Loading…

Modularity as a Strategy for Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of U.S. Auto

Companies across industries have admired the success of Dell Computersin using modularity as part of a mass customization strategy to achieve build-to-order and a streamlined supply chain. Many companies are attempting to emulate this successful model, including the American automotive industry. Thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on engineering management 2007-02, Vol.54 (1), p.172-189
Main Authors: Ro, Y.K., Liker, J.K., Fixson, S.K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-da1ce925ccf9961deee2333fcf8d3a1e56ff2737d571af5c5b54f005d08a54b83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-da1ce925ccf9961deee2333fcf8d3a1e56ff2737d571af5c5b54f005d08a54b83
container_end_page 189
container_issue 1
container_start_page 172
container_title IEEE transactions on engineering management
container_volume 54
creator Ro, Y.K.
Liker, J.K.
Fixson, S.K.
description Companies across industries have admired the success of Dell Computersin using modularity as part of a mass customization strategy to achieve build-to-order and a streamlined supply chain. Many companies are attempting to emulate this successful model, including the American automotive industry. This paper focuses on how the auto industry has been attempting to move to modularity, in part, motivated by a desire to build cars to order. This movement has led to major changes in supply chain practices based partly on imitation of successful keiretsu models in Japan and a move toward modules. This study finds significant impact of modularity on outsourcing, product development, and supply chain coordination based on interviews conducted with automakers and suppliers from 2000-2003. Based on our interviews, we observe that modularity has accompanied a major reorganization of the automotive supplier industry. We identify two major issues that appear to block U.S. automakers from gaining most of the advantages possible through modularity. First, most modularity activities appear to be primarily strategically cost reduction driven, leaving the potential of modularity for mass customization largely untapped. Second, the shift in industry reorganization has not been accompanied by changes in the supply chain infrastructure to encourage long-term partnerships. We contrast this to the more gradual approach used by Toyota as it incorporates modularity on a selective basis and moves to a build-to-order model
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TEM.2006.889075
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_875025848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4077243</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1216384071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-da1ce925ccf9961deee2333fcf8d3a1e56ff2737d571af5c5b54f005d08a54b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTtPwzAUhS0EEuUxM7BYDDAlXMe-tc2GovKQqBjazpab2BAU4mInQ_89qYoYGJiurvSdIx19hFwwyBkDfbuczfMCYJorpUHiAZkwRJUBCDgkEwCmMs01OyYnKX2Mr8ACJmQ-D_XQ2tj0W2oTtXTRR9u7ty31IdLFsNm0W1q-26ajZQixbjrbN6G7o8t3R0ubHA2ervJFTu-HPpyRI2_b5M5_7ilZPcyW5VP28vr4XN6_ZJVgss9qyyqnC6wqr_WU1c65gnPuK69qbpnDqfeF5LJGyazHCtcoPADWoCyKteKn5Gbfu4nha3CpN59Nqlzb2s6FIRklEQpUYkde_0tyIbQsNI7g1R_wIwyxG1cYpnGKQsoddLuHqhhSis6bTWw-bdwaBmZnwYwWzM6C2VsYE5f7RDOO_KUFSFkIzr8BSAeBLA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195654775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modularity as a Strategy for Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of U.S. Auto</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Ro, Y.K. ; Liker, J.K. ; Fixson, S.K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ro, Y.K. ; Liker, J.K. ; Fixson, S.K.</creatorcontrib><description>Companies across industries have admired the success of Dell Computersin using modularity as part of a mass customization strategy to achieve build-to-order and a streamlined supply chain. Many companies are attempting to emulate this successful model, including the American automotive industry. This paper focuses on how the auto industry has been attempting to move to modularity, in part, motivated by a desire to build cars to order. This movement has led to major changes in supply chain practices based partly on imitation of successful keiretsu models in Japan and a move toward modules. This study finds significant impact of modularity on outsourcing, product development, and supply chain coordination based on interviews conducted with automakers and suppliers from 2000-2003. Based on our interviews, we observe that modularity has accompanied a major reorganization of the automotive supplier industry. We identify two major issues that appear to block U.S. automakers from gaining most of the advantages possible through modularity. First, most modularity activities appear to be primarily strategically cost reduction driven, leaving the potential of modularity for mass customization largely untapped. Second, the shift in industry reorganization has not been accompanied by changes in the supply chain infrastructure to encourage long-term partnerships. We contrast this to the more gradual approach used by Toyota as it incorporates modularity on a selective basis and moves to a build-to-order model</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9391</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0040</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2006.889075</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IEEMA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Automobile industry ; Automobiles ; Automotive ; Automotive components ; Automotive engineering ; Automotive industry ; Construction ; Customization ; mass customization ; Modularity ; Outsourcing ; product development ; Strategy ; Studies ; supply chain ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on engineering management, 2007-02, Vol.54 (1), p.172-189</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) Feb 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-da1ce925ccf9961deee2333fcf8d3a1e56ff2737d571af5c5b54f005d08a54b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-da1ce925ccf9961deee2333fcf8d3a1e56ff2737d571af5c5b54f005d08a54b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4077243$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,54774</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ro, Y.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liker, J.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fixson, S.K.