Loading…
Modularity as a Strategy for Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of U.S. Auto
Companies across industries have admired the success of Dell Computersin using modularity as part of a mass customization strategy to achieve build-to-order and a streamlined supply chain. Many companies are attempting to emulate this successful model, including the American automotive industry. Thi...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on engineering management 2007-02, Vol.54 (1), p.172-189 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-da1ce925ccf9961deee2333fcf8d3a1e56ff2737d571af5c5b54f005d08a54b83 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-da1ce925ccf9961deee2333fcf8d3a1e56ff2737d571af5c5b54f005d08a54b83 |
container_end_page | 189 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 172 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on engineering management |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Ro, Y.K. Liker, J.K. Fixson, S.K. |
description | Companies across industries have admired the success of Dell Computersin using modularity as part of a mass customization strategy to achieve build-to-order and a streamlined supply chain. Many companies are attempting to emulate this successful model, including the American automotive industry. This paper focuses on how the auto industry has been attempting to move to modularity, in part, motivated by a desire to build cars to order. This movement has led to major changes in supply chain practices based partly on imitation of successful keiretsu models in Japan and a move toward modules. This study finds significant impact of modularity on outsourcing, product development, and supply chain coordination based on interviews conducted with automakers and suppliers from 2000-2003. Based on our interviews, we observe that modularity has accompanied a major reorganization of the automotive supplier industry. We identify two major issues that appear to block U.S. automakers from gaining most of the advantages possible through modularity. First, most modularity activities appear to be primarily strategically cost reduction driven, leaving the potential of modularity for mass customization largely untapped. Second, the shift in industry reorganization has not been accompanied by changes in the supply chain infrastructure to encourage long-term partnerships. We contrast this to the more gradual approach used by Toyota as it incorporates modularity on a selective basis and moves to a build-to-order model |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TEM.2006.889075 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_875025848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4077243</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1216384071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-da1ce925ccf9961deee2333fcf8d3a1e56ff2737d571af5c5b54f005d08a54b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTtPwzAUhS0EEuUxM7BYDDAlXMe-tc2GovKQqBjazpab2BAU4mInQ_89qYoYGJiurvSdIx19hFwwyBkDfbuczfMCYJorpUHiAZkwRJUBCDgkEwCmMs01OyYnKX2Mr8ACJmQ-D_XQ2tj0W2oTtXTRR9u7ty31IdLFsNm0W1q-26ajZQixbjrbN6G7o8t3R0ubHA2ervJFTu-HPpyRI2_b5M5_7ilZPcyW5VP28vr4XN6_ZJVgss9qyyqnC6wqr_WU1c65gnPuK69qbpnDqfeF5LJGyazHCtcoPADWoCyKteKn5Gbfu4nha3CpN59Nqlzb2s6FIRklEQpUYkde_0tyIbQsNI7g1R_wIwyxG1cYpnGKQsoddLuHqhhSis6bTWw-bdwaBmZnwYwWzM6C2VsYE5f7RDOO_KUFSFkIzr8BSAeBLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195654775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modularity as a Strategy for Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of U.S. Auto</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Ro, Y.K. ; Liker, J.K. ; Fixson, S.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ro, Y.K. ; Liker, J.K. ; Fixson, S.K.</creatorcontrib><description>Companies across industries have admired the success of Dell Computersin using modularity as part of a mass customization strategy to achieve build-to-order and a streamlined supply chain. Many companies are attempting to emulate this successful model, including the American automotive industry. This paper focuses on how the auto industry has been attempting to move to modularity, in part, motivated by a desire to build cars to order. This movement has led to major changes in supply chain practices based partly on imitation of successful keiretsu models in Japan and a move toward modules. This study finds significant impact of modularity on outsourcing, product development, and supply chain coordination based on interviews conducted with automakers and suppliers from 2000-2003. Based on our interviews, we observe that modularity has accompanied a major reorganization of the automotive supplier industry. We identify two major issues that appear to block U.S. automakers from gaining most of the advantages possible through modularity. First, most modularity activities appear to be primarily strategically cost reduction driven, leaving the potential of modularity for mass customization largely untapped. Second, the shift in industry reorganization has not been accompanied by changes in the supply chain infrastructure to encourage long-term partnerships. We contrast this to the more gradual approach used by Toyota as it incorporates modularity on a selective basis and moves to a build-to-order model</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2006.889075</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEEMA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Automobile industry ; Automobiles ; Automotive ; Automotive components ; Automotive engineering ; Automotive industry ; Construction ; Customization ; mass customization ; Modularity ; Outsourcing ; product development ; Strategy ; Studies ; supply chain ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on engineering management, 2007-02, Vol.54 (1), p.172-189</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Feb 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-da1ce925ccf9961deee2333fcf8d3a1e56ff2737d571af5c5b54f005d08a54b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-da1ce925ccf9961deee2333fcf8d3a1e56ff2737d571af5c5b54f005d08a54b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4077243$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,54774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ro, Y.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liker, J.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fixson, S.