Loading…

Rabbit antithymocyte induction and dosing in deceased donor renal transplant recipients over 60 yr of age

Patel SJ, Knight RJ, Suki WN, Abdellatif A, Duhart BT, Krauss AG, Mannan S, Nezakatgoo N, Gaber AO. Rabbit antithymocyte induction and dosing in deceased donor renal transplant recipients over 60 yr of age.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E250–E256. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. :  Background:  Antith...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical transplantation 2011-05, Vol.25 (3), p.E250-E256
Main Authors: Patel, Samir J., Knight, Richard J., Suki, Wadi N., Abdellatif, Abdul, Duhart Jr, Benjamin T., Krauss, Amy G., Mannan, Saurabh, Nezakatgoo, Nosratollah, Osama Gaber, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Patel SJ, Knight RJ, Suki WN, Abdellatif A, Duhart BT, Krauss AG, Mannan S, Nezakatgoo N, Gaber AO. Rabbit antithymocyte induction and dosing in deceased donor renal transplant recipients over 60 yr of age.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E250–E256. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. :  Background:  Antithymocyte globulin (rATG) is a commonly used induction agent in renal transplantation; however, data in older kidney recipients are limited. Methods:  We reviewed charts of 301 deceased donor renal transplants who received a protocol consisting of 3–7 doses of rATG and triple maintenance therapy. Outcomes of patients >60 yr of age (n = 45) were compared to those aged 18–59 yr (n = 256). Results:  Older recipients had more diabetics, were more likely to receive expanded criteria donor kidneys (p 60 received less cumulative rATG (4.6 vs. 5.1 mg/kg; p 60 group (2% vs. 16%, p 60 group at three yr was lower (80% vs. 95%; p = 0.02). Specifically, patients >60 with delayed graft function and rATG cumulative dosing >6 mg/kg had a survival of 6 mg/kg. These data suggest that when used, lower cumulative dosages of rATG are preferable in the older recipient.
ISSN:0902-0063
1399-0012
DOI:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01393.x