection</topic><topic>Fatty Liver - complications</topic><topic>Fatty Liver - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental immunology</topic><topic>Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Health Status Indicators</topic><topic>Hepatitis B - complications</topic><topic>Hepatitis B - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hepatitis C - complications</topic><topic>Hepatitis C - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Liver Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Liver Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</topic><topic>Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Other diseases. Semiology</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tissue Donors - supply &amp; distribution</topic><topic>Tissue, organ and graft immunology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vitale, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez Morales, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dalla Bona, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scopelliti, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanus, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neri, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>d'Amico, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gringeri, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russo, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burra, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angeli, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cillo, U</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vitale, A</au><au>Ramirez Morales, R</au><au>dalla Bona, E</au><au>Scopelliti, M</au><au>Zanus, G</au><au>Neri, D</au><au>d'Amico, F</au><au>Gringeri, E</au><au>Russo, F</au><au>Burra, P</au><au>Angeli, P</au><au>Cillo, U</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Donor-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Donor-Recipient Matching in Liver Transplantation</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation proceedings</jtitle><addtitle>Transplant Proc</addtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>974</spage><epage>976</epage><pages>974-976</pages><issn>0041-1345</issn><eissn>1873-2623</eissn><coden>TRPPA8</coden><abstract>Abstract Background The product between donor (D) age and recipient (R) Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at the moment of liver transplantation (LT) has been proposed as a potential D-R matching tool to reduce the risk of “futile” LT from using the MELD score as the main allocation tool. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic ability of D-MELD among a cohort of Italian patients already selected for LT on the basis of a D-R matching philosophy. Methods We studied 303 consecutive adult patients undergoing first LT for chronic liver diseases with available D-MELD at the moment of LT from 2003 to 2009. Optimal donors were assigned to more severe cirrhotic patients (MELD ≥20); suboptimal organs were allocated to patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not responsive to bridging therapies (specific priority score) or other exceptions with MELD &lt;20. A suboptimal donor had age &gt;70 years, severe steatosis by ultrasound, and/or body mass index &gt;30 kg/m2 , partial liver, or hepatitis C (HCV) or B virus positivity. Results Characteristics of the study group were a median age of 55 years (range, 27–68 years), HCV positivity in 164 patients (54%), HCC in 134 patients (44%), partial liver use in 25 (8%), MELD 15 (range, 6–40), D-age of 56 years (range, 18–87 years), and median D-MELD score 826 (range, 126–2,988). Overall graft survival was 84%, 79%, and 77% at 1, 3, and 5 years after LT, respectively. Logistic regression did not show a significant correlation between graft failure and D-MELD score in the absence of a significant D-MELD cutoff. Cox regression with D-MELD as the continuous variable showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.99–1.00; P = NS); and with D-MELD as a dichotomic variable (≥0 to &lt;1,600) an HR of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.63–1.77; P = NS). Conclusion The prognostic ability of D-MELD fails in OLT centers that use a more complex D-R matching policy.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21620029</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.138</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1345
ispartof Transplantation proceedings, 2011-05, Vol.43 (4), p.974-976
issn 0041-1345
1873-2623
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869408879
source Elsevier:Jisc Collections:Elsevier Read and Publish Agreement 2022-2024:Freedom Collection (Reading list)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Body Mass Index
Chronic Disease
Decision Support Techniques
Donor Selection
Fatty Liver - complications
Fatty Liver - diagnostic imaging
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Fundamental immunology
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Graft Survival
Health Status Indicators
Hepatitis B - complications
Hepatitis B - diagnosis
Hepatitis C - complications
Hepatitis C - diagnosis
Humans
Italy
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Liver Diseases - diagnosis
Liver Diseases - surgery
Liver Transplantation - adverse effects
Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen
Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas
Logistic Models
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Other diseases. Semiology
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Severity of Illness Index
Surgery
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the digestive system
Time Factors
Tissue Donors - supply & distribution
Tissue, organ and graft immunology
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography
Young Adult
title Donor-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease and Donor-Recipient Matching in Liver Transplantation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T02%3A32%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Donor-Model%20for%20End-Stage%20Liver%20Disease%20and%20Donor-Recipient%20Matching%20in%20Liver%20Transplantation&rft.jtitle=Transplantation%20proceedings&rft.au=Vitale,%20A&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=974&rft.epage=976&rft.pages=974-976&rft.issn=0041-1345&rft.eissn=1873-2623&rft.coden=TRPPA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.138&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E869408879%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-d74e3cb953532b6b600e7ab57db38d43abe0448b20a1182fe4d2d6122769e5e13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=869408879&rft_id=info:pmid/21620029&rfr_iscdi=true