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Modularity as a Strategy for Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of U.S. Auto</title><title>IEEE transactions on engineering management</title><addtitle>TEM</addtitle><description>Companies across industries have admired the success of Dell Computersin using modularity as part of a mass customization strategy to achieve build-to-order and a streamlined supply chain. Many companies are attempting to emulate this successful model, including the American automotive industry. This paper focuses on how the auto industry has been attempting to move to modularity, in part, motivated by a desire to build cars to order. This movement has led to major changes in supply chain practices based partly on imitation of successful keiretsu models in Japan and a move toward modules. This study finds significant impact of modularity on outsourcing, product development, and supply chain coordination based on interviews conducted with automakers and suppliers from 2000-2003. Based on our interviews, we observe that modularity has accompanied a major reorganization of the automotive supplier industry. We identify two major issues that appear to block U.S. automakers from gaining most of the advantages possible through modularity. First, most modularity activities appear to be primarily strategically cost reduction driven, leaving the potential of modularity for mass customization largely untapped. Second, the shift in industry reorganization has not been accompanied by changes in the supply chain infrastructure to encourage long-term partnerships. We contrast this to the more gradual approach used by Toyota as it incorporates modularity on a selective basis and moves to a build-to-order model</description><subject>Automobile industry</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Automotive</subject><subject>Automotive components</subject><subject>Automotive engineering</subject><subject>Automotive industry</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Customization</subject><subject>mass customization</subject><subject>Modularity</subject><subject>Outsourcing</subject><subject>product development</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>supply chain</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>0018-9391</issn><issn>1558-0040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kTtPwzAUhS0EEuUxM7BYDDAlXMe-tc2GovKQqBjazpab2BAU4mInQ_89qYoYGJiurvSdIx19hFwwyBkDfbuczfMCYJorpUHiAZkwRJUBCDgkEwCmMs01OyYnKX2Mr8ACJmQ-D_XQ2tj0W2oTtXTRR9u7ty31IdLFsNm0W1q-26ajZQixbjrbN6G7o8t3R0ubHA2ervJFTu-HPpyRI2_b5M5_7ilZPcyW5VP28vr4XN6_ZJVgss9qyyqnC6wqr_WU1c65gnPuK69qbpnDqfeF5LJGyazHCtcoPADWoCyKteKn5Gbfu4nha3CpN59Nqlzb2s6FIRklEQpUYkde_0tyIbQsNI7g1R_wIwyxG1cYpnGKQsoddLuHqhhSis6bTWw-bdwaBmZnwYwWzM6C2VsYE5f7RDOO_KUFSFkIzr8BSAeBLA</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Ro, Y.K.</creator><creator>Liker, J.K.</creator><creator>Fixson, S.K.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Modularity as a Strategy for Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of U.S. Auto</title><author>Ro, Y.K. ; Liker, J.K. ; Fixson, S.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-da1ce925ccf9961deee2333fcf8d3a1e56ff2737d571af5c5b54f005d08a54b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Automobile industry</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Automotive</topic><topic>Automotive components</topic><topic>Automotive engineering</topic><topic>Automotive industry</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Customization</topic><topic>mass customization</topic><topic>Modularity</topic><topic>Outsourcing</topic><topic>product development</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>supply chain</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ro, Y.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liker, J.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fixson, S.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library Online</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on engineering management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ro, Y.K.</au><au>Liker, J.K.</au><au>Fixson, S.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modularity as a Strategy for Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of U.S. Auto</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on engineering management</jtitle><stitle>TEM</stitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>172-189</pages><issn>0018-9391</issn><eissn>1558-0040</eissn><coden>IEEMA4</coden><abstract>Companies across industries have admired the success of Dell Computersin using modularity as part of a mass customization strategy to achieve build-to-order and a streamlined supply chain. Many companies are attempting to emulate this successful model, including the American automotive industry. This paper focuses on how the auto industry has been attempting to move to modularity, in part, motivated by a desire to build cars to order. This movement has led to major changes in supply chain practices based partly on imitation of successful keiretsu models in Japan and a move toward modules. This study finds significant impact of modularity on outsourcing, product development, and supply chain coordination based on interviews conducted with automakers and suppliers from 2000-2003. Based on our interviews, we observe that modularity has accompanied a major reorganization of the automotive supplier industry. We identify two major issues that appear to block U.S. automakers from gaining most of the advantages possible through modularity. First, most modularity activities appear to be primarily strategically cost reduction driven, leaving the potential of modularity for mass customization largely untapped. Second, the shift in industry reorganization has not been accompanied by changes in the supply chain infrastructure to encourage long-term partnerships. We contrast this to the more gradual approach used by Toyota as it incorporates modularity on a selective basis and moves to a build-to-order model</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TEM.2006.889075</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-9391 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on engineering management, 2007-02, Vol.54 (1), p.172-189 |
issn | 0018-9391 1558-0040 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_875025848 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals |
subjects | Automobile industry Automobiles Automotive Automotive components Automotive engineering Automotive industry Construction Customization mass customization Modularity Outsourcing product development Strategy Studies supply chain Supply chains |
title | Modularity as a Strategy for Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of U.S. Auto |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T01%3A44%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modularity%20as%20a%20Strategy%20for%20Supply%20Chain%20Coordination:%20The%20Case%20of%20U.S.%20Auto&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20engineering%20management&rft.au=Ro,%20Y.K.&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=172-189&rft.issn=0018-9391&rft.eissn=1558-0040&rft.coden=IEEMA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TEM.2006.889075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1216384071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-da1ce925ccf9961deee2333fcf8d3a1e56ff2737d571af5c5b54f005d08a54b83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195654775&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4077243&rfr_iscdi=true |