Loading…
Methods for Genotyping Verotoxin‐Producing Escherichia coli
Verotoxin‐producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) is annually incriminated in more than 100 000 cases of enteric foodborne human disease and in losses amounting to $US 2.5 billion every year. A number of genotyping methods have been developed to track VTEC infections and determine diversity and evolutiona...
Saved in:
Published in: | Zoonoses and public health 2010-12, Vol.57 (7), p.447-462 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4899-182ecfe59342223b0688c9abd05372b0d5a759ac6b883b1eabdacbd75a0f1df53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4899-182ecfe59342223b0688c9abd05372b0d5a759ac6b883b1eabdacbd75a0f1df53 |
container_end_page | 462 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 447 |
container_title | Zoonoses and public health |
container_volume | 57 |
creator | Karama, M Gyles, C.L |
description | Verotoxin‐producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) is annually incriminated in more than 100 000 cases of enteric foodborne human disease and in losses amounting to $US 2.5 billion every year. A number of genotyping methods have been developed to track VTEC infections and determine diversity and evolutionary relationships among these microorganisms. These methods have facilitated monitoring and surveillance of foodborne VTEC outbreaks and early identification of outbreaks or clusters of outbreaks. Pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been used extensively to track and differentiate VTEC because of its high discriminatory power, reproducibility and ease of standardization. Multiple‐locus variable‐number tandem‐repeats analysis (MLVA) and microarrays are the latest genotyping methods that have been applied to discriminate VTEC. MLVA, a simpler and less expensive method, is proving to have a discriminatory power comparable to that of PFGE. Microarrays are successfully being applied to differentiate VTEC and make inferences on genome diversification. Novel methods that are being evaluated for subtyping VTEC include the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms and optical mapping. This review discusses the principles, applications, advantages and disadvantages of genotyping methods that have been used to differentiate VTEC strains. These methods have been mainly used to differentiate strains of O157:H7 VTEC and to a lesser extent non‐O157 VTEC. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01259.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872125850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>808464070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4899-182ecfe59342223b0688c9abd05372b0d5a759ac6b883b1eabdacbd75a0f1df53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu1DAURS0EomXgFyBiwyrh2Y4Te9EFGpVpxQCVmILExnIcp-MhE0_tRMzs-gl8I1-CQ0ZFYgPe-Mnv3Cv5XoQSDBmO5_Umw7ygKaElzwiAyAATJrL9A3R6v3h4nLFg4gQ9CWEDwJiA8jE6wUJgUmA4RWfvTb92dUga55OF6Vx_2NnuJvlsvOvd3nY_735ceVcPenw9D3ptvNVrqxLtWvsUPWpUG8yz4z1D12_PV_OLdPlxcTl_s0x1zoVIMSdGN4YJmhNCaAUF51qoqgZGS1JBzVTJhNJFxTmtsIkbpau6ZAoaXDeMztCryXfn3e1gQi-3NmjTtqozbgiSlyQGwBn8mwSeFzmUI_nyL3LjBt_Fb0SIRESQEeITpL0LwZtG7rzdKn-QGORYhdzIMWU5Ji7HKuTvKuQ-Sp8f_Ydqa-o_wmP2ETibgO-2NYf_NpZfry7GKerTSW9Db_b3euW_yaKkJZNfPizkCr9bzulqGX1m6MXEN8pJdeNtkNefCGAKWOACckZ_Acv2r6s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>802407920</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methods for Genotyping Verotoxin‐Producing Escherichia coli</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Karama, M ; Gyles, C.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Karama, M ; Gyles, C.L</creatorcontrib><description>Verotoxin‐producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) is annually incriminated in more than 100 000 cases of enteric foodborne human disease and in losses amounting to $US 2.5 billion every year. A number of genotyping methods have been developed to track VTEC infections and determine diversity and evolutionary relationships among these microorganisms. These methods have facilitated monitoring and surveillance of foodborne VTEC outbreaks and early identification of outbreaks or clusters of outbreaks. Pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been used extensively to track and differentiate VTEC because of its high discriminatory power, reproducibility and ease of standardization. Multiple‐locus variable‐number tandem‐repeats analysis (MLVA) and microarrays are the latest genotyping methods that have been applied to discriminate VTEC. MLVA, a simpler and less expensive method, is proving to have a discriminatory power comparable to that of PFGE. Microarrays are successfully being applied to differentiate VTEC and make inferences on genome diversification. Novel methods that are being evaluated for subtyping VTEC include the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms and optical mapping. This review discusses the principles, applications, advantages and disadvantages of genotyping methods that have been used to differentiate VTEC strains. These methods have been mainly used to differentiate strains of O157:H7 VTEC and to a lesser extent non‐O157 VTEC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-1959</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01259.