Loading…
Appendicitis, body mass index, and CT: is CT more valuable for obese patients than thin patients?
The purpose of our study is to determine whether body mass index (BMI = weight in kg/height in meters(2)) was related to the rate of negative appendectomy in patients who underwent preoperative CT. A surgical database search performed using the procedure code for appendectomy identified 925 patients...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American surgeon 2011-04, Vol.77 (4), p.471-475 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-578da6936106c9988a4738692c37eef0d1277137f45f20cb5a90546711e3d7553 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-578da6936106c9988a4738692c37eef0d1277137f45f20cb5a90546711e3d7553 |
container_end_page | 475 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 471 |
container_title | The American surgeon |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Coursey, Courtney A Nelson, Rendon C Moreno, Ricardo D Patel, Mayur B Beam, Craig A Vaslef, Steven |
description | The purpose of our study is to determine whether body mass index (BMI = weight in kg/height in meters(2)) was related to the rate of negative appendectomy in patients who underwent preoperative CT. A surgical database search performed using the procedure code for appendectomy identified 925 patients at least 18 years of age who underwent urgent appendectomy between January 1998 and September 2007. BMI was computed for the 703 of these 925 patients for whom height and weight information was available. Patients were stratified based on body mass index (BMI 15-18.49 = underweight; 18.5-24.9 = normal weight; 25-29.9 = overweight; 30-39.9 = obese; ≥ 40 = morbidly obese). Negative appendectomy rates were computed. Negative appendectomy rates for patients who did and did not undergo preoperative CT were 27 per cent and 50 per cent for underweight patients, 10 per cent and 15 per cent for normal weight patients, 12 per cent and 17 per cent for overweight patients, 7 per cent and 30 per cent for obese patients, and 10 per cent and 100 per cent for morbidly obese patients. The difference in negative appendectomy rates for overweight patients, obese patients, and morbidly obese patients who underwent preoperative CT as compared with patients in the same BMI category who did not undergo preoperative CT was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.001). The negative appendectomy rates for overweight patients, obese patients, and morbidly obese patients who underwent preoperative CT were significantly lower than for patients in these same BMI categories who did not undergo preoperative CT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/000313481107700425 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872438289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1011203927</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-578da6936106c9988a4738692c37eef0d1277137f45f20cb5a90546711e3d7553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMouq7-AQ8SvOhhq5l8x4ssi1-w4EXPJW1TzNIvm1bcf2-WVQ8KXmaY4Zl3mHkROgFyCaDUFSGEAeMagChFCKdiB01ACJEYTdkummyAZEMcoMMQVrHkUsA-OqAglRFCT5Cdd51rCp_7wYcZztpijWsbAvZN4T5m2DYFXjxfYx9iwnXbO_xuq9FmlcNl2-M2c8Hhzg7eNUPAw6ttYvDNT-vmCO2Vtgru-CtP0cvd7fPiIVk-3T8u5ssk50QOiVC6sNIwCUTmxmhtuWJaGpoz5VxJCqBKAVMlFyUleSasIYJLBeBYoYRgU3S-1e369m10YUhrH3JXVbZx7RhSrShnmmoTyYt_SSAAlDBDVUTPfqGrduybeEca10sudXzxFNEtlPdtCL0r0673te3XUSndOJX-dSoOnX4pj1ntip-Rb2vYJ4Q4iiA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>905646800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Appendicitis, body mass index, and CT: is CT more valuable for obese patients than thin patients?</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><creator>Coursey, Courtney A ; Nelson, Rendon C ; Moreno, Ricardo D ; Patel, Mayur B ; Beam, Craig A ; Vaslef, Steven</creator><creatorcontrib>Coursey, Courtney A ; Nelson, Rendon C ; Moreno, Ricardo D ; Patel, Mayur B ; Beam, Craig A ; Vaslef, Steven</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of our study is to determine whether body mass index (BMI = weight in kg/height in meters(2)) was related to the rate of negative appendectomy in patients who underwent preoperative CT. A surgical database search performed using the procedure code for appendectomy identified 925 patients at least 18 years of age who underwent urgent appendectomy between January 1998 and September 2007. BMI was computed for the 703 of these 925 patients for whom height and weight information was available. Patients were stratified based on body mass index (BMI 15-18.49 = underweight; 18.5-24.9 = normal weight; 25-29.9 = overweight; 30-39.9 = obese; ≥ 40 = morbidly obese). Negative appendectomy rates were computed. Negative appendectomy rates for patients who did and did not undergo preoperative CT were 27 per cent and 50 per cent for underweight patients, 10 per cent and 15 per cent for normal weight patients, 12 per cent and 17 per cent for overweight patients, 7 per cent and 30 per cent for obese patients, and 10 per cent and 100 per cent