Loading…

Exact Fault-Sensitive Feasibility Analysis of Real-Time Tasks

In this paper, we consider the problem of checking the feasibility of a set of n real-time tasks while provisioning for timely recovery from (at most) k transient faults. We extend the well-known processor demand approach to take into account the extra overhead that may be induced by potential recov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on computers 2007-10, Vol.56 (10), p.1372-1386
Main Author: Aydin, H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ee672222c66456225c1a1dd3799ffaac3427b41e3406deca6992aca4334175ee3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ee672222c66456225c1a1dd3799ffaac3427b41e3406deca6992aca4334175ee3
container_end_page 1386
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1372
container_title IEEE transactions on computers
container_volume 56
creator Aydin, H.
description In this paper, we consider the problem of checking the feasibility of a set of n real-time tasks while provisioning for timely recovery from (at most) k transient faults. We extend the well-known processor demand approach to take into account the extra overhead that may be induced by potential recovery operations under earliest-deadline-first scheduling. We develop a necessary and sufficient test using a dynamic programming technique. An improvement upon the previous solutions is to address and efficiently solve the case where the recovery blocks associated with a given task do not necessarily have the same execution time. We also provide an online version of the algorithm that does not require a priori knowledge of release times. The online algorithm runs in O(m ldr k 2 ) time, where m is the number of ready tasks. We extend the framework to periodic execution settings: We derive a sufficient condition that can be checked efficiently for the feasibility of periodic tasks in the presence of faults. Finally, we analyze the case where the recovery blocks are to be executed nonpreemptively and we formally show that the problem becomes intractable under that assumption.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TC.2007.70739
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_875042112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4302709</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2332059001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ee672222c66456225c1a1dd3799ffaac3427b41e3406deca6992aca4334175ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0T1PwzAQBmALgUQpjEwsEQNMLueP2PHAUEUtIFVCgjBHrnuRXNKmxAmi_x6XIgYGuOWWR6e7ewk5ZzBiDMxNkY84gB5p0MIckAFLU02NSdUhGQCwjBoh4ZichLAEAMXBDMjt5MO6Lpnavu7oM66D7_w7JlO0wc997bttMl7beht8SJoqeUJb08KvMClseA2n5KiydcCz7z4kL9NJkd_T2ePdQz6eUSdZ1lFEpXksp5RMFeepY5YtFkIbU1XWOiG5nkuGcT21QGeVMdw6K4WQTKeIYkiu93M3bfPWY-jKlQ8O69quselDaUCoFGQm_5WZjo4zxqO8-lMKKbXMTBbh5S-4bPo2PiVOUyLjWbwoIrpHrm1CaLEqN61f2XZbMih36ZRFXu7SKb_Sif5i7z0i_lgpgGsw4hMxqIfk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>863828622</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exact Fault-Sensitive Feasibility Analysis of Real-Time Tasks</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Aydin, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aydin, H.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we consider the problem of checking the feasibility of a set of n real-time tasks while provisioning for timely recovery from (at most) k transient faults. We extend the well-known processor demand approach to take into account the extra overhead that may be induced by potential recovery operations under earliest-deadline-first scheduling. We develop a necessary and sufficient test using a dynamic programming technique. An improvement upon the previous solutions is to address and efficiently solve the case where the recovery blocks associated with a given task do not necessarily have the same execution time. We also provide an online version of the algorithm that does not require a priori knowledge of release times. The online algorithm runs in O(m ldr k 2 ) time, where m is the number of ready tasks. We extend the framework to periodic execution settings: We derive a sufficient condition that can be checked efficiently for the feasibility of periodic tasks in the presence of faults. Finally, we analyze the case where the recovery blocks are to be executed nonpreemptively and we formally show that the problem becomes intractable under that assumption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-9340</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-9956</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TC.2007.70739</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITCOB4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: IEEE</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Circuit faults ; Deadline-driven Systems ; Fault tolerance ; Faults ; Feasibility ; On-line systems ; Online ; Processor Demand Analysis ; Processor scheduling ; Real time ; Real time systems ; Real-time Scheduling ; Recovery ; Recovery Blocks ; Redundancy ; Studies ; Tasks ; Timing ; Transient analysis</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on computers, 2007-10, Vol.56 (10), p.1372-1386</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ee672222c66456225c1a1dd3799ffaac3427b41e3406deca6992aca4334175ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ee672222c66456225c1a1dd3799ffaac3427b41e3406deca6992aca4334175ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4302709$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aydin, H.