Loading…

Pre-Operative versus Post-Operative Gait Variability in Patients with Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

Change in gait variability at least 6 months after surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was assessed in 20 male patients with acute ACL deficiency and compared with pre-operative data and that from 20 healthy male controls. Gait was measured using a triaxial accelerometer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of international medical research 2011-04, Vol.39 (2), p.580-593
Main Authors: Tsivgoulis, SD, Tzagarakis, GN, Papagelopoulos, PJ, Koulalis, D, Sakellariou, VI, Kampanis, NA, Chlouverakis, GI, Alpantaki, KI, Nikolaou, PK, Katonis, PG
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Change in gait variability at least 6 months after surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was assessed in 20 male patients with acute ACL deficiency and compared with pre-operative data and that from 20 healthy male controls. Gait was measured using a triaxial accelerometer and data were analysed by the Gait Evaluation Differential Entropy Method (GEDEM) to determine gait variability. Pain was assessed with a visual analogue scale and functional ability with the Oswestry Disability Index and the International Knee Documentation Committee score. Mean gait variability was significantly lower after than before surgery, with values for the anterior—posterior axis being in the normal range of controls after 6 months, whereas in the mediolateral axis mean gait variability remained significantly higher, indicating that some rotational instability remained in the time-frame of the study. Pain and functional ability scores improved after surgery compared with before surgery. The combination of accelerometry and GEDEM may be a useful orthopaedic tool for the post-operative evaluation of patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction.
ISSN:0300-0605
1473-2300
DOI:10.1177/147323001103900227