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19912610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacterial Typing Techniques ; disease outbreaks ; disease surveillance ; E coli ; Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field ; Epidemiology ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology ; Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology ; Escherichia coli O157 - classification ; Escherichia coli O157 - genetics ; Escherichia coli O157 - metabolism ; Evolution ; Food contamination & poisoning ; foodborne illness ; Genes, Bacterial - genetics ; Genetic Variation - genetics ; Genotype ; Genotype & phenotype ; genotyping methods ; Humans ; literature reviews ; loci ; methodology ; Microarray Analysis ; microarray technology ; microbial genetics ; Minisatellite Repeats ; Molecular Epidemiology ; molecular sequence data ; multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; pulsed-field gel electrophoresis ; Research methodology ; Shiga toxin ; Shiga Toxins - genetics ; Shiga Toxins - metabolism ; Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - classification ; Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics ; Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation & purification ; subtyping ; tandem repeat sequences ; Verotoxin ; verotoxins ; zoonoses</subject><ispartof>Zoonoses and public health, 2010-12, Vol.57 (7), p.447-462</ispartof><rights>2009 Blackwell Verlag GmbH</rights><rights>2009 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4899-182ecfe59342223b0688c9abd05372b0d5a759ac6b883b1eabdacbd75a0f1df53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4899-182ecfe59342223b0688c9abd05372b0d5a759ac6b883b1eabdacbd75a0f1df53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19912610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karama, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyles, C.L</creatorcontrib><title>Methods for Genotyping Verotoxin‐Producing Escherichia coli</title><title>Zoonoses and public health</title><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><description>Verotoxin‐producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) is annually incriminated in more than 100 000 cases of enteric foodborne human disease and in losses amounting to $US 2.5 billion every year. A number of genotyping methods have been developed to track VTEC infections and determine diversity and evolutionary relationships among these microorganisms. These methods have facilitated monitoring and surveillance of foodborne VTEC outbreaks and early identification of outbreaks or clusters of outbreaks. Pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been used extensively to track and differentiate VTEC because of its high discriminatory power, reproducibility and ease of standardization. Multiple‐locus variable‐number tandem‐repeats analysis (MLVA) and microarrays are the latest genotyping methods that have been applied to discriminate VTEC. MLVA, a simpler and less expensive method, is proving to have a discriminatory power comparable to that of PFGE. Microarrays are successfully being applied to differentiate VTEC and make inferences on genome diversification. Novel methods that are being evaluated for subtyping VTEC include the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms and optical mapping. This review discusses the principles, applications, advantages and disadvantages of genotyping methods that have been used to differentiate VTEC strains. These methods have been mainly used to differentiate strains of O157:H7 VTEC and to a lesser extent non‐O157 VTEC.</description><subject>Bacterial Typing Techniques</subject><subject>disease outbreaks</subject><subject>disease surveillance</subject><subject>E coli</subject><subject>Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Escherichia coli O157 - classification</subject><subject>Escherichia coli O157 - genetics</subject><subject>Escherichia coli O157 - metabolism</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Food contamination & poisoning</subject><subject>foodborne illness</subject><subject>Genes, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>Genetic Variation - genetics</subject><subject>Genotype</subject><subject>Genotype & phenotype</subject><subject>genotyping methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>literature reviews</subject><subject>loci</subject><subject>methodology</subject><subject>Microarray Analysis</subject><subject>microarray technology</subject><subject>microbial genetics</subject><subject>Minisatellite Repeats</subject><subject>Molecular Epidemiology</subject><subject>molecular sequence data</subject><subject>multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>pulsed-field gel electrophoresis</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Shiga toxin</subject><subject>Shiga Toxins - genetics</subject><subject>Shiga Toxins - metabolism</subject><subject>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - classification</subject><subject>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics</subject><subject>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</subject><subject>subtyping</subject><subject>tandem repeat sequences</subject><subject>Verotoxin</subject><subject>verotoxins</subject><subject>zoonoses</subject><issn>1863-1959</issn><issn>1863-2378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFu1DAURS0EomXgFyBiwyrh2Y4Te9EFGpVpxQCVmILExnIcp-MhE0_tRMzs-gl8I1-CQ0ZFYgPe-Mnv3Cv5XoQSDBmO5_Umw7ygKaElzwiAyAATJrL9A3R6v3h4nLFg4gQ9CWEDwJiA8jE6wUJgUmA4RWfvTb92dUga55OF6Vx_2NnuJvlsvOvd3nY_735ceVcPenw9D3ptvNVrqxLtWvsUPWpUG8yz4z1D12_PV_OLdPlxcTl_s0x1zoVIMSdGN4YJmhNCaAUF51qoqgZGS1JBzVTJhNJFxTmtsIkbpau6ZAoaXDeMztCryXfn3e1gQi-3NmjTtqozbgiSlyQGwBn8mwSeFzmUI_nyL3LjBt_Fb0SIRESQEeITpL0LwZtG7rzdKn-QGORYhdzIMWU5Ji7HKuTvKuQ-Sp8f_Ydqa-o_wmP2ETibgO-2NYf_NpZfry7GKerTSW9Db_b3euW_yaKkJZNfPizkCr9bzulqGX1m6MXEN8pJdeNtkNefCGAKWOACckZ_Acv2r6s</recordid><startdate>201012</startdate><enddate>201012</enddate><creator>Karama, M</creator><creator>Gyles, C.L</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201012</creationdate><title>Methods for Genotyping Verotoxin‐Producing Escherichia coli</title><author>Karama, M ; Gyles, C.