Loading…

"Cape capture"; geologic data and modeling results suggest the Holocene loss of a Carolina cape

For more than a century, the origin and evolution of the set of cuspate forelands known as the Carolina Capes--Hatteras, Lookout, Fear, and Romain--off the eastern coast of the United States have been discussed and debated. The consensus conceptual model is not only that these capes existed through...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geology (Boulder) 2011-04, Vol.39 (4), p.339-342
Main Authors: Thieler, E. Robert, Ashton, Andrew D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a345t-805e51333fbd984a1869853f8ac6b8263e559573ce64c70754f7f6eacb37b6cd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a345t-805e51333fbd984a1869853f8ac6b8263e559573ce64c70754f7f6eacb37b6cd3
container_end_page 342
container_issue 4
container_start_page 339
container_title Geology (Boulder)
container_volume 39
creator Thieler, E. Robert
Ashton, Andrew D
description For more than a century, the origin and evolution of the set of cuspate forelands known as the Carolina Capes--Hatteras, Lookout, Fear, and Romain--off the eastern coast of the United States have been discussed and debated. The consensus conceptual model is not only that these capes existed through much or all of the Holocene transgression, but also that their number has not changed. Here we describe bathymetric, lithologic, seismic, and chronologic data that suggest another cape may have existed between Capes Hatteras and Lookout during the early to middle Holocene. This cape likely formed at the distal end of the Neuse-Tar-Pamlico fluvial system during the early Holocene transgression, when this portion of the shelf was flooded ca. 9 cal (calibrated) kyr B.P., and was probably abandoned by ca. 4 cal kyr B.P., when the shoreline attained its present general configuration. Previously proposed mechanisms for cape formation suggest that the large-scale, rhythmic pattern of the Carolina Capes arose from a hydrodynamic template or the preexisting geologic framework. Numerical modeling, however, suggests that the number and spacing of capes can be dynamic, and that a coast can self-organize in response to a high-angle-wave instability in shoreline shape. In shoreline evolution model simulations, smaller cuspate forelands are subsumed by larger neighbors over millennial time scales through a process of "cape capture". The suggested former cape in Raleigh Bay represents the first interpreted geological evidence of dynamic abandonment suggested by the self-organization hypothesis. Cape capture may be a widespread process in coastal environments with large-scale rhythmic shoreline features; its preservation in the sedimentary record will vary according to geologic setting, physical processes, and sea-level history.
doi_str_mv 10.1130/G31641.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874181606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>874181606</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a345t-805e51333fbd984a1869853f8ac6b8263e559573ce64c70754f7f6eacb37b6cd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1Kw0AURgdRsFbBRxi6UZDUuZnf4EqKtkLBja6H6eQmpqSZOpMgvr0pFQRXd3M4fPcQcg1sDsDZ_ZKDEjCHEzKBQvAsVyY_JRPGCsi0An5OLlLaMgZCajMhdrZwe6Te7fsh4uyB1hjaUDeelq531HUl3YUS26aracQ0tH2iaahrTD3tP5CuRtpjh7QNKdFQUUcXLoaRdwcpXpKzyrUJr37vlLw_P70tVtn6dfmyeFxnjgvZZ4ZJlMA5rzZlYYQDowojeWWcVxuTK45SFlJzj0p4zbQUla4UOr_heqN8yafk5ujdx_A5jOvsrkke29Z1GIZkjRZgQDE1krN_5DYMsRvHWaNAgC7GjlNye4R8HP-KWNl9bHYufltg9tDZHjvbA3p3RMdyyTfYefwKsS3_tDkDsIwbI3L-A17ufIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>861417911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>"Cape capture"; geologic data and modeling results suggest the Holocene loss of a Carolina cape</title><source>GeoScienceWorld</source><creator>Thieler, E. Robert ; Ashton, Andrew D</creator><creatorcontrib>Thieler, E. Robert ; Ashton, Andrew D</creatorcontrib><description>For more than a century, the origin and evolution of the set of cuspate forelands known as the Carolina Capes--Hatteras, Lookout, Fear, and Romain--off the eastern coast of the United States have been discussed and debated. The consensus conceptual model is not only that these capes existed through much or all of the Holocene transgression, but also that their number has not changed. Here we describe bathymetric, lithologic, seismic, and chronologic data that suggest another cape may have existed between Capes Hatteras and Lookout during the early to middle Holocene. This cape likely formed at the distal end of the Neuse-Tar-Pamlico fluvial system during the early Holocene transgression, when this portion of the shelf was flooded ca. 9 cal (calibrated) kyr B.P., and was probably abandoned by ca. 4 cal kyr B.P., when the shoreline attained its present general configuration. Previously proposed mechanisms for cape formation suggest that the large-scale, rhythmic pattern of the Carolina Capes arose from a hydrodynamic template or the preexisting geologic framework. Numerical modeling, however, suggests that the number and spacing of capes can be dynamic, and that a coast can self-organize in response to a high-angle-wave instability in shoreline shape. In shoreline evolution model simulations, smaller cuspate forelands are subsumed by larger neighbors over millennial time scales through a process of "cape capture". The suggested former cape in Raleigh Bay represents the first interpreted geological evidence of dynamic abandonment suggested by the self-organization hypothesis. Cape capture may be a widespread process in coastal environments with large-scale rhythmic shoreline features; its preservation in the sedimentary record will vary according to geologic setting, physical processes, and sea-level history.