for morbidly obese patients. The difference in negative appendectomy rates for overweight patients, obese patients, and morbidly obese patients who underwent preoperative CT as compared with patients in the same BMI category who did not undergo preoperative CT was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.001). The negative appendectomy rates for overweight patients, obese patients, and morbidly obese patients who underwent preoperative CT were significantly lower than for patients in these same BMI categories who did not undergo preoperative CT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000313481107700425</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21679558</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adult ; Appendectomy - adverse effects ; Appendicitis ; Appendicitis - diagnostic imaging ; Appendicitis - surgery ; Body mass ; Body Mass Index ; Body Weight ; Emergencies ; Female ; Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act 1996-US ; Height ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Obesity ; Pathology ; Patients ; Preoperative Care ; Prognosis ; Statistics ; Surgery ; Thinness ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Weight</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2011-04, Vol.77 (4), p.471-475</ispartof><rights>Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress Apr 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-578da6936106c9988a4738692c37eef0d1277137f45f20cb5a90546711e3d7553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-578da6936106c9988a4738692c37eef0d1277137f45f20cb5a90546711e3d7553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21679558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Coursey, Courtney A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Rendon C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Ricardo D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Mayur B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beam, Craig A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaslef, Steven</creatorcontrib><title>Appendicitis, body mass index, and CT: is CT more valuable for obese patients than thin patients?</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>The purpose of our study is to determine whether body mass index (BMI = weight in kg/height in meters(2)) was related to the rate of negative appendectomy in patients who underwent preoperative CT. A surgical database search performed using the procedure code for appendectomy identified 925 patients at least 18 years of age who underwent urgent appendectomy between January 1998 and September 2007. BMI was computed for the 703 of these 925 patients for whom height and weight information was available. Patients were stratified based on body mass index (BMI 15-18.49 = underweight; 18.5-24.9 = normal weight; 25-29.9 = overweight; 30-39.9 = obese; ≥ 40 = morbidly obese). Negative appendectomy rates were computed. Negative appendectomy rates for patients who did and did not undergo preoperative CT were 27 per cent and 50 per cent for underweight patients, 10 per cent and 15 per cent for normal weight patients, 12 per cent and 17 per cent for overweight patients, 7 per cent and 30 per cent for obese patients, and 10 per cent and 100 per cent for morbidly obese patients. The difference in negative appendectomy rates for overweight patients, obese patients, and morbidly obese patients who underwent preoperative CT as compared with patients in the same BMI category who did not undergo preoperative CT was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.001). The negative appendectomy rates for overweight patients, obese patients, and morbidly obese patients who underwent preoperative CT were significantly lower than for patients in these same BMI categories who did not undergo preoperative CT.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Appendectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Appendicitis</subject><subject>Appendicitis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Appendicitis - surgery</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Emergencies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act 1996-US</subject><subject>Height</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Thinness</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMouq7-AQ8SvOhhq5l8x4ssi1-w4EXPJW1TzNIvm1bcf2-WVQ8KXmaY4Zl3mHkROgFyCaDUFSGEAeMagChFCKdiB01ACJEYTdkummyAZEMcoMMQVrHkUsA-OqAglRFCT5Cdd51rCp_7wYcZztpijWsbAvZN4T5m2DYFXjxfYx9iwnXbO_xuq9FmlcNl2-M2c8Hhzg7eNUPAw6ttYvDNT-vmCO2Vtgru-CtP0cvd7fPiIVk-3T8u5ssk50QOiVC6sNIwCUTmxmhtuWJaGpoz5VxJCqBKAVMlFyUleSasIYJLBeBYoYRgU3S-1e369m10YUhrH3JXVbZx7RhSrShnmmoTyYt_SSAAlDBDVUTPfqGrduybeEca10sudXzxFNEtlPdtCL0r0673te3XUSndOJX-dSoOnX4pj1ntip-Rb2vYJ4Q4iiA</recordid><startdate>201104</startdate><enddate>201104</enddate><creator>Coursey, Courtney A</creator><creator>Nelson, Rendon C</creator><creator>Moreno, Ricardo D</creator><creator>Patel, Mayur B</creator><creator>Beam, Craig A</creator><creator>Vaslef, Steven</creator><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201104</creationdate><title>Appendicitis, body mass index, and CT: is CT more valuable for obese patients than thin patients?