Loading…

Seasonal contrasts in carbon resources and ecological processes on a tropical floodplain

Summary 1. Globally, tropical floodplains are highly productive ecosystems. This is largely because of predictable seasonal rains providing replenishing floodwaters that stimulate nutrient turnover which, in turn, substantially boosts both primary and secondary productivity. This is associated with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Freshwater biology 2011-06, Vol.56 (6), p.1047-1064
Main Authors: PETTIT, N. E., BAYLISS, P., DAVIES, P. M., HAMILTON, S. K., WARFE, D. M., BUNN, S. E., DOUGLAS, M. M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4124-8d8f03c37e5e2ea645e40290be3bd9164ebaedfae4b94d598e7d454ad7265fc53
cites
container_end_page 1064
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1047
container_title Freshwater biology
container_volume 56
creator PETTIT, N. E.
BAYLISS, P.
DAVIES, P. M.
HAMILTON, S. K.
WARFE, D. M.
BUNN, S. E.
DOUGLAS, M. M.
description Summary 1. Globally, tropical floodplains are highly productive ecosystems. This is largely because of predictable seasonal rains providing replenishing floodwaters that stimulate nutrient turnover which, in turn, substantially boosts both primary and secondary productivity. This is associated with concomitant shifts in the types of primary producers and associated food webs. 2. The Magela Creek floodplain on Kakadu National Park in northern Australia is one of the most studied tropical freshwater ecosystems in Australia and provides an opportunity to collate and examine information on organic carbon sources and pathways through food webs to gain a fundamental understanding of how these systems may function. 3. We reviewed biophysical information published since the early 1980s to construct an assessment of the carbon resources for the channel and floodplain. 4. We conclude that macrophytes, largely in the form of grasses and aquatic plants, produce the greatest above‐ground biomass on the Magela Creek floodplain. Although macrophytes provide suitable substrata for the attachment of epiphytes, they do not appear to be an important carbon source for aquatic consumers themselves. Nevertheless, macrophytes do provide critical seasonal food and habitat structure for other producers and consumers on the floodplain, such as the abundant magpie geese. 5. We developed a generalised conceptual food web and carbon budget contrasting the ‘wet’ and ‘dry’ seasons for the Magela Creek system, as a representative of tropical seasonal floodplain systems. 6. Our conceptual model of tropical floodplains indicates that knowledge of the seasonal and spatial links and exchanges between the floodplain and the river is critical in understanding ecosystem function.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02544.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869579065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3377877491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4124-8d8f03c37e5e2ea645e40290be3bd9164ebaedfae4b94d598e7d454ad7265fc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMouH78h4IHT12naT7agwcVV0VRREVvQ5pOpWtt1qSL6783dcWDc8nwzvMOmZexJINpFutoPs1yJVMuuJ5yiCpwKcR0tcEmf4NNNgEQKpWgYZvthDAHgEJqPmEvD2SC602XWNcP3oQhJG2fWOMr1yeeglt6SyExfZ2QdZ17bW2EF95FNcRBpEwyeLf40ZvOuXrRmbbfY1uN6QLt_7677Gl2_nh2md7cXVydndykVmRcpEVdNJDbXJMkTkYJSQJ4CRXlVV1mSlBlqG4MiaoUtSwL0rWQwtSaK9lYme-yw_Xe-KWPJYUB39tgqetMT24ZsFCl1CWokTz4R87jcfH0gJkUCqAs-Egdr6nPtqMvXPj23fgvzADHuHGOY6o4popj3PgTN65w9nw6dtGfrv1tGGj15zf-DZXOtcTn2wvMH4tCqHuB1_k3D_yFeQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1546009825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seasonal contrasts in carbon resources and ecological processes on a tropical floodplain</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><creator>PETTIT, N. E. ; BAYLISS, P. ; DAVIES, P. M. ; HAMILTON, S. K. ; WARFE, D. M. ; BUNN, S. E. ; DOUGLAS, M. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>PETTIT, N. E. ; BAYLISS, P. ; DAVIES, P. M. ; HAMILTON, S. K. ; WARFE, D. M. ; BUNN, S. E. ; DOUGLAS, M. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary 1. Globally, tropical floodplains are highly productive ecosystems. This is largely because of predictable seasonal rains providing replenishing floodwaters that stimulate nutrient turnover which, in turn, substantially boosts both primary and secondary productivity. This is associated with concomitant shifts in the types of primary producers and associated food webs. 2. The Magela Creek floodplain on Kakadu National Park in northern Australia is one of the most studied tropical freshwater ecosystems in Australia and provides an opportunity to collate and examine information on organic carbon sources and pathways through food webs to gain a fundamental understanding of how these systems may function. 3. We reviewed biophysical information published since the early 1980s to construct an assessment of the carbon resources for the channel and floodplain. 