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-7613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-2682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1130/G31641.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boulder: Geological Society of America (GSA)</publisher><subject>Atlantic Coastal Plain ; beach cusps ; Brunswick County North Carolina ; Cape Fear ; Cape Hatteras ; Cape Lookout ; Cape Romain ; capes ; Carolina Capes ; Carteret County North Carolina ; Cenozoic ; Coasts ; cuspate forelands ; Dare County North Carolina ; Fluid mechanics ; forelands ; geomorphology ; Holocene ; landform evolution ; North Carolina ; Outer Banks ; Quaternary ; sea-level changes ; Sedimentary geology ; shore features ; Shorelines ; Simulation ; theoretical models ; United States</subject><ispartof>Geology (Boulder), 2011-04, Vol.39 (4), p.339-342</ispartof><rights>GeoRef, Copyright 2020, American Geosciences Institute. Reference includes data from GeoScienceWorld @Alexandria, VA @USA @United States. Reference includes data supplied by the Geological Society of America @Boulder, CO @USA @United States</rights><rights>Copyright Geological Society of America Apr 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a345t-805e51333fbd984a1869853f8ac6b8263e559573ce64c70754f7f6eacb37b6cd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a345t-805e51333fbd984a1869853f8ac6b8263e559573ce64c70754f7f6eacb37b6cd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/lithosphere/article-lookup?doi=10.1130/G31641.1$$EHTML$$P50$$Ggeoscienceworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,38881,77824</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thieler, E. Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashton, Andrew D</creatorcontrib><title>"Cape capture"; geologic data and modeling results suggest the Holocene loss of a Carolina cape</title><title>Geology (Boulder)</title><description>For more than a century, the origin and evolution of the set of cuspate forelands known as the Carolina Capes--Hatteras, Lookout, Fear, and Romain--off the eastern coast of the United States have been discussed and debated. The consensus conceptual model is not only that these capes existed through much or all of the Holocene transgression, but also that their number has not changed. Here we describe bathymetric, lithologic, seismic, and chronologic data that suggest another cape may have existed between Capes Hatteras and Lookout during the early to middle Holocene. This cape likely formed at the distal end of the Neuse-Tar-Pamlico fluvial system during the early Holocene transgression, when this portion of the shelf was flooded ca. 9 cal (calibrated) kyr B.P., and was probably abandoned by ca. 4 cal kyr B.P., when the shoreline attained its present general configuration. Previously proposed mechanisms for cape formation suggest that the large-scale, rhythmic pattern of the Carolina Capes arose from a hydrodynamic template or the preexisting geologic framework. Numerical modeling, however, suggests that the number and spacing of capes can be dynamic, and that a coast can self-organize in response to a high-angle-wave instability in shoreline shape. In shoreline evolution model simulations, smaller cuspate forelands are subsumed by larger neighbors over millennial time scales through a process of "cape capture". The suggested former cape in Raleigh Bay represents the first interpreted geological evidence of dynamic abandonment suggested by the self-organization hypothesis. Cape capture may be a widespread process in coastal environments with large-scale rhythmic shoreline features; its preservation in the sedimentary record will vary according to geologic setting, physical processes, and sea-level history.</description><subject>Atlantic Coastal Plain</subject><subject>beach cusps</subject><subject>Brunswick County North Carolina</subject><subject>Cape Fear</subject><subject>Cape Hatteras</subject><subject>Cape Lookout</subject><subject>Cape Romain</subject><subject>capes</subject><subject>Carolina Capes</subject><subject>Carteret County North Carolina</subject><subject>Cenozoic</subject><subject>Coasts</subject><subject>cuspate forelands</subject><subject>Dare County North Carolina</subject><subject>Fluid mechanics</subject><subject>forelands</subject><subject>geomorphology</subject><subject>Holocene</subject><subject>landform evolution</subject><subject>North Carolina</subject><subject>Outer Banks</subject><subject>Quaternary</subject><subject>sea-level changes</subject><subject>Sedimentary geology</subject><subject>shore features</subject><subject>Shorelines</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>theoretical models</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0091-7613</issn><issn>1943-2682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkM1Kw0AURgdRsFbBRxi6UZDUuZnf4EqKtkLBja6H6eQmpqSZOpMgvr0pFQRXd3M4fPcQcg1sDsDZ_ZKDEjCHEzKBQvAsVyY_JRPGCsi0An5OLlLaMgZCajMhdrZwe6Te7fsh4uyB1hjaUDeelq531HUl3YUS26aracQ0tH2iaahrTD3tP5CuRtpjh7QNKdFQUUcXLoaRdwcpXpKzyrUJr37vlLw_P70tVtn6dfmyeFxnjgvZZ4ZJlMA5rzZlYYQDowojeWWcVxuTK45SFlJzj0p4zbQUla4UOr_heqN8yafk5ujdx_A5jOvsrkke29Z1GIZkjRZgQDE1krN_5DYMsRvHWaNAgC7GjlNye4R8HP-KWNl9bHYufltg9tDZHjvbA3p3RMdyyTfYefwKsS3_tDkDsIwbI3L-A17ufIQ</recordid><startdate>201104</startdate><enddate>201104</enddate><creator>Thieler, E. Robert</creator><creator>Ashton, Andrew