Loading…

Topical anaesthetics for repair of dermal laceration

Topical local anaesthetics are recognized as providing effective analgesia for numerous superficial procedures, including repair of dermal lacerations. The need for cocaine in topical anaesthetic formulations has been questioned due to concern about adverse effects, and so novel preparations of coca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2011-06 (6), p.CD005364-CD005364
Main Authors: Eidelman, Anthony, Weiss, Jocelyn M, Baldwin, Cristy L, Enu, Ikay K, McNicol, Ewan D, Carr, Daniel B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-29b04c92c3c0e45f661b81068c3786c2cbbb04554068822b3c010cccaaa8a4ad3
cites
container_end_page CD005364
container_issue 6
container_start_page CD005364
container_title Cochrane database of systematic reviews
container_volume
creator Eidelman, Anthony
Weiss, Jocelyn M
Baldwin, Cristy L
Enu, Ikay K
McNicol, Ewan D
Carr, Daniel B
description Topical local anaesthetics are recognized as providing effective analgesia for numerous superficial procedures, including repair of dermal lacerations. The need for cocaine in topical anaesthetic formulations has been questioned due to concern about adverse effects, and so novel preparations of cocaine-free anaesthetics have been developed. To compare the efficacy and safety of infiltrated local anaesthetics with those of topical local anaesthetics for repair of dermal lacerations and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various single or multi-component topical anaesthetics to identify cocaine-free topically applied local anaesthetics that may provide equivalent analgesia to those containing cocaine. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 10); MEDLINE (1966 to November 2010); EMBASE (1980 to November 2010); CINAHL (1982 to November 2010); and reference lists of articles. We also handsearched selected journals, reviewed abstracts presented at international society meetings, reviewed metaregisters of ongoing trials and contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of topical anaesthetics for repair of torn skin in adult and paediatric patients. Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected adverse event information from the trials. We included 23 RCTs involving 3128 patients. The small number of trials in each comparison group and the heterogeneity of outcome measures precluded quantitative analysis of data in all but one outcome, pain scores using a visual analogue scale. The majority of trials that compared infiltrated and topical anaesthetics are at high risk of bias, which is likely to affect the interpretation of the results. Several cocaine-free topical anaesthetics were found to provide effective analgesic efficacy. However, the data regarding the efficacy of each topical agent is mostly based upon single comparisons, in trials that have unclear or high risk of bias. Mild, self-limited erythematous skin induration occurred in one case after application of topical tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine (TAC) where a total of 1042 patients were exposed. No serious complications were reported in any of the patients treated with either cocaine-based or cocaine-free topical anaesthetics. Based on mostly descripti
doi_str_mv 10.1002/14651858.CD005364.pub2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872438524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>872438524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-29b04c92c3c0e45f661b81068c3786c2cbbb04554068822b3c010cccaaa8a4ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j09LxDAUxIMg7lr9Cktvnrrmf9OjVF2FBS8reCsvrylW2qYm7cFvb8D1MgNvfgxvCNkxumeU8nsmtWJGmX39SKkSWu7n1fILsk1BVchKfGzIdYxflIqKMXNFNpzp0ghZbok8-blHGHKYwMXl0y09xrzzIQ9uhj7kvstbF8ZEDIAuwNL76YZcdjBEd3v2jLw_P53ql-L4dnitH44Fci2WgleWSqw4CqROqk5rZg2j2qAojUaO1iZAKZlOhnObMEYREQAMSGhFRu7-eufgv9f0XjP2Ed0wwOT8GhtTcimMSpKR3Zlc7ejaZg79COGn-R8qfgEe6lQ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>872438524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Topical anaesthetics for repair of dermal laceration</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Eidelman, Anthony ; Weiss, Jocelyn M ; Baldwin, Cristy L ; Enu, Ikay K ; McNicol, Ewan D ; Carr, Daniel B</creator><creatorcontrib>Eidelman, Anthony ; Weiss, Jocelyn M ; Baldwin, Cristy L ; Enu, Ikay K ; McNicol, Ewan D ; Carr, Daniel B</creatorcontrib><description>Topical local anaesthetics are recognized as providing effective analgesia for numerous superficial procedures, including repair of dermal lacerations. The need for cocaine in topical anaesthetic formulations has been questioned due to concern about adverse effects, and so novel preparations of cocaine-free anaesthetics have been developed. To compare the efficacy and safety of infiltrated local anaesthetics with those of topical local anaesthetics for repair of dermal lacerations and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various single or multi-component topical anaesthetics to identify cocaine-free topically applied local anaesthetics that may provide equivalent analgesia to those containing cocaine. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 10); MEDLINE (1966 to November 2010); EMBASE (1980 to November 2010); CINAHL (1982 to November 2010); and reference lists of articles. We also handsearched selected journals, reviewed abstracts presented at international society meetings, reviewed metaregisters of ongoing trials and contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of topical anaesthetics for repair of torn skin in adult and paediatric patients. Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected adverse event information from the trials. We included 23 RCTs involving 3128 patients. The small number of trials in each comparison group and the heterogeneity of outcome measures precluded quantitative analysis of data in all but one outcome, pain scores using a visual analogue scale. The majority of trials that compared infiltrated and topical anaesthetics are at high risk of bias, which is likely to affect the interpretation of the results. Several cocaine-free topical anaesthetics were found to provide effective analgesic efficacy. However, the data regarding the efficacy of each topical agent is mostly based upon single comparisons, in trials that have unclear or high risk of bias. Mild, self-limited erythematous skin induration occurred in one case after application of topical tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine (TAC) where a total of 1042 patients were exposed. No serious complications were reported in any of the patients treated with either cocaine-based or cocaine-free topical anaesthetics. Based on mostly descriptive analysis, topical anaesthetics are possibly an efficacious, non-invasive means of providing analgesia prior to suturing of dermal lacerations. However, additional well designed RCTs with low risk of bias are necessary before definitive conclusions can be made.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1469-493X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005364.pub2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21678347</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage ; Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects ; Anesthetics, Local - chemistry ; Child ; Cocaine - adverse effects ; Humans ; Lacerations - surgery ; Pain Measurement ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Skin - injuries ; Sutures</subject><ispartof>Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011-06 (6), p.CD005364-CD005364</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-29b04c92c3c0e45f661b81068c3786c2cbbb04554068822b3c010cccaaa8a4ad3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21678347$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eidelman, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Jocelyn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, Cristy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enu, Ikay K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNicol, Ewan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Daniel B</creatorcontrib><title>Topical anaesthetics for repair of dermal laceration</title><title>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</title><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><description>Topical local anaesthetics are recognized as providing effective analgesia for numerous superficial procedures, including repair of dermal lacerations. The need for cocaine in topical anaesthetic formulations has been questioned due to concern about adverse effects, and so novel preparations of cocaine-free anaesthetics have been developed. To compare the efficacy and safety of infiltrated local anaesthetics with those of topical local anaesthetics for repair of dermal lacerations and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various single or multi-component topical anaesthetics to identify cocaine-free topically applied local anaesthetics that may provide equivalent analgesia to those containing cocaine. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 10); MEDLINE (1966 to November 2010); EMBASE (1980 to November 2010); CINAHL (1982 to November 2010); and reference lists of articles. We also handsearched selected journals, reviewed abstracts presented at international society meetings, reviewed metaregisters of ongoing trials and contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of topical anaesthetics for repair of torn skin in adult and paediatric patients. Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected adverse event information from the trials. We included 23 RCTs involving 3128 patients. The small number of trials in each comparison group and the heterogeneity of outcome measures precluded quantitative analysis of data in all but one outcome, pain scores using a visual analogue scale. The majority of trials that compared infiltrated and topical anaesthetics are at high risk of bias, which is likely to affect the interpretation of the results. Several cocaine-free topical anaesthetics were found to provide effective analgesic efficacy. However, the data regarding the efficacy of each topical agent is mostly based upon single comparisons, in trials that have unclear or high risk of bias. Mild, self-limited erythematous skin induration occurred in one case after application of topical tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine (TAC) where a total of 1042 patients were exposed. No serious complications were reported in any of the patients treated with either cocaine-based or cocaine-free topical anaesthetics. Based on mostly descriptive analysis, topical anaesthetics are possibly an efficacious, non-invasive means of providing analgesia prior to suturing of dermal lacerations. However, additional well designed RCTs with low risk of bias are necessary before definitive conclusions can be made.