Five-year clinical evaluation of In-Ceram crowns fabricated using GN-I (CAD/CAM) system

• Published in: Journal of oral rehabilitation 2011-08, Vol.38 (8), p.601-607
• Main Authors: KOKUBO, Y., TSUMITA, M., SAKURAI, S., SUZUKI, Y., TOKINIWA, Y., FUKUSHIMA, S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aluminum Oxide - pharmacology; Aluminum Oxide - standards; Computer-Aided Design - standards; computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing; Crowns - standards; Dental Porcelain - pharmacology; Dental Porcelain - standards; Dental Prosthesis Design - methods; Dental Prosthesis Design - standards; Dentistry; Female; GN-I system; Humans; In-Ceram crown; Japan; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Prospective Studies; Survival Analysis; survival rate; Time Factors
• ISSN: 0305-182X; 1365-2842
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02188.x

Summary  This study prospectively evaluated the clinical performance of computer‐assisted design and computer‐assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM)‐generated In‐Ceram Alumina core crowns in Japanese patients for up to 5 years. A total of 101 In‐Ceram crowns with aluminium copings fabricated using the GN‐I system were placed in Japanese patients. The crowns were evaluated using a California Dental Association (CDA) quality assessment system at baseline and at all follow‐up examinations. Gingival condition was assessed using plaque and bleeding scores. The survival of anterior and posterior crowns was analysed according to the Kaplan–Meier method. The scores of gingival condition were compared between restored crowns and contralateral teeth using a t‐test. During the observation period, six crowns were lost to follow‐up. Five crowns were fractured from the copings and removed, and four crowns were removed for other reasons. Chipping within the porcelain was detected in three crowns, which were then polished. The cumulative survival rates after 60 months were 96·9% for anterior crowns and 87·7% for posterior ones, and there were no significant differences between anterior and posterior crowns. According to the CDA criteria, most of the crowns were rated as satisfactory during the observation period. There were significant differences in soft tissue conditions between In‐Ceram crowns and control teeth at 2‐ and 5‐year examinations. Despite the five fractures from copings, In‐Ceram Alumina crowns with copings fabricated using the CAD/CAM (GN‐I system) for replacing both anterior and posterior teeth showed predictable results during a 5‐year observation period.