Loading…
Exact Fault-Sensitive Feasibility Analysis of Real-Time Tasks
In this paper, we consider the problem of checking the feasibility of a set of n real-time tasks while provisioning for timely recovery from (at most) k transient faults. We extend the well-known processor demand approach to take into account the extra overhead that may be induced by potential recov...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on computers 2007-10, Vol.56 (10), p.1372-1386 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ee672222c66456225c1a1dd3799ffaac3427b41e3406deca6992aca4334175ee3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ee672222c66456225c1a1dd3799ffaac3427b41e3406deca6992aca4334175ee3 |
container_end_page | 1386 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1372 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on computers |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Aydin, H. |
description | In this paper, we consider the problem of checking the feasibility of a set of n real-time tasks while provisioning for timely recovery from (at most) k transient faults. We extend the well-known processor demand approach to take into account the extra overhead that may be induced by potential recovery operations under earliest-deadline-first scheduling. We develop a necessary and sufficient test using a dynamic programming technique. An improvement upon the previous solutions is to address and efficiently solve the case where the recovery blocks associated with a given task do not necessarily have the same execution time. We also provide an online version of the algorithm that does not require a priori knowledge of release times. The online algorithm runs in O(m ldr k 2 ) time, where m is the number of ready tasks. We extend the framework to periodic execution settings: We derive a sufficient condition that can be checked efficiently for the feasibility of periodic tasks in the presence of faults. Finally, we analyze the case where the recovery blocks are to be executed nonpreemptively and we formally show that the problem becomes intractable under that assumption. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TC.2007.70739 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_875042112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4302709</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2332059001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ee672222c66456225c1a1dd3799ffaac3427b41e3406deca6992aca4334175ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0T1PwzAQBmALgUQpjEwsEQNMLueP2PHAUEUtIFVCgjBHrnuRXNKmxAmi_x6XIgYGuOWWR6e7ewk5ZzBiDMxNkY84gB5p0MIckAFLU02NSdUhGQCwjBoh4ZichLAEAMXBDMjt5MO6Lpnavu7oM66D7_w7JlO0wc997bttMl7beht8SJoqeUJb08KvMClseA2n5KiydcCz7z4kL9NJkd_T2ePdQz6eUSdZ1lFEpXksp5RMFeepY5YtFkIbU1XWOiG5nkuGcT21QGeVMdw6K4WQTKeIYkiu93M3bfPWY-jKlQ8O69quselDaUCoFGQm_5WZjo4zxqO8-lMKKbXMTBbh5S-4bPo2PiVOUyLjWbwoIrpHrm1CaLEqN61f2XZbMih36ZRFXu7SKb_Sif5i7z0i_lgpgGsw4hMxqIfk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>863828622</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exact Fault-Sensitive Feasibility Analysis of Real-Time Tasks</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Aydin, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aydin, H.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we consider the problem of checking the feasibility of a set of n real-time tasks while provisioning for timely recovery from (at most) k transient faults. We extend the well-known processor demand approach to take into account the extra overhead that may be induced by potential recovery operations under earliest-deadline-first scheduling. We develop a necessary and sufficient test using a dynamic programming technique. An improvement upon the previous solutions is to address and efficiently solve the case where the recovery blocks associated with a given task do not necessarily have the same execution time. We also provide an online version of the algorithm that does not require a priori knowledge of release times. The online algorithm runs in O(m ldr k 2 ) time, where m is the number of ready tasks. We extend the framework to periodic execution settings: We derive a sufficient condition that can be checked efficiently for the feasibility of periodic tasks in the presence of faults. Finally, we analyze the case where the recovery blocks are to be executed nonpreemptively and we formally show that the problem becomes intractable under that assumption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9340</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9956</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TC.2007.70739</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITCOB4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Circuit faults ; Deadline-driven Systems ; Fault tolerance ; Faults ; Feasibility ; On-line systems ; Online ; Processor Demand Analysis ; Processor scheduling ; Real time ; Real time systems ; Real-time Scheduling ; Recovery ; Recovery Blocks ; Redundancy ; Studies ; Tasks ; Timing ; Transient analysis</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on computers, 2007-10, Vol.56 (10), p.1372-1386</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ee672222c66456225c1a1dd3799ffaac3427b41e3406deca6992aca4334175ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ee672222c66456225c1a1dd3799ffaac3427b41e3406deca6992aca4334175ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4302709$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aydin, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Exact Fault-Sensitive Feasibility Analysis of Real-Time Tasks</title><title>IEEE transactions on computers</title><addtitle>TC</addtitle><description>In this paper, we consider the problem of checking the feasibility of a set of n real-time tasks while provisioning for timely recovery from (at most) k transient faults. We extend the well-known processor demand approach to take into account the extra overhead that may be induced by potential recovery operations under earliest-deadline-first scheduling. We develop a necessary and sufficient test using a dynamic programming technique. An improvement upon the previous solutions is to address and efficiently solve the case where the recovery blocks associated with a given task do not necessarily have the same execution time. We also provide an online version of the algorithm that does not require a priori knowledge of release times. The online algorithm runs in O(m ldr k 2 ) time, where m is the number of ready tasks. We extend the framework to periodic execution settings: We derive a sufficient condition that can be checked efficiently for the feasibility of periodic tasks in the presence of faults. Finally, we analyze the case where the recovery blocks are to be executed nonpreemptively and we formally show that the problem becomes intractable under that assumption.