Loading…

Methods for Genotyping Verotoxin‐Producing Escherichia coli

Verotoxin‐producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) is annually incriminated in more than 100 000 cases of enteric foodborne human disease and in losses amounting to $US 2.5 billion every year. A number of genotyping methods have been developed to track VTEC infections and determine diversity and evolutiona...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Zoonoses and public health 2010-12, Vol.57 (7), p.447-462
Main Authors: Karama, M, Gyles, C.L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4899-182ecfe59342223b0688c9abd05372b0d5a759ac6b883b1eabdacbd75a0f1df53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4899-182ecfe59342223b0688c9abd05372b0d5a759ac6b883b1eabdacbd75a0f1df53
container_end_page 462
container_issue 7
container_start_page 447
container_title Zoonoses and public health
container_volume 57
creator Karama, M
Gyles, C.L
description Verotoxin‐producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) is annually incriminated in more than 100 000 cases of enteric foodborne human disease and in losses amounting to $US 2.5 billion every year. A number of genotyping methods have been developed to track VTEC infections and determine diversity and evolutionary relationships among these microorganisms. These methods have facilitated monitoring and surveillance of foodborne VTEC outbreaks and early identification of outbreaks or clusters of outbreaks. Pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been used extensively to track and differentiate VTEC because of its high discriminatory power, reproducibility and ease of standardization. Multiple‐locus variable‐number tandem‐repeats analysis (MLVA) and microarrays are the latest genotyping methods that have been applied to discriminate VTEC. MLVA, a simpler and less expensive method, is proving to have a discriminatory power comparable to that of PFGE. Microarrays are successfully being applied to differentiate VTEC and make inferences on genome diversification. Novel methods that are being evaluated for subtyping VTEC include the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms and optical mapping. This review discusses the principles, applications, advantages and disadvantages of genotyping methods that have been used to differentiate VTEC strains. These methods have been mainly used to differentiate strains of O157:H7 VTEC and to a lesser extent non‐O157 VTEC.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01259.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872125850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>808464070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4899-182ecfe59342223b0688c9abd05372b0d5a759ac6b883b1eabdacbd75a0f1df53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAURS0EomXgFyBiwyrh2Y4Te9EFGpVpxQCVmILExnIcp-MhE0_tRMzs-gl8I1-CQ0ZFYgPe-Mnv3Cv5XoQSDBmO5_Umw7ygKaElzwiAyAATJrL9A3R6v3h4nLFg4gQ9CWEDwJiA8jE6wUJgUmA4RWfvTb92dUga55OF6Vx_2NnuJvlsvOvd3nY_735ceVcPenw9D3ptvNVrqxLtWvsUPWpUG8yz4z1D12_PV_OLdPlxcTl_s0x1zoVIMSdGN4YJmhNCaAUF51qoqgZGS1JBzVTJhNJFxTmtsIkbpau6ZAoaXDeMztCryXfn3e1gQi-3NmjTtqozbgiSlyQGwBn8mwSeFzmUI_nyL3LjBt_Fb0SIRESQEeITpL0LwZtG7rzdKn-QGORYhdzIMWU5Ji7HKuTvKuQ-Sp8f_Ydqa-o_wmP2ETibgO-2NYf_NpZfry7GKerTSW9Db_b3euW_yaKkJZNfPizkCr9bzulqGX1m6MXEN8pJdeNtkNefCGAKWOACckZ_Acv2r6s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>802407920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methods for Genotyping Verotoxin‐Producing Escherichia coli</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Karama, M ; Gyles, C.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Karama, M ; Gyles, C.L</creatorcontrib><description>Verotoxin‐producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) is annually incriminated in more than 100 000 cases of enteric foodborne human disease and in losses amounting to $US 2.5 billion every year. A number of genotyping methods have been developed to track VTEC infections and determine diversity and evolutionary relationships among these microorganisms. These methods have facilitated monitoring and surveillance of foodborne VTEC outbreaks and early identification of outbreaks or clusters of outbreaks. Pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been used extensively to track and differentiate VTEC because of its high discriminatory power, reproducibility and ease of standardization. Multiple‐locus variable‐number tandem‐repeats analysis (MLVA) and microarrays are the latest genotyping methods that have been applied to discriminate VTEC. MLVA, a simpler and less expensive method, is proving to have a discriminatory power comparable to that of PFGE. Microarrays are successfully being applied to differentiate VTEC and make inferences on genome diversification. Novel methods that are being evaluated for subtyping VTEC include the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms and optical mapping. This review discusses the principles, applications, advantages and disadvantages of genotyping methods that have been used to differentiate VTEC strains. These methods have been mainly used to differentiate strains of O157:H7 VTEC and to a lesser extent non‐O157 VTEC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-1959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01259.