Explaining Stability and Change: The Rise and Fall of Logics in Pluralistic Fields

Based on an in-depth, longitudinal case study involving the public employment services in the Netherlands, we provide a novel conceptual imagery of how pluralistic fields may evolve over time. Our study shows how multiple institutional logics remain in play after a dominant logic is settled in an or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Organization studies 2011-02, Vol.32 (2), p.231-252
Main Authors: van Gestel, Nicolette, Hillebrand, Bas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Business
Case studies
Economics
Employment
Employment agencies
Employment stability
Institutional change
Logic
Netherlands
Organization theory
Organizational behaviour
Public sector
Studies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Based on an in-depth, longitudinal case study involving the public employment services in the Netherlands, we provide a novel conceptual imagery of how pluralistic fields may evolve over time. Our study shows how multiple institutional logics remain in play after a dominant logic is settled in an organizational field. We uncover several factors that explain the process of temporary stability and change and focus especially on two factors — negative choice and deliberate ambiguity — that explain ongoing change. These factors solve the struggle between competing logics, but simultaneously sow the seeds for further subsequent change. This study contributes to the institutional logics perspective beyond competing logics to the study of how fields with plural logics evolve.
ISSN:0170-8406
1741-3044
DOI:10.1177/0170840610397475