4. We conclude that macrophytes, largely in the form of grasses and aquatic plants, produce the greatest above‐ground biomass on the Magela Creek floodplain. Although macrophytes provide suitable substrata for the attachment of epiphytes, they do not appear to be an important carbon source for aquatic consumers themselves. Nevertheless, macrophytes do provide critical seasonal food and habitat structure for other producers and consumers on the floodplain, such as the abundant magpie geese. 5. We developed a generalised conceptual food web and carbon budget contrasting the ‘wet’ and ‘dry’ seasons for the Magela Creek system, as a representative of tropical seasonal floodplain systems. 6. Our conceptual model of tropical floodplains indicates that knowledge of the seasonal and spatial links and exchanges between the floodplain and the river is critical in understanding ecosystem function.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-5070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02544.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>aquatic food webs ; Aquatic plants ; Carbon ; connectivity ; consumers ; Ecosystems ; Food chains ; Freshwater ; productivity ; River ecology ; sources ; wet-dry tropics</subject><ispartof>Freshwater biology, 2011-06, Vol.56 (6), p.1047-1064</ispartof><rights>2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4124-8d8f03c37e5e2ea645e40290be3bd9164ebaedfae4b94d598e7d454ad7265fc53</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>PETTIT, N. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAYLISS, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVIES, P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAMILTON, S. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WARFE, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUNN, S. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOUGLAS, M. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Seasonal contrasts in carbon resources and ecological processes on a tropical floodplain</title><title>Freshwater biology</title><description>Summary 1. Globally, tropical floodplains are highly productive ecosystems. This is largely because of predictable seasonal rains providing replenishing floodwaters that stimulate nutrient turnover which, in turn, substantially boosts both primary and secondary productivity. This is associated with concomitant shifts in the types of primary producers and associated food webs. 2. The Magela Creek floodplain on Kakadu National Park in northern Australia is one of the most studied tropical freshwater ecosystems in Australia and provides an opportunity to collate and examine information on organic carbon sources and pathways through food webs to gain a fundamental understanding of how these systems may function. 3. We reviewed biophysical information published since the early 1980s to construct an assessment of the carbon resources for the channel and floodplain. 4. We conclude that macrophytes, largely in the form of grasses and aquatic plants, produce the greatest above‐ground biomass on the Magela Creek floodplain. Although macrophytes provide suitable substrata for the attachment of epiphytes, they do not appear to be an important carbon source for aquatic consumers themselves. Nevertheless, macrophytes do provide critical seasonal food and habitat structure for other producers and consumers on the floodplain, such as the abundant magpie geese. 5. We developed a generalised conceptual food web and carbon budget contrasting the ‘wet’ and ‘dry’ seasons for the Magela Creek system, as a representative of tropical seasonal floodplain systems. 6. Our conceptual model of tropical floodplains indicates that knowledge of the seasonal and spatial links and exchanges between the floodplain and the river is critical in understanding ecosystem function.</description><subject>aquatic food webs</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>connectivity</subject><subject>consumers</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>productivity</subject><subject>River ecology</subject><subject>sources</subject><subject>wet-dry tropics</subject><issn>0046-5070</issn><issn>1365-2427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMouH78h4IHT12naT7agwcVV0VRREVvQ5pOpWtt1qSL6783dcWDc8nwzvMOmZexJINpFutoPs1yJVMuuJ5yiCpwKcR0tcEmf4NNNgEQKpWgYZvthDAHgEJqPmEvD2SC602XWNcP3oQhJG2fWOMr1yeeglt6SyExfZ2QdZ17bW2EF95FNcRBpEwyeLf40ZvOuXrRmbbfY1uN6QLt_7677Gl2_nh2md7cXVydndykVmRcpEVdNJDbXJMkTkYJSQJ4CRXlVV1mSlBlqG4MiaoUtSwL0rWQwtSaK9lYme-yw_Xe-KWPJYUB39tgqetMT24ZsFCl1CWokTz4R87jcfH0gJkUCqAs-Egdr6nPtqMvXPj23fgvzADHuHGOY6o4popj3PgTN65w9nw6dtGfrv1tGGj15zf-DZXOtcTn2wvMH4tCqHuB1_k3D_yFeQ</recordid><startdate>201106</startdate><enddate>201106</enddate><creator>PETTIT, N. E.</creator><creator>BAYLISS, P.</creator><creator>DAVIES, P. M.</creator><creator>HAMILTON, S. K.</creator><creator>WARFE, D. M.