</creatorcontrib><title>Modularity as a Strategy for Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of U.S. Auto</title><title>IEEE transactions on engineering management</title><addtitle>TEM</addtitle><description>Companies across industries have admired the success of Dell Computersin using modularity as part of a mass customization strategy to achieve build-to-order and a streamlined supply chain. Many companies are attempting to emulate this successful model, including the American automotive industry. This paper focuses on how the auto industry has been attempting to move to modularity, in part, motivated by a desire to build cars to order. This movement has led to major changes in supply chain practices based partly on imitation of successful keiretsu models in Japan and a move toward modules. This study finds significant impact of modularity on outsourcing, product development, and supply chain coordination based on interviews conducted with automakers and suppliers from 2000-2003. Based on our interviews, we observe that modularity has accompanied a major reorganization of the automotive supplier industry. We identify two major issues that appear to block U.S. automakers from gaining most of the advantages possible through modularity. First, most modularity activities appear to be primarily strategically cost reduction driven, leaving the potential of modularity for mass customization largely untapped. Second, the shift in industry reorganization has not been accompanied by changes in the supply chain infrastructure to encourage long-term partnerships. We contrast this to the more gradual approach used by Toyota as it incorporates modularity on a selective basis and moves to a build-to-order model</description><subject>Automobile industry</subject><subject>Automobiles</subject><subject>Automotive</subject><subject>Automotive components</subject><subject>Automotive engineering</subject><subject>Automotive industry</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Customization</subject><subject>mass customization</subject><subject>Modularity</subject><subject>Outsourcing</subject><subject>product development</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>supply chain</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>0018-9391</issn><issn>1558-0040</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kTtPwzAUhS0EEuUxM7BYDDAlXMe-tc2GovKQqBjazpab2BAU4mInQ_89qYoYGJiurvSdIx19hFwwyBkDfbuczfMCYJorpUHiAZkwRJUBCDgkEwCmMs01OyYnKX2Mr8ACJmQ-D_XQ2tj0W2oTtXTRR9u7ty31IdLFsNm0W1q-26ajZQixbjrbN6G7o8t3R0ubHA2ervJFTu-HPpyRI2_b5M5_7ilZPcyW5VP28vr4XN6_ZJVgss9qyyqnC6wqr_WU1c65gnPuK69qbpnDqfeF5LJGyazHCtcoPADWoCyKteKn5Gbfu4nha3CpN59Nqlzb2s6FIRklEQpUYkde_0tyIbQsNI7g1R_wIwyxG1cYpnGKQsoddLuHqhhSis6bTWw-bdwaBmZnwYwWzM6C2VsYE5f7RDOO_KUFSFkIzr8BSAeBLA</recordid><startdate>20070201</startdate><enddate>20070201</enddate><creator>Ro, Y.K.</creator><creator>Liker, J.K.</creator><creator>Fixson, S.K.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070201</creationdate><title>Modularity as a Strategy for Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of U.S. Auto</title><author>Ro, Y.K. ; Liker, J.K. ; Fixson, S.K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-da1ce925ccf9961deee2333fcf8d3a1e56ff2737d571af5c5b54f005d08a54b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Automobile industry</topic><topic>Automobiles</topic><topic>Automotive</topic><topic>Automotive components</topic><topic>Automotive engineering</topic><topic>Automotive industry</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Customization</topic><topic>mass customization</topic><topic>Modularity</topic><topic>Outsourcing</topic><topic>product development</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>supply chain</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ro, Y.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liker, J.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fixson, S.K.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library Online</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on engineering management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ro, Y.K.</au><au>Liker, J.K.</au><au>Fixson, S.K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modularity as a Strategy for Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of U.S. Auto</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on engineering management</jtitle><stitle>TEM</stitle><date>2007-02-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>172</spage><epage>189</epage><pages>172-189</pages><issn>0018-9391</issn><eissn>1558-0040</eissn><coden>IEEMA4</coden><abstract>Companies across industries have admired the success of Dell Computersin using modularity as part of a mass customization strategy to achieve build-to-order and a streamlined supply chain. Many companies are attempting to emulate this successful model, including the American automotive industry. This paper focuses on how the auto industry has been attempting to move to modularity, in part, motivated by a desire to build cars to order. This movement has led to major changes in supply chain practices based partly on imitation of successful keiretsu models in Japan and a move toward modules. This study finds significant impact of modularity on outsourcing, product development, and supply chain coordination based on interviews conducted with automakers and suppliers from 2000-2003. Based on our interviews, we observe that modularity has accompanied a major reorganization of the automotive supplier industry. We identify two major issues that appear to block U.S. automakers from gaining most of the advantages possible through modularity. First, most modularity activities appear to be primarily strategically cost reduction driven, leaving the potential of modularity for mass customization largely untapped. Second, the shift in industry reorganization has not been accompanied by changes in the supply chain infrastructure to encourage long-term partnerships. We contrast this to the more gradual approach used by Toyota as it incorporates modularity on a selective basis and moves to a build-to-order model</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TEM.2006.889075</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-9391
ispartof IEEE transactions on engineering management, 2007-02, Vol.54 (1), p.172-189
issn 0018-9391
1558-0040
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_875025848
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals
subjects Automobile industry
Automobiles
Automotive
Automotive components
Automotive engineering
Automotive industry
Construction
Customization
mass customization
Modularity
Outsourcing
product development
Strategy
Studies
supply chain
Supply chains
title Modularity as a Strategy for Supply Chain Coordination: The Case of U.S. Auto
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T01%3A44%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modularity%20as%20a%20Strategy%20for%20Supply%20Chain%20Coordination:%20The%20Case%20of%20U.S.%20Auto&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20engineering%20management&rft.au=Ro,%20Y.K.&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=172&rft.epage=189&rft.pages=172-189&rft.issn=0018-9391&rft.eissn=1558-0040&rft.coden=IEEMA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TEM.2006.889075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1216384071%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-da1ce925ccf9961deee2333fcf8d3a1e56ff2737d571af5c5b54f005d08a54b83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195654775&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4077243&rfr_iscdi=true