Loading…
Randomized comparison of the magnetic navigation system vs. standard wires in the treatment of bifurcations
Aims Randomly compare the magnetic navigation system (MNS) to standard guidewire techniques in managing bifurcating lesions. Methods and results Thirty-one consecutive patients with bifurcating lesions were randomized to cross the bifurcating vessels prior to treatment and thereafter the struts of d...
Saved in:
Published in: | European heart journal 2011-06, Vol.32 (12), p.1479-1483 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Aims
Randomly compare the magnetic navigation system (MNS) to standard guidewire techniques in managing bifurcating lesions.
Methods and results
Thirty-one consecutive patients with bifurcating lesions were randomized to cross the bifurcating vessels prior to treatment and thereafter the struts of deployed stents with either magnetic or standard guidewires. Crossing success, crossing/fluoroscopy times, and contrast media usage were directly compared. Similar times were noted in both the magnetic wire crossings (median, IQR; 68 s, 45-138 s vs. 59 s, 32-133 s) and fluoroscopic times (median, IQR; 62 s, 44-135 s vs. 55 s, 27-133 s) when compared with standard conventional wires passage through the deployed struts. The MNS successful crossings were 30/31 (96.8%) compared with 28/31 (90.0%) observed with the standard wires. Two previously failed standard wire cases were successfully crossed with magnetic guidewires.
Conclusion
In contemporary stented bifurcations, the MNS achieved equivalent crossing/fluoroscopy times through deployed stents struts and may be useful in salvaging failed standard wire cases. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0195-668X 1522-9645 |
DOI: | 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq123 |