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4899-182ecfe59342223b0688c9abd05372b0d5a759ac6b883b1eabdacbd75a0f1df53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Bacterial Typing Techniques</topic><topic>disease outbreaks</topic><topic>disease surveillance</topic><topic>E coli</topic><topic>Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Escherichia coli O157 - classification</topic><topic>Escherichia coli O157 - genetics</topic><topic>Escherichia coli O157 - metabolism</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Food contamination & poisoning</topic><topic>foodborne illness</topic><topic>Genes, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>Genetic Variation - genetics</topic><topic>Genotype</topic><topic>Genotype & phenotype</topic><topic>genotyping methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>literature reviews</topic><topic>loci</topic><topic>methodology</topic><topic>Microarray Analysis</topic><topic>microarray technology</topic><topic>microbial genetics</topic><topic>Minisatellite Repeats</topic><topic>Molecular Epidemiology</topic><topic>molecular sequence data</topic><topic>multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>pulsed-field gel electrophoresis</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Shiga toxin</topic><topic>Shiga Toxins - genetics</topic><topic>Shiga Toxins - metabolism</topic><topic>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - classification</topic><topic>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics</topic><topic>Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</topic><topic>subtyping</topic><topic>tandem repeat sequences</topic><topic>Verotoxin</topic><topic>verotoxins</topic><topic>zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karama, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gyles, C.L</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karama, M</au><au>Gyles, C.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methods for Genotyping Verotoxin‐Producing Escherichia coli</atitle><jtitle>Zoonoses and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Zoonoses Public Health</addtitle><date>2010-12</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>447</spage><epage>462</epage><pages>447-462</pages><issn>1863-1959</issn><eissn>1863-2378</eissn><abstract>Verotoxin‐producing Escherichia coli (VTEC) is annually incriminated in more than 100 000 cases of enteric foodborne human disease and in losses amounting to $US 2.5 billion every year. A number of genotyping methods have been developed to track VTEC infections and determine diversity and evolutionary relationships among these microorganisms. These methods have facilitated monitoring and surveillance of foodborne VTEC outbreaks and early identification of outbreaks or clusters of outbreaks. Pulsed‐field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) has been used extensively to track and differentiate VTEC because of its high discriminatory power, reproducibility and ease of standardization. Multiple‐locus variable‐number tandem‐repeats analysis (MLVA) and microarrays are the latest genotyping methods that have been applied to discriminate VTEC. MLVA, a simpler and less expensive method, is proving to have a discriminatory power comparable to that of PFGE. Microarrays are successfully being applied to differentiate VTEC and make inferences on genome diversification. Novel methods that are being evaluated for subtyping VTEC include the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms and optical mapping. This review discusses the principles, applications, advantages and disadvantages of genotyping methods that have been used to differentiate VTEC strains. These methods have been mainly used to differentiate strains of O157:H7 VTEC and to a lesser extent non‐O157 VTEC.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>19912610</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01259.x</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1863-1959 |
ispartof | Zoonoses and public health, 2010-12, Vol.57 (7), p.447-462 |
issn | 1863-1959 1863-2378 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872125850 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Bacterial Typing Techniques disease outbreaks disease surveillance E coli Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field Epidemiology Escherichia coli Escherichia coli Infections - epidemiology Escherichia coli Infections - microbiology Escherichia coli O157 - classification Escherichia coli O157 - genetics Escherichia coli O157 - metabolism Evolution Food contamination & poisoning foodborne illness Genes, Bacterial - genetics Genetic Variation - genetics Genotype Genotype & phenotype genotyping methods Humans literature reviews loci methodology Microarray Analysis microarray technology microbial genetics Minisatellite Repeats Molecular Epidemiology molecular sequence data multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeats analysis Polymerase Chain Reaction pulsed-field gel electrophoresis Research methodology Shiga toxin Shiga Toxins - genetics Shiga Toxins - metabolism Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - classification Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - genetics Shiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coli - isolation & purification subtyping tandem repeat sequences Verotoxin verotoxins zoonoses |
title | Methods for Genotyping Verotoxin‐Producing Escherichia coli |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A49%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methods%20for%20Genotyping%20Verotoxin%E2%80%90Producing%20Escherichia%20coli&rft.jtitle=Zoonoses%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=Karama,%20M&rft.date=2010-12&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=447&rft.epage=462&rft.pages=447-462&rft.issn=1863-1959&rft.eissn=1863-2378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01259.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E808464070%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4899-182ecfe59342223b0688c9abd05372b0d5a759ac6b883b1eabdacbd75a0f1df53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=802407920&rft_id=info:pmid/19912610&rfr_iscdi=true |