Loading…

Maxillary anterior tooth dimensions and proportions in an Irish young adult population

Summary  This study was undertaken in a young Irish population to determine the dimensions and ratios of the six maxillary anterior teeth. One hundred and nine Irish subjects (age 18–25 inclusive) had irreversible hydrocolloid impressions made of their maxillary dentition poured in type V stone. Cli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of oral rehabilitation 2011-07, Vol.38 (7), p.501-508
Main Authors: CONDON, M., BREADY, M., QUINN, F., O'CONNELL, B. C., HOUSTON, F. J., O'SULLIVAN, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary  This study was undertaken in a young Irish population to determine the dimensions and ratios of the six maxillary anterior teeth. One hundred and nine Irish subjects (age 18–25 inclusive) had irreversible hydrocolloid impressions made of their maxillary dentition poured in type V stone. Clinical crown dimensions were measured with a digital calliper. The stone casts were digitally photographed in a standardised manner enabling calculation of various ratios between the maxillary anterior teeth. Sexual dimorphism existed for various tooth dimensions; most notably canine teeth were in the region of 0·8 mm longer and 0·6 mm wider in males. Central and lateral incisors were found to be 0·5 mm wider in males. It is, therefore, recommended that dimensional tooth guidelines should be given for each of the sexes and not on a population basis. With regard to tooth proportion ratios, no significant differences were found between genders or the left and right sides for any of the measurements or ratios measured. The digitally recorded tooth proportions were similar for both sexes, and the Golden Proportion guidelines could only be applied to the lateral incisor/central incisor widths (0·618). Identified width proportions for the canine/central incisor were 0·58 and for canine/lateral incisor 0·89.
ISSN:0305-182X
1365-2842
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02181.x