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19912610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacterial Typing Techniques ; disease outbreaks ; disease surveillance ; E coli ; Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field ; Epidemiology ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology ; Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology ; Escherichia coli O157 - classification ; Escherichia coli O157 - genetics ; Escherichia coli O157 - metabolism ; Evolution ; Food contamination &amp; poisoning ; foodborne illness ; Genes, Bacterial - genetics ; Genetic Variation - genetics ; Genotype ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; genotyping methods ; Humans ; literature reviews ; loci ; methodology ; Microarray Analysis ; microarray technology ; microbial genetics ; Minisatellite Repeats ; Molecular Epidemiology ; molecular sequence data ; multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; pulsed-field gel electrophoresis ; Research methodology ; Shiga toxin ; Shiga Toxins - genetics ; Shiga Toxins - metabolism ; Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - classification ; Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics ; Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification ; subtyping ; tandem repeat sequences ; Verotoxin ; verotoxins ; zoonoses</subject><ispartof>Zoonoses and public health, 2010-12, Vol.57 (7), p.447-462</ispartof><rights>2009 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2009 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4899-182ecfe59342223b0688c9abd05372b0d5a759ac6b883b1eabdacbd75a0f1df53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4899-182ecfe59342223b0688c9abd05372b0d5a759ac6b883b1eabdacbd75a0f1df53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19912610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karama, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyles, C.L</creatorcontrib><title>Methods for Genotyping Verotoxin‐Producing Escherichia coli</title><title>Zoonoses and public health</title><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><description>Verotoxin‐producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) is annually incriminated in more than 100 000 cases of enteric foodborne human disease and in losses amounting to $US 2.5 billion every year. A number of genotyping methods have been developed to track VTEC infections and determine diversity and evolutionary relationships among these microorganisms. These methods have facilitated monitoring and surveillance of foodborne VTEC outbreaks and early identification of outbreaks or clusters of outbreaks. Pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been used extensively to track and differentiate VTEC because of its high discriminatory power, reproducibility and ease of standardization. Multiple‐locus variable‐number tandem‐repeats analysis (MLVA) and microarrays are the latest genotyping methods that have been applied to discriminate VTEC. MLVA, a simpler and less expensive method, is proving to have a discriminatory power comparable to that of PFGE. Microarrays are successfully being applied to differentiate VTEC and make inferences on genome diversification. Novel methods that are being evaluated for subtyping VTEC include the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms and optical mapping. This review discusses the principles, applications, advantages and disadvantages of genotyping methods that have been used to differentiate VTEC strains. These methods have been mainly used to differentiate strains of O157:H7 VTEC and to a lesser extent non‐O157 VTEC.</description><subject>Bacterial Typing Techniques</subject><subject>disease outbreaks</subject><subject>disease surveillance</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli O157 - classification</subject><subject>Escherichia coli O157 - genetics</subject><subject>Escherichia coli O157 - metabolism</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Food contamination &amp; poisoning</subject><subject>foodborne illness</subject><subject>Genes, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>Genetic Variation - genetics</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>genotyping methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>literature reviews</subject><subject>loci</subject><subject>methodology</subject><subject>Microarray Analysis</subject><subject>microarray technology</subject><subject>microbial genetics</subject><subject>Minisatellite Repeats</subject><subject>Molecular Epidemiology</subject><subject>molecular sequence data</subject><subject>multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>pulsed-field gel electrophoresis</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Shiga toxin</subject><subject>Shiga Toxins - genetics</subject><subject>Shiga Toxins - metabolism</subject><subject>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - classification</subject><subject>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics</subject><subject>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>subtyping</subject><subject>tandem repeat sequences</subject><subject>Verotoxin</subject><subject>verotoxins</subject><subject>zoonoses</subject><issn>1863-1959</issn><issn>1863-2378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAURS0EomXgFyBiwyrh2Y4Te9EFGpVpxQCVmILExnIcp-MhE0_tRMzs-gl8I1-CQ0ZFYgPe-Mnv3Cv5XoQSDBmO5_Umw7ygKaElzwiAyAATJrL9A3R6v3h4nLFg4gQ9CWEDwJiA8jE6wUJgUmA4RWfvTb92dUga55OF6Vx_2NnuJvlsvOvd3nY_735ceVcPenw9D3ptvNVrqxLtWvsUPWpUG8yz4z1D12_PV_OLdPlxcTl_s0x1zoVIMSdGN4YJmhNCaAUF51qoqgZGS1JBzVTJhNJFxTmtsIkbpau6ZAoaXDeMztCryXfn3e1gQi-3NmjTtqozbgiSlyQGwBn8mwSeFzmUI_nyL3LjBt_Fb0SIRESQEeITpL0LwZtG7rzdKn-QGORYhdzIMWU5Ji7HKuTvKuQ-Sp8f_Ydqa-o_wmP2ETibgO-2NYf_NpZfry7GKerTSW9Db_b3euW_yaKkJZNfPizkCr9bzulqGX1m6MXEN8pJdeNtkNefCGAKWOACckZ_Acv2r6s</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Karama, M</creator><creator>Gyles, C.L</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>Methods for Genotyping Verotoxin‐Producing Escherichia coli</title><author>Karama, M ; Gyles, C.