</creator><creator>BUNN, S. E.</creator><creator>DOUGLAS, M. M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201106</creationdate><title>Seasonal contrasts in carbon resources and ecological processes on a tropical floodplain</title><author>PETTIT, N. E. ; BAYLISS, P. ; DAVIES, P. M. ; HAMILTON, S. K. ; WARFE, D. M. ; BUNN, S. E. ; DOUGLAS, M. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4124-8d8f03c37e5e2ea645e40290be3bd9164ebaedfae4b94d598e7d454ad7265fc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>aquatic food webs</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>connectivity</topic><topic>consumers</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>productivity</topic><topic>River ecology</topic><topic>sources</topic><topic>wet-dry tropics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PETTIT, N. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BAYLISS, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAVIES, P. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAMILTON, S. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WARFE, D. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BUNN, S. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOUGLAS, M. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PETTIT, N. E.</au><au>BAYLISS, P.</au><au>DAVIES, P. M.</au><au>HAMILTON, S. K.</au><au>WARFE, D. M.</au><au>BUNN, S. E.</au><au>DOUGLAS, M. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seasonal contrasts in carbon resources and ecological processes on a tropical floodplain</atitle><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle><date>2011-06</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1047</spage><epage>1064</epage><pages>1047-1064</pages><issn>0046-5070</issn><eissn>1365-2427</eissn><abstract>Summary 1. Globally, tropical floodplains are highly productive ecosystems. This is largely because of predictable seasonal rains providing replenishing floodwaters that stimulate nutrient turnover which, in turn, substantially boosts both primary and secondary productivity. This is associated with concomitant shifts in the types of primary producers and associated food webs. 2. The Magela Creek floodplain on Kakadu National Park in northern Australia is one of the most studied tropical freshwater ecosystems in Australia and provides an opportunity to collate and examine information on organic carbon sources and pathways through food webs to gain a fundamental understanding of how these systems may function. 3. We reviewed biophysical information published since the early 1980s to construct an assessment of the carbon resources for the channel and floodplain. 4. We conclude that macrophytes, largely in the form of grasses and aquatic plants, produce the greatest above‐ground biomass on the Magela Creek floodplain. Although macrophytes provide suitable substrata for the attachment of epiphytes, they do not appear to be an important carbon source for aquatic consumers themselves. Nevertheless, macrophytes do provide critical seasonal food and habitat structure for other producers and consumers on the floodplain, such as the abundant magpie geese. 5. We developed a generalised conceptual food web and carbon budget contrasting the ‘wet’ and ‘dry’ seasons for the Magela Creek system, as a representative of tropical seasonal floodplain systems. 6. Our conceptual model of tropical floodplains indicates that knowledge of the seasonal and spatial links and exchanges between the floodplain and the river is critical in understanding ecosystem function.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02544.x</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-5070
ispartof Freshwater biology, 2011-06, Vol.56 (6), p.1047-1064
issn 0046-5070
1365-2427
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_869579065
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)
subjects aquatic food webs
Aquatic plants
Carbon
connectivity
consumers
Ecosystems
Food chains
Freshwater
productivity
River ecology
sources
wet-dry tropics
title Seasonal contrasts in carbon resources and ecological processes on a tropical floodplain
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T03%3A24%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seasonal%20contrasts%20in%20carbon%20resources%20and%20ecological%20processes%20on%20a%20tropical%20floodplain&rft.jtitle=Freshwater%20biology&rft.au=PETTIT,%20N.%20E.&rft.date=2011-06&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1047&rft.epage=1064&rft.pages=1047-1064&rft.issn=0046-5070&rft.eissn=1365-2427&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02544.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E3377877491%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4124-8d8f03c37e5e2ea645e40290be3bd9164ebaedfae4b94d598e7d454ad7265fc53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1546009825&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true