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - chemistry</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cocaine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lacerations - surgery</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Skin - injuries</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><issn>1469-493X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1j09LxDAUxIMg7lr9Cktvnrrmf9OjVF2FBS8reCsvrylW2qYm7cFvb8D1MgNvfgxvCNkxumeU8nsmtWJGmX39SKkSWu7n1fILsk1BVchKfGzIdYxflIqKMXNFNpzp0ghZbok8-blHGHKYwMXl0y09xrzzIQ9uhj7kvstbF8ZEDIAuwNL76YZcdjBEd3v2jLw_P53ql-L4dnitH44Fci2WgleWSqw4CqROqk5rZg2j2qAojUaO1iZAKZlOhnObMEYREQAMSGhFRu7-eufgv9f0XjP2Ed0wwOT8GhtTcimMSpKR3Zlc7ejaZg79COGn-R8qfgEe6lQ8</recordid><startdate>20110615</startdate><enddate>20110615</enddate><creator>Eidelman, Anthony</creator><creator>Weiss, Jocelyn M</creator><creator>Baldwin, Cristy L</creator><creator>Enu, Ikay K</creator><creator>McNicol, Ewan D</creator><creator>Carr, Daniel B</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110615</creationdate><title>Topical anaesthetics for repair of dermal laceration</title><author>Eidelman, Anthony ; Weiss, Jocelyn M ; Baldwin, Cristy L ; Enu, Ikay K ; McNicol, Ewan D ; Carr, Daniel B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-29b04c92c3c0e45f661b81068c3786c2cbbb04554068822b3c010cccaaa8a4ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - chemistry</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cocaine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lacerations - surgery</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Skin - injuries</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eidelman, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Jocelyn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldwin, Cristy L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enu, Ikay K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNicol, Ewan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carr, Daniel B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eidelman, Anthony</au><au>Weiss, Jocelyn M</au><au>Baldwin, Cristy L</au><au>Enu, Ikay K</au><au>McNicol, Ewan D</au><au>Carr, Daniel B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Topical anaesthetics for repair of dermal laceration</atitle><jtitle>Cochrane database of systematic reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Cochrane Database Syst Rev</addtitle><date>2011-06-15</date><risdate>2011</risdate><issue>6</issue><spage>CD005364</spage><epage>CD005364</epage><pages>CD005364-CD005364</pages><eissn>1469-493X</eissn><abstract>Topical local anaesthetics are recognized as providing effective analgesia for numerous superficial procedures, including repair of dermal lacerations. The need for cocaine in topical anaesthetic formulations has been questioned due to concern about adverse effects, and so novel preparations of cocaine-free anaesthetics have been developed. To compare the efficacy and safety of infiltrated local anaesthetics with those of topical local anaesthetics for repair of dermal lacerations and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various single or multi-component topical anaesthetics to identify cocaine-free topically applied local anaesthetics that may provide equivalent analgesia to those containing cocaine. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 10); MEDLINE (1966 to November 2010); EMBASE (1980 to November 2010); CINAHL (1982 to November 2010); and reference lists of articles. We also handsearched selected journals, reviewed abstracts presented at international society meetings, reviewed metaregisters of ongoing trials and contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy and safety of topical anaesthetics for repair of torn skin in adult and paediatric patients. Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected adverse event information from the trials. We included 23 RCTs involving 3128 patients. The small number of trials in each comparison group and the heterogeneity of outcome measures precluded quantitative analysis of data in all but one outcome, pain scores using a visual analogue scale. The majority of trials that compared infiltrated and topical anaesthetics are at high risk of bias, which is likely to affect the interpretation of the results. Several cocaine-free topical anaesthetics were found to provide effective analgesic efficacy. However, the data regarding the efficacy of each topical agent is mostly based upon single comparisons, in trials that have unclear or high risk of bias. Mild, self-limited erythematous skin induration occurred in one case after application of topical tetracaine-adrenaline-cocaine (TAC) where a total of 1042 patients were exposed. No serious complications were reported in any of the patients treated with either cocaine-based or cocaine-free topical anaesthetics. Based on mostly descriptive analysis, topical anaesthetics are possibly an efficacious, non-invasive means of providing analgesia prior to suturing of dermal lacerations. However, additional well designed RCTs with low risk of bias are necessary before definitive conclusions can be made.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>21678347</pmid><doi>10.1002/14651858.CD005364.pub2</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1469-493X
ispartof Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2011-06 (6), p.CD005364-CD005364
issn 1469-493X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_872438524
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Anesthetics, Local - adverse effects
Anesthetics, Local - chemistry
Child
Cocaine - adverse effects
Humans
Lacerations - surgery
Pain Measurement
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Skin - injuries
Sutures
title Topical anaesthetics for repair of dermal laceration
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T09%3A41%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Topical%20anaesthetics%20for%20repair%20of%20dermal%20laceration&rft.jtitle=Cochrane%20database%20of%20systematic%20reviews&rft.au=Eidelman,%20Anthony&rft.date=2011-06-15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=CD005364&rft.epage=CD005364&rft.pages=CD005364-CD005364&rft.eissn=1469-493X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005364.pub2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E872438524%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c263t-29b04c92c3c0e45f661b81068c3786c2cbbb04554068822b3c010cccaaa8a4ad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=872438524&rft_id=info:pmid/21678347&rfr_iscdi=true