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4899-182ecfe59342223b0688c9abd05372b0d5a759ac6b883b1eabdacbd75a0f1df53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Bacterial Typing Techniques</topic><topic>disease outbreaks</topic><topic>disease surveillance</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli O157 - classification</topic><topic>Escherichia coli O157 - genetics</topic><topic>Escherichia coli O157 - metabolism</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Food contamination &amp; poisoning</topic><topic>foodborne illness</topic><topic>Genes, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>Genetic Variation - genetics</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>genotyping methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>literature reviews</topic><topic>loci</topic><topic>methodology</topic><topic>Microarray Analysis</topic><topic>microarray technology</topic><topic>microbial genetics</topic><topic>Minisatellite Repeats</topic><topic>Molecular Epidemiology</topic><topic>molecular sequence data</topic><topic>multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>pulsed-field gel electrophoresis</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Shiga toxin</topic><topic>Shiga Toxins - genetics</topic><topic>Shiga Toxins - metabolism</topic><topic>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - classification</topic><topic>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics</topic><topic>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>subtyping</topic><topic>tandem repeat sequences</topic><topic>Verotoxin</topic><topic>verotoxins</topic><topic>zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karama, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyles, C.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karama, M</au><au>Gyles, C.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methods for Genotyping Verotoxin‐Producing Escherichia coli</atitle><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>447</spage><epage>462</epage><pages>447-462</pages><issn>1863-1959</issn><eissn>1863-2378</eissn><abstract>Verotoxin‐producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) is annually incriminated in more than 100 000 cases of enteric foodborne human disease and in losses amounting to $US 2.5 billion every year. A number of genotyping methods have been developed to track VTEC infections and determine diversity and evolutionary relationships among these microorganisms. These methods have facilitated monitoring and surveillance of foodborne VTEC outbreaks and early identification of outbreaks or clusters of outbreaks. Pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been used extensively to track and differentiate VTEC because of its high discriminatory power, reproducibility and ease of standardization. Multiple‐locus variable‐number tandem‐repeats analysis (MLVA) and microarrays are the latest genotyping methods that have been applied to discriminate VTEC. MLVA, a simpler and less expensive method, is proving to have a discriminatory power comparable to that of PFGE. Microarrays are successfully being applied to differentiate VTEC and make inferences on genome diversification. Novel methods that are being evaluated for subtyping VTEC include the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms and optical mapping. This review discusses the principles, applications, advantages and disadvantages of genotyping methods that have been used to differentiate VTEC strains. These methods have been mainly used to differentiate strains of O157:H7 VTEC and to a lesser extent non‐O157 VTEC.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19912610</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01259.x</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1863-1959
ispartof Zoonoses and public health, 2010-12, Vol.57 (7), p.447-462
issn 1863-1959
1863-2378
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872125850
source Wiley
subjects Bacterial Typing Techniques
disease outbreaks
disease surveillance
E coli
Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field
Epidemiology
Escherichia coli
Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology
Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology
Escherichia coli O157 - classification
Escherichia coli O157 - genetics
Escherichia coli O157 - metabolism
Evolution
Food contamination & poisoning
foodborne illness
Genes, Bacterial - genetics
Genetic Variation - genetics
Genotype
Genotype & phenotype
genotyping methods
Humans
literature reviews
loci
methodology
Microarray Analysis
microarray technology
microbial genetics
Minisatellite Repeats
Molecular Epidemiology
molecular sequence data
multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis
Polymerase Chain Reaction
pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
Research methodology
Shiga toxin
Shiga Toxins - genetics
Shiga Toxins - metabolism
Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - classification
Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics
Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation & purification
subtyping
tandem repeat sequences
Verotoxin
verotoxins
zoonoses
title Methods for Genotyping Verotoxin‐Producing Escherichia coli
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A49%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methods%20for%20Genotyping%20Verotoxin%E2%80%90Producing%20Escherichia%20coli&rft.jtitle=Zoonoses%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Karama,%20M&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=447&rft.epage=462&rft.pages=447-462&rft.issn=1863-1959&rft.eissn=1863-2378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01259.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E808464070%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4899-182ecfe59342223b0688c9abd05372b0d5a759ac6b883b1eabdacbd75a0f1df53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=802407920&rft_id=info:pmid/19912610&rfr_iscdi=true