Loading…

Does structure influence growth? A panel data econometric assessment of "relatively less developed" countries, 1979-2003

Neo-Schumpeterian streams of research emphasize the close relationship between changes in economic structure in favor of high-skill and high-tech branches and rapid economic growth. They identify the emergence of a new technological paradigm in the 1970s, strongly based on the application of informa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Industrial and corporate change 2011-04, Vol.20 (2), p.457-510
Main Authors: Silva, E. G., Teixeira, A. A. C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f74891c3745d0eaddcd6e8874c85d7179cf30ef295d8270cb7881ec5027c4f9e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f74891c3745d0eaddcd6e8874c85d7179cf30ef295d8270cb7881ec5027c4f9e3
container_end_page 510
container_issue 2
container_start_page 457
container_title Industrial and corporate change
container_volume 20
creator Silva, E. G.
Teixeira, A. A. C.
description Neo-Schumpeterian streams of research emphasize the close relationship between changes in economic structure in favor of high-skill and high-tech branches and rapid economic growth. They identify the emergence of a new technological paradigm in the 1970s, strongly based on the application of information and communication technologies (ICTs), arguing that in such periods of transition and emergence of new techno-economic paradigms, the intermediate development countries and the countries which are not at the technological frontier have higher opportunities to catch-up. Although this debate is theoretically well documented, the empirics seem to lag behind the theory. In this article, we contribute to this literature by adding enlightening evidence on the issue. More precisely, we relate the growth experiences of countries which had relatively similar economic structures in the late 1970s, with changes occurring in these countries' structures between 1979 and 2003. The results reveal a robust relationship between structure and (labor) productivity growth, and lend support to the view that producing (though not user) ICT-related industries are strategic branches of economic activity. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1093/icc/dtr003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874184256</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2317591921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f74891c3745d0eaddcd6e8874c85d7179cf30ef295d8270cb7881ec5027c4f9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9LxDAQxYMouK5e_ARhL4JYN2nSJjmJrH9hwYueS51MtUvb1CRV99sbWU-eZhh-83iPR8gpZ5ecGbFsAZY2esbEHplxWcpMlAXbJzNmSpaV0vBDchTChjGWM6Vn5PvGYaAh-gni5JG2Q9NNOADSN---4vsVvaZjPWBHbR1riuAG12P0LdA6BAyhxyFS19CFx66O7Sd2W9qlO7WYdjeiXVBw05BeMFxQbpTJ8uTvmBw0dRfw5G_Oycvd7fPqIVs_3T-urtcZiELErFFSGw5CycIyrK0FW6LWSoIurOLKQCMYNrkprM4Vg1elNUcoWK5ANgbFnJztdEfvPiYMserbANh1KZSbQpWkuJZ5USZy8Y_cuMkPyVylSy65yXOToPMdBN6F4LGpRt_2td9WnFW_FVSpgmpXgfgBUAh6aQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>861419229</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does structure influence growth? A panel data econometric assessment of "relatively less developed" countries, 1979-2003</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)</source><creator>Silva, E. G. ; Teixeira, A. A. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Silva, E. G. ; Teixeira, A. A. C.</creatorcontrib><description>Neo-Schumpeterian streams of research emphasize the close relationship between changes in economic structure in favor of high-skill and high-tech branches and rapid economic growth. They identify the emergence of a new technological paradigm in the 1970s, strongly based on the application of information and communication technologies (ICTs), arguing that in such periods of transition and emergence of new techno-economic paradigms, the intermediate development countries and the countries which are not at the technological frontier have higher opportunities to catch-up. Although this debate is theoretically well documented, the empirics seem to lag behind the theory. In this article, we contribute to this literature by adding enlightening evidence on the issue. More precisely, we relate the growth experiences of countries which had relatively similar economic structures in the late 1970s, with changes occurring in these countries' structures between 1979 and 2003. The results reveal a robust relationship between structure and (labor) productivity growth, and lend support to the view that producing (though not user) ICT-related industries are strategic branches of economic activity. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-6491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-3650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtr003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</publisher><subject>Developing countries ; Econometrics ; Economic growth ; Economic structure ; Economic theory ; Information and communication technologies ; Information technology ; Labour ; LDCs ; Less developed countries ; Panel data ; Productivity ; Productivity growth ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Industrial and corporate change, 2011-04, Vol.20 (2), p.457-510</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Apr 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f74891c3745d0eaddcd6e8874c85d7179cf30ef295d8270cb7881ec5027c4f9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f74891c3745d0eaddcd6e8874c85d7179cf30ef295d8270cb7881ec5027c4f9e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Silva, E. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, A. A. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Does structure influence growth? A panel data econometric assessment of "relatively less developed" countries, 1979-2003</title><title>Industrial and corporate change</title><description>Neo-Schumpeterian streams of research emphasize the close relationship between changes in economic structure in favor of high-skill and high-tech branches and rapid economic growth. They identify the emergence of a new technological paradigm in the 1970s, strongly based on the application of information and communication technologies (ICTs), arguing that in such periods of transition and emergence of new techno-economic paradigms, the intermediate development countries and the countries which are not at the technological frontier have higher opportunities to catch-up. Although this debate is theoretically well documented, the empirics seem to lag behind the theory. In this article, we contribute to this literature by adding enlightening evidence on the issue. More precisely, we relate the growth experiences of countries which had relatively similar economic structures in the late 1970s, with changes occurring in these countries' structures between 1979 and 2003. The results reveal a robust relationship between structure and (labor) productivity growth, and lend support to the view that producing (though not user) ICT-related industries are strategic branches of economic activity. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Econometrics</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Economic structure</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Information and communication technologies</subject><subject>Information technology</subject><subject>Labour</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Less developed countries</subject><subject>Panel data</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Productivity growth</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0960-6491</issn><issn>1464-3650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9LxDAQxYMouK5e_ARhL4JYN2nSJjmJrH9hwYueS51MtUvb1CRV99sbWU-eZhh-83iPR8gpZ5ecGbFsAZY2esbEHplxWcpMlAXbJzNmSpaV0vBDchTChjGWM6Vn5PvGYaAh-gni5JG2Q9NNOADSN---4vsVvaZjPWBHbR1riuAG12P0LdA6BAyhxyFS19CFx66O7Sd2W9qlO7WYdjeiXVBw05BeMFxQbpTJ8uTvmBw0dRfw5G_Oycvd7fPqIVs_3T-urtcZiELErFFSGw5CycIyrK0FW6LWSoIurOLKQCMYNrkprM4Vg1elNUcoWK5ANgbFnJztdEfvPiYMserbANh1KZSbQpWkuJZ5USZy8Y_cuMkPyVylSy65yXOToPMdBN6F4LGpRt_2td9WnFW_FVSpgmpXgfgBUAh6aQ</recordid><startdate>20110401</startdate><enddate>20110401</enddate><creator>Silva, E. G.</creator><creator>Teixeira, A. A. C.</creator><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110401</creationdate><title>Does structure influence growth? A panel data econometric assessment of "relatively less developed" countries, 1979-2003</title><author>Silva, E. G. ; Teixeira, A. A. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f74891c3745d0eaddcd6e8874c85d7179cf30ef295d8270cb7881ec5027c4f9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Econometrics</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Economic structure</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Information and communication technologies</topic><topic>Information technology</topic><topic>Labour</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Less developed countries</topic><topic>Panel data</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Productivity growth</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Silva, E. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teixeira, A. A. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Industrial and corporate change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Silva, E. G.</au><au>Teixeira, A. A. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does structure influence growth? A panel data econometric assessment of "relatively less developed" countries, 1979-2003</atitle><jtitle>Industrial and corporate change</jtitle><date>2011-04-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>457</spage><epage>510</epage><pages>457-510</pages><issn>0960-6491</issn><eissn>1464-3650</eissn><abstract>Neo-Schumpeterian streams of research emphasize the close relationship between changes in economic structure in favor of high-skill and high-tech branches and rapid economic growth. They identify the emergence of a new technological paradigm in the 1970s, strongly based on the application of information and communication technologies (ICTs), arguing that in such periods of transition and emergence of new techno-economic paradigms, the intermediate development countries and the countries which are not at the technological frontier have higher opportunities to catch-up. Although this debate is theoretically well documented, the empirics seem to lag behind the theory. In this article, we contribute to this literature by adding enlightening evidence on the issue. More precisely, we relate the growth experiences of countries which had relatively similar economic structures in the late 1970s, with changes occurring in these countries' structures between 1979 and 2003. The results reveal a robust relationship between structure and (labor) productivity growth, and lend support to the view that producing (though not user) ICT-related industries are strategic branches of economic activity. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</pub><doi>10.1093/icc/dtr003</doi><tpages>54</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-6491
ispartof Industrial and corporate change, 2011-04, Vol.20 (2), p.457-510
issn 0960-6491
1464-3650
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_874184256
source EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PAIS Index; Oxford Journals Online; BSC - Ebsco (Business Source Ultimate)
subjects Developing countries
Econometrics
Economic growth
Economic structure
Economic theory
Information and communication technologies
Information technology
Labour
LDCs
Less developed countries
Panel data
Productivity
Productivity growth
Studies
title Does structure influence growth? A panel data econometric assessment of "relatively less developed" countries, 1979-2003
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A20%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20structure%20influence%20growth?%20A%20panel%20data%20econometric%20assessment%20of%20%22relatively%20less%20developed%22%20countries,%201979-2003&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20and%20corporate%20change&rft.au=Silva,%20E.%20G.&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=457&rft.epage=510&rft.pages=457-510&rft.issn=0960-6491&rft.eissn=1464-3650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/icc/dtr003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2317591921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-f74891c3745d0eaddcd6e8874c85d7179cf30ef295d8270cb7881ec5027c4f9e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=861419229&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true