Toward an Optimal SMOS Ocean Salinity Inversion Algorithm

As part of the preparation for the European Space Agency's Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite mission, empirical sea-surface emissivity (forward) models have been used to retrieve sea-surface salinity from L-band brightness-temperature ( T B ) measurements. However, the salinity...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE geoscience and remote sensing letters 2009-07, Vol.6 (3), p.509-513
Main Authors: Gabarro, C., Portabella, M., Talone, M., Font, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Algorithms
Constraints
Cost function
Geophysical measurements
Inversion algorithm
Inversions
L-band
Mathematical models
Moisture measurement
Ocean salinity
Oceans
Retrieval
Salinity
Satellites
Sea measurements
Sensitivity analysis
SMOS
SMOS mission
Space missions
Studies
Testing
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:As part of the preparation for the European Space Agency's Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite mission, empirical sea-surface emissivity (forward) models have been used to retrieve sea-surface salinity from L-band brightness-temperature ( T B ) measurements. However, the salinity inversion is not straightforward, and substantial effort is required to define the most appropriate cost function. Various Bayesian-based configurations of the cost function are examined, depending on whether a priori information is used in the inversion. A sensitivity analysis of T B to several geophysical parameters has been performed and has shown that the instrument has low sensitivity to the parameters that modulate the T B (including salinity). The SMOS end-to-end simulator is used to test the accuracy of different cost-function configurations. Currently, the general opinion in the SMOS community is that a partially constrained cost function, in which the salinity constraint is effectively removed, is the most appropriate for salinity retrieval. The purpose of this letter is to show that we found no evidence that such a configuration performs better than a fully constrained or a nonconstrained one. Moreover, in contrast to previous results, we found that the fully constrained inversion does not converge to the reference or auxiliary salinity value and produces the most accurate salinity retrievals of the tested configurations. Therefore, such a configuration should not be disregarded for future tests.
ISSN:1545-598X
1558-0571
DOI:10.1109/LGRS.2009.2018490