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Circuit faults</subject><subject>Deadline-driven Systems</subject><subject>Fault tolerance</subject><subject>Faults</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>On-line systems</subject><subject>Online</subject><subject>Processor Demand Analysis</subject><subject>Processor scheduling</subject><subject>Real time</subject><subject>Real time systems</subject><subject>Real-time Scheduling</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Recovery Blocks</subject><subject>Redundancy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tasks</subject><subject>Timing</subject><subject>Transient analysis</subject><issn>0018-9340</issn><issn>1557-9956</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0T1PwzAQBmALgUQpjEwsEQNMLueP2PHAUEUtIFVCgjBHrnuRXNKmxAmi_x6XIgYGuOWWR6e7ewk5ZzBiDMxNkY84gB5p0MIckAFLU02NSdUhGQCwjBoh4ZichLAEAMXBDMjt5MO6Lpnavu7oM66D7_w7JlO0wc997bttMl7beht8SJoqeUJb08KvMClseA2n5KiydcCz7z4kL9NJkd_T2ePdQz6eUSdZ1lFEpXksp5RMFeepY5YtFkIbU1XWOiG5nkuGcT21QGeVMdw6K4WQTKeIYkiu93M3bfPWY-jKlQ8O69quselDaUCoFGQm_5WZjo4zxqO8-lMKKbXMTBbh5S-4bPo2PiVOUyLjWbwoIrpHrm1CaLEqN61f2XZbMih36ZRFXu7SKb_Sif5i7z0i_lgpgGsw4hMxqIfk</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Aydin, H.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Exact Fault-Sensitive Feasibility Analysis of Real-Time Tasks</title><author>Aydin, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ee672222c66456225c1a1dd3799ffaac3427b41e3406deca6992aca4334175ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Circuit faults</topic><topic>Deadline-driven Systems</topic><topic>Fault tolerance</topic><topic>Faults</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>On-line systems</topic><topic>Online</topic><topic>Processor Demand Analysis</topic><topic>Processor scheduling</topic><topic>Real time</topic><topic>Real time systems</topic><topic>Real-time Scheduling</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Recovery Blocks</topic><topic>Redundancy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tasks</topic><topic>Timing</topic><topic>Transient analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aydin, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on computers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aydin, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exact Fault-Sensitive Feasibility Analysis of Real-Time Tasks</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on computers</jtitle><stitle>TC</stitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1372</spage><epage>1386</epage><pages>1372-1386</pages><issn>0018-9340</issn><eissn>1557-9956</eissn><coden>ITCOB4</coden><abstract>In this paper, we consider the problem of checking the feasibility of a set of n real-time tasks while provisioning for timely recovery from (at most) k transient faults. We extend the well-known processor demand approach to take into account the extra overhead that may be induced by potential recovery operations under earliest-deadline-first scheduling. We develop a necessary and sufficient test using a dynamic programming technique. An improvement upon the previous solutions is to address and efficiently solve the case where the recovery blocks associated with a given task do not necessarily have the same execution time. We also provide an online version of the algorithm that does not require a priori knowledge of release times. The online algorithm runs in O(m ldr k 2 ) time, where m is the number of ready tasks. We extend the framework to periodic execution settings: We derive a sufficient condition that can be checked efficiently for the feasibility of periodic tasks in the presence of faults. Finally, we analyze the case where the recovery blocks are to be executed nonpreemptively and we formally show that the problem becomes intractable under that assumption.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TC.2007.70739</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-9340 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on computers, 2007-10, Vol.56 (10), p.1372-1386 |
issn | 0018-9340 1557-9956 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_875042112 |
source | IEEE Xplore (Online service) |
subjects | Algorithms Circuit faults Deadline-driven Systems Fault tolerance Faults Feasibility On-line systems Online Processor Demand Analysis Processor scheduling Real time Real time systems Real-time Scheduling Recovery Recovery Blocks Redundancy Studies Tasks Timing Transient analysis |
title | Exact Fault-Sensitive Feasibility Analysis of Real-Time Tasks |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A31%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exact%20Fault-Sensitive%20Feasibility%20Analysis%20of%20Real-Time%20Tasks&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20computers&rft.au=Aydin,%20H.&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1372&rft.epage=1386&rft.pages=1372-1386&rft.issn=0018-9340&rft.eissn=1557-9956&rft.coden=ITCOB4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TC.2007.70739&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2332059001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ee672222c66456225c1a1dd3799ffaac3427b41e3406deca6992aca4334175ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=863828622&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4302709&rfr_iscdi=true |