</title><author>Coursey, Courtney A ; Nelson, Rendon C ; Moreno, Ricardo D ; Patel, Mayur B ; Beam, Craig A ; Vaslef, Steven</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-578da6936106c9988a4738692c37eef0d1277137f45f20cb5a90546711e3d7553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Appendectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Appendicitis</topic><topic>Appendicitis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Appendicitis - surgery</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Emergencies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act 1996-US</topic><topic>Height</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Thinness</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Coursey, Courtney A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Rendon C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno, Ricardo D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Mayur B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beam, Craig A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaslef, Steven</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Coursey, Courtney A</au><au>Nelson, Rendon C</au><au>Moreno, Ricardo D</au><au>Patel, Mayur B</au><au>Beam, Craig A</au><au>Vaslef, Steven</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Appendicitis, body mass index, and CT: is CT more valuable for obese patients than thin patients?</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2011-04</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>475</epage><pages>471-475</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><abstract>The purpose of our study is to determine whether body mass index (BMI = weight in kg/height in meters(2)) was related to the rate of negative appendectomy in patients who underwent preoperative CT. A surgical database search performed using the procedure code for appendectomy identified 925 patients at least 18 years of age who underwent urgent appendectomy between January 1998 and September 2007. BMI was computed for the 703 of these 925 patients for whom height and weight information was available. Patients were stratified based on body mass index (BMI 15-18.49 = underweight; 18.5-24.9 = normal weight; 25-29.9 = overweight; 30-39.9 = obese; ≥ 40 = morbidly obese). Negative appendectomy rates were computed. Negative appendectomy rates for patients who did and did not undergo preoperative CT were 27 per cent and 50 per cent for underweight patients, 10 per cent and 15 per cent for normal weight patients, 12 per cent and 17 per cent for overweight patients, 7 per cent and 30 per cent for obese patients, and 10 per cent and 100 per cent for morbidly obese patients. The difference in negative appendectomy rates for overweight patients, obese patients, and morbidly obese patients who underwent preoperative CT as compared with patients in the same BMI category who did not undergo preoperative CT was statistically significant (P ≤ 0.001). The negative appendectomy rates for overweight patients, obese patients, and morbidly obese patients who underwent preoperative CT were significantly lower than for patients in these same BMI categories who did not undergo preoperative CT.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</pub><pmid>21679558</pmid><doi>10.1177/000313481107700425</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-1348 |
ispartof | The American surgeon, 2011-04, Vol.77 (4), p.471-475 |
issn | 0003-1348 1555-9823 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872438289 |
source | SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list) |
subjects | Accuracy Adult Appendectomy - adverse effects Appendicitis Appendicitis - diagnostic imaging Appendicitis - surgery Body mass Body Mass Index Body Weight Emergencies Female Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act 1996-US Height Humans Male Middle Aged Obesity Pathology Patients Preoperative Care Prognosis Statistics Surgery Thinness Tomography, X-Ray Computed Weight |
title | Appendicitis, body mass index, and CT: is CT more valuable for obese patients than thin patients? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T20%3A55%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Appendicitis,%20body%20mass%20index,%20and%20CT:%20is%20CT%20more%20valuable%20for%20obese%20patients%20than%20thin%20patients?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Coursey,%20Courtney%20A&rft.date=2011-04&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=475&rft.pages=471-475&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000313481107700425&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1011203927%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-578da6936106c9988a4738692c37eef0d1277137f45f20cb5a90546711e3d7553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=905646800&rft_id=info:pmid/21679558&rfr_iscdi=true |