</creatorcontrib><title>Exact Fault-Sensitive Feasibility Analysis of Real-Time Tasks</title><title>IEEE transactions on computers</title><addtitle>TC</addtitle><description>In this paper, we consider the problem of checking the feasibility of a set of n real-time tasks while provisioning for timely recovery from (at most) k transient faults. We extend the well-known processor demand approach to take into account the extra overhead that may be induced by potential recovery operations under earliest-deadline-first scheduling. We develop a necessary and sufficient test using a dynamic programming technique. An improvement upon the previous solutions is to address and efficiently solve the case where the recovery blocks associated with a given task do not necessarily have the same execution time. We also provide an online version of the algorithm that does not require a priori knowledge of release times. The online algorithm runs in O(m ldr k 2 ) time, where m is the number of ready tasks. We extend the framework to periodic execution settings: We derive a sufficient condition that can be checked efficiently for the feasibility of periodic tasks in the presence of faults. Finally, we analyze the case where the recovery blocks are to be executed nonpreemptively and we formally show that the problem becomes intractable under that assumption.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Circuit faults</subject><subject>Deadline-driven Systems</subject><subject>Fault tolerance</subject><subject>Faults</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>On-line systems</subject><subject>Online</subject><subject>Processor Demand Analysis</subject><subject>Processor scheduling</subject><subject>Real time</subject><subject>Real time systems</subject><subject>Real-time Scheduling</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Recovery Blocks</subject><subject>Redundancy</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tasks</subject><subject>Timing</subject><subject>Transient analysis</subject><issn>0018-9340</issn><issn>1557-9956</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0T1PwzAQBmALgUQpjEwsEQNMLueP2PHAUEUtIFVCgjBHrnuRXNKmxAmi_x6XIgYGuOWWR6e7ewk5ZzBiDMxNkY84gB5p0MIckAFLU02NSdUhGQCwjBoh4ZichLAEAMXBDMjt5MO6Lpnavu7oM66D7_w7JlO0wc997bttMl7beht8SJoqeUJb08KvMClseA2n5KiydcCz7z4kL9NJkd_T2ePdQz6eUSdZ1lFEpXksp5RMFeepY5YtFkIbU1XWOiG5nkuGcT21QGeVMdw6K4WQTKeIYkiu93M3bfPWY-jKlQ8O69quselDaUCoFGQm_5WZjo4zxqO8-lMKKbXMTBbh5S-4bPo2PiVOUyLjWbwoIrpHrm1CaLEqN61f2XZbMih36ZRFXu7SKb_Sif5i7z0i_lgpgGsw4hMxqIfk</recordid><startdate>20071001</startdate><enddate>20071001</enddate><creator>Aydin, H.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20071001</creationdate><title>Exact Fault-Sensitive Feasibility Analysis of Real-Time Tasks</title><author>Aydin, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ee672222c66456225c1a1dd3799ffaac3427b41e3406deca6992aca4334175ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Circuit faults</topic><topic>Deadline-driven Systems</topic><topic>Fault tolerance</topic><topic>Faults</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>On-line systems</topic><topic>Online</topic><topic>Processor Demand Analysis</topic><topic>Processor scheduling</topic><topic>Real time</topic><topic>Real time systems</topic><topic>Real-time Scheduling</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Recovery Blocks</topic><topic>Redundancy</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tasks</topic><topic>Timing</topic><topic>Transient analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aydin, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on computers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aydin, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exact Fault-Sensitive Feasibility Analysis of Real-Time Tasks</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on computers</jtitle><stitle>TC</stitle><date>2007-10-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1372</spage><epage>1386</epage><pages>1372-1386</pages><issn>0018-9340</issn><eissn>1557-9956</eissn><coden>ITCOB4</coden><abstract>In this paper, we consider the problem of checking the feasibility of a set of n real-time tasks while provisioning for timely recovery from (at most) k transient faults. We extend the well-known processor demand approach to take into account the extra overhead that may be induced by potential recovery operations under earliest-deadline-first scheduling. We develop a necessary and sufficient test using a dynamic programming technique. An improvement upon the previous solutions is to address and efficiently solve the case where the recovery blocks associated with a given task do not necessarily have the same execution time. We also provide an online version of the algorithm that does not require a priori knowledge of release times. The online algorithm runs in O(m ldr k 2 ) time, where m is the number of ready tasks. We extend the framework to periodic execution settings: We derive a sufficient condition that can be checked efficiently for the feasibility of periodic tasks in the presence of faults. Finally, we analyze the case where the recovery blocks are to be executed nonpreemptively and we formally show that the problem becomes intractable under that assumption.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TC.2007.70739</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-9340
ispartof IEEE transactions on computers, 2007-10, Vol.56 (10), p.1372-1386
issn 0018-9340
1557-9956
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_875042112
source IEEE Xplore (Online service)
subjects Algorithms
Circuit faults
Deadline-driven Systems
Fault tolerance
Faults
Feasibility
On-line systems
Online
Processor Demand Analysis
Processor scheduling
Real time
Real time systems
Real-time Scheduling
Recovery
Recovery Blocks
Redundancy
Studies
Tasks
Timing
Transient analysis
title Exact Fault-Sensitive Feasibility Analysis of Real-Time Tasks
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T00%3A31%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exact%20Fault-Sensitive%20Feasibility%20Analysis%20of%20Real-Time%20Tasks&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20computers&rft.au=Aydin,%20H.&rft.date=2007-10-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1372&rft.epage=1386&rft.pages=1372-1386&rft.issn=0018-9340&rft.eissn=1557-9956&rft.coden=ITCOB4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TC.2007.70739&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2332059001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-ee672222c66456225c1a1dd3799ffaac3427b41e3406deca6992aca4334175ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=863828622&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4302709&rfr_iscdi=true