Loading…
Comparison study of treadmill versus arm ergometry
Summary The Bruce treadmill test is used worldwide to assess cardiovascular disease. However, because of the high increments of intensity between the stages of this test, it is not best suited to a number of populations. Therefore, the aim of the study was to determine the difference between physiol...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Clinical physiology and functional imaging 2011-07, Vol.31 (4), p.326-331 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4204-53abf0630a128579f142b5b6b4e9e2312d60e02254ffb4c9e6608adb7a35166e3 |
|---|---|
| cites | |
| container_end_page | 331 |
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 326 |
| container_title | Clinical physiology and functional imaging |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Schrieks, Ilse C. Barnes, Matthew J. Hodges, Lynette D. |
| description | Summary
The Bruce treadmill test is used worldwide to assess cardiovascular disease. However, because of the high increments of intensity between the stages of this test, it is not best suited to a number of populations. Therefore, the aim of the study was to determine the difference between physiological outcomes of the arm crank test and Bruce treadmill test and to provide a regression equation to account for this. Thirty subjects (16 men and 14 women) performed both an arm crank test and the Bruce treadmill test, on two separate days, in a random order. Peak values of oxygen uptake (VO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), ventilation rate (VE), heart rate (HR) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded. Arm crank VO2peak and peak VE were significantly lower compared with treadmill VO2peak and peak VE, in both men and women (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2011.01014.x |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872125013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1671462431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4204-53abf0630a128579f142b5b6b4e9e2312d60e02254ffb4c9e6608adb7a35166e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1PwzAMhiMEYmPwF1AvCC4tcZIm24EDqthAGl8SiIlLlLYp6mjXkbSw_XtSNsoN52BLfl5H9ouQBzgAF-fzAJgIfTwSs4BggAADBhasdlC_a-x2NYceOrB2jjEIysQ-6hHgggAjfUSiqlwqk9tq4dm6SddelXm10Sot86LwPrWxjfWUKT1t3qpS12Z9iPYyVVh9tM0D9Dy-eoqu_en95Ca6nPoJI5j5IVVxhjnFCsgwFKPM_ReHMY-ZHmlCgaQca0xIyLIsZslIc46HKo2FoiFwrukAnW7mLk310WhbyzK3iS4KtdBVY-XQrUBCDNSRZ_-SbltgnDAKDj3eok1c6lQuTV4qs5a_F3HAyRZQNlFFZtQiye0fx9zjwB13seG-8kKvuz5g2Tok57I9vmyNkK1D8schuZLRw7itnN7f6HNb61WnV-ZdckGd9OVuIvlMYHH7-igj-g361pCy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671462431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison study of treadmill versus arm ergometry</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Schrieks, Ilse C. ; Barnes, Matthew J. ; Hodges, Lynette D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Schrieks, Ilse C. ; Barnes, Matthew J. ; Hodges, Lynette D.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
The Bruce treadmill test is used worldwide to assess cardiovascular disease. However, because of the high increments of intensity between the stages of this test, it is not best suited to a number of populations. Therefore, the aim of the study was to determine the difference between physiological outcomes of the arm crank test and Bruce treadmill test and to provide a regression equation to account for this. Thirty subjects (16 men and 14 women) performed both an arm crank test and the Bruce treadmill test, on two separate days, in a random order. Peak values of oxygen uptake (VO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), ventilation rate (VE), heart rate (HR) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded. Arm crank VO2peak and peak VE were significantly lower compared with treadmill VO2peak and peak VE, in both men and women (P<0·001). Arm crank HRpeak was significantly lower than treadmill HRpeak in men (P<0·001). The following is the regression equation to estimate treadmill: VO2peak = 0·8*arm crank VO2peak + 0·019*body weight + 2·025*gender−0·038*gender*body weight + 0·852, with gender being ‘0’ for males and ‘1’ for females. This model has a r2 of 0·832 (SEE = 0·471). This strong correlation indicates that an accurate prediction of treadmill VO2peak can be made by arm crank VO2peak, which is a good estimate of a person’s maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). Therefore, the arm crank test can be of great importance for evaluation of cardiovascular disease in many people.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-0961</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-097X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2011.01014.