D</creator><general>Geological Society of America (GSA)</general><general>Geological Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201104</creationdate><title>"Cape capture"; geologic data and modeling results suggest the Holocene loss of a Carolina cape</title><author>Thieler, E. Robert ; Ashton, Andrew D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a345t-805e51333fbd984a1869853f8ac6b8263e559573ce64c70754f7f6eacb37b6cd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Atlantic Coastal Plain</topic><topic>beach cusps</topic><topic>Brunswick County North Carolina</topic><topic>Cape Fear</topic><topic>Cape Hatteras</topic><topic>Cape Lookout</topic><topic>Cape Romain</topic><topic>capes</topic><topic>Carolina Capes</topic><topic>Carteret County North Carolina</topic><topic>Cenozoic</topic><topic>Coasts</topic><topic>cuspate forelands</topic><topic>Dare County North Carolina</topic><topic>Fluid mechanics</topic><topic>forelands</topic><topic>geomorphology</topic><topic>Holocene</topic><topic>landform evolution</topic><topic>North Carolina</topic><topic>Outer Banks</topic><topic>Quaternary</topic><topic>sea-level changes</topic><topic>Sedimentary geology</topic><topic>shore features</topic><topic>Shorelines</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>theoretical models</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thieler, E. Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashton, Andrew D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Geology (Boulder)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thieler, E. Robert</au><au>Ashton, Andrew D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>"Cape capture"; geologic data and modeling results suggest the Holocene loss of a Carolina cape</atitle><jtitle>Geology (Boulder)</jtitle><date>2011-04</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>342</epage><pages>339-342</pages><issn>0091-7613</issn><eissn>1943-2682</eissn><abstract>For more than a century, the origin and evolution of the set of cuspate forelands known as the Carolina Capes--Hatteras, Lookout, Fear, and Romain--off the eastern coast of the United States have been discussed and debated. The consensus conceptual model is not only that these capes existed through much or all of the Holocene transgression, but also that their number has not changed. Here we describe bathymetric, lithologic, seismic, and chronologic data that suggest another cape may have existed between Capes Hatteras and Lookout during the early to middle Holocene. This cape likely formed at the distal end of the Neuse-Tar-Pamlico fluvial system during the early Holocene transgression, when this portion of the shelf was flooded ca. 9 cal (calibrated) kyr B.P., and was probably abandoned by ca. 4 cal kyr B.P., when the shoreline attained its present general configuration. Previously proposed mechanisms for cape formation suggest that the large-scale, rhythmic pattern of the Carolina Capes arose from a hydrodynamic template or the preexisting geologic framework. Numerical modeling, however, suggests that the number and spacing of capes can be dynamic, and that a coast can self-organize in response to a high-angle-wave instability in shoreline shape. In shoreline evolution model simulations, smaller cuspate forelands are subsumed by larger neighbors over millennial time scales through a process of "cape capture". The suggested former cape in Raleigh Bay represents the first interpreted geological evidence of dynamic abandonment suggested by the self-organization hypothesis. Cape capture may be a widespread process in coastal environments with large-scale rhythmic shoreline features; its preservation in the sedimentary record will vary according to geologic setting, physical processes, and sea-level history.</abstract><cop>Boulder</cop><pub>Geological Society of America (GSA)</pub><doi>10.1130/G31641.1</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-7613
ispartof Geology (Boulder), 2011-04, Vol.39 (4), p.339-342
issn 0091-7613
1943-2682
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874181606
source GeoScienceWorld
subjects Atlantic Coastal Plain
beach cusps
Brunswick County North Carolina
Cape Fear
Cape Hatteras
Cape Lookout
Cape Romain
capes
Carolina Capes
Carteret County North Carolina
Cenozoic
Coasts
cuspate forelands
Dare County North Carolina
Fluid mechanics
forelands
geomorphology
Holocene
landform evolution
North Carolina
Outer Banks
Quaternary
sea-level changes
Sedimentary geology
shore features
Shorelines
Simulation
theoretical models
United States
title "Cape capture"; geologic data and modeling results suggest the Holocene loss of a Carolina cape
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T21%3A55%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%22Cape%20capture%22;%20geologic%20data%20and%20modeling%20results%20suggest%20the%20Holocene%20loss%20of%20a%20Carolina%20cape&rft.jtitle=Geology%20(Boulder)&rft.au=Thieler,%20E.%20Robert&rft.date=2011-04&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=342&rft.pages=339-342&rft.issn=0091-7613&rft.eissn=1943-2682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1130/G31641.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E874181606%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a345t-805e51333fbd984a1869853f8ac6b8263e559573ce64c70754f7f6eacb37b6cd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=861417911&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true