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21672142</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Arm - physiology ; arm crank ergometry ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bruce treadmill test ; cardiovascular fitness ; comparison study and upper body ergometry ; Eccentrics ; Estimates ; Exercise Test - classification ; Exercise Test - methods ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Leg - physiology ; Male ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Men ; Oxygen Consumption - physiology ; Physical Exertion - physiology ; Regression ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Treadmills ; Uptakes ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><ispartof>Clinical physiology and functional imaging, 2011-07, Vol.31 (4), p.326-331</ispartof><rights>2011 The Authors. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging © 2011 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2011 The Authors. Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging © 2011 Scandinavian Society of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4204-53abf0630a128579f142b5b6b4e9e2312d60e02254ffb4c9e6608adb7a35166e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24242616$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21672142$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schrieks, Ilse C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Lynette D.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison study of treadmill versus arm ergometry</title><title>Clinical physiology and functional imaging</title><addtitle>Clin Physiol Funct Imaging</addtitle><description>Summary
The Bruce treadmill test is used worldwide to assess cardiovascular disease. However, because of the high increments of intensity between the stages of this test, it is not best suited to a number of populations. Therefore, the aim of the study was to determine the difference between physiological outcomes of the arm crank test and Bruce treadmill test and to provide a regression equation to account for this. Thirty subjects (16 men and 14 women) performed both an arm crank test and the Bruce treadmill test, on two separate days, in a random order. Peak values of oxygen uptake (VO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), ventilation rate (VE), heart rate (HR) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded. Arm crank VO2peak and peak VE were significantly lower compared with treadmill VO2peak and peak VE, in both men and women (P<0·001). Arm crank HRpeak was significantly lower than treadmill HRpeak in men (P<0·001). The following is the regression equation to estimate treadmill: VO2peak = 0·8*arm crank VO2peak + 0·019*body weight + 2·025*gender−0·038*gender*body weight + 0·852, with gender being ‘0’ for males and ‘1’ for females. This model has a r2 of 0·832 (SEE = 0·471). This strong correlation indicates that an accurate prediction of treadmill VO2peak can be made by arm crank VO2peak, which is a good estimate of a person’s maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). Therefore, the arm crank test can be of great importance for evaluation of cardiovascular disease in many people.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Arm - physiology</subject><subject>arm crank ergometry</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bruce treadmill test</subject><subject>cardiovascular fitness</subject><subject>comparison study and upper body ergometry</subject><subject>Eccentrics</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Exercise Test - classification</subject><subject>Exercise Test - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leg - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</subject><subject>Physical Exertion - physiology</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Treadmills</subject><subject>Uptakes</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><issn>1475-0961</issn><issn>1475-097X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1PwzAMhiMEYmPwF1AvCC4tcZIm24EDqthAGl8SiIlLlLYp6mjXkbSw_XtSNsoN52BLfl5H9ouQBzgAF-fzAJgIfTwSs4BggAADBhasdlC_a-x2NYceOrB2jjEIysQ-6hHgggAjfUSiqlwqk9tq4dm6SddelXm10Sot86LwPrWxjfWUKT1t3qpS12Z9iPYyVVh9tM0D9Dy-eoqu_en95Ca6nPoJI5j5IVVxhjnFCsgwFKPM_ReHMY-ZHmlCgaQca0xIyLIsZslIc46HKo2FoiFwrukAnW7mLk310WhbyzK3iS4KtdBVY-XQrUBCDNSRZ_-SbltgnDAKDj3eok1c6lQuTV4qs5a_F3HAyRZQNlFFZtQiye0fx9zjwB13seG-8kKvuz5g2Tok57I9vmyNkK1D8schuZLRw7itnN7f6HNb61WnV-ZdckGd9OVuIvlMYHH7-igj-g361pCy</recordid><startdate>201107</startdate><enddate>201107</enddate><creator>Schrieks, Ilse C.</creator><creator>Barnes, Matthew J.</creator><creator>Hodges, Lynette D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201107</creationdate><title>Comparison study of treadmill versus arm ergometry</title><author>Schrieks, Ilse C. ; Barnes, Matthew J. ; Hodges, Lynette D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4204-53abf0630a128579f142b5b6b4e9e2312d60e02254ffb4c9e6608adb7a35166e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Arm - physiology</topic><topic>arm crank ergometry</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bruce treadmill test</topic><topic>cardiovascular fitness</topic><topic>comparison study and upper body ergometry</topic><topic>Eccentrics</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Exercise Test - classification</topic><topic>Exercise Test - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leg - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Oxygen Consumption - physiology</topic><topic>Physical Exertion - physiology</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Treadmills</topic><topic>Uptakes</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schrieks, Ilse C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Lynette D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical physiology and functional imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schrieks, Ilse C.</au><au>Barnes, Matthew J.</au><au>Hodges, Lynette D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison study of treadmill versus arm ergometry</atitle><jtitle>Clinical physiology and functional imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Physiol Funct Imaging</addtitle><date>2011-07</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>326</spage><epage>331</epage><pages>326-331</pages><issn>1475-0961</issn><eissn>1475-097X</eissn><abstract>Summary
The Bruce treadmill test is used worldwide to assess cardiovascular disease. However, because of the high increments of intensity between the stages of this test, it is not best suited to a number of populations. Therefore, the aim of the study was to determine the difference between physiological outcomes of the arm crank test and Bruce treadmill test and to provide a regression equation to account for this. Thirty subjects (16 men and 14 women) performed both an arm crank test and the Bruce treadmill test, on two separate days, in a random order. Peak values of oxygen uptake (VO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), ventilation rate (VE), heart rate (HR) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded. Arm crank VO2peak and peak VE were significantly lower compared with treadmill VO2peak and peak VE, in both men and women (P<0·001). Arm crank HRpeak was significantly lower than treadmill HRpeak in men (P<0·001). The following is the regression equation to estimate treadmill: VO2peak = 0·8*arm crank VO2peak + 0·019*body weight + 2·025*gender−0·038*gender*body weight + 0·852, with gender being ‘0’ for males and ‘1’ for females. This model has a r2 of 0·832 (SEE = 0·471). This strong correlation indicates that an accurate prediction of treadmill VO2peak can be made by arm crank VO2peak, which is a good estimate of a person’s maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max). Therefore, the arm crank test can be of great importance for evaluation of cardiovascular disease in many people.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21672142</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1475-097X.2011.01014.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1475-0961 |
| ispartof | Clinical physiology and functional imaging, 2011-07, Vol.31 (4), p.326-331 |
| issn | 1475-0961 1475-097X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872125013 |
| source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
| subjects | Adult Arm - physiology arm crank ergometry Biological and medical sciences Bruce treadmill test cardiovascular fitness comparison study and upper body ergometry Eccentrics Estimates Exercise Test - classification Exercise Test - methods Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Leg - physiology Male Mathematical analysis Mathematical models Men Oxygen Consumption - physiology Physical Exertion - physiology Regression Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Task Performance and Analysis Treadmills Uptakes Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems |
| title | Comparison study of treadmill versus arm ergometry |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A12%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20study%20of%20treadmill%20versus%20arm%20ergometry&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20physiology%20and%20functional%20imaging&rft.au=Schrieks,%20Ilse%20C.&rft.date=2011-07&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=331&rft.pages=326-331&rft.issn=1475-0961&rft.eissn=1475-097X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1475-097X.2011.01014.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1671462431%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4204-53abf0630a128579f142b5b6b4e9e2312d60e02254ffb4c9e6608adb7a35166e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671462431&rft_id=info:pmid